User talk:TropicalAnalystwx13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup![edit]

Hello TropicalAnalystwx13, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition will begin at midnight tonight (UTC). There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 17:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, TropicalAnalystwx13. You have new messages at United States Man's talk page.
Message added 04:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

United States Man (talk) 04:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Refs[edit]

What evidence do you have that the author of those entries are the NWS offices. The WFO section is just informational; it does not credit the NWS. As I said on my talk page (to which you failed to reply), even if I gave you information to write a book, you still wrote the book and would be credited as the author. In this case, NCDC lists no author, so you fail to be in compliance with WP:OR. Now, regarding IEM, they do nothing except relay information that is published by NOAA's NWS offices. Unlike the NCDC, they do not put out anything of their own. United States Man (talk) 03:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

But you still don't give any evidence of an author. There is no author listed on the entry pages, so how can we list one on Wikipedia without anything to back it up? United States Man (talk) 04:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Since you haven't answered my question, I feel inclined to remove it again. Do you have any evidence? If so, where? United States Man (talk) 22:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Jason Rees gave me this, which solves half of the problem. I don't care either way; I just wanted the evidence. United States Man (talk) 23:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

May 26–31, 2013 tornado outbreak graphic[edit]

What about the graphic was misleading? (On a side note, I also don't see any record of it being removed in the past.) Inks.LWC (talk) 23:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

So, about the article deals.[edit]

  • You'll be writing a three-paragraph lede and a short paragraph impact header for 1846 Havana hurricane by the 14th of January
  • I'll copyedit the entire article and send it to GAN.
  • After that, feel free to claim GA credit for it in the WikiCup. (Yeah, I know you declined, but I'd appreciate it if you did it.)
  • In exchange, I'll collaborate with you, as we discussed, on Hurricane Frances. We'll plan this out sometime later, probably over IRC – we'll wait and see, I suppose.

I'm posting this on WP 'cause I'm holding this to you. You better do it with me or I'mma hunt you down, TA.

See ya. Cloudchased (talk) 03:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Oi; any update on this? What should we be doing for Frances? Cloudchased (talk) 23:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Winter Storm Hercules[edit]

This is surely worthy of an article but I don't feel confident enough to write it.

I heard someone describe the "polar vortex" as "Ion", but unfortunately The Weather Channel's one article proving there was such a storm only exists as a link which doesn't go anywhere on their web site. So I'm not sure if the cold air, which is worthy of its own article, counts as part of Hercules.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 16:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Tables[edit]

Most the tables that I deleted were not properly done. they need to have areas effected, instead of landfalls and direct hits.

Sutowe12 (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you![edit]

Dobos cake (Gerbeaud Confectionery Budapest Hungary).jpg 7&6=thirteen () has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 00:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Hurricane Erick's GA review.[edit]

Greetings! I apologize for the late getting-around, but this had slipped my mind till you reminded me. Well, I've almost completed this review, but there are a couple of little details I would appreciate clarity on before I go any further. I have them noted in a comments section in the review page; when you have a moment to do so, it'd be great if you could look into them. Thanks! :) Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 06:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter[edit]

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 2012 Pacific hurricane season/archive1[edit]

You have comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the 2012 Pacific hurricane season/archive1. Please respond within 24 to 48 hours or we will have to archive the nomination. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes from January to February 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK[edit]

Hi, congratulations on the GA for Hurricane Nate (2011), I have nominated it for Did you know, which will hopefully result in the article appearing on the main page. The nominations is here. Thanks, Matty.007 19:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, the Wall Street Journal reference doesn't exist, and I couldn't find any cached versions over Google. Any ideas? Thanks, Matty.007 19:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry about that--I've replaced the link. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 00:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, sorry I couldn't fix it. Best, Matty.007 17:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter[edit]

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

  1. Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
  2. Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
  3. United States WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Hurricane Nate (2011)[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter[edit]

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Rhodesia Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 22:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup error[edit]

Hi there- this is just a quick note to apologise for a small but important mistake in the last WikiCup newsletter; it is not 64 users who will progress to the next round, but 32. J Milburn (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

2014 Atlantic Hurricane Season[edit]

Out of curiosity, who is "we", as in "we dont use wxbell"? 38.105.174.189 (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) He meant the wikipedia editors who edit the article. The biggest problem we have with the seasonal forecasting stuff is whos prediction to include and who not too, since it seems that the market has exploded over the last few year with forecasts.Jason Rees (talk) 17:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

It does seem rather arbitrary that certain private firms are given preference over others by certain editors. 69.115.65.61 (talk) 23:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

I've started a discussion about this at Talk:2014 Atlantic hurricane season. Inks.LWC (talk) 00:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States tornadoes from April to May 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 April newsletter[edit]

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's United States ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included Rhodesia Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and Washington, D.C. Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from Canada Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from Minas Gerais Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to Nepal Czar (submissions) and Indiana Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail), The ed17 (talkemail) and Miyagawa (talkemail) 17:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 11 May[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited January 29–30, 2013 tornado outbreak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Outbreak images on List of North American tornadoes and tornado outbreaks[edit]

