Start a new talk topic.
- 1 Edit summary
- 2 Yerdle proposed deletion
- 3 Grounds for Coffee article speedy deletion
- 4 My edits to Looney Tunes related articles
- 5 List of TopGolf location milestones
- 6 Jackie Onassis (Band)
- 7 Africans Abroad
- 8 Respectfully requesting additional details
- 9 LINUX ACCRA
- 10 question to learn
- 11 aaa
- 12 Category:The Kids in the Hall members
- 13 Category:Orson Welles
- 14 Reference Errors on 19 January
- 15 Category:Family Guy and Category:American Dad!
- 16 FYI
- 17 reference link to wiki article subsection
- 18 Kayden Kross
- 19 Category:Comedy albums by decade
- 20 63rd Creative Arts Emmy Awards (Eminem)
- 21 This edit made no sense
- 22 Category:Crowdfunded films
- 23 Napoleon Hill
Could you please use an edit summary when removing categories from articles?
For example, I'm baffled as to why you removed what appears to be relevant categories from the CSI (franchise) article.
Yerdle proposed deletion
Thanks for keeping an eye on the Yerdle article! I have expanded it an written a little motivation on why I think it should remain on Wikipedia (see talk of article).
Grounds for Coffee article speedy deletion
I contested the deletion of it, but another user within less than 40 minutes deleted the article (probably without reading my contesting reply - to request more time). I don't know why that is? How often is 'speedy'? 24 hours? 1 hour? If an article such as this which is 'in the works' of being created, and is just barely getting off the ground, to delete the article that quickly is only going to create a negative atmosphere towards newer users wanting to contribute to Wikipedia. Zul32 (talk) 00:45, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note you left me in my talk page about creating a new userspace draft! I've been in Wikipedia for many years now, but all this time never knew about that feature. I'll certainly take advantage of it... now all I have to do is figure out how to create one. I'll experiment a bit with it and see how it goes. Thanks for your help! NOTE: I don't know who put that 'leave now' message on there on this section I removed it Zul32 (talk) 14:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Trivialist, Please include a summary of why you remove certain prints. It gets annoying when u delete stuff but don't explain why u did. This includes The Essential Bugs Bunny Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1929–39) Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1940–49) Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies filmography (1950–59) List of Bugs Bunny cartoons List of Daffy Duck cartoons Porky Pig filmography List of cartoons featuring Sylvester The Golden Age of American animation and other Looney Tunes related articles. Every day the edits I make, look like they get deleted by you. That's why I use Wikia and not Wikipedia. Oh and by the way, low pitch cartoon means sound doesn't sound normal. Watch Awful Orphan on Super Cartoons. You'll see what I mean. Looney Tunes Spotlight Collection Volume 1 also has the evidence low pitch cartoon for Awful Orphan. Yay Dad (talk) 21:23, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
List of TopGolf location milestones
Thanks for nominating List of TopGolf milestones for deletion a while back. The user has now cheekily created List of TopGolf location milestones which is presumably the same. Perhaps you could delete this new page too. Nigej (talk) 13:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Jackie Onassis (Band)
These guys get a lot of radio play in Australia for a bunch of songs, and are signed to Sony as well as charting on on the Australian ARIA charts. They're also referenced on other band's pages. They have played multiple national tours and also many festivals. They were also played on BBC Radio 1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YoungPoundcake (talk • contribs) 03:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your guidance, I was trying to save and reserve the page to continue updating it. I am the author of the work 1980 Africans Abroad, and do own the copyright, but being new to Wikipedia I could not quite understand how this page Africans Abroad is done properly. I am learning as I go along, so any directives or specifics to enlighten me on the proper presentation is always appreciated. So I am willing to have your team assist me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IADN2014Dec (talk • contribs) 10:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Respectfully requesting additional details
Thank you for your feedback on the APUS Group article. Would you mind clarifying which parts reflect advertisement / non-neutral language? I would like to submit a revision if possible if you can help provide additional guidance.
Hi Trivialist, I've made so be revisions to the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apus_Group
If it reads ok, can you remove the advert tag please?
Hi Trivialist Linux Accra will be worked on soon.And this page should not be deleted because the community (linux ACCRA) is one of the surving and still active communities advicating opensource movements. I assure you, I'll work on it soon.Thatkidkwakku (talk) 16:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Submit Press Release 123. You said you deleted it for a variety of reasons which is rather vague. Some parts might be promotion so I am going to edit those out and put back up. They meet the notability requirements with articles in Forbes and others. Please list specific reasons. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supereditor1001 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
question to learn
I noticed that you removed the Category:Fictional hares and rabbits from Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit it is a category I added some time ago, can you tell me why you removed it? (so that I can learn from it) WillemienH (talk) 22:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Category:The Kids in the Hall members
Category:The Kids in the Hall members, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello; I see that you've removed this category from a number of articles, and no edit summary was provided to help explain the reasoning. Can you explain why? — WFinch (talk) 00:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks — I just caught a few more and restored the category. — WFinch (talk) 03:52, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 19 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Category:Family Guy and Category:American Dad!
Hello T. I wanted to let you know that 22.214.171.124 (talk · contribs) has returned from its block and has gone right back to the problematic editing that brought about a said block. I took care of the recent edits and left a notice on the talk page. It is late where I am so I wanted to clue you in about this in case they perform more edits while I am away from WikiP. Thanks for you time and for dealing with this person in the past. MarnetteD|Talk 04:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
I have a query relating to creating a ref which links to an existing wiki article's subsection. The ref I created is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_D_(dance_group). It appears incomplete in the sandbox article's ref list. Not sure if it is more appropriate to be an Internal link rather than a ref which I would like it to be. I could not find any further info on whether or not I have done this one correctly before submitting.
Can I trouble you to have a look at it please? Cornelius Henson/sandbox ref no.7
- Sorry, didn't realize that that was from a comment section. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 02:47, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Category:Comedy albums by decade
Category:Comedy albums by decade, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.
Hello, Mr.Trivialist I know Eminem din't receive the Emmy award (commercial) But as featured artist at the ad. But Aaron Allen did receive the award she's from Weiden & Kennedy agency actually a creative director from .she said that she wondered if humor would win instead.... after that he earned the award not won as a featured artist as I say ..so I really don't have the source of what I say cuz I don't remember the site right now..but. I'm sure about what I said but I have a URL about the reliable source but not the original it a copied verified source that I don't remember from Emmy site but it's a related one here it is The page………… Kagemaru2022 (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
This edit made no sense
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Making History (novel), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 06:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
You're most welcome. I do think Category:Films by type more helpfully groups it with other categories of films by type of funding, such as Category:Sponsored films... best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. You removed the content I added to Napoleon Hill, and labeled it as spam, and I am confused as to why? It was cited, and a link to another article (which you are also contesting). Napoleon Hill is listed as an author on the 2013 book. Why take that down? I also added some more citations to Michelle Seiler-Tucker, which hopefully gives the article more validity.