User talk:TomStar81

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to leave a message here, or email me if you prefer; however, if you post here you I ask that you observe the following requests:

  • Place new messages at the bottom of the page, not at the top. This preserves the chronological order for the page.
  • Separate topic sections with a ==Descriptive header==
  • Sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).
  • BE POLITE. I am a person, not a computer. I do have feelings, and they can be hurt.
  • Solicitors are welcome here, but do not twist my arm to do something. It's my decision, not yours.
  • If you need/want my input on a matter outside of this page then please leave a link to the page in question.
  • Did I delete your page? For CSD, click here; for AFD click here and follow the instructions.
  • Do not post in the archive(s). I will not answer any post placed on a page that is mothballed.
  • Unless otherwise noted I will respond on your talk page, not mine.
Archive
Archives
Master Archive Page
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TomStar81.

FACs needing feedback
viewedit
Ontario Highway 402 Review it now
Current Military history WikiProject discussions
  • No major discussions are open at the moment
edit this list

Contents

The Signpost: 17 July 2013[edit]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:47, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 31 July 2013[edit]

Thanks![edit]

Hello TomStar81! Thanks for starting the Union Pacific 4014 article and for the barnstar! I am always glad to help out. MountainRail (talk) 13:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013[edit]

WP:WAWARD[edit]

Still wondering whatever happened to your WP:WAWARD interest. It seems that with your article accomplishments, you should be able to find another anniversary to nominate at WP:SA. Good luck.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 02:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013[edit]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 28 August 2013[edit]

a request[edit]

You nominated Richard Phillips (captain) and called for the name to be salted. Now that Tom Hanks is portraying Phillips do you think it possible your call for salting was too hasty?

I just checked that {{afd}}. I thought I had weighed in, suggesting a movie would be made, but I don't see that comment. Maybe the afd closed first?

I spent an hour or so working on the article on Chesley Sullenberger during its first day. I have found that there are always overly hasty individuals ready to try to delete articles on individuals like Sullenberger and Phillips before good faith contributors have had a chance to work on those articles. A surprising number of contributors wanted to delete the Sullenberger article. I knew they would claim WP:BLP1E. So I looked for references that predated the landing. The landing tended to drown them out. But I found some, and came to the conclusion Sullenberger would already have been notable, or at least on the cusp of notability, prior to the landing.

Richard Phillips nomination was four years ago. Maybe you aren't so hasty now? If you are still hasty, I am going to suggest the movie should be a reason for you to consider being less hasty. Geo Swan (talk) 05:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013[edit]

Nomination of List of Universal Century superweapons for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Universal Century superweapons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Universal Century superweapons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:56, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 September 2013[edit]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Solar Ray Cannon (Gundam).jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Solar Ray Cannon (Gundam).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Solar System II (Gundam).jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Solar System II (Gundam).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013[edit]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2013[edit]

Congratulations[edit]

G'day, in recognition of your successful election as a co-ordinator of the Military History project for the next year, please accept these co-ord stars. I look forward to working with you over the next year. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Coordinator of the Military history Project, September 2013 – September 2014

The Signpost: 02 October 2013[edit]

POTD notification[edit]

Hi Tom,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:England Expects Signal.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 21, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-10-21. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 October 2013[edit]

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, TomStar81. You have new messages at Codename Lisa's talk page.
Message added 23:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Codename Lisa (talk) 23:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013[edit]

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013[edit]

WP:FT topic question[edit]

Hello, you recently commented on the Featured Topic nomination Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Battlecruisers of the World/archive1. There have been three different versions of the topic box proposed - could you take a look at them and offer an opinion as to which is best? Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 18:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

POTD notification[edit]

Hi Tom,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:M4A4 cutaway.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 19, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-11-19. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:29, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013[edit]

Thanks mate[edit]

WHY DID YOU WANT TO DELETE MY PAGE I AM AN AUTHOR AND YOUTUBER AND I DESERVE MY OWN PAGE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owhittington9874 (talkcontribs) 06:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 November 2013[edit]

Proposed deletion of Space colony (Gundam)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Space colony (Gundam) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article about a minor fictional concept clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:FICTION. It is also unreferenced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piotrus (talkcontribs)

Sorry about the missing signature. I used to write fiction articles too, so I know where you are coming from, but fortunately the development of thriving fiction-focused Wikia communities allows for the fiction content to be transwikified there. As we need to enforce WP:N, I think transwikifying articles like this one to relevant wikias is the best compromise. Regarding this particular article, if we had any good sources, we could keep parts of it, probably in the Gundam and popular culture. But without refs, it fails N and OR, and I think we have to re(move) such pages. And yeah, I also consider deletions without notifications to be quite unfriendly. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Since the authors of Formula Project, One Year War and Newtype are no longer active, I'll ping you about the relevant Gundam's prods that I did at theame time as the space colony one. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:19, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 November 2013[edit]

