User talk:Tokyogirl79

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hazrat Maulana Muhammad Hashim Samangani RA[edit]

Hi Tokyogirl79
Does this Hazrat Maulana Muhammad Hashim Samangani RA look familiar? See Maulana Mohammad Hashim Samangani RA if you need a reminder. Regards, 220 of Borg 16:58, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

  • @220 of Borg: It's almost identical for the most part, as are the usernames. It looks like they were trying to avoid detection, which is a little disappointing since I hadn't blocked the original user or restricted them at all so there was no reason for them to do this. I figure I'll block the newer of the two accounts and leave a warning on the page for the main account, since obvious sock is obvious. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:44, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks 'TG'. I see someone else CSD'd it and MaterialScientist deleted it. Not sure if there is a hint of notability there, hard to tell with no refs! At least there isn't, yet, multiple IPs and a whole sockfarm about. See Jalpaiguri for example, lots of 'fun' there recently! --220 of Borg 05:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Chris Dominguez[edit]

Thanks for that. Can you delete User:Yankees10/Chris Dominguez and User:Chris Dominguez? Thanks--Yankees10 07:11, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Done! Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

CoSign by ARX[edit]

Hi Tokyogirl79
I saw that the page CoSign by ARX was deleted for advertising. If you could give suggestions as to how to rewrite (what to remove, change, etc), that would be great. I'd like to try again and make it fitting for Wikipedia. Thanks so much! Drcarver (talk) 08:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

  • I'll transfer a copy to your userspace, as the biggest issue was how some of the article was phrased. An example would be this sentence:
"CoSign serves a horizontal need, satisfying digital signature requirements across any industry that requires signatures, and can be used anywhere a pen is currently used to sign paper. "
While this is what the product does, it's written in sort of a promotional advert-ish type manner. Removing the term "satisfying" would be a good start, as that's the thing that really stood out in that sentence. I think I'd re-write it like "CoSign can be used to replace traditional pen-and-paper signatures, in any industry that requires signatures." That's pretty clunky (so I wouldn't say to use that one as-is), but it's a more succinct way of putting it without it immediately coming across as promotional. The whole article had sentences like that, which is why I'd deleted it. However that said, I have no problem with restoring it to your userspace since it's not so promotional that it's unsalvageable. (Sorry if that comes across as rude! It's just that I've seen out-and-out promotions and I do think that you are operating in good faith here, meaning that I don't think that this was intentional spam.) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:29, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • @Drcarver: Done! You can find it at User:Drcarver/CoSign by ARX. On a side note, you probably will need to provide more sourcing, as some of the sources are primary or could be argued away as blog sourcing. I'm a big fan of the "more is better" type of gal when it comes to sourcing articles, in any case. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:33, 1 September 2014 (UTC)