User talk:Thw1309

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at


Thanks for the help[edit]

I was hoping for something that would allow me to set vertical alignment for the entire table. Your suggestion is on a row by row basis. I guess I could copy the entire text of my tables to a word processor and do a global find and replace changing |- to |-valign="top". Once its done maintaining it would be easy enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lownen (talkcontribs) 00:42, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you![edit]

Thank you so much for the time you put into fixing my template; I really do appreciate it. The box looks much better now -- the border is now complete again on my userpage. Thanks again, Kafka Liz (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


Hope you had a good Christmas and Happy New Year to you.

Well as i said i posted the suggested link for others to comment upon which some have done though no comments since 29th December.

No-one has made bad comments though. Phil --Phil2511 (talk) 13:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank You[edit]

Thanks for your help on my Talk Page, when I posted a Help Me request. (It was about Tables and you directed me to a Help / Talk board where they discuss Tables.) Thanks --- I never knew that that discussion board existed. Who would have ever thought that they have a discussion board solely dedicated to Table issues? Thanks a million -- that is extremely helpful ... and I am sure I will use it quite a bit ... now that I know it's out there. Thanks! (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC))

I am also thanking you for the reference about the pogrom in corfu, it is really intereting that there is very little secular reference, only in the Hebrew books. I included your reference in the article. Shoteh (talk) 22:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Orgelbau Hey[edit]


You sent me a message about copyright problems with the above article - please note that I did not create the article! All I did was to remove the signature of the creator, a guy called Windchest... I shall remove the notice from my talk page. Best wishes, Vox Humana 8' 15:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I know you did not create this article, but I noticed, you tried to help the creator, a newbie, so I thought, it would be better to inform you too, to enable him to defend his article.--Thw1309 (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Aerospace engineering[edit]

Sorry about that - we were both trying to revert vandalism at the same time and I ended up reverting you. I think the page is straight now. JohnCD (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Luxembourgish language[edit]

You are absolutely correct, but English exonyms must exist. The Worldmark Encyclopedia of the Nations calls the language "Luxembourgian," and I believe that Wikipedia should acknowledge this, even if the name is less common. As for what I wrote on my page, that was a joke! User:Two-face Jackie 2 February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 18:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad Image Proposal[edit]

Thanks for your comment on my Proposal about images on Muhammad article at village pump. I have tried my best to reply you there. Please have a look. If you want to discuss this further, it will be my pleasure. Arman (Talk) 07:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi There[edit]

I was wanting to ask a question. I was checking to see if there had been any updates to the Neapolitan mastiff article i wrote some months ago. I saw that 2 links had been added to a site so i went to check it and discovered that the 2 links where to the same site and 1 other link had been edited to a similar link which was a redirection also to the same site. I have undid this morning but they have returned and done the same thing again.

the person doing so is not a member but always posts from the same ip address each time is Thanks Phil --Phil2511 (talk) 20:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:CURRENTMONT[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:CURRENTMONT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Frazione infobox?[edit]

Hi. I was just wondering if you had made any progress with the Italian frazione infobox we discussed a while back? No big deal if you haven't, I just thought I'd see how you were getting on - or I can request it again if you've taken a look and decided that you don't want to do it. FlagSteward (talk) 11:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008 edition of the WikiProject Germany newsletter[edit]

- Newsletter Bot Talk 15:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

This newsletter is delivered by a bot to all members of WikiProject Germany. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please leave a note at the talk page of the Outreach department so we can come up with a better spamlist solution. Thank you, - Newsletter Bot Talk 15:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Catholic diocese[edit]

Template:Infobox Catholic diocese has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. All the instances where it was used (all 3) now point to the more widely used {{Infobox Roman Catholic diocese}}. Bazj (talk) 14:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Template:User Thw1309/Sandbox[edit]

If you still do not need Template:User Thw1309/Sandbox, please consider adding {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Thanks. Suntag (talk) 20:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Portal:Catholicism/Patron Archive/April[edit]

Hi Thw1309. I moved a page you created, "Wikipedia:Portal:Catholicism/Patron Archive/April", to "Portal:Catholicism/Patron Archive/Header". I then added it in the Patron Archive month pages as a transcluded header. -- Suntag 15:37, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

The Left (Germany)[edit]

Hi, Thw1309. Please note that there is indeed a discussion section, which can be found at Talk:The Left (Germany)#"Totalitarian" and "extremist". --Linkswechsel (talk) 14:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:Dab-Class Catholicism articles[edit]

Information icon.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Dab-Class Catholicism articles, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Dab-Class Catholicism articles has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Dab-Class Catholicism articles, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Task Force[edit]

Hi, I have suggested the creation of a task force, within WP:HV to cover Heraldry by country articles. You may be interested in commenting on this proposal and/or joining. German heraldry, for example, needs expansion, and I believe a Task Force is a good idea to collaborate efforts like this. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 12:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Thanks, - Jarry1250 (t, c) 12:12, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Origin of the coats of arms of Germany and its federal states[edit]

A discussion is being held about the future of this page at the WP:HV talk page. While your account is inactive as far as I can see, I feel it at least deserves a mention here. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 10:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


Hello. I like it very symbol of the portal, which you did. Is it possible that you did for a similar site in my language ("Portal Katolicyzm")? Albertus teolog (talk) 18:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Origin of the coats of arms of German federal states[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Origin of the coats of arms of German federal states, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No longer any unique content as this has been moved to other pages.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 18:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)


Hallo lieber User:Thw1309,

hiermit möchte ich dich ganz herzlich zu unserem Stammtisch am 7. März um 19 Uhr einladen. Er findet im „Stumm’s Brauhaus“ in Neunkirchen (Saar) statt. Die Anfahrt ist hier erklärt. Es würde uns freuen, dich als Besucher begrüßen zu dürfen. Eine unhalbverbindliche Anmeldung ist hier möglich. Bei Fragen kannst du gerne die Diskussionsseite benutzen oder mich anschreiben. --Gripweed (talk) 15:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC) PS: Auch wenn du momentan kein Interesse haben solltest, lohnt sich immer ein Blick auf die Seite de:Wikipedia:Saarland, da wir den Stammtisch von nun ab regelmäßig veranstalten wollen.

Ichthus: January 2012[edit]

Ichthus dark yellow.png


January 2012

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)[edit]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]


I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Abstraktionsprinzip - Abschnitt "Kritik"[edit]

Hallo Twh1309,

Du hast vor einiger Zeit einen Satz zum Kritik-Abschnitt vom dt. Artikel zum Abstraktionsprinzip hinzugefügt: "Ein Blick auf die Rechtsausübung zeigt, dass weder das Abstraktionsprinzip des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches noch das Kausalprinzip zum Beispiel des code civil wesentliche Vorteile bringt."

Auch wenn der Satz für Juristen evtl. naheliegt, kannst du für Nicht-Juristen Quellen angeben, woraus die Behauptung ersichtlich ist? Danke! :) Johannes Simon (talk) 11:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


Hi, i would like to have your opinion about a discussion which i started here, thank.Kingroyos (talk) 23:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)