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

ANZAC Mounted Division[edit]

As there is now a consensus to use Turkish at WPMILHIST and the other editor involved, did not respect the status que. Would you mind if I started editing again? Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

However there is still this problem on the talk page POV section. This does not deal with the lack of neutral treatment of the light horse and mounted rifles units. They have been variously referred to as the "1st and 3rd Brigades", the "1st Brigade", the "1st and the NZ Brigades", the "2nd Brigade", the "2nd and NZ Brigade's", the "NZ Brigade", the 7th LHR", while the 5th Mounted Brigade is consistently referred in full. This article will remain POV until these names are equally treated. Could you give some advice on that, the 1st Brigade 2nd Brigade and NZ Brigade are organic to the division, mentioned several times and abbreviated, instead of writing out New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade etc at every use. The short form is also used in brackets after the full name in the order of battle section. While brigades not organic to the division with only one or two mentions are given the full name and linked. The obvious solution is I know to write them all out in full but that gets unwieldy. Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013[edit]

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, TomStar81. You have new messages at MarcusBritish's talk page.
Message added 23:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ma®©usBritish{chat} 23:52, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration case opened[edit]

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 9, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Rschen7754 22:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Featured content[edit]

Hey Tom, you offered to help out with this. I'm going to finish the pictures tomorrow sometime, but I'm hoping you can start next week, if you're still interested. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your evidence in Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute[edit]

You have submitted evidence at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute/Evidence. Since then, new instructions have been added to the evidence page; they are summarised in the "Important notice" box at the top of the page, and explained in the first section of the same page. Please update your submissions accordingly, by 00:01, Thursday 5 December 2013 (UTC). Thank you! AGK [•] 12:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Flow testing[edit]

Hey TomStar :). As mentioned on the Milhist coordinators talkpage, we've opened Flow up for community testing. I'd be really grateful if you could hammer on the system (if you haven't already!), let me know any bugs you find, and leave a note at the 'first release' page explaining what you, as a member of Wikiproject Military History, would need to see to be okay with it being deployed on that wikiproject's talkpage.

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 20:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration evidence[edit]

You may wish to note the special instructions for evidence for this particular case that AGK left on Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute/Evidence. --Rschen7754 03:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposals[edit]

Hi Tom; I'm drafting proposals for the RoslynSKP ArbCom case at User:MarcusBritish/sandbox/case to present on the Workshop page, once it becomes available. Would welcome your thoughts or even concerns if you have any. Drafted proposals are made without prejudice to involved parties and are in the interests of seeking a long-term solution via restrictions rather than punitive actions. Cheers, Ma®©usBritish{chat} 20:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 December 2013[edit]

  • Featured content: F*&!

Evidence for Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute[edit]

Hi there. You are receiving this message because you are a party to the Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute arbitration case, or you have been mentioned somewhere on the case talk pages, or you have submitted evidence in this case. Please be aware that the evidence phase for this case closes at 00:01, 09 December 2013 (UTC), which is just over one day from now. If you have not submitted evidence and would like to do so, please do so before the deadline. If you have submitted evidence and would like to amend or expand it, please also do so before the deadline. Thank you! AGK [•] 15:38, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 December 2013[edit]

Battleships[edit]

Thought this might interest you. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:00, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Writing for WP is no longer enjoyable...and the assessors make it so[edit]

Hello,

I have benefited greatly from Mr. Bee's critiques and help; indeed, I have been grateful for this, and have spent many hours correcting the list in question in response to his comments. However, his arrogant statement that WP has the right to demand that I jettison my personal ethics in order to get an article promoted is a form of emotional extortion. So is his repeated insistence that I invent statistics. His indifference to the fact that some of his suggestions will wipe out the lead on eight allied lists is irrational, as well as injurious to Wikipedia.

If this had been my first run-in with this type of inventive rulemaking during assessment, I might have toughed it out. However, the constant contemptuous disregard that has been consistently displayed whenever I note instances of assessment procedure contradicting general overall WP policy has become so frustrating that I no longer enjoy writing for WP. I cannot get the assessors to even recognize they have problems. When I realized this, I settled for a policy of slavish obedience to whatever whims assessors have dreamt up. As can be seen by this case, that doesn't work either.

I am a professional writer who has donated his daily writing to WP for over five years. I built the list in question, as well as its eight associated lists, entailing researching and collating over 1,800 names. These nine lists are complete, and can be completely cited. The smaller ones may even be promotable under the assessors' requirement that X length of list needs Y length of lead. I haven't bothered wasting my time mentioning this ludicrous inconsistency to the assessing bureaucrats for them to ignore.

