User talk:Ugog Nizdast

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Feel free to post here, especially if I made any mistakes. I am not experienced enough here and one never stops learning. Need some help with anything or perhaps an article? I generally am lazy and slow in my contributions but with a little prodding or help on an article, I'll get encouraged to work on it.

Christian law in india.[edit]

Majority of the content on wikipedia related to christian law in India was uploaded by me , and almost all of it is from Dr. Sebastian Champappilly's various books(not pamphlets). But yea I do not want to revive the page for the author as he has risen to high rank in the courts of south India and jealous competitors were vandalizing his page from public ip's. After the personal attacks make against the author via wikipedia, the author no longer wishes to share his content online and has requested that i remove all excerpts from his books. Hence I'm marking all my articles related to christian law for deletion and i expect you to not make use of the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HolyFist (talkcontribs) 11:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi @HolyFist:: I'm very well aware of about your contributions here and was of the impression that you were no longer active in editing. I wanted to contact you myself to sort this issue. You must be well aware that I had nominated your page on Champapilly for deletion, other members of the community found that it failed our notability requirement and it was finally deleted--see the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Champappilly.
Let me clarify first, that whatever content you added was a copyright issue itself and your close association with the subject (previously one editor did tell you about your conflict of interest) was another problem. The best and safest solution I found was to trim down all the content you added and merge the remaining into a single page Christian Personal Law...I've posted here for further explanation especially for future editors having resources to improve it further: Talk:Christian Personal Law#Merge report
Finally, nominating Christian Personal Law for deletion is will not likely succeed because this is not a valid reason for it. There is still a little content which added by me and another editor based on other references. I think the best solution here is that we blank out all of what you added and leave the rest there, making it a short stub page. This copyright issue could have been easily solved by addressing the close paraphrasing issue (read this link)....sorry to hear that you've decided to completely remove it. So shall I go ahead and remove whatever you've added? Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
@HolyFist: Removed it here and kept back material containing just bare facts or cited to other sources. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for providing the 3O...[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

My Bad[edit]

Sorry, I meant to put that last edit in the talk page. I was not paying attention at all, totally my fault. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

No problem, but in any case, talk pages are meant for discussing improvements on the article...not general discussion on the topic itself. Good day, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


bt i have added a genuine line bt at may be wrong position. so I want you to correct only that mistake and not just the whole line. Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RajatGarg0063 (talkcontribs) 16:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

@RajatGarg0063: Hi, I would like to help you out but how can I be sure that what you added is verifiable? Could you provide a reliable source? -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Some Help[edit]

Hey UN, since you've helped me out before, I thought I'd ask again. I've been tangling with a remarkably obtuse POV pusher at Medha Patkar. I do not in any way imply that the article was perfect earlier, it's just that some of his statements are so outrageous that I do not know how to deal with them. I also do not believe my conduct has been perfect, but I have tried hard to keep it so, and I would appreciate your input very much. Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello again...I'll check it out when I get time and reply here. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
It would appear that my redoubtable opponent has been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry on an unrelated page. So I don't need your assistance any longer, although the offer is much appreciated. Of course, the page is still a mess, so if you're willing to look at it you're more than welcome. Have a good day, my friend. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Sorry that I didn't respond soon enough. As you can see, I've not been very active these past few days and looks like I missed the fun. I've briefly skimmed through the really long discussion and commend your resolve in continuing it for so long. Though I'm not exactly sure about your "opponent's" exact reasoning for deleting some quite non-controversial content. Curiously enough, I couldn't find any Sockpuppet investigation report filled under that username...maybe just got blocked per WP:DUCK. Best regards as always, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Tim tam dunk[edit]

Good call. I was wondering how that would get answered. smile --Stfg (talk) 11:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Hehe thanks, nice to know that you too have started volunteering the list will be empty more often. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Social Media Section of Omar Abdullah's Wikipedia Page[edit]

How you can say that Social Media section is pointless? Then why Twitter and Facebook on Wikipedia page? Are they not pointless? And even though mainstream media has recognized it. Articles links are also posted for the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajivgupta33 (talkcontribs) 05:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi @Rajivgupta33: the section is weakly sourced since the given references do not indicate any claims on his social media presence. Have you seen any decent article on our politicians having such a section overhere? At the most you could provide his social media links in the "external links" section. Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi @Ugog Nizdast:, The link which I had provide is of mainstream media of India. IBN and Times Of India are the two authentic source of news. We can't point finger on them. So please, don't consider those link as 'Weak'. And for this parody account link is given in IBN news article. If there is no section of social media of other politicians that doesn't mean we should not do the with others. Nowadays social has very impact in India especially in General Elections. I think you are not from Indian origin so you don't know about these buzz else you won't call those articles as 'Weak' source. Better to have debate any Indian regarding articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajivgupta33 (talkcontribs) 07:42, 12 April 2014‎ (UTC)
@Rajivgupta33: What I meant by "weakly sourced" was, none of the sources mentioned anything about any extraordinary social media notability; both sources, just talk about his parody accounts and contain just passing mentions--the sources were misrepresented. Also, I repeat again, it is simply not encyclopaedic. Even if you do get good sources saying it, doesn't mean we have to add each and every trivial thing written about them.
Have you checked the article's history? This was added multiple times before by a new account, only to be removed by different experienced editors, the same is happening to you. Each of them even told that editor to stop too.
I'm sorry, we can keep discussing about this on and on but you still need consensus to add it. It will be considered disruptive if you keep adding it again and edit warring. You seem to be a new editor, so please take some time to familiarise yourself with how we work here (policies, guidelines etc, see your welcome message). I can help too if you need anything. Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


Hey, it's me again. A couple of editors appear to be making an attempt to modify the lead of the Modi article, which almost seems like a pre-election push to me. I cannot revert any further, as I have no intention of getting blocked; could you look into it? Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:30, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Since you've already called the cavalry (Sitush and DS), you'll probably get help soon plus...this is Namo's page we're talking about...this is not going to be ignored. Why don't you tag the "though it was cleared" statement or whatever you dispute with the "dubious" tag yourself till it gets resolved, since you can't revert?
You probably know by now that I have a generally avoid such topics since I can't tolerate the usual heated discussions and pesky POV pushers. I don't know how anyone can manage it and I really salute you along with the other editors who do it. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks friend, no worries. I called on all the help I could, seeing as this is during the election, and POV tampering is even more of a problem. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Ugog Nizdast. You have new messages at Delibzr's talk page.
Message added 05:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Benfold (talk) 05:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Stop vandalising[edit]

I am asking you what is your problem with Freedom of religion in India why ? are you removing shiite section. If it is not reliable that is kind of problem. But you are vandalizing the section of an encyclopedia. Please behave normal. You are being warned else i should report you in case of vandalism after a user has been warned. Hope you understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inside99 (talkcontribs) 12:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, sorry I 'vandalised'. Why don't you report me to the WP:AIV? -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:28, 15 April 2014 (UTC)