User talk:Typhoon2013

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Archive
Typhoon2013's Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This is the 3rd Archive of Typhoon2013's talk page. Archive 3 includes events during October 12 - present.

Cyclone Hudhud[edit]

I see you reverted my edits on Hudhud. But why don't we need the template for the North Indian Ocean Storms? We do that for all other northern hemisphere basin (I don't know about southern hemisphere, because I haven't experienced tracking them yet) but not for the Indian Ocean. May I know why? Besides, the template also works for Indian Ocean. So I do not know why we don't put templates on Indian Ocean storms. Please clarify. Damien4794 (talk) 00:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: anon[edit]

Hey there. I'm not really sure what to do. It looks like a lot of the edits are legit. Instead of warning about blocking, why not try asking that IP address to create an account and work with him/her? You catch more flies with honey, not vinegar :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Try this new approach of being nice to the anon, see if that changes anything. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

Dude, I know you have administrator ambitions, but you really can't become one if you can't learn to use the talk page of an article. If three separate people revert you, then chances are you might be in the wrong. I'm not sure why you're so obsessed with this storm, but you can't let obsession drive your editing habits. I opened up a discussion on the talk page, which is what you should do in the future in cases of dispute. You shouldn't use edit summaries to explain your changes, and it shouldn't be split over multiple user talk pages. Always use the article talk page. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

To be completed...[edit]

I think this covered by my previous response at User talk:Typhoon2013/Archive2#Season Track Summary.--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 17:12, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

The "NASA prediction"[edit]

This fake prediction has already been thoroughly debunked in 2012 when it originally appeared (with the date 2012-12-21 known for another public hysteria event), no need to proliferate silly hoaxes in an encyclopedia. You can read more about it here. — Yerpo Eh? 09:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)