I have also created over 900 articles for WP. The only time I checked, I was the 1,432nd most active Wikipedian in number of edits. I am at the point where I could start pushing some biographies up to FA standards. But why bother? There is no assurance that my diligence will be rewarded with anything other than stressful disappointment.

The fun is gone. So am I, at least concerning lists. When my daily writing stint comes up, I still ponder whether to work on articles to push up the quality scale. If I can ever do that without a feeling of sinking disappointment, I may once again write for WP. Just don't hold your breath waiting.

Georgejdorner (talk) 19:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Steve Sparrow[edit]

Hello TomStar81. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Steve Sparrow, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 09:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: pleas to return[edit]

If you folks ever develop a written checklist(s) of A-List, A-Class, Featured Article, and Featured List requirements that can be referred to, I would give serious consideration to returning because I could pre-edit my work. However, I am not about to undergo any more "assessments via ambush".

The last assessment I was involved in made no changes perceptible to our reader. For this, I spent five years accumulating data to ensure a complete list, and a month's unsuccessful monkeying with code. It was supposed to be an assessment, not a crap shoot.

Georgejdorner (talk) 18:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Decision proposed in Ottoman naming dispute[edit]

You are receiving this message because you are a party to the Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute arbitration case, or you have commented or been mentioned on the case pages. I am the drafting arbitrator for this case. I have written the draft decision and proposed it for adoption at the proposed decision case page. The committee will now vote on the final decision for this dispute. If you wish to bring any information or comments to the committee's attention, the proposed decision talk page is monitored by the arbitrators active on this case. Thank you, AGK [•] 20:12, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013[edit]

Why/how a checklist would benefit WP.[edit]

"Assessment by ambush" is basically an unfair system of random requirements, for which the newbie cannot prepare. If the excuse for not codifying requirements is that they are constantly evolving, well, so are Wikipedia's articles. If the articles can be written down subject to change, so can the checklist.

Right now, the assessment system is swamped. A checklist would help alleviate that problem. Reading through the checklist would give pause to the unprepared, and delay nominations that are bound to fail until they are truly ready. The actual assessments that are nominated could be processed much more quickly. Better prepared nominations would lessen the assessors' work loads, and speed up the assessment process. Cripes, assessments might even become sort of fun.Georgejdorner (talk) 19:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute closed[edit]

An arbitration case about the behaviour of RoslynSKP (talk · contribs) with regards to the use of the terms 'Turkish' to 'Ottoman', has now closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. RoslynSKP (talk · contribs) is indefinitely prohibited from changing 'Turkey' or 'Turkish' to 'Ottoman' on any article.
  2. RoslynSKP (talk · contribs)'s topic ban from "editing any article relating to Turkish military history in and predating World War I" is suspended and will be unsuspended (and the prohibition will take effect) if any uninvolved administrator blocks RoslynSKP for misconduct relating to Turkish military history. If the block is reversed or repealed by any of the usual community channels of appeal, the topic ban will lapse back into suspension.
  3. RoslynSKP is prohibited from making any more than one revert on any one page in any 72-hour period.
  4. For a period of one year, RoslynSKP is prohibited from adding maintenance tags, such as {{POV}}, to any article or section of an article without first raising her concern on the talkpage and obtaining the agreement of at least one other editor that the tag is appropriate.
  5. Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) is reminded to avoid edit warring, and to use dispute resolution to assist in resolving disputes.

For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ21 Call me Hahc21 23:06, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Archived discussion

The Signpost: 25 December 2013[edit]

MilHist votes[edit]

Hi, just thought I'd advise that you've voted for 14 nominees rather than the requested maximum of three. Regards, Ma®©usBritish{chat} 01:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Your AE comment[edit]

Please don't intentionally put your comment in the wrong section, this just creates unneeded work for others and reduces the chance that they'll take your proposal seriously. Thanks,  Sandstein  09:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
Awarded to TomStar81, as part of AustralianRupert's 2014 New Year Honours List, in recognition of his efforts as a co-ord to keep the project focused throughout 2013. Thank you and keep up the good work! AustralianRupert (talk) 21:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 08 January 2014[edit]

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 22 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 29 January 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 29 January 2014[edit]

BB-62 Launch Date[edit]

Back in 2007, you changed the Big J's launch date from 7 December to 12 December in the Construction section. Please chime in on the NJ talk page. --J Clear (talk) 14:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 19 February 2014[edit]

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 February 2014[edit]

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 12 March 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 19 March 2014[edit]

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2014[edit]

JSTOR Survey (and an update)[edit]

Hi! Just a quick update that while JSTOR and The Wikipedia Library discuss expanding the partnership, they've gone ahead and extended the pilot access again, until May 31st. Thanks, JSTOR!

It would be really helpful for growing the program if you would fill out this short survey about your usage and experience with JSTOR:

SURVEY

Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2014[edit]

The Signpost: 09 April 2014[edit]