User talk:Vituzzu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Precisazione[edit]

Heyla, sono sempre io. Ciò che mi ero dimenticato di dirti ieri è che la mia connessione è condivisa da un'altra persona che conosco e che si dedica ad altre attività su Wikipedia. Ecco perchè, probabilmente, sulla Wikipedia italiana mi sono comparsi oggi due avvisi di blocco infinito, sebbene io non abbia avuto accesso a Wikipedia in queste ore. Tutto questo per precisare. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CuoreAlVanadio (talkcontribs) 18:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


Non ti preoccupare, grazie lo stesso per il supporto morale. --Angelo 21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Grazie per avermi avvisato, ho già beccato due immagini uploadate da Green Owl con licenza libera, ma nettamente copyrighted (una foto di Mosconi e un fumetto di Paperino, in particolare). Andrò col tempo a ricontrollare i contributi delle utenze che mi hai comunicato per vedere se vi sono comportamenti non adeguati alle policy di Wikipedia. Grazie ancora. --Angelo 21:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Orceana Calcio è la squadra di calcio di Orzinuovi, e l'articolo è stato creato da Green Owl (tanto per cambiare), con Brixia come altro contributore; se te mi dici che il puppetmaster ha legami wikipediani o reali con Orzinuovi, allora a questo punto è altamente probabile che egli e Green Owl siano la stessa persona. In ogni caso, io posso bloccarli solo in caso violno qualche policy di Wikipedia. Finché i sock fanno interventi su articoli di topic distinti e separati non c'è violazione di policy da queste parti, e due upload sbagliati e disturbi da personalità multipla non ritengo siano ragioni sufficienti per prendere provvedimenti. In ogni caso, le utenze sono sotto osservazione da parte del sottoscritto d'ora in avanti. --Angelo 21:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Si sono LpL! Sono anche Green Owl! Muahahah! --Zan Biedro 15:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


Ciao, questo Zan Biedro (alias Green Owl, alias...) mi scrive, ma mi sembra un troll, mi potresti dire cosa ne sai? Grazie Mauro Cicognini 10:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Grazie per la risposta ed il puntatore Mauro Cicognini 15:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Various[edit]

Grazie per gli auguri, per quanto riguarda il soggetto di cui mi dici richiedi un checkuser anche perché io sto andando fuori città proprio adesso (tra Siena e Milano) e mancherò per almeno 24 ore. Ciao e grazie ancora. --Angelo 14:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Grazie della traduzione[edit]

Come vedi l'ho subito usata (Rocco Jemma), potevi farlo direttamente tu, non c'era problema. Tornando alla questione italiana: allora me lo fai questo regalo di Pasqua? ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 05:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Acciughe[edit]

Segnalo che la wiki italiana necessiterebbe l'unione di queste due voci Engraulis encrasicolus e Engraulidae o meglio il cancellamento della seconda che sembra meno completa della prima. --Kasper2006 (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you Saud (talk) 20:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Modifiche bloccate??[edit]

Ciao Vituzzu, volevo contattarti su wiki italia ma non ci riesco: come posso fare ad modificare una pagina? mi dice che non posso!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.75.50 (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Perché condividi la classe di indirizzi di un noto vandalo, sei registrato? --Vituzzu (talk) 11:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


Minaccia di morte?[edit]

Egregio Vituzzu. Sono moglie di "Brunodam" e la prego di chiarire dove, come e quando mio marito le ha fatto "minaccia di morte". Qui ([1]) lei dichiara cose non vere. Suo cugino Luigi mi ha detto che le ha scritto riguardo a "vedersi faccia a faccia" con lei in una prossima riunione di wikipedia in Italia, allo scopo di chiarire unas situazione di blocco che ricorda molto l'ingiustizia-sbaglio fatta con Crisarco e Presbite nella wikipedia inglese. Io, per esempio, uso lo stesso computer di mio marito e sono stata recentemente bloccata ed accusata di essere un suo sockpuppet. Purtroppo wikipedia ha "alcune" falle, come dice ora lo stesso Crisarco rispondendo a Presbite nella wikipedia italiana. Le stesse falle che hanno fatto bandire nella wikipedia italiana mio marito anni fa, solo per avere ospitato per alcuni mesi il cugino Luigi e la moglie Maria Rubino (che scrisse allora un blog di denuncia) che usarono lo stesso modem di casa nostra sugli stessi argomenti. Mio marito disse solo che pensava di inoltrare denuncia (che poi non fece) e subito fu bandito. Questo bando fu il pretesto usato da un gruppo croato per farlo bandire anche dalla wikipedia inglese. Come vede, una vicenda ingarbugliata che parlando "faccia a faccia" (come vuole fare Luigi) si potrebbe risolvere. Cordialmente. Maria

