User talk:Wcquidditch/Archive2

Dumah (band)

Hi, I noticed you removed the PROD from this and applied a speed tag. Fair enough on the speedy, but you might have been better to leave the prod. If an admin decides that it does not meet the speedy criteria, and removes the tag, the article will then have to be sent to AfD. If you'd left the prod tag, and added the speedy, it may still have been speedied - but if not, then PROD would have deleted if no-one objected. Hope that makes sense.--Doc ^ask? 16:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Well... it's still a new process... I'm not 100% used to it! --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

OK, I was just pointing it out. --Doc ^ask? 17:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

OK. Well, thanks for this reminder. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 6th

The Wikipedia Signpost has been updated for February 6th. Ral315 (talk) 03:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Deletion templates

I don't know if this ever came up before, but the changes you made a little while ago to templates such as Template:Ifd, Template:Afd, Template:Afdx, Template:Md1, and Template:Cfd don't work in other skins (at least, for example, Cologne Blue). I'm not bothered by this (I use Monobook usually), but someone else might be. You might want to see about getting the Javascript that handles this included in the other skins (or, alternately, finding out if there's a way to make the instructions show by default if the Javascript isn't present). If this has been brought up before, my apologies. =) —Locke Cole • t • c 23:50, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

This was discussed on Template talk:Afd back in December, two months ago. See the bottom of this discussion, specifically after Cryptic says that it doesn't work outside of monobook. So, it has indeed been brought up in the past. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 13th

The Wikipedia Signpost has been updated for February 13th. Ral315 (talk) 06:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Annette Steigerwald

I removed the speedy tag from this article, as I don't think A7 is enough in this case. You could try AfD, of course. I also wikified the article...hopefully some well-meaning stub builder will wander by and improve it. —BorgHunter ^ubx (talk) 01:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I'll leave it be, then... --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 20th

The Wikipedia Signpost has been updated for February 20th. Ral315 (talk) 05:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Why not be an admin?

You would be a good admin, from what I've seen of you in the last hour, you could delete articles yourself, and free up the rest of us to do other stuff! If you're interested, I'll nominate you in a couple of months.--File Éireann 17:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Maybe, maybe not, who knows. Sometimes even userboxes can become inaccurate info. Stay tuned... --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 27th

The Wikipedia Signpost has been updated for February 27th. Ral315 (talk) 04:20, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Hi

Stop removing content from Wikipedia on The Weather Channel, it is considered vandalism, if you want to experiment with the sandbox for any tests, do it there.

Note: I am going to put back the link, it was deleted.

65.54.xxx.xxx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.54.154.13 (talk • contribs) 20:25 March 1, 2006 (UTC).

Uh... --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th.

The Wikipedia Signpost has been updated for March 13th. Ral315 (talk) 07:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Signpost updated for March 20th.

The Wikipedia Signpost has been updated for March 20th. Ral315 (talk) 06:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

WSBE-TV - Listing

The WSBE-TV is for the TV Channel 1 article --- Wikipedia in progress. I am sorry that you fail to see why an old South Bend, Indiana station that was originally assigned these FCC call letters int he 1940s. Before being very sorry --- look at the links next time ..("but I don't know what it is..."). You have been added to my potential "vandal" list.

PLEASE ASK BEFORE REVERTING IN FUTURE. -- Greg Beat 16:13 25 March, 2006 (UTC)

Now, yes, I understand that mention can be made in the Channel 1 article. I simply noted that it is likely just a coincidence that the WSBE in South Bend from the 1940s happened to share the same call letters with a current PBS member station, and that the two stations' histories are unrelated. That said, I could make some mention somewhere in the WSBE-TV article... and, by the way, I tried my best to assume good faith, even if this didn't turn out as I expected. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:31, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 27th.

The Wikipedia Signpost has been updated for March 27th. Ral315 (talk) 01:36, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

mall guidelines

Since you expressed interest, can I invite you to look over the proposal(s) we want to submit to public consideration? It's here: User:Youngamerican/Indoor shopping malls. Feel free to edit the text or to comment at the bottom of that page. - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 18:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

The comment has been made. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:12, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I know they're contradictory - the idea is to let people recraft them, and then gauge the response. Hopefully, the people of WP have a clear preference for one vs. the other. - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 23:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Hmm... well, I will let consensus develop before I'll make my decision. I understand the intent, however. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

If you have any ideas about notability guidelines, feel free to add them. Crzrussian and I tend to be a bit stubborn on what we each personally feel on the topic, so we need all kinds of imput to gather such a consensus. youngamerican (talk) 04:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

I really don't have any... but we'll see. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 13:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The above talk page is preserved as an archive of the discussions. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the user's current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.