User talk:Tomobe03

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Battle of the Dalmatian Channels[edit]


RfC on Dalmatia[edit]

Dear user, there is an ongoing RfC on Dalmatia. You might want to participate. --Silvio1973 (talk) 14:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

RfC/U[edit]

Dear User as you know Director and myself experience often difficulties in communication. For this reason I have filed a RfC/U to discuss about this problem. I must confess that I genuinely believe he deals with me with improper language (inaccaptable, regardeless of the difficulties of communication we experienced). I did not file an AN/I because I would like to have a large discussion about this issue. And may be I am the guilty one.

If you want to partecipate to the discussion as a "User who tried and failed to resolve the dispute" or "Additional user endorsing this cause for concern") you can do at [[1]].

To avoid the suspicion of canvassing I am contacting all the users involved in the previous and present dispute. If you think I forgote someone please tell me. Silvio1973 (talk) 12:44, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Re: DYK[edit]

Thanks! Actually, not at all - my objective here was simply to push the article past the DYK line, even if I did overshoot that target a bit. I wanted to try doing a couple of GAs (Perković and Stublić are prime candidates), but right now to me that feels more like something that ought to be done, rather than something I'd actually enjoy doing. I'm in a DYK mood at the moment. :-) GregorB (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vance plan[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vance plan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vance plan[edit]

The article Vance plan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Vance plan for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vance plan[edit]

The article Vance plan you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Vance plan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Article name(s)[edit]

I have a question regarding the names of navy related articles. I'm familiar that ship classes are written with cursive follwed by a dash and a short explanation, for instance, Una-class submarine, but what if the class doesn't have a name, but rather just a designation such as "Type 132" (a class of Yugoslav patrol boats). Do I just go with "Type-132 patrol boat", "Type 132-class patrol boat", or something third?--Saxum (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships)#Ships with hull number only has some info on numbered ship names, but I'm not quite sure what it means - if it were "T132", the title would be written as T132, but I'm not at all sure about "type" here. In that respect, perhaps it would be the best to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. As a side note, are you sure the Type 132 ship has no NATO designated name? For instance Project 641 soviet subs are presented here as Foxtrot-class submarine. I have no clue if the Type 132 had a NATO name or not, but it is not entirely possible. I'm sorry I was not of more help. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your constant and long-standing efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the late unpleasantness in the former Yugoslavia --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much. I only wish I had more time these days to contribute more! Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 20:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

10th century counties map[edit]

Have you done this map: Croatia Counties 10th century? I think that Lika, Krbava and Gacka should also be added to it. They were under the rule of a ban, but also a part of Croatia. Ferdo Šišić placed them like this: "gatska sa središtem oko današnjega Otočca; lička sa središtem oko današnjega Počitelja; krbavska sa središtem u gradu Krbavi {danas Udbina)", and this is a map from Ivo Goldstein and how he positioned them [[2]] (Rani hrvatski srednji vijek, p. 154). He also switched the positions of counties "Nina" and "Nona", although Šišić and some others place both like you did.Tzowu (talk) 18:03, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip and the source. I'll add those as soon as I manage some time to tweak the map and the accompanying text. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)