User talk:TopGun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search






Obscured jaguar.jpg Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers.




Please create new sections at the bottom of the page.

If we were already talking on this page but the conversation is gone:
you'll find our conversation in one of the archives unless you were rude. You can revive it by creating a new discussion here and linking it to the archive and you can even move it back with attribution in edit summaries with a civil note.

If I have left you a message on your talk page, you can reply there, but remember to add a {{tb|replace this with your username|ts=~~~~~}} template to my talk page because I might not be watchlisting your talkpage if we don't interact regularly. I will do the same for you if you ask me to or if you have not recently commented on my talkpage in the discussion.

Note that it is Crystal Clear app clock.svg 7:49 PM (+5 UTC), where I live.
Chess, everyone!

Make a move...
View current game

TopGun vs. World
Chessboard Moves
a b c d e f g h
8
Chessboard480.svg
f8 black rook
c7 white rook
f7 black pawn
a6 black pawn
d6 black pawn
f6 black king
h6 black pawn
b5 black pawn
d5 white bishop
f5 black pawn
g5 black pawn
d4 white knight
b3 white pawn
d3 white pawn
g3 white pawn
a2 white pawn
e2 white pawn
f2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
g1 white king
8
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
a b c d e f g h
TopGun to move...
# TopGun World
1 b3 Nf6
2 g3 g6
3 Bb2 Bg7
4 Bg2 c6
5 Na3 Qa5
6 Nc4 Qc7
7 d3 b5
8 Nd2 Qa5
9 Nh3 Bb7
10 O-O Bh6
11 Ne4 Bg7
12 Qd2 Qxd2
13 Nxd2 Na6
14 Rfc1 Nc5
15 c4 Bf8
16 xb5 Rc8
17 Rxc5 xb5
18 Rxc8+ Bxc8
19 Ne4 Bg7
20 Nxf6+ xf6
21 Rc1 O-O
22 Rc5 a6
23 Bd5 d6
24 Rc7 h6
25 Nf4 g5
26 Ng6 Rd8
27 Ne7+ Kh7
28 Nxc8 f5
29 Bxg7 Kxg7
30 Ne7 Kf6
31 Nc6 Re8
32 Nd4 Rf8
33 Nc6 Kg6



Picture of the day
Northern carmine bee-eater

The northern carmine bee-eater (Merops nubicus) is a near passerine bird in the bee-eater family. Native to Africa, the species is predominantly carmine in colour. Its diet consists mostly of bees and other flying insects.

Photograph: Luc Viatour
ArchiveMore featured pictures...


October 2014[edit]

Let's not try to blame each other. I've not added my own personal analysis to Wikipedia article on Azad Kashmir. I just added Instrument of Accession with India which is a fact, even as per Wikipedia. It does not violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia in any form. I've provided external link as well from princeton.edu today. Thank you. ljinishansl (talk) 17:15, 22 October 2014 (CST)

My first edit here...[edit]

since 13 February 2013 :p Mar4d (talk) 16:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Haha! A sleeping ogre like me? --lTopGunl (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Actually I've been feeling more like an awakened hobbit lately :p Mar4d (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
A gnome and a hobbit... what a peaceful combination! ;) Musterup the courrage to take a look at your watchlist :p ...all the old disputes seem stale. It's easier to keep track of current edits through watchlist. I was irritated of browsing my contributions history so finally took a look at it and that got me editing more again (hopefully I'll avoid disputes because it already took me some time to give time to wikipedia). If some one was to ask me, I'd say most of the wikipedia addiction lies in the watchlist! (not that it's a bad thing). --lTopGunl (talk) 16:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Hahaha. True :) Mar4d (talk) 16:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Welcome back[edit]

A small cup of coffee.JPG Hi lTopGunl welcome back, we were missing you. Face-smile.svg Justice007 (talk) 18:29, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Hey, thanks! Good to see you holding on and still active! I was trying to edit whenever I could but that was dwarfed by my previous editing habits I guess ;) --lTopGunl (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

WP:LR - Broken Link[edit]

TopGun - The UNHRC link is broken, you can't have it as a reference right. Why we're reverting and quoting that UNHRC is saying as 'administered by India, it's part of India under Jammu and Kashmir page. TopGun - The UNHRC link is broken, you can't have it as a reference right. Why we're reverting and quoting that UNHRC is saying as 'administered by India, it's part of India under Jammu and Kashmir page. ljinishansl (talk)Jinishans (talk) 00:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Sources do not have to be online. The source contains the verifying information (an online link is not part of verifiability). Also see WP:LINKROT. The view that it's a part of India is Indian point of view. That's why the dispute exists. Is it that hard to understand? --lTopGunl (talk) 00:40, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

TopGun - If the link itself doesn't exist, how can you say it can stay in Wikipedia. You're not ready for any sort of consesus for any of the changes related to Jammu and Kashmir. As per Accession document it's part of India and Jammu and Kashmir is a state of India and it's not just Indian point of view, it's the world point of view and as per the document of accession as well. It has nothing to do with removing the link. Let's remove the link. ljinishansl (talk)Jinishans (talk) 04:42, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

A link is not a reference per se. See WP:SOURCEACCESS. --lTopGunl (talk) 11:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your view[edit]

Let me check it out as I haven't seen this before. --lTopGunl (talk) 11:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Apparently this is some kind of joke at WikiProject India or some one vandalized their information. If you follow the linked discussion that supposedly supports a 'concensus', the discussion actually concludes there is no such consensus:
"There is ultimately no consensus about which language to use, but I see a fair bit of support in regards to IPA and pronunciation and would think this would help normal readers, so I am going to say that 'Using IPA to clarify pronunciation' is the consensus of this discussion, all other sections do not meet a level of consensus needed to pass."
Feel free to use as you like in lede or infobox and even fix that misinformation. The conclusion of the discussion clearly states that IPA should be used for clarification but does not prohibit using Indic. I tend to attract hounds so I'll refrain from going and editing that out at the Project page ;). --lTopGunl (talk) 11:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Gilgit-Baltistan[edit]

Dear Topgun, you look an experienced editor. Can you see that User:Delljvc was changing the titles of the articles that were cited. I didn't add anything. I was just reverting his edits, which are half-baked. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I know that and took that in to consideration while reverting. The edit he made was towards neutrality. All points of views are required to be balanced. Hopefully you'll get that your 're-addition' of the previous edit was what I reverted. --lTopGunl (talk) 14:10, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Eh? The title of a cited article should be exactly what was in the source. Fiddling with it would be POV! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:43, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
External sources are not subject to wikipedia NPOV policy as they are not published by the wiki. And given that sources exist for all these names (covering all POVs), as wikipedia editors we should use the neutral names. Is it really worth the time to dispute that when you can make so many other improvements to the article? --lTopGunl (talk) 14:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)