Senti qua, non credo manco ad una delle tue bugie sulla presenza di un folto gruppo di persone (putacaso scrivono tutti allo stesso modo e sanno tutto di tutti allo stesso momento, casualmente si spostano nel mondo tutti allo stesso momento, esistono più tizi che vengono qui a rompere le proverbiali scatole, probabilmente in coordinazione fra di loro attraverso i vari canali che il web offre ma per cortesia, finge l'onnipotenza è un gioco abbastanza infantile così come lo è provare ad imbarcare tutti gli italofoni nel proprio pastone di trolling, fascismo, nazionalismo e menzogna), francamente ho seri dubbi sull'esistenza stessa di una Maria Rubino e di un Luigi28 distinto dal buon Brunodam, non sciorinare link a presunti profili o roba simile, non vale la pena. Il presunto Luigi mi ha detto che vuole incontrare coi classici ammiccamenti che solo uno che, alla luce di una cultura decisamente scarsa, pensa siano propri di tutto il Meridione, ora 'sta roba mi fa semplicemente ridere, "faccia a faccia" penso che il buon Mr. Salvezza del Pianeta avrebbe buon gioco a mettersi la coda fra le gambe, a dimostrazione di ciò ho provveduto ad una semplice informativa alle autorità e nulla più: a me 'sto genere di giochi non fa batter ciglio, ma c'è gente che ci potrebbe credere ed è bene che sia a conoscenza e delle conseguenze che la minaccia generalizzata ha e quanto poi, in sostanza, questa poggi sul vuoto, l'accesso della famosa biblioteca barese è tutto sommato abbastanza facilmente riconducibile, grazie a quel "provvidenziale" DL del 2002, a chi ne abusa.
Se stessi facendo (anche se è un'ipotesi abbastanza remota) di tutta l'erba un fascio la colpa non è di certo mia, ma di chi in questo si è legato di sua volontà a tale fascio.
L'aver letto quanto scritto da un gran signore della masnada poi mi impedisce di essere ulteriormente cordiale
--Vituzzu (talk) 12:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Vedo che con lei non si riesce ad intavolare un discorso. Putroppo wikipedia ha "falle" enormi: io addirittura sono stata bandita dalla wikipedia italiana senza mai avervi scritto o postato una parola (credo sia un record!). Mi meraviglia che una persona del suo livello non riesca a porsi il dubbio che tanti anni (e scritti) di mio marito e Luigi su wikipedia possano essere motivati da una palese ingiustizia (direi sbaglio). Nessuno al mondo risulta infallibile, neanche alcuni amministratori della wikipedia (ed il caso Crisarco docet). Insomma, Presbite e Barba Nane vengono banditi e li si riconosce innocenti, ma mio marito e Luigi no: strano, anzi curioso. Viene da pensare che tutto sia riconducibile alle accuse fatte da Maria Rubino sul suo Blog contro una certa "Cricca" della wikipedia italiana (criccawikipediaitaliana.blogspot.com/). Comunque, le tolgo il disturbo per sempre (come penso anche Luigi, che mi ha detto di non volerle piu parlare "faccia a faccia" in futuro). Per educazione la saluto cordialmente. Maria
Quando la presunta sig.ra Rubino fece quel blog io non ero manco attivo, è anche abbastanza infantile a rileggerlo e direi pure che ha fatto rumore solo fra i wikipediani con scarso senso della realtà.
Circa quanto succede qui i deliri del gruppuscolo di salvatori (i vari Brunodam e soci) impediscono loro di vedere che sono essi stessi i migliori alleati dei propri "nemici" (posto che umanamente mi fa davvero sorridere vedere 'ste guerre virtuali).
Dicono che Luigi28 sia il simpaticone che mi scrisse Non ce l'avevo con te....ma adesso ci vedremo faccia a faccia e ci scambieremo presto quattro chiacchiere alla prossima riunione di wikipediani. Lì non potrai colpire dietro ad un computer in forma indisturbata (e, scusami, un poco vigliacca). Ciao :) :) ora l'ammiccamento, come dicevo, è il sigillo di chi, un po' per ignoranza, un po' per ottusità, avendo visto troppi film di De Niro e pensa che fare il maffioso, insomma bambinate che possono risultare pericolose solo per chi le scrive e non per chi le legge ma che oltre a farmi ridere mi fanno fare una sola domanda: con quale faccia tosta mi si scrive ancora? Con quale faccia tosta ogni quanto arriva qualche amico "dei croati" (perché con le sue bravate li aiuta) a chiedermi aiuto? Con quale faccia tosta ci si guarda allo specchio la mattina sapendo che si fa il teppistello per il web? Come si vive a 30, 40 o più anni sapendo che si ragiona come un bimbo di 5 anni? Riguardo l'incontro solitamente ho una specie di allergia alla gentaglia o i mocciosi, ma alle volte sono tentato di are un'eccezione. --Vituzzu (talk) 16:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Maria, ti sto seguendo dal mio computer. Confermo che con Vituzzu non si intavola alcun discorso. Avevi ragioni quando mi dicevi che non era il caso di parlargli personalmente faccia a faccia. Riconosco che ha un livello un poco troppo basso intellettualmente. Comunque siamo riusciti a fare bloccare 6 volte il Direktor, mentre alcuni "cretinetti" della wiki italiana come lui continuano a fare il gioco degli slavi. Luigi
Non hai idea piccolo di quanto rida a vedere le balle che ti racconti da solo ed anzi, il fatto che parli da solo! --Vituzzu (talk) 19:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
SEI PROPRIO UN PICCIOTTO CRETINETTO, VITUZZU BEDDU....questa volta non puoi VIGLIACCAMENTE cancellare e bloccare tutto (LOL), vero? Luigi.
Sei fortissimo XD --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Caro Vito, ti prego di prendere debita nota del fatto che il sottoscritto è il sig. Luigi28. Non sono sock di nessuno e nella wiki italiana scrivo col nome di Presbite. Purtroppo lo stesso meccanismo che ha portato qui dentro al blocco di Crisarco (fortunatamente rientrato) è quello che mi ha fatto bloccare a suo tempo, come sock di un certo Pio. Il meccanismo è sempre lo stesso: nella wiki inglese ruota attorno alle tematiche istriano/dalmate un gruppo di esagitati, che con le loro azioni hanno fatto ritenere tutti quanti dei pericoli per il progetto, conseguentemente il ban scatta praticamente "in automatico". Oramai la situazione si è incancrenita alquanto, anche perché gli esagitati di cui sopra mescolano nomi, fatti e dati. Lo stesso nome "Luigi" del presunto parente di Bruno, fa ritenere che questo "Luigi" sia in realtà "Luigi28", e così una volta in più vengo inserito in questo inestricabile vortice d'accuse. Qui nelle voci della Wiki inglese non ho più scritto nulla, limitandomi a singole frasi in qualche talk-page. In tal caso, faccio praticamente sempre capire chi sono, in modo da evitare d'essere confuso con qualcun altro. La cosa però non mi evita lo stesso d'essere confuso per questo o quel vandalo, e quindi non esiste nemmeno la lontana ipotesi che io ritorni a contribuire a questo progetto, anche se a suo tempo avevo sperato che qualcuno si accorgesse dell'errore fatto nei miei confronti. La cosa "simpatica" è che poi chi mi trascinò al ban ha successivamente riconosciuto che in realtà io non ero sock di nessuno, ma di fronte alla mia richiesta di dirlo ad un amministratore mi ha ribattuto che era meglio comunque che io fossi bannato. Ribadisco per l'ennesima volta: io qui ho scritto sempre e solo come "Luigi28" o col mio IP, che pur avendo io l'ADSL vedo che differisce spesso negli ultimi numeri. Ad ogni modo, inizia sempre con "151". E questo è tutto. Presbite/Luigi28--151.21.253.187 (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Secondo te confondo 'sto fesso con te? --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Concerned edits[edit]

If you're concerned about an IP's edits as you appear to be at Elia Pirone, you need to issue the appropriate warnings to the IP, either by hand on their talk page or using a script such as Twinkle. In addition, I notice most of your communication on this page is in Spanish Italian. Thanks. Shadowjams (talk) 09:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010[edit]

Information.svg I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elia Pirone in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elia Pirone, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 19:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Ciao[edit]

E grazie per i tuoi contributi nella Wikipedia in Inglese. Fammi sapere se vuoi che ti aiuti con DYK sugli articoli da tradurre dall'Italiano in Inglese. Tempo fa stavo vedendo per esempio che l'Accademia delle Belle Arti di Napoli aveva un bellissimo articolo in Italiano, ma nessun articolo in inglese. E' un peccato che l'Italia sia cosi poco presentata nel progetto inglese, ed in effetti avrebbe mille volte piu' contenuto da far vedere al mondo. Ti saluto come le persone anziane come me sogliono fare: "Tante belle cose", :-). --Sulmues (talk) 01:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)


COSA?![edit]

Io, sarei un sockpuppet di Tikary? Ma fammi il piaciere, toglimi il blocco!

C'è semplicemente stato un equivoco. NON sono io che cercate!! Per Favore, sbloccami! E Per Favore indicami anche i "motivi" del mio blocco. Ti do l'autorizzazione a copiare questo in dirizzo e-mail, paolo.caliego@alice.it per dirmi cosa è succeso e per elencarmi i tuoi "motivi" per cui mi hai bloccato. Hai fatto un errore! E NON TE LO PERDONO FINCHE NON MI SBLOCCHI!!!

