User talk:Tom harrison

For new users

If you are new here, welcome. The page Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers has links to a tutorial, and answers to frequently-asked questions.

Archives

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 28 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tom harrison/Archive 2007 . Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.

Previous discussions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Building 7 article

Are you going to respond to my comments here and here?--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

See my comment at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. Tom Harrison ^Talk 14:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I would really like to get some sort of comment from you at the section I created on the talk page concerning that revert you performed during my block. I raised other issues as well concerning some of the material in the article.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 21:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

You should be aware that reverting due to "no consensus" is never a legitimate reason. You have to actually give a reason for why you don't agree with a change when using the undo function. I started a section on the talk page just for that, though I really don't see how you could possibly have an issue with me splitting a large paragraph into two paragraphs. However, whatever reason you have for opposing the change I would like to know. It also looks like you undid some changes from several days ago that you actually expressed no opposition to so your actions are perplexing. An explanation in either of the sections on the talk page concerning those edits would be nice, or you could just provide an explanation in a new section of the talk page.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

It's difficult to work with anyone whose apparent goal is to promote fringe theories and deemphasize the facts.--MONGO 17:00, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

You said there needs to be consensus and for that there needs to be discussion. So I started a section on the talk page for you to explain any concerns you had about the changes you reverted.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 07:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

It would be nice for you to give some explanation in the talk page at the section I linked to in my previous comment.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 15:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

I saw that you commented on the RfC. Would you mind responding to the section right at the bottom of the page and mention what your issues were with the changes you reverted?--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 01:30, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Please respond to my comment here.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 19:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiPeace

The Devil's Advocate (talk) wishes you peace!

Spread peace and goodwill by adding {{subst:WikiPeace}} to other's talk pages with a friendly message.

Peace to you as well in the new year, Tom Harrison ^Talk 19:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

9/11 cultural impact discussion

Would you mind commenting on the proposals (there are several) here?--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 00:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

I've followed the discussion; not sure I have anything to add at this point. Tom Harrison ^Talk 00:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)