How are you creating the images in the 2010–present section? Dustin (talk) 19:38, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm using a program called QGIS. I can walk you through the steps if you want, but I do warn that it's a little complex and takes a lot of time (especially for large outbreaks). TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 20:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply; if you are willing to say how this works (or direct me to a tutorial of some sort), that would be helpful, but I will by no means demand it. I just noticed you and one other user were creating the images, and wanted to take part in some way. I won't be able to do anything until tomorrow afternoon (CDT), though. Thank you for taking the time to respond. Dustin (talk) 02:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
@TAWX13: Just wanted to say that I love those maps. Definitely something useful and worth the work. Thanks for creating those. United States Man (talk) 03:39, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your efforts[edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thank you for all of the help you gave me in working around the tornado maps; you were not required to help me. Your efforts to help have allowed me to contribute in a new way, and so I hereby award you with this Original Barnstar. Dustin (talk) 03:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited January 29–30, 2013 tornado outbreak, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cairo, Tennessee and Cedar Grove, Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:01E 2014 5day.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:01E 2014 5day.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

timeline[edit]

Why did you revert the timeline? This was included in every year's season. 68.111.70.220 (talk) 16:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

As I said in the edit summary, the timeline goes on its own page..Timeline of the 2014 Pacific hurricane season. Feel free to explore previous season timelines and create it if you wish. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 16:47, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

[1] Show me how NHC advisories are wording the timeline, because I do not believe your edit summary as of yet. Also, I do not understand why you are compelled to revert every edit I contribute. Is this some pattern of behavior that I should be reporting to ANI? 68.111.70.220 (talk) 00:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

NHC advisories word it so here: [2]. Also, you shouldn't be making accusations. Dustin (talk) 00:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
That's not an accusation. That was a question. However, you are making an accusation of me for "making accusations". 68.111.70.220 (talk) 00:34, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
By that logic, I could say you are making an accusation. I never technically or literally made an accusation against you in the first place. Don't try to turn my words against me, it will not work. Dustin (talk) 00:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Regarding merging the timeline into the PHS, when the season is ongoing, it's best to have a timeline page. Yes, some past PHS's have been merged back in, but that was done after the season. YE Pacific Hurricane 00:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

If you would bother to click on the references I added to the end of the sentence, anon, you would see...

Advisory Number 8: "...AMANDA INTENSIFIES RAPIDLY AND BECOMES THE FIRST HURRICANE OF THE EASTERN PACIFIC SEASON..." source

Advisory Number 12: "...AMANDA RAPIDLY STRENGTHENS TO NEAR CATEGORY 5 INTENSITY..." source

Advisory Number 17: "...AMANDA RAPIDLY WEAKENS TO A CATEGORY 3 HURRICANE..." source

Advisory Number 18: "...AMANDA CONTINUES TO RAPIDLY WEAKEN..." source

That said, I have no vendetta against you. I reverted your edit on the 2014 Pacific hurricane season page because it's true that timelines have their own articles. I directed you on where to make it if you so wished. I reverted your edit on the recent timeline because adding the degree in which the system strengthened (rapidly) provided context. So feel free to bring it up on the ANI if you wish; you won't get far. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 00:42, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I believe this concerns you. Dustin (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

How did you make the update to the 2014 Pacific hurricane season article so quickly[edit]

The NHC update came out only two minutes ago. How did you already make the entire update? I was watching the NHC website for the update constantly until it was released, then I went to update the article. But you had already made the entire update. Dustin (talk) 02:41, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Practice. :) TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Timeline references[edit]

You don't have to change around what has already been put for the authors if you have been doing this for a long time, but I have found out that it is preferred to use surname first with the "author=" parameter, so it is unnecessary for you to change what has already been put. See Template:Cite report#Description to see what I am talking about. On a sidenote, it seems that the "author" parameter is deprecated, but I have almost always used it. I don't understand if that means that it shouldn't be used anymore or if it means something else. That's all I have to say for now. Dustin (talk) 23:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 June newsletter[edit]

After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C, Scotland Casliber (submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), whose contributions included featured articles Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.

The round saw this year's first featured portal, with Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) taking Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to Florida 12george1 (submissions) and the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on Maya Angelou's autobiographies from Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer Tomáš Rosický from Bartošovice v Orlických horách Cloudz679 (submissions) and a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions).

The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

April 25–28, 2011 tornado outbreak map[edit]

If you don't mind, could you redo the tornado plots on the map. Sharkguy05 found three tornadoes that were mistakenly added to the April 26 section of the list page by Carlossuarez46 on May 9, 2011. They were actually from April 26, 2007 (I don't know why it took three years for anyone to notice). United States Man (talk) 23:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

I just realized that I forgot to mention that they were the three EF1s near the IN/MI border. Thanks, United States Man (talk) 04:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:2014 Pacific hurricane season#Location of 5-day forecast maps[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2014 Pacific hurricane season#Location of 5-day forecast maps--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 09:03, 9 July 2014 (UTC)