Sonkir Blue--Sonkir Blue (talk) 10:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Sbloccami sono Onesto! E non farei mai del male! paolo.caliego@alice.it

Sonkir Blue--Sonkir Blue (talk) 10:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Aitna[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Aitna deletion. Thank you. —Tikiwont (talk) 12:24, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

There's now yet another thread related to this mess, at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Two politician pages,.....in WP? Its out.. Any comments you would like to make are welcome. Gavia immer (talk) 22:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Ti devo di' 'na cosa[edit]

Abbandono wikipedia, la mia ribellione l'ho fatta, se vedi qualche nome strambo in giro sappi che non sono io, se non c'è una "K" o "W", "Y", "V" non è un SP mio. Mi sono sempre comportato bene, sempre, nella mia vita reale. Non ho intenzioni di far del male a wikipedia, ma siete voi che mi avete costretto. Ho intenzione di chiedere un bel SCUSA grande grande, sia per il mio comportamento sciocco, sia perché ho intenzione di non avere nemici. Sembrerebbe l'ENNESIMA PRESA PER IL CULO, ma non è così. --Dr Claudio --87.7.81.244 (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User talk:Uishaki with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   13:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Spam[edit]

Hey, no it´s not true. He just asked me how to contact other members on here and i told him that it can be done on their specific talkpages, did not asked why. Just later i knew he had that forum and was just here for spaming, didn´t know that before. Via mail? I never heard that he does that and never ever suggested something like that, WP is not a place for spam. I reported him the last time as a sockpuppet and reverted some of his edits. Why are you asking? Kante4 (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, i read that and used google translator to understand it a bit. ;) But like i said i never said that and reported his spam and said on his talk page of one of his accounts that he needs to stop it because he was blocked several times and it is just annoying. Hope that it´s cleared up now. :) Kante4 (talk) 22:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Revert[edit]

Hey, I hope you are fine. You reverted my edits there, no reason was given. May I know the reason?

--Illahnou (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
What is the matter with that edit? --Illahnou (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Burmeseteetotalers and User:Karatemyintkywe[edit]

Sorry - Tags removed as not copyvios. They are both copied from pages in en.wikiversity.org, which is allowed. You are quite welcome to raise them at WP:SPI if you wish. I suspect http://www.knowledgerush.com used data from en.wikiversity.org. Please note, we do not blank pages with CSD#G12 tags - we cannot use the "Duplication Detector" report with a blanked page, pages are only blanked when you use the {{copyvio}} template, and it does it automatically for you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Spam[edit]

Please let me deal with it by myself. Thanks
--Nitsansh (talk) 17:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

For your info... Matteo was declared Persona non grata on my talk page. I hope he won't bother us anymore, though I doubt it... --Nitsansh (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User talk:109.117.190.31[edit]

Hello Vituzzu. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:109.117.190.31, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: talk pages should not be deleted. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Vituzzu. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
Message added 22:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

User_talk:Smartse#Problem_with_an_Administrator. SmartSE (talk) 23:46, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Oh and by the way - can't the forum name be added to an edit filter to stop anyone entering it? User:Beetstra would be able to fix it up for you pronto. SmartSE (talk) 23:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

RevDelete[edit]

Any reason you could not have jumped on IRC and requested a local administrator (I know there are some active) perform the RevDelete and then emailed an Oversighter instead of using your Steward tools to do so yourself? Tiptoety talk 17:55, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Missing people[edit]

I understand you decided to improve your knowledge of english wikipedia policies, but.. why don't you jump back on it.wiki IRC channel? --Theirrulez (talk) 02:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Vituzzu beddu[edit]

Scusa, Vituzzu beddu, ma qui bisogna collaborare a wikipedia imparzialmente, non fare i bloccatutto per ragioni politiche o antipatie personali (o perché ingiustamente "banditi" dalla rinomata cricca alla berlusca con bunga-bunga alla marijuana) Tra parentesi: ho anche creato la voce Donato Seppi nella wiki spagnola ed anche lí non ho avuto problemi....Solo in quella italiana viene cancellata....strano, ma vero (come nella famosa serie televisiva).B.D. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.77.108.169 (talk) 14:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

en.wp arbcom results[edit]

Hi,

thanks for posting. I caught an obvious error in AGK's totals. (141, not 241, opposes) Could you do a quick double check that there aren't other small typos? Thanks, Jd2718 (talk) 21:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I've done it for Vituzzu, see here. Regards, Trijnstel (talk) 21:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

photorealism[edit]

Scusa Vituzzu, perchè sono state cancellate alcune voci su "photorealism" in particolare Roberto Bernardi e Raphaella Spence che riportavano fonti molto molto attendibili?

--82.63.232.202 (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative[edit]

Hi Vituzzu,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


Article Feedback Tool newsletter[edit]

Sorry for the radio silence, guys :). I just wanted to let you know that we're planning on starting a new round of hand coding, which you can sign up for here. This will be the final round (honest!), and is basically because we found some really interesting results from the last round that blew our collective mind. It's important to check that they weren't a fluke, though, and so a bit more work is needed.

If you have any questions, drop a note on my talkpage - and if you know anyone who would be interested in participating, please tell them about it! We'll be holding an IRC training session in #wikimedia-office at 18:00 UTC on the 21st of March to run through the tool and answer any questions you may have. Thanks! :) Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your counter-vandalism action[edit]

Thank you.

Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 09:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

DAMMIT[edit]

YOUR KILLINGS ARE NOT OVER! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walang ng MegaFon (talkcontribs) 11:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

FIGHT FOR ONE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bago Pilipinas ng Laban (talkcontribs) 11:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
NOW! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apat ng GABRIELA (talkcontribs) 12:28, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Indeed. I'm sorry to see that you're Dragon2016. --Ferfrans SOAR (talk) 05:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool updates[edit]

Hey all. My regular(ish) update on what's been happening with the new Article Feedback Tool.

Hand-coding

As previously mentioned, we're doing a big round of hand-coding to finalise testing :). I've been completedly bowled over by the response: we have 20 editors participating, some old and some new, which is a new record for this activity. Many thanks to everyone who has volunteered so far!

Coding should actively start on Saturday, when I'll be distributing individualised usernames and passwords to everyone. If you haven't spoken to me but would be interested in participating, either drop me a note on my talkpage or email okeyes@wikimedia.org. If you have spoken to me, I'm very sorry for the delay :(. There were some toolserver database issues beyond our control (which I think the Signpost discussed) that messed with the tool.

New designs and office hours

Our awesome designers have been making some new logos for the feedback page :) Check out the oversighter view and the monitor view to get complete coverage; all opinions, comments and suggestions are welcome on the talkpage :).

We've also been working on the Abuse Filter plugin for the tool; this will basically be the same as the existing system, only applied to comments. Because of that, we're obviously going to need slightly different filters, because different things will need to be blocked :). We're holding a special office hours session tomorrow at 22:00 UTC to discuss it. If you're a regex nut, existing abuse filter writer, or simply interested in the feedback tool and have suggestions, please do come along :).

I'm pretty sure that's it; if I've missed anything or you have any additional queries, don't hesitate to contact me! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready![edit]

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

  • Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
    • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
    • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 21:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

HighBeam[edit]

Hi, I want to email your activation code, but your email is not set up. Please set it and enable it to receive emails at Special:Preferences. Or, contact me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com with your username. Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 23:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool office hours[edit]

Hey Vituzzu; just a quick note to let you know that we'll be holding an Office Hours session at 18:00 UTC (don't worry, I got the time right ;p) on 4th May in #wikimedia-office. This is to show off the almost-finished feedback page and prep it for a more public release; I'm incredibly happy to have got to this point :). Hope to see you there! Regards, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 03:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Addirittura...[edit]

