User talk:Ujongbakuto

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Ujongbakuto, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 22:53, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mizuho Group[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mizuho Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. West Eddy (talk) 03:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita‎[edit]

Hello. Please stop removing from the article the lists from the CIA and UPenn, as they are both very useful and widely used, and both include countries not available in the World Bank or IMF lists. Pristino (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I've reverted the CIA update because the CIA updated its list of GDP per capita by simply taking the IMF estimates for 20121, which are based on projections of economic growth released in October 2012. Many of those estimates are now wrong. I suggest waiting until April, when both the IMF and the World Bank will release more solid estimates for 2012 based on actual national accounts data. Cheers. Pristino (talk) 05:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

1 Compare the new CIA data for 2012 with the IMF's 2012 projections released in October 2012: they're both exactly the same. The only difference is that the CIA is rounding the data to the nearest hundred.

Oh, I see. Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 06:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Singapore. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 15:28, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Singapore does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 16:44, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Okay, noted. :-)--Ujongbakuto (talk) 01:54, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Misao Okawa![edit]

Dear Ujongbakuto, please have a look at her talk page. MattSucci (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I've replied. :-) - Ujongbakuto (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Team Barnstar Hires.png The Teamwork Barnstar
For your work on Jiroemon Kimura's 116th birthday! Bearian (talk) 19:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh, wow! Arigato Gozaimasu! ^_^ - Ujongbakuto (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Wp Japan[edit]

You may wish to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan. It's free! Bearian (talk) 19:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


Stop reverting sourced info edits without checking anything with posts like "seems like vandalism". Do you understand?--Hakan Erbaslar (talk) 12:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I understand. So, in your case, I'll state clearly that I actually checked the source, and clearly accuse you of vandalism. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 12:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
There are 2 seperate edits. 1 is sourced info. the other is out of date tag template. If you think both edits are wrong and reverted it, you should prove it. Otherwise you are vandal.--Hakan Erbaslar (talk) 12:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Okay, here you go: Ujongbakuto (talk) 13:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
It's good that you are learning not to revert the update tag for an out of date table. Now it's time to learn that facts should be found from direct and not some archieve.--Hakan Erbaslar (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
What on earth are you talking about? It's you who are in the wrong, and I've reported you to an admin. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 13:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
It's good that you learned not to revert the update tag for an out of data table. Now it's time for you to learn that sourced info on wikipedia should not be reverted. Please call an admin to report your own vandalism.--Hakan Erbaslar (talk) 13:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I checked that you didn't notice any administrator about this issue. Maybe it's time for you to learn that "lying" is a bad thing.--Hakan Erbaslar (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Maybe it's time you learn about e-mailing. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 13:44, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I should have been notified about this complaint. You may not e-mail an administrator and use it as a threat to remove sourced information.--Hakan Erbaslar (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Please show me the rules for that, and I won't do it again. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 13:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Using bold letters in a wikipedia discussion is forbidden.--Hakan Erbaslar (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Please show me the rules for that, and I won't do it again. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 13:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
OK, I checked database again. Your numbers were right. so soooory for that. :)--Hakan Erbaslar (talk) 15:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Apologies accepted, and hopefully, this doesn't happen again; we were both in danger of being blocked. :) - Ujongbakuto (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


Hello, May I please draw to your attention that we do not just delete a dead link. If you have not found a replacement source, please put a [dead link] template, but leave the link in place until somebody can deal with it. In this particular case, I easily found a replacement source for the information. Thanks -- Alarics (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Okay, noted. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 08:51, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Repetitive links in Template:Major stock exchanges[edit]

I am wondering about the need of deleting repetitive links in Template:Major stock exchanges. See Template talk:Major stock exchanges. --Mimosinnet (talk) 09:46, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

add new link[edit]

add new link ,not vandal, what wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 05:48, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

- Ujongbakuto (talk) 06:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)


Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Singapore shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Okay, noted. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 08:31, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Please use the article's Talk Page to discuss your concerns with the extensive copy edit recently done on the Singapore page rather than simply reverting. Jaytwist (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, but I think I'd rather not. I also won't revert your latest edits again. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 03:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Second Coming, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 23:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

very sorry, I honestly didn't notice that the link was in a quote again; I honestly had no intention to repeat the same mistake with a different link. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 01:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

need help to create a wiki article on gold leasing[edit]

Ujongbakuto could you please create this wiki article. -- (talk) 02:44, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't think I'm qualified. - Ujongbakuto (talk) 03:12, 6 October 2014 (UTC)