User talk:Ultimate cosmic evil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

December 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Jual bibit kroto, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Josh3580talk/hist 18:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

My apologies, I had the wrong diff selected in WP:Huggle. I meant to tag the promo user. Josh3580talk/hist 18:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zacgtrdfxgdxh Sgtdfgdsxlater. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Zacgtrdfxgdxh Sgtdfgdsxlater was changed by Ultimate cosmic evil (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897674 on 2013-12-26T02:51:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  only (talk) 03:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ultimate cosmic evil (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

sorry

Decline reason:

Appropriate, but insufficient. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 03:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.

  • There is no 'Sorry' for this. This is blatant vandalism that is causing other editrs hours of work to revert. I have no patience or AGF for this. Grow up and go away from Wikipedia until you are 10 years older. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
@Kudpung: This editor claims to be 21 years old, according to his main user page. In that case, I don't think he may be a kid, but a college-age student who just chooses to act puerile. But still, what he did was disappointing, especially for a trusted editor… Epicgenius (talk) 18:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)