User talk:Tikiwont

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

User_talk:Staryash[edit]

Yash Agarwal (talk) 20:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your advice. I understand. I am also a scientific researcher and hence I am trained to be neutral and present as they are! Are there any mentors here?!

Kemalism/Kemalist ideology[edit]

Could you delete the redirect Kemalism so i can move Kemalist ideology there? Kemalism is far more used than Kemalist ideology.--Chauahuasachca (talk) 13:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC):

I've deleted it and restored just the current redirect, thus removing the trivial history and the obstacle to a move. For uncontroversial housekeeping requests you can in general use the template {{db-move}}. Now that we are here, I'd suggest to open a talk page section. After all the article was there for a number of years and it might be less controversial than you assume.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

You have an lolcat![edit]

WidgetsUSA (talk) 14:59, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

You have a cheeseburger![edit]

WidgetsUSA (talk) 15:01, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, maybe with some extra calories i get to be more active again, but then there is vacation coming up....--Tikiwont (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Chagos Islands national football team for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chagos Islands national football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chagos Islands national football team (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

This is an article previously delete at AFD (twice) that you restored so giving you a courtesy notice that I have taken it back there. GiantSnowman 09:44, 5 July 2013 (UTC)


Oscar Lopez Rivera[edit]

I have entered a Dispute Resolution regarding the above cited Puerto Rican prisoner. I noted you also had concerns about the article. Your input could be helpful.

For now the question is simple: I state OLR was convicted of robbery, robbery is a violent crime, therefore, OLR convicted of a violent crime. The opposing side began with stating that OLR was never accused of violence, now they say he was never convicted of violence. Rococo1700 (talk) 21:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia Reference Desk redirect[edit]

In October 2012 you contributed to the discussion that led to Wikipedia Reference Desk becoming a redirect to Wikipedia:Reference Desk (Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 October 8#Wikipedia Reference Desk). The redirect was nominated for deletion on 22 August and you are invited to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 August 22#Wikipedia Reference Desk. Thryduulf (talk) 12:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 11:38, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Non-random listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-random. Since you had some involvement with the Non-random redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZCL 20:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)