Addirittura due blocchi di 1 mese al range in it.wiki solo perché ti ho fatto notare la tua smisurata voglia di protagonismo e la tua difficoltà ad intavolare un discorso costruttivo con i cosiddetti "avversari" virtuali... Certo che o sei una specie di Catone o devo aver colpito nel segno. Delle due l'una. E, guarda un po', ho i miei buoni motivi per optare per la seconda, anche dando un'occhiatina ai tuoi blocchi pregressi. Insomma, non è che tu sia granché collaborativo come admin. Se questo deve valere due blocchi al range per evasione del blocco, mi chiedo in che mani siamo. Contestualmente, mi chiedo per quale ragione tu mi abbia lasciato scorrazzare da IP tempo addietro (Shiva ha confermato) mentre adesso, magicamente, è evasione del blocco. Due pesi e due misure? O, per meglio dire, quando non si disturba il buon Vito passi (quasi) tutto mentre quando gli si rompe le scatole allora no? Dai, su, siamo seri. Rimuovi il blocco ai range che, per inciso, non danneggiano me, che vado di proxy e altri simpatici mezzucci clandestini, ma molti altri potenziali (ed effettivi) utenti che si vedono bloccati a causa della tua infantile permalosità. Rimuovi il blocco e dimostra la tua maturità. Thanks! --151.42.249.190 (talk) 18:07, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Non ti sembra che ti/mi prendi troppo sul serio? --Vituzzu (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Ho solo espresso una opinione come ne esprimo tante nel corso della mia giornata tipo. Solo che i miei interlocutori in RL non mi prendono mai a sberle, quando gli faccio notare alcune loro pecche. Vedi un po' tu... --151.42.120.108 (talk) 05:19, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool, Version 5[edit]

Hey all :)

Just a quick update on what we've been working on:

  • The centralised feedback page is now live! Feel free to use it and all other feedback pages; there's no prohibition on playing around, dealing with the comments or letting others know about it, although the full release comes much later. Let me know if you find any bugs; we know it's a bit odd in Monobook, but that should be fixed in our deployment this week.
  • On Thursday, 7th June we'll be holding an office hours session at 20:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. We'll be discussing all the latest developments, as well as what's coming up next; hope to see you all there!
  • Those of you who hand-coded feedback; I believe I contacted you all about t-shirts. If I didn't, drop me a line and I'll get it sorted out :).

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Cambio epocale da lancio del giavellotto a tiro del giavellotto[edit]

Scusa se ti disturbo Vito, ma tu ne sai qualcosa? Da quando ne io, ne Yiyi, ne Mattew666 partecipiamo più al Progetto Atltecica, il generossissimo Dre Rock fa da solo. Qui chiedo lumi, ma lui non entra spesso su en.wiki. Tu ne sai nulla? E soprattutto condividi? Pare che si sia fatto aiutare da Pil56 per qualche azione da bot, ma di voci come it:Atletica leggera ai Giochi della XXIX Olimpiade - Lancio del giavellotto maschile ce ne sono ad iosa. Cmq, nella sua talk (link a Treccani incluso), io spiego le mie perplesssità, esistessi su it.wiki sarebbe problema da Bar o da admin noticeboard. --Kasper2006 (talk) 13:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Mi intrometto nella discussione per una doverosa precisazione, dato che Kasper mi citava. Come si può evincere dalla cronologia di tiro del giavellotto, non sono io l'autore del "cambio epocale" da lancio del giavellotto a tiro del giavellotto ;) --Dre Rock (talk) 14:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Come ho già risposto nella tua talk, ne ho preso atto e mi sono rivolto a User_talk:Ysogo. Cmq aggiungo che lo spostamento è privo di fonti e che per gli inglesi discus, hammer e javelin sono throw mentre peso è shot e così era su it.wiki prima della formidabile autonoma decisione di Ysogo. --Kasper2006 (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

AFT5 release coming up - help us design a banner![edit]

Hey all :). First-off, thanks to everyone for all their help so far; we're coming up to a much wider deployment :). Starting at the end of this month, and scaling up until 3 July, AFT5 will begin appearing on 10 percent of articles. For this release we plan on sending out a CentralNotice that every editor will see - and for this, we need your help :). We've got plans, we know how long it's going to run for, where it's going to run...but not what it says. If you've got ideas for banners, give this page a read and submit your suggestion! Many thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Ri-complimenti.[edit]

Guarda che io non mi stanco di darti del pessimo sysop, eh. --151.42.120.96 (talk) 16:00, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Mario Magnotta[edit]

Hi. I've declined the WP:PROD proposal on Mario Magnotta because a user objected to the deletion by removing the PROD template. I noticed that you reverted that removal. While you may believe that the article should be deleted, any user is entitled to oppose a PROD and if this happens the PROD fails - the template should not be restored. You can read more about the process at WP:PROD.

If you still believe the subject of the article is not notable enough for Wikipedia, you can propose the article for deletion using the full WP:AfD process. Thanks. Whouk (talk) 21:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Excuse me?[edit]

Why are you removing info from my talk page? Even if this person is a long term spammer, it's still my choice to talk or not talk to this person. Besides that it's also my choice to have this information on my talk page or not. LindaSportGirl (talk) 17:45, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Article Feedback newsletter[edit]

Hey all!

So, big news this week - on Tuesday, we ramped up to 5 percent of articles :). There's been a lot more feedback (pardon the pun) as I'm sure you've noticed, and to try and help we've scheduled a large number of office hours sessions, including one this evening at 22:00 UTC in the #wikimedia-office connect channel, and another at 01:00 UTC for the aussies amongst us :). I hope to see some of you there - if any of you can't make it but have any questions, I'm always happy to help.

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 20:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

AFT5 newsletter[edit]

Hey again all :). So, some big news, some small news, some good news, some bad news!

On the "big news" front; we've now deployed AFT5 on to 10 percent of articles, This is pretty awesome :). On the "bad news", however, it looks like we're having to stop at 10 percent until around September - there are scaling issues that make it dangerous to deploy wider. Happily, our awesome features engineering team is looking into them as we speak, and I'm optimistic that the issues will be resolved.

For both "small" and "good" news; we've got another office hours session. This one is tomorrow, at 22:00 UTC in #wikimedia-officeconnect - I appreciate it's a bit late for Europeans, but I wanted to juggle it so US east coasters could attend if they wanted :). Hope to see you all there!

E vabbé...[edit]

Goditi pure la tua vacanza, ma non mettere i bastoncini tra le ruote alle persone che "lavorano"... ^_^

Oggi (ieri, a questo punto) mi sento di buon umore, quindi non farò né "il critico" né il "superiore et contento". Mi limiterò solo a dirti - fiato sprecato - di non bloccarmi. Sperando che stavolta tu recepisca il messaggio. Ma come puoi concentrare la tua attenzione su di me quando in giro ci sono fior fior di vandali e di troll (pure registrati)? Vabbé, buona vita. --151.42.248.93 (talk) 00:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

szechenyi baths hungary spam[edit]

I am waiting for your answer for 5 days and no answer... Strange. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpvisit (talkcontribs) 13:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC) Hi Vituzzu, I cna see you are an admin and I am not, I am new on wikipedia. But I think that what you were 'correcting' was too fast. Pleas have a closer look at the editing.

What is your reason to undo my edits? I honestly don't understand the reasons you did. OK, I am glad that you are helping Hungarian articles, so you love Hungary I guess.

The problem is my question is this: why did you put back the szechenyi link of the HotelStart Kft, and why did you put the other link on black list????

question 1

szechenyibath.com is NOT THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF SZECHENYI BATHS!

So please, do not restore it, ever. Szechenyibath.com is just a website, they want to sell hotel room in Budapest.

szechenyibath.com is just one of the many website of a Hungarian hotel company and the sites sell hotel rooms. The official website of all bath in Budapest (not the Racz bath which in shared property) is this: http://budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu/ I linked this site!! in English this http://www.budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu/en for Szechenyi Bath http://www.budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu/en/szechenyi/history

Almost all baths are own by the state. Not by Hotel Start kft.

