- 1 Viibird, you are invited to the Teahouse
- 2 Your recent edits
- 3 Nomination of Abraham modal haplotype for deletion
- 4 Nomination of Anatole Klyosov for deletion
- 5 November 2013
- 6 Warning
- 7 Speedy deletion nomination of J1 Y-DNA Project
- 8 Nomination of Galilee modal haplotype for deletion
- 9 Disambiguation link notification for November 19
- 10 I implore you to stop
- 11 Talkback
Viibird, you are invited to the Teahouse
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Nomination of Abraham modal haplotype for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham modal haplotype until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ironholds (talk) 10:58, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Anatole Klyosov for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anatole Klyosov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ironholds (talk) 11:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Zeitun Rebellion (1895–96) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please discuss the sourcing on the talkpage. Ironholds (talk) 01:45, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abraham modal haplotype may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The '''Abraham modal haplotype''' is a set of DNA sequences that are inherited together) on the [[Y-chromsome]] that has been hypothesized to mark the split between the Jewish and the
Please avoid using sources that don't comply with what the general consensus deems as WP:RS. Be aware of arbitration sanctions. Edit summaries like "it does not have to conform to other sources, which might be lies" are also unacceptable on Wikipedia. And please refrain from making inappropriate statements like the ones you made on Talk:Zeitun Rebellion (1895–96) : "The armenian refugees to syria counted at 1.3 million, so where is the genocide.???" and "armenians excelled in lies". If not, you will be reported at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. Thank you for understanding. --Երևանցի talk 06:48, 13 November the other editor called the turkish sources lies! -general census of who? the armenians and the russians. can you add the turks to that sensus if you dont mind?? are making a mockery of history. since wiki require one or two references for a statement. there is no general sensus on any topic in history of science or any science, including history throughout history. what is exactly is the general sensus between armenians and turks regarding this issue for example? oyu have the turks who lost 3.7 million civilians, where can their story be told in your general sensus Viibird (talk) 01:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC) I have references for the encyclopedia britanica and the conclusion from referencd book, you could easily find that by googling.http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/circassian.htm, my edit was deleted unjustly based on the deleter claim that resources untrrustful and again he deleted beased on reason: resources contradict the armenian resources (obviously all references in the article made by random armenian persons ( all the alleged resources of armenian genocide are like: because a guy with armenian name said so.)! However my resources are ligitimate Ottoman empire documents of the highest authority backed with 3000 photos of massacred turkish muslims women and children (mostly) well documented. some of these photos like the one i posted in the article talk page were used by armenians several places even the frensh media, still in the website of australian Hunchak party, you can find that by googling the photo and finding the web site of fraud. many of the photos armenians post are actually of turk muslims massacred by the armenians.Viibird (talk) 10:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC) many resouces in the same line ( supporting that Armenian militia slaughtered muslim turks and not viseversa are abound such as: Authors Leonid Mitrofanovich Bolkhovitinov Леонид Митрофанович Болховитинов; Азер Мустафа-заде (2011). The report of Major General Bolkhovitinov on the activities of Armenian troops in Turkey and the Caucasus in the First World War: Рапорт генерал-майора Болховитинова о деятельности армянских вооруженных отрядов в Турции и Закавказье в Первую Мировую войну. Азернешр. OCLC 725890208.
Review of Armenian Studies. ASAM Institute for Armenian Research. 2002.
Review of Armenian Studies. ASAM Institute for Armenian Research. 2007. Review of Armenian Studies. ASAM Institute for Armenian Research. 2002. Sedat Laçiner; Şenol Kantarcı (2002). ARARAT. ARTISTIC ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA: Ararat: sanatsal Ermeni propagandası. Ankara: Avrasya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi. ISBN 978-975-6769-47-8.
Prof. Stanford Shaw, Prof. heath Lowry, Prof. Justin McCarthy
Justin McCarthy (1995). Death and exile: the ethnic cleansing of Ottoman Muslims, 1821-1922. Princeton: Darwin Press. ISBN 9780878500949.
TÜRKÖZÜ, H. Kemal-, Armenian Atrocity According to Ottoman and Russian Documents, Institute for the Study of Turkish Culture Publication, Ankara 1986.
Ankara Üniversitesi (1984). Armenian Terrorism, Its Supporters, the Narcotic Connection, the Distortion of History. Press, Information, and Public Relations Office, Ankara University. OCLC 11551007.
Cezmi Yurtsever (1999). The 311 (1895 AD) legacies of the Zeitoun Armenians: the Andırın raid, the Geben disaster, the Çukurhisar genocide and the discovery of mass graves. KÖKSAV. ISBN 978-975-7430-17-9. Archived from the original on
|archivedate= (help).</ref> Sedat Laçiner; Ibrahim Kaya (2002). The Armenian Issue and the Jews. USAK Books. ISBN 978-975-92445-3-8. ...Viibird (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Umman Manda, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of J1 Y-DNA Project
A tag has been placed on J1 Y-DNA Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 10:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Galilee modal haplotype for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galilee modal haplotype until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Agricolae (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Betacoronavirus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MERS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I implore you to stop
Wikipedia is not a science journal - it's an encyclopedia of notable topics, and the definition of notable is not negotiable. Please stop creating articles that do not meet even basic notability requirements. I have already recommended that further creations - or even arguing that those creations should be undeleted - should result in a topic ban. It appears you have positive things to add, but they have to be the right things, and follow our rules - you did agree to those rules, after all 12:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)