User talk:Titanium Dragon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Join date: November 2004.

2004 Archive

2005 Archive

2006 Archive

2007 Archive

2008 Archive

BCE/BC[edit]

If you think it is time for another discussion, you are probably right - there are many more active editors at Wikipedia than when I forwarded my proposal. The way to do it is to make a formal policy proposal, and announce it widely (I posted notes for the various RfC topic categories; now we have the Wikipedia Times as well). I think as before, it will be important to provide a rationale. My only advice: when you have time, reread my original proposal and the vote/discussion, and learn from my mistakes. The main value of my proposal was, in provoking wide discussion, we got to see the range of major views and what issues matter to editors. Good luck, Slrubenstein | Talk 13:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Punctuated equilibrium[edit]

Left you a comment on the talk page. Best, Miguel Chavez (talk) 19:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Introduction to evolution[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Introduction to evolution. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Introduction to evolution (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Draconity[edit]

Hi there. Back in 2006, you participated in an AfD for this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draconity. The article has been recreated, and I have re-nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draconity (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 00:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Scrub (gaming) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scrub (gaming) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scrub (gaming) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fages (talk) 21:53, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Question Regarding Recent Bush v. Gore Edit[edit]

Hi. I have a question about this edit. Where in the citation does it say " a statewide recount would have made Gore the winner"? Your edit summery seems to indicate that this should be in the article, but I can't find it. Thanks! -- Sailing to Byzantium (msg), 03:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I should upcite the article at the end of the article (its the source at the very end of the article). I'll do it after dinner. Titanium Dragon (talk) 03:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Ok great! Just trying to head off an editing war at the pass. -- Sailing to Byzantium (msg), 03:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
I reverted those edits, because they caused that sentence to no longer match what the source said. SMP0328. (talk) 03:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Upon review of the source, the issue is more complicated than "X candidate would have won". According to the source, either candidate would have won depending on the standards used to count dimpled ballots. This type of thing really should be hashed out on the talk page of the article. -- Sailing to Byzantium (msg), 04:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unidentified flying object, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bow and arrow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)