The official site had an other official url, which they use in email, but the website was dead for maybe a year: spabudapest.hu

For few days spabudapest.hu was redirected to the other official url I wrote (!!! and also said in a comment, which you ignored): budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu

you can see the contact address (only on the Hungarian version): http://budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu/hu/szechenyi/elerhetoseg here you can see spabudapest.hu after the word kukac (the email signal in Hungarian)

szechenyibath.com is not official. Look: another website owned by hotelstart kft is gellertbath.com. Is it the official site? NO. Does it sell hotel rooms. YES. They also own budapest-parliament.com/ Wow. Another good website! What surprise. Is it the official Parliament site? NO. Does it sell hotel room. YES.

these sites are not the official sites. Neither szechenyibath.com nor gellertbath.com

You understand it now, please do not bring back a lame website which is not official. Just because is first place on search it is not the official website. And not even good. So I cannot digest any advantages to include the not official website, it is a fake official website.

question 2:

Is szechenyispabaths.com the official site? I am not sure. It looks good, good info. But on blacklist? Why? Because you like better the hotelstart kft web page? If you think that szechenyispabaths.com is not OK, and doesn't helps people, don't use it. I used it and I suggest it to friends because I believe that it is cool and the best info on web you get about Szechenyi my favorite bath. You dislike it and put it on the blacklist??? Why put it on the blacklist? Did you look into the hole situation or you started to just quickly do something because you are an administrator???

Put back at least the REAL official site on wikipedia.

Have a good day. If you have a question just ask. I am a Hungarian live in Hungary and can help you help better for Hungarian articles and clear away the spam. If I change anything in the Italian section, I would ask the local guys first and then edit things.

Gabor Takacs Bpvisit Bpvisit (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Ti sei dimenticato qualcosa (anche se non serve a niente...)[edit]

Ti sei dimenticato di richiedere l'eliminazione della voce Donato Seppi nella wiki tedesca....(;D)..... B.D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.77.106.232 (talk) 23:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

User:Omar-Toons[edit]

You globally locked this user's account for "massive crosswiki edit-warring", but the user immediately re-appeared with their alternate account User:Omar-toons, contining with the same disruptive behaviour. I've raised the issue here, but since I can't find the original discussion that led to the lock it might be helpful if you commented on the discussion. TDL (talk) 02:05, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Vituzzu. I am Miha of Croatia. I do not understand your question very well. I am sometimes editing Wikipedia in my school, so it is likely that I use IP address of somebody else. Be well.--Miha (talk) 12:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

This is not a newsletter[edit]

This is just a tribute.

Anyway. You're getting this note because you've participated in discussion and/or asked for updates to either the Article Feedback Tool or Page Curation. This isn't about either of those things, I'm afraid ;p. We've recently started working on yet another project: Echo, a notifications system to augment the watchlist. There's not much information at the moment, because we're still working out the scope and the concepts, but if you're interested in further updates you can sign up here.

In addition, we'll be holding an office hours session at 21:00 UTC on Wednesday, 14 November in #wikimedia-office - hope to see you all there :). I appreciate it's an annoying time for non-Europeans: if you're interested in chatting about the project but can't make it, give me a shout and I can set up another session if there's enough interest in one particular timezone or a skype call if there isn't. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

AFT5 newsletter[edit]

Hey all :). A couple of quick updates (one small, one large)

First, we're continuing to work on some ways to increase the quality of feedback and make it easier to eliminate and deal with non-useful feedback: hopefully I'll have more news for you on this soon :).

Second, we're looking at ways to increase the actual number of users patrolling and take off some of the workload from you lot. Part of this is increasing the prominence of the feedback page, which we're going to try to do with a link at the top of each article to the relevant page. This should be deployed on Tuesday (touch wood!) and we'll be closely monitoring what happens. Let me know if you have any questions or issues :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Kindness Barnstar Hires.png The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for explaining such problems in my talk page. Please also help me to respond on the sock. Have a nice day! :) Mediran talk to me! 12:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Blockbean[edit]

Before this notice,i have only beeen doing my job asa wikipedia editor. Why would i get blocked in my global account? Isn't the reason to put your information in wikipedia to provide useful information? my edits in the article separation of powers seem very resourceful and would like to know what is the reason. I have a PhD and that shows you that my intention is not to vandalize the page. Now i know there is a dissatisfaction and apparently you are one and thank you again for not blocking me but can't we all come into an agreement? If we can discuss this, then i am sure there can be peace and have a discussion with the people in aragonese, italian and spanish wikipedia. By the way, I am a multilingualist, so i know these languages for your concern. please reply.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 01:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC))

Really now, How are my statements meaningless, I even added more detailed information in the italian wikipedia, I added information (the purpose for this website) and I get punished for it. I told you i'm not here to vandalize, if you would clarify a bit more on detail, then I will consider your purpose, in fact, only the aragonese and spanish wikipedias blocked me, but it was from the mistake for not discussing it before i edit like the others articles, which is a mistake that i told you wont happen again, cheers.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC))
I happen to speak and write Italian, i'm multilingual and thank you for pointing out my mistakes. I will point out to the problem immediatly, as you will.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 00:21, 4 December 2012 (UTC))
I wonder and correct me if I'm wrong, but my statements are more longer than the original and you said [(Quote)"your short Italian text"] that my statements are short, then you might want to go over the two texts and see which text is longer and you will see that my text has by far more information, more details and more accuracy. And you know that i am putting the truth in here, and you revert me as i was someone who vandalizes, but i understand why you are concerned and i approve of you intentions, but just read my statement and you will see that it is more beneficial for the article, which is all i am trying to do. Anyways, i thank you for your concerning on how good my Italian grammar is and I appreciate you letting me know so i could fix the mistake, Thanks.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 00:46, 4 December 2012 (UTC))
----->
I understand your concern and yes I will let you know that my time has come to leave wikipedia, but what I don't quite understand is when you say that my sentences are meaningless if they are in perfect italian, and when you say that my statements have no sources at all, how come the original text doesn't have any sources either? I don't know if you are a historian, but i can tell you with great confidence that the original text has some grammar mistakes too and is not historically accurate. And if there is something you don't understand, tell me so i can know where to fix it and like i said, i know how to read and write italian as i did and showed in the text, so i don't see where the problem really lies and if there is a particular reason on what there is wrong with thenthings said in the text, then feel free to express what it is. and Oh, i see you blocked me without even reading my argument. Well i guess i can't stop you. But keep this in mind, you are not doing a very good job, your job is to see if the content in the text is historically accurate and apparently you only chose to block me because i just made a simple change on the article which is an abuse in your position and exaggerate my mistakes. Cheers. --(Slurpy121 (talk) 01:25, 4 December 2012 (UTC))
I do agree with you (to an extent), but some of the corrections, i do not agree, because the original text does contain some of the mistakes i have made and you went a bit more picky in my article ""(for example:, I did not say that the kings of Rome were overthrown in 509 ac, I'm saying that that is the traditional date according to Latin texts which say they were overthrown in the year 509. you say that that fact is incorrect, but That is what history says or at least what we know of the Romans. You say that that fact is incorrect, do you have any proof stating that the text is incorrect? If you say it with no background ((like the original text)), then you need to learn more about history, but if you have proof stating me wrong, then I would love to hear it)"", I do not understand why you were a bit picky by the looks of it, But what i can say (for now) is I am sorry, I am not a proud man like you say i am and i should have consulted you before editing and sorry for making you go through all that trouble, and i will be talking to you later, eventually. but cheers for now.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 04:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC))

No, ho capito quello che hai detto. Ho praticamente detto tutto sufficiente per il momento. Ho ancora non capisco perché si è rifiutate di riconoscere il testo fornito, sai che è vero. Il vostro compito è di mantenere wikipedia in buona forma e che comprende la fornitura di una buona informazione. Le informazioni del testo originale è spazzatura più o meno e una cosa mi ricordo dicendo è che la mia informazione non ha una fonte, ma neppure il testo originale. Come e detto, non voglio essere la modifica in wikipedia in qualunque momento presto. Ho riconosciuto quello che hai detto, ma ho ancora si rifiutano di credere che la ragione di mantenere l'eliminazione le mie modifiche, è solo perché per alcuni problemi di grammatica. So che c'è di più ad esso e se solo si sarebbe così gentile da spiegare, grazie :). Y antes que me olvide, crees que me puedas decir como entiendes muy bien el espanol? te lo agradeceria si me dirias en donde lo aprendiste hablar ;) --(Slurpy121 (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC))

I just have one question, If my editing had terrible grammar and bothered to make an effort to fix my comments and edits here, why didn't you bother to correct my edits in the article itself which would had been more simpler than the corrections you did in our discussion?--(Slurpy121 (talk) 04:34, 5 December 2012 (UTC))
The response you gave doesn't answer my question. You seemed to recover my messages pretty well. And I see you still haven't answered my question. --(Slurpy121 (talk) 02:25, 6 December 2012 (UTC))

Notice[edit]

I came here to let you know that i will edit the article Separazione dei poteri and just to be clear with you, i am editing this with letting you know that everytime i edit, i will first inform in the talk page of an article, so be aware of my actions and see my latest updates in the talk pages. So i will proceed to edit said page and if you will consider the changes, you will see a more broader explicit information in he article and see that my actions is only to help this page.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 02:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC))

Flavio Briatore[edit]

As I noted, if you want to improve the Italian Wikipedia's article, you can rescue the 16 sources that it cited before this began but that have been lost along the way, from the article's history. Uncle G (talk) 17:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

OpenVPN Private Tunnel is not an "open proxy"[edit]

OpenVPN Private Tunnel is a legitimate paid private VPN service. What's the policy/procedure for me, a rather long-term editor, to be able to edit securely out through a hostile firewall? Thanks. I've come to your talk page courtesy the stacked messages:

"You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. Editing from your IP address (50.117.78.137) has been blocked (disabled) on all Wikimedia wikis until 19:24, 11 September 2017 by Vituzzu" and
"You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are now not able to edit, move, or create them. Editing from 50.117.0.0/17 has been blocked (disabled) by DeltaQuad"

I got these messages while logged in normally to enWP, via OpenVPN. Seems like, if I'm logged in, it's me, and I should have my normal editing privileges, without restriction, no matter where I connect from. So, what's the next step? --Lexein (talk) 01:42, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

You want WP:IPBE. T. Canens (talk) 15:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Ok, but I have no information about OpenVPNs operation details, or exit node IP ranges. Thanks, though, off I go. --Lexein (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Update: action moved to User talk:Lexein. --Lexein (talk) 15:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

RE:Fonts[edit]

I was just checking out by adding some html codes to the common.css. You have my word, that will never happen again. I would suggest using Mv Elaaf Lite.otf.ttf as a suitable font for the dv.wiki. Regards --Glacious (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Chiara Galiazzo[edit]

Ciao! Scrivo in italiano perché ho visto che, come me, sei italiano e quindi ci capiamo meglio così. Sulla voce Chiara Galiazzo hai inserito il template che indica la necessità di copy editing. Visto che la pagina l'ho creata io e che sarei interessato a migliorarla, mi farebbe piacere se mi indicassi più precisamente cosa c'è da sistemare. Immagino di aver usato qualche costruzione grammaticale in inglesiano, ma non essendo madrelingua inglese non riesco ad individuare esattamente dove siano i problemi. Grazie! --Stee888 (talk) 13:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Legal threats?[edit]

Just saw your note at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldo Grippaldi. Are the threats from User:Unotretre or a sock-puppet? Others got the same. Thought you should know that the case was at WP:ANI on en.wiki last night. User:Dennis Brown was particularly good (an en.wiki admin). You might like to shoot him a note or raise it again at ANI - it has been there three times now, I don't think they would be surprised. Stalwart111 13:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I was actually inclined to remove it from the article - the company is clearly not notable so including it serves no encyclopaedic purpose. I will comment at your ANI thread. Stalwart111 14:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Commented so there's no need to ANI-template-message me. Consider me notified. Cheers, Stalwart111 14:32, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, that was about the previous ANI post, but I've mentioned this one on his talk page just so there's no concerns. Cheers, Stalwart111 23:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Back to the Topic?[edit]

Vituzzu! long time no see. I want to let you know, that our pending situation on the article on the Italian wikipedia, Separazione dei poteri, is still not over. Since I'm having trouble to put the accent marks on the paragraphs, I need your help (at least) to correct the accent marks of my article, and since I use an electronic translator to put the accent marks, it messes up the grammar, and rarely sometimes the spelling of my paragraph. I really do need your help to improve the article. Please be willing to spare a small amount of time on this. Thanks. (Slurpy121 (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC))

AFT5 newsletter[edit]

Hey all; another newsletter.

  • If you're not already aware, a Request for Comment on the future of the Article Feedback Tool on the English-language Wikipedia is open; any and all comments, regardless of opinion and perspective, are welcome.
  • Our final round of hand-coding is complete, and the results can be found here; thanks to everyone who took part!
  • We've made test deployments to the German and French-language projects; if you are aware of any other projects that might like to test out or use the tool, please let me know :).
  • Developers continue to work on the upgraded version of the feedback page that was discussed during our last office hours session, with a prototype ready for you to play around with in a few weeks.

That's all for now! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Block[edit]

I'm 24.139.122.193. I've been replacing instances on Wikipedia of my real name (which I foolishly used as a user name 5 years ago) with my current username. I don't see any harm in it. It's just to avoid these links popping up on Google search. Feedback 22:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Did you seriously revert all my edits? Not cool. Could you un-revert them please? Feedback 22:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

New Article Feedback version available for testing[edit]

Hey all.

As promised, we've built a set of improvements to the Article Feedback Tool, which can be tested through the links here. Please do take the opportunity to play around with it, let me know of any bugs, and see what you think :).

A final reminder that the Request for Comment on whether AFT5 should be turned on on Wikipedia (and how) is soon to close; for those of you who have not submitted an opinion or !voted, it can be found here.

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Free Territory of Trieste[edit]

Helo Vituzzu. If you have noticed a similar dispute on another Wikipedia such as the Italian, it would be helpful if you could summarize that in the SPI report. Also, it's easier to persuade admins here that some group is being disruptive if there is a clear statement on the article talk page of what the issues are and giving the evidence. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

On the sametopic, just thought I'd let you know. ViridaeDON'T PANIC 08:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

ciao[edit]

mi si è appena posato sul davanzale un corvo (sto a un piano alto e come animale fa veram paura, tra poco mi entrava in casa). vi ho pensato ah ah ah chissà come segno se è nefasto o meno :p scopriremo prossimi giorni/gironi infernali :p cobain4 --46.193.175.39 (talk) 12:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

ps leggiti come trattano monti sti galletti d me.r.d.a

http://italie.blog.lemonde.fr/2013/03/30/faute-de-gouvernement-giorgio-napolitano-prolonge-le-calvaire-de-mario-monti/ ah ah ah — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.193.175.39 (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at Adam Kadmon (character) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. JetBlast (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Vituzzu. You have new messages at JetBlast's talk page.
Message added 20:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JetBlast (talk) 20:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

mr p[edit]

http://www.google.com/#output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=adriano+prosperi&oq=adriano+prosperi

cazzo siamo ancora solo al terzo posto dietro a wiki ma davanti a treccani ihihih corvo rulez --46.193.175.39 (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi there.[edit]

Thought you may want to take a look at this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Katy_Perry#Don.27t_edit_on_the_Italia_wiki.21.21

VelvetViolet44444444 (talk) 07:33, 4 July 2013 (UTC)VelvetViolet44444444

I will ask for damages[edit]

I am astonished to see that I am accused of being a sockpuppet. I am even outraged because I feel humiliated with this accusation. An accusation of being "user Brunodam" without proof, even if I offered to submit my personal data. I demand justice. I am going to complain to the "Better Business Bureau of Florida" and to the Police department of Fort Lauderdale, following instructions from my attorney about this clear case of harassment & offense. I will ask for damages. Junior5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.46.252.98 (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Antagonism[edit]

Vituzzu, I would like to address this antagonism that's being displayed, and open the door to the possibility of constructive collaboration. It strikes me that your views regarding my behavior are likely founded on what Sig. D'Ambrosio has to say. Please understand that "excessive nationalism" is hard to perceive objectively. What may seem to you as "nationalist POV-pushing" - may seem to me to be the restoration of neutrality in the face of excessive nationalism of another kind.

I have read much of what Bruno has to say regarding myself and others who opposed against his edits. And while your view on the matter, perhaps influenced by Brunodam's slanderous fabrications, may be different, I myself do not believe it is accurate to describe me as a "Croatian nationalist". In fact, I am more than half Italian by ancestry. My attitude years ago was different, I agree, but I feel it was primarily a reaction against the shocking and brutal slant introduced by the likes of Giovanni Giove and Brunodam. I was also a significantly younger man.

I am now, I dare say, a reasonably "respectable" Wikipedian with well over 45,000 edits, who's primary objective is to expand and improve the project, following sources in the most unbiased and scientific way possible (indeed, I hope to earn a PhD reasonably soon :)).

Case in point, my edit on FTT. I came there to edit the article to fix its erroneous coa and wrong infobox. I switched the language order as a side-edit, and was annoyed to see it reverted apparently for no real reason. I was wrong there and it was rash of me to revert you. I didn't regard you as a serious editor - I most sincerely apologize. Please note I stopped reverting relatively early on and brought the matter to talk. Whether you believe me or not, the reasons why I switched the languages were as follows:

  • Historical: Zone B was administered by Yugoslavia in general, not just its Slovene republic. The majority language in Yugoslavia was Serbo-Croatian (which is another name for Croatian). It was also the exclusive language used in all federal government administration, as well as the military. I thought it logical to have the main Yugoslav language listed up front in a territory administered by Yugoslavia as a whole.
  • Contemporary: Only a relatively small chunk of the FTT is part of Slovenia in modern times. Whereas its largest part is today in Croatia.
  • Finally, I thought that in either case it would be neutral to have an alphabetical order.

Please note these rationales are not mutually exclusive, and all three were more or less on my mind when I off-handedly edited the languages.

In conclusion, however, let me say in case you misinterpret this, that I am not the least bit threatened by your demening insults and repeated threats. Nor am I really that insulted, or I would have reported you on grounds of WP:NPA immediately. I merely understand that my reverts were inappropriate, and that I am at least partially guilty for thusly re-enforcing the slanderous preconceptions Brunodam and/or his cronies may have instilled. I feel bad about that, and would like to see if I can redress the damage. Best regards, -- Director (talk) 13:31, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

I hope you will realize I am certainly not like the maniac Brunodam, or at least, not as bad :). That was the comment that most struck me as inappropriate. I knew the guy, and for one thing - sources have an actual impact on my position (plus I keep my sockpuppets to a reasonable 200 or so :)-- Director (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

RFC/U discussion concerning Direktor[edit]

Hello, Please be aware that a user conduct request for comment has been filed concerning Direktor's conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry is located at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Direktor, where you may want to participate. It is the first time that I file a RFC/U so all my apologies for the improper use of the template and syntax. You are welcome to participate. I hope that with the help of other users both Direktor and I can start working again with proficiency. --Silvio1973 (talk) 13:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Banned for 4 years?[edit]

I recently went to my account in Persian Wikipedia and I saw this message: Your IP had been closed for all wikis by Vituzzu (meta.wikimedia.org). reason: Open proxy: hosting on OVH + spam from 5.135.13.188. I use a proxifier software in my connection to the net because we don't have free access to the useful science sites in Iran which we need for editing the Wikis articles. I ask you to set my account free. I have been in Persian Wiki for more than 5 years. This is my address: http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1:Bbadree Bbadree (talk) 05:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Voce "Free Territory of Trieste"[edit]

Buongiorno. Segnalo che la voce "Free Territory of Trieste" nella versione inglese di Wikipedia è stata bloccata nella versione falsificata dagli indipendentisti. Già nelle scorse settimane queste incursioni si sono rimanifestate, anche da parte di un croato ("DIREKTOR") che insisteva nell'includere il serbocroato tra le lingue ufficiali del fu territorio libero (cosa che non è mai stata) e nell'indicare come stati predecessori Jugoslavia e Regno Unito (confondendo evidentemente sovranità e occupazione militare). Poi è arrivato uno che modificava sistematicamente l'intera voce in senso indipendentista con la motivazione che "visto che non c'è nessuna supervisione seria su questa voce tanto vale continuare a scherzare". Ora qualcuno ("Mark Arsten") lo ha preso sul serio e ha bloccato la pagina nella veste indipendentista. Ci sarà un modo per fare finire questo triste e penoso carosello, portato Avanti con zelo degno di miglior causa da Quattro scalmanati patetici che col loro operato offendono la stragrande maggioranza dei triestini? Grazie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tergestinus (talkcontribs) 07:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Tancredi AfD[edit]

Ciao Vituzzu. Thank you for cleaning up there but we don't remove such comments from AfD pages. They are useful for the closing administrator to decide upon the outcome of the discussion. If clearly inappropriate, we strike a post by wrapping<s></s> around it. On the other hand, This SPI may also be of interest to you. De728631 (talk) 00:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

OK, ReaperEternal has now blocked the lot of them and semi-protected the AfD page. I didn't know you're a steward that's why I was a bit surprised that you locked the accounts. De728631 (talk) 01:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Proof?[edit]

Before you reverse this and block me, I would like to know why you globally blocked AcidBurnRose4, and did you have any proof? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B103:ADAB:0:0:0:103 (talk) 11:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

I see that you are edit warring on Alessandro Taverna. Please don't. As you know, edit warring can lead to a block. The king of the sun (talk) 16:18, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Also, any user can contest a speedy deletion nomination, not just an administrator. The king of the sun (talk) 16:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter[edit]

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

Eurasian Eagle-Owl Maurice van Bruggen.JPG

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

You were mentioned here ("You've been denounced to the Florida Police") Yours, Quis separabit? 16:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

And here Quis separabit? 19:11, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding motion granting temporary local CheckUser permission to Arbitration Committee Election Scrutineers[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

For the purpose of scrutineering the 2013 Arbitration Committee elections, stewards User:Mathonius, User:Vituzzu, User:Matanya, and User:Tegel, appointed as scrutineers, are granted temporary local CheckUser permissions effective from the time of the passage of this motion until the certification of the election results.

For the Arbitration Committee, Bbb23 (talk) 18:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Discuss here

Compartment syndrome editing issues[edit]

Hi Vituzzu, I've been trying to edit the Compartment syndrome page and each time I do it says that I cannot because you made some kind of block regarding cross-wiki abuse? I have no idea what cross-wiki abuse is, so, if you could explain what is going on and why I am unable to edit this page, I would really appreciate it. As far as I know, I haven't been breaking rules on Wikipedia and no one has said anything to the contrary. If this is some mistake, please let me know and take whatever action you need to in order to fix this. I appreciate it =) TylerDurden8823 (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey[edit]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

ACE2013[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Vituzzu. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

GiantSnowman 19:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Thank you for your time and effort in scrutinizing the 2013 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee elections. Your attention to detail and expertise were greatly appreciated. v/r - TP 13:49, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Željko and Croatia[edit]

They are deleting evidence on your talk page, so see that for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.133.149.188 (talk) 17:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


176.9.146.244 Block ?![edit]

Hey! Just noticed that you blocked 176.9.146.244. It is indeed a Hetzner server, but this IP has been under my control for two years. Is it part of a larger netblock ban or was there really spam from that IP? If so, I have a problem. :( Thomas Auge (talk) 18:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks...[edit]

...for helping out with the ARBCOM elections.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy new year.79.31.61.252 (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of WikiFM for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WikiFM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiFM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

  • I'd originally speedied this, but there was a request to let it run through a formal AfD, which seems like a fair request. In any case, I thought I should let you know. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
  • BTW, next time please let the original editor know that the page is up for a speedy deletion. It's not required, but it is a nice gesture to do. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Voce "Free Territory of Trieste"[edit]

Tra il 25 e il 27 gennaio ho apportato alcune modifiche, in particolare ho tolto la bandiera jugoslava dagli stati predecessori, dal momento che si parla di un territorio che fino al 1947 apparteneva nella sua totalità al Regno d'Italia, e ho poi riformulato alcune frasi nell'introduzione in modo che fosse chiaro che il Territorio libero di Trieste come entità statuale non è in realtà mai nato, poiché la sua nascita era subordinata all'entrata in vigore dello statuto permanente, della quale era precondizione la nomina del governatore, nomina che - come è noto - non ebbe mai luogo. Il Territorio libero di Trieste come stato si trovava insomma in una condizione paragonabile a chi, iscrittosi alla scuola superiore, compie tutto il ciclo di studi fino a essere ammesso alla maturità ma poi non sostiene l'esame, e quindi rimane con il titolo di terza media. La versione da me modificata coincideva del resto - nello spirit se non nella lettera - con quanto si può leggere nella voce italiana. Ora però le mie modifiche sono state cancellate. Come mai? Grazie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tergestinus (talkcontribs) 16:39, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Stop[edit]

2nd opinion requested: Mareklug talk 07:53, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop removing all main space linking to Marek Lugowski or outright censoring article content that refers validly to this person. For example, you have removed a sentence describing this person's academic published research as described by a separate chapter in the book of which article you edited to this end. You claim that the edits you are undoing constitute self promo. Whatever evidence you may offer for that opinion, and it is only your opinion, the facts are that a) the content you remove is encyclopedic and not out of tune with the rest of the article content. When the user whom you are suppressing is being described by an entire book chapter, a reprint of a standalone Scientific American column that went into published circulation globally when it was published, and not just in English, as Scientific American is translated into twenty languages, including Chinese and Italian, and read by literally tens of millions of non-English speakers, your edit appears to be off. Furthermore, b) the person in question is notable, and his BLP is being prepared by an experienced Wikipedian. When it goes on line in March 2014, all the red links you are removing (as well as content!) will instantly become blue links/undisputedly encyclopedic. I request you stop your disruptive edits and allow the Wikipedia process to hash out this issue on its own. Just don't edit in this area anymore, as your edits have merely the net effect of censoring and impoverishing valid main space content, without bringing any tangible benefit to Wikipedia, and your censure of User:Mareklug across several WMF projects by now has all the appearances of stalking and unreasonable policing. As you find yourself on record branding in a discussion on meta on the user's talk page him a "spammer", you are in an adversarial relationship with him, not to omit, failing to assume good faith, especially as the user continues to produce good content (just did major housekeeping on Commons in commons:Category:Commesso (art technique), which he created, and just entered a new article on English Wikipedia, a BLP of a Hopi silversmith and jeweler, and uploaded to Commons a rare heretofore unavailable media of the artist's work. You are a steward, and an experienced Wikipedian as well as an administrator on other WMF project, therefore you should not have to have this explained. I hereby request a second opinion in this matter. Cordially, --Mareklug talk 07:53, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

External Links[edit]

Vituzzu, you left a message on my talk page regarding External Links. I suggest you actually look at the single external link I left. Your remark was inappropriate. EJT (talk) 12:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

I have replied to your last comment on my talk page.EJT (talk) 10:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Designer links to FMD[edit]

Ciao Vituzzu, I've answered to your accusation regarding links to designer profiles being spam. Please let me know your thoughts and you are welcome to suggest me how to do it better. ► robomod 12:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Ciao ancora, sarebbe possibile chiudere l'incidente visto che non abbiamo chiarito le cose prima come visto qua: "Before posting a grievance about a user here, please discuss the issue with them on their user talk page." Mi piacerebbe sapere per quale motivo si dovrebbe punire un intero portale per colpa di una persona singola. Inoltre ti invito a leggere o a vedere i links che avevo messo nella discussione. Grazie e auguri ► robomod 17:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

OER inquiry[edit]

Hi Vituzzu, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Portmahomack[edit]

Ok, now I found out that User:48Utilisateur is Brunodamm. I appreciate that you clean up after him in particular since I had run-in with that user myself recently and on that note I'd like to point out that User:Cresthaven might be another socket of the same guy. Originally I had an edit conflict/disagreement with Cresthaven at Diana Veteranorum and User:48Utilisateur got created exactly in that time and got immediately involved in the conflict.

With regard to Portmahomack however 48Utilisateur's edit there was already discussed (see article's talk page) and essentially corrected by User:Ben MacDui and your deletion removed Ben MacDui's correction. So unless you do not see any additional problem with the content and its source, the article should be reset ro Ben MacDui's version. The section on the Roman camp however could be deleted.--Kmhkmh (talk) 16:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Kmhkmh, as you may know Brunodam has a very very strong Italian nationalistic (with a fascist flavour) POV and all of his edits are meant to pursue it. I also tend to do anything possible to frustrate all its actions. So, this revert won't weaken my effort but let's say I'm not completely sure about re-inserting those contents. Ciao! --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I hope it is ok that i moved your comment here, simply to keep the conversation in one threat. With regard to Portmahomack I suggest to remove 48Utilisateur's original edit, rather than the part that was corrected User:Ben MacDui. In practice that means reverting your edit and remove the section on the Roman camp. If 48Utilisateur's intent was to push Italian nationalism via exaggerating the extend of the Roman empire, he'll be utterly frustated because the article won't contain any reference to the Romans anymore.
Personally I didn't come across Brunodam before 48Utilisateur and the latter accopunt is only 2 weeks old. My concrete issue 48Utilisateur was not related to the pushing of any nationalist views but rather with insufficient sourcing and falsely summarizing sources---Kmhkmh (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)