User talk:Uwatch310

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Marco Guzman, Jr[edit]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000 I would appreciate if you could weight with your experiences with Marco Guzman, Jr if possible. Thank you and regards.--Paniraja (talk) 06:13, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Uwatch310, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Uwatch310! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:21, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Gonzalez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Provost (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Dead links[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to University of Southern California. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Arxiloxos (talk) 06:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
List of Sacramento State people, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Andrew327 16:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sacramento State people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Elk Grove, Gary Davis and Angus Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Sacramento Kings season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marcus Thornton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Sacramento montage[edit]

I don't believe there is a way to include that template into the infobox as you desire. Where similar pages have a montage it is because someone created a montage image and uploaded it to Commons. You will likely have to do the same.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 01:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I updated Sacramento, California to fix the placement of {{Photomontage}} template so that it displays in the same position inside the infobox, but without the extraneous "[[File:" text. -- Zyxw (talk) 02:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited California State University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comprehensive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

California State University, Northridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Arrested Development, Dexter, Chuck and The Ringer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:California Polytechnic State University, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Absolutely do not remove talk page comments because you disagree with them. This is poor form, especially when you are in the midst of edit warring. tedder (talk) 19:12, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 05:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Covina, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greater Los Angeles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

The Cal Poly Barnstar[edit]

-- Marco Guzman, Jr  Talk  15:58, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Diego State University, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kathleen Kennedy and Jerry Sanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Please dont undo my changes. I work at the University and I am trying to update the page.[edit]

Please dont undo my changes. I work at the University and I am trying to update the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.157.161.180 (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Canadian endowment[edit]

Your edit on the page University of Toronto has been reverted. Please be aware that financial figures for Canadian university articles (such as Toronto) are written in CAD and not USD. Thank you. Leventio (talk) 13:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:California State University, Long Beach, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Bahooka (talk) 19:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oxnard, California, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please see WP:RS. Also, adjectives ending in "EST" already are defined as most, so the use of most before them is not proper English grammar. Gtwfan52 (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Oxnard, California, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. the source you provided is not the FBI crime stats it is a commercial website without fact checking purporting to be giving the FBI crime stats. See WP:RS. also the syntax sucks. if you want that in, cite a decent source and write it in better English. Gtwfan52 (talk) 23:56, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

You may find this link illuminating as to the reliability of the source you are citing: http://www.businessinsider.com/disclaimer. Self-admittedly, they are not a reliable source. Gtwfan52 (talk) 00:07, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Oxnard, California. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Oxnard, California. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Admissions to California State University, Sacramento concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Admissions to California State University, Sacramento, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Admissions to California State University, Sacramento[edit]

Hello Uwatch310. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Admissions to California State University, Sacramento.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Admissions to California State University, Sacramento}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.

Disambiguation link notification for August 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Nevada, Las Vegas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of largest universities in California concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of largest universities in California, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Editorializing[edit]

I've noticed you like to use the term "notably," most recently in your Sept. 3rd contribution to Todd Gloria. Please note this is considered editorializing by Wikipedia (WP:EDITORIALIZING): "The use of adverbs such as notably and interestingly, and phrases such as it should be noted, to highlight something as particularly significant or certain without attributing that opinion should usually be avoided to maintain an impartial tone." Please refrain in the future. Thanks. 50.143.150.226 (talk) 02:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Linda Katehi: Reorganization and 2011 Occupy protest[edit]

Hello, Uwatch310. I noticed that you made a very helpful edit to the Linda Katehi page yesterday. I recently left two new messages on the discussion page for other editors to review and I thought you might be interested in looking over one or both, if you have time. The first note is about restructuring the entire article in order to organize the information more logically, and the second message is about condensing the information about the protest in 2011 so that the section just focuses on Katehi's actions. Here is the new message about reorganizing the page and you'll find my other message directly below that one. If you're able to help out, will you let me know what you think?

I should also mention that I am an employee of UC Davis in the communications department and I know I shouldn't make edits to the page myself.

Thank you for looking at this. LindaF UC Davis (talk) 23:52, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Delta Lambda Phi's motto[edit]

Hello. I was wonder if you had a source for this edit? The website has the motto Making Our Presence Make a Difference as a banner, while Party With a Lambda Man only seems to be used unofficially as an occasional slogan for events. Grayfell (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Auburn University may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AFI Conservatory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

WP:3RR[edit]

Please talk it out with the other editor at Talk:San Diego State University or you'll both be subject to blocks under WP:3RR. I would rather not and see a discussion take place. Mkdwtalk 04:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

SDSU is not the flagship. Citing internal documents naming itself as such is not a valid citation. Nor is a news story. I am aware of an email from the CSU system telling SDSU to not identify itself as the flagship. Prehaps you should do some history of the CSU system. in 2007 The U.S. H.O.R. recognized SJSU as the flagship, and founding campus of the CSU system. See proper link https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hres365/text. There are also several other citations naming SJSU as the flagship campus. Please stop posting false info.SCraigA (talk) 05:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Discussion on this topic needs to be moved to the public talk page of SDSU, not personal pages. An "email" is not a form of valid verification - unless the CSU sends out publications stating otherwise, calling SDSU (and Cal Poly at this point) Flagship still stands - based on the qualifications of what a flagship is. There are nearly 5 sources that check this.--Uwatch310 (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Mkdwtalk 05:51, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Delta Lambda Phi[edit]

Hello again. This edit re-introduced material, along with a new source, to Delta Lambda Phi. The source did not actually support the added material, however. If you added the wrong link by mistake or something, you might want to fix that when you have the opportunity. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 06:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to California State University, Fresno may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Texas and Oklahoma), and 36th in all regional universities, both public and private, in the West (all the western states from Hawaii and Alaska to Texas and Oklahoma.<ref name="colleges.usnews.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

AfD tag on Sean Paul Lockhart[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you tagged Sean Paul Lockhart for deletion at Afd but never created the deletion discussion for that article. I have removed the tag. If want to nominate the article for deletion, please create the deletion discussion and include a rationale why the article should be deleted. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Images on Humboldt State University[edit]

Greetings Uwatch310: I am sorry you felt the need to revert my edit to the images on the Humboldt State University page. I am an administrator at Wikimedia Commons and the images were being prepared for deletion because they were all copyright violations - having been copied from the university's website and other sources. The images are no longer available for reversion, I'm sorry you didn't understand why the images were being removed from the page. If this happens in future, please follow the link over to the pages at Wikimedia Commons where the images are stored and read the "tags" that are on them; it will all make much better sense. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of largest universities in California concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of largest universities in California, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)