User talk:Whowhat1121

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Dwyane Wade has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 23:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

{{|unblock|made a mistake yo, no need for this, and plus considering he IS going to Miami, seems i was right anyway}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whowhat1121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

made a mistake yo, no need for this, and plus considering he IS going to Miami, seems i was right anyway

Decline reason:

I've reviewed your contribution history, and I found only vandalism, the addition of your personal opinions, and the addition of unsourced or inappropriately sourced information. I wasn't able to find any useful edits, so the evidence so far indicates that unblocking you is not likely to lead to a better encyclopedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|if you are not going to unblock it(unfairly since only what 2 edits were 'false'), why not delete the account then?}} Accounts are not ordinarily deleted, and you might make more useful edits when your block expires. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:42, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your unblock request here, since it applies to your previous block, and not your current block. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for first edit upon expiration of block was vandalism. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:45, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whowhat1121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

rofl i didn't even realize I could edit until i just typed whatever since you said you wouldn't unblock then it randomly accepted it to go through? the hell was that? either way, i don