User talk:Thebishophoward

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Stoner, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 21:56, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stoner with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your message on my talk page: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. You seriously misunderstand it if you think it is a social media site. It is a site that anyone can edit - within the framework that it is an encyclopedia and has certain rules. Also, your edit could just as easily be false and an attack on the person for all anyone knows. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Donner60 (talk) 01:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Donner60. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Seaphoto^Talk 14:13, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. – Gilliam (talk) 05:58, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]