- 1 Regarding Ardshininvestbank
- 2 Regarding Remotii
- 3 Regarding McDonaldland
- 4 Kitty Pryde (rapper)
- 5 inre 1906 (film)
- 6 March 2013
- 7 inre United Artists
- 8 Monsters, Inc. related and more
- 9 Nomination of Sue Snell for deletion
- 10 Muppets Most Wanted-related
- 11 Branded Content
- 12 Thanks!
- 13 This page NIAMA-REISSER Technology should not be speedy deleted because...
- 14 The Jess Greenberg case
- 15 Person to Bunny
- 16 Show Biz Bugs
- 17 Category:Unofficial names
- 18 Sources for common terms
- 19 CleanLife Energy
I don't understand why are you marking for deletion my page Ardshininvestbank, while it has been created by the same logic as for example Ameriabank? Is it some sort of discrimination?
Please reconsider the deleting of the Remotii RM3 page. It has similar significance to that of the Belkin Wemo. It was tagged with speedy deleting and advertising, yet advertising was never the point. The goal was simply to define what a Remotii is so that it can be referenced easily. Please see See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belkin_WeMo. for an almost identical page. Thank you, -Eric.
I did NOT make those stupid changes to the grimace description, i edited them out!
I went on this morning to find out of the history of that stupid creature after thinking that someone reminded me of him, when i saw all of that crap! All i did was delete those weird references that some user had put in a few hours earlier. As you can see I am new to this editing, so not sure if i did it right. Before i signed in to edit, i put in the star warnings to alert about the vandalism. So if you're so smart then please track who edited the page before me, because that is who is responsible for those dumb changes. It had some name hidden in it, i guess of the abuser, but i took that out too!
Kitty Pryde (rapper)
My edit has more sourced information that is important. If you want to add your dumb facts back then do it just don't undo my edit that has accurate EP information. *Rolls eyes*
inre 1906 (film)
You have a new message here.
inre United Artists
Seeing as there was a redirect and nobody started the official character page, I had to establish it with the information we had. Besides, we had to start the bios for the ones that will appear in Monsters University when that movie comes out. After all, there were already character pages for Toy Story and Cars. Besides thanking you for supporting the fact that The Adventures of Timmy the Tooth is not a production of The Jim Henson Company, those who have seen Greg the Bunny recognized the puppets from the The Adventures of Timmy the Tooth in some of the characters as recycled puppets (somewhat similar to what they did for minor characters in The Muppet Show, Muppets Tonight, Sesame Street, and Mopatop's Shop). Rtkat3 (User talk:Rtkat3) 10:57, June 12 2013 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Snell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The Muppet Wiki listed Mak Wilson under it's performers as if one of the puppeteers that worked in the Muppets Most Wanted movie contributed to that website. The other puppeteer I added commented somewhere on his Twitter account. Rtkat3 (talk) 5:32, June 30 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from any further removal of information from the Branded Content page. If you believe that the information has been written in a self promotion fashion please feel free to add necessary or missing sources instead of removing it. Thank you.
This page NIAMA-REISSER Technology should not be speedy deleted because...
Hello there: Once again I am faced with the same issues. I am, the article is, complying with all the Wikipedia requirements: Notability--Columbus Dispatch, USPTO, ATZ Germany, etc.-. The article had been reworked to exclude any sentences or phrases which could allure advertisement....
I am really tired of this negative vibe that the past admins, when it got DELETED & UNDELTEDED previously already- have clouded my article with. The sources and references are all there. It is no advertisement --just purely facts that you can look up at the United States Patent Office Website, Ansys Publications, Coshocton Tribune, ABC6 News and Fox28 News channels.
For the above mentioned reasons the article is valid. Sorry Trivialist, but you seem to be one of those guys that doesn't read a single word of an article, but decides to attempt to delete it.
You have a great talk page by the way. Are you new, just like me? If so, I wouldn't try to delete stuff that I obviously don't know anything about. Stick to McDonald and food related topics.
The Jess Greenberg case
Hi. It seems this artist popularity is increasing each day. If you add the views on Youtube or have special criterias for someone to have her name on here, I don't know them. Please forward so she can get her own page, thx.
(+4 Mio views) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbNtB1yLcJA
Person to Bunny
Person to Bunny was mainly made up of reused footage from earlier cartoons. Look at these two references
Show Biz Bugs
Show Biz Bugs was mainly made up of reused footage from earlier cartoons because of the reused gags from earlier cartoons. There is not a difference between reused animation and reused gags
Category:Unofficial names, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Sources for common terms
RE: this revert. Eight of the refs on that page use that exact term in their titles - you really want me to stick it inline in the lede (and only) paragraph?? Cheers, Nikthestunned 16:31, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Are G11 and A7 the only cited reasons in deleting the page? And if so why was it deleted so quickly? The company is notable and I can prove it through references. The page was neutral and about a notable Cleveland company. Please expand the cited "inappropriate for a variety of reasons" so that I may improve and possibly recreate the page. Thanks Aeroplanepics0112 (talk) 03:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)