User talk:Vensatry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Please leave a message; I'll reply here.


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 04:32, 12 July 2014 (UTC).—cyberbot I NotifyOnline

Wiki Learning

Apologies[edit]

I am sorry for my actions on the FAC of Gemini. Because I am not a co-nominator of the article (despite wishing that I had been one), I thought I am allowed to post comments. Also, I edited much of the article not for the fun of it, but because Sriram was absent for one month, which would have failed the FAC again. But I promise they will never happen again on any other FAC. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

While I see that GANs can only be reviewed by "anyone who has not contributed significantly to" the article, I believe FACs can be reviewed by anyone. Is there a rule prohibiting it? With that argument, an editor reviewing an FAC should have made not a single edit to the article. Pls. enlighten me. -- Sriram speak up 14:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
@Kailash29792: My bad! All editors can review FACs per the instructions given here. Further, it says "If you were a major contributor to the article, please note that when you support". I thought it was an unwritten rule for FACs that major contributors shouldn't support the nomination as in the case of GAN. @Sriram Vikram: Thanks for enlightening this fogey! Best wishes for the nomination. Vensatry (ping) 16:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Happens. And, thanks for your wishes. Btw, Krimuk90 pointed out that the prose requires more polishing and I find myself nodding in acceptance. Since you were successful in your first attempt with FAC, can you spare a little time and help me better the prose quality? I ain't so fluent in English and my vocabulary is rather limited. So, pls. consider my request. Thanks. -- Sriram speak up 13:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the request, but I should admit that I'm not really comfortable working on film articles. Even during the Trichy FAC there were some minor objections about the quality of prose not being "professional". Luckily I got an editor who did a great job. Let's hope for the best! Vensatry (ping) 18:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Will asking a GOCE member personally get the job done? Because listing it at the GOCE may force us to wait longer. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:52, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
You may have to ask this to the "editor in your mind". Again, even if they agree it's not a guarantee that the prose will be up to FAC standards. Vensatry (ping) 16:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

WP:VA/E[edit]

You may be interested to know that we did end up adding Rajinikanth to the list of vital articles. Cheers, Cobblet (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Ha, the style samrat is back! Thanks for letting me know about it :) Vensatry (ping) 14:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Aitraaz/GA1[edit]

Hi, you might want to sort out the neutrality issue in the reception, it seems nobody else is going to. I'll pass it once it's sorted, it really doesn't need much.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:22, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Regret to say that I'm personally disinterested in the article for obvious reasons. Vensatry (ping) 15:45, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2014[edit]

Commons[edit]

Hey! I recently uploaded an image of Vikram from Bollywood Hungama to commons and have used it in Vikram filmography. Can you review the image in commons? -- Sriram speak up 16:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

A valid one! Be sure to check the URL each time when you upload an image from that site. Someone will review it soon Vensatry (ping) 16:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2014[edit]