User talk:Tutelary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hey. Welcome to my talk page. It's a place where you can leave me messages. Please do not leave templates unless it is absolutely necessary. See also the essay WP:TEMPLAR. I am a lady, so please do use female pronouns, but I won't fault you for not doing so accidentally. (I can be a bit masculine sometimes!) But anywho, don't hesitate to give me some critiques, invoke some discussion, or anything like it! Thanks.

second Afd for Shabbos App[edit]

Nomination of Shabbos App for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shabbos App is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabbos App (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Joseph W Walker changes[edit]

I work for Joseph Walker and was told to make some additions and amend a few items. The first he informed me of was that date change. My source is Mr Walker himself but I will make citation of my sources when I make the changes. If he informs me that the date was in fact correct I will change it back.

Link?[edit]

Hello Tutelary. I noticed this change you made to Draft:Gamergate controversy with the edit summary Undid revision 634569431 by Aquillion (talk) This was discussed a while back in the archives, this was the result of said compromise. I endorse it and I dissent against your revert of such.

Would you be so kind as to link to the discussion you were referring to as I could not find it in the archives. CIreland (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

A precursory look before I have to leave reveals this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gamergate_controversy/Archive_12#GG_Branding But I remember there being a bigger more heated discussion about it. I'll look more thoroughly when I get back home. Tutelary (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:15, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Gamergate/Requests_for_enforcement[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Gamergate/Requests_for_enforcement. about tarc edit war Thanks. Retartist (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Edit summary[edit]

Hi, I'll admit I'm new to editing wikipedia, but you messaged me saying that I should leave an edit summary. I belive I did leave a summary for my edit of the article on 8chan, due to a large amount of content being biased and potentially defamatory.

8chan[edit]

I'm sorry if I came out harsh wasn't my intention, didn't know you added that, right now the article probably needs a descpriptive section, and maybe a background section but there isn't a lot to add. And the criticism should go last as it's common, with a neutral title like "Media response" as in the 4chan article

Also I was wondering if the The David Pakman Show show is RS, I had heard it was https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWDF9WFtro4 Loganmac (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

I still believe it's acceptable to mention it in the lead. It's what the sources say its notable for. Also check out my mention on your talk page. It should seriously be moved back to 8chan. Tutelary (talk) 23:13, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your sources are biased and your article has a big fat citation needed next to the claim that the userbase harasses women. Please fix this.

Block notice[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at ∞chan. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   Mike VTalk 23:23, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

@Mike V:, I was not aware that with the vandalism reverts, I was over. I acknowledge and see my reverts now and if I was given an edit warring warning, I would've self reverted my most recent change. I was inappropriate for going over 3RR on said article and if unblocked, will be given a 0RR on the article for the next 48 hours. (Followed to the WP:BANEX exceptions, blatant vandalism. I will be limited solely to the talk page. Tutelary (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
The concerning edits were: 1, 2, 3, 4, and though not the same material, a revert nonetheless (5). I would encourage you to request an unblock through the template provided above. Mike VTalk 23:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
As you requested on IRC, I've unblocked you per your agreement to abide by 0RR on ∞chan for the next 2 days. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Also part of it was to use reverts sparingly even after that is to be done and discuss edits on talk page. Thank you nonetheless. Tutelary (talk) 04:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
How I feel towards 8chan people right now. They being mean to you kouhai, calling you "SJW" and such, which is silly since you got doxxed just for wanting reliably-sourced and neutrally-phrased true shit added to Quinn's bio that other people not like because maybe make Quinn look bad. Silly willies at /gg/ then get mad because you added reliably-sourced and neutrally-phrased true shit to 8chan page because maybe make 8chan look bad. Funny how "uninvolved" admins try to ban you for supposedly being too "pro-GamerGate" yet only blocks are for edits where you were upholding the rules in opposition to GamerGate. Anyway, good you unblocked, since block was silly.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 08:38, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

User:The Devil's Advocate, I am actually a bit shocked at what they've done. I was also viewing on the board /b/ that they were trying to dox me like some other site has done. They didn't get very far, which tells me how really skillful they are, but still, I was just kind of shocked by the whole thing. Obviously I'm not gonna say that '8chan doxed me' but a 'user on 8chan attempted to dox me', yes. I figured that maybe Frederick Brennan, regarding the h8chan remark and the original page being a disambiguation page that any type of page would be beneficial, no matter how negative. (The overwhelming amount of sources are negative.) Now, the content on the page is in need of a huge reform because there's -alot- of original research present in the article now. I mean a lot of it. They euphemized Anita Sarkeesian, Zoe Quinn, Brianna Wu even though the vast majority of them are the only ones relating to 8chan. Bleh, I need to make a comprehensive note on the talk about it. I'll probably do that after the name change is done. But thanks for keeping me in the loop and providing cute anime characters for me to giggle at. ^^ Tutelary (talk) 19:21, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

No prob. :^) They just a bit paranoid, which makes sense under the circumstances.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 19:29, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Confiscated Armenian properties in Turkey[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Confiscated Armenian properties in Turkey. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alien (creature in Alien franchise)[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Alien (creature in Alien franchise). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Article already deleted[edit]

Hello, I just started creating a page on Wikipedia and saved it. I didn't mean for it to go live or anything... I just wanted to save it as a draft because it's going to take me a few days to finish writing it, but I saw that you already submitted it for deletion. How do I save my Wikipedia page I am working on, as a draft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clairemckinneypr (talkcontribs) 20:58, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

What was the title of your draft? Tutelary (talk) 20:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Ruth W. Crocker. Does clicking 'save page' automatically create it into a live article? I thought it was just for drafts.

It's located here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_W._Crocker Would you like me to move it into the draft space so you can work on it without the threat of deletion? Tutelary (talk) 20:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes Please!!!! :) And thank you!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clairemckinneypr (talkcontribs) 21:08, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Looks like Huon has already done such. See Draft:Ruth_W._Crocker. Tutelary (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I have edited drag pageantry with citations from websites supporting the listings of the information. These websites are owned and supported by the actual pageant systems. Would these not be constructive?? Please advise, if I'm not responding properly please let me know instead of blocking me. Thanks

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Software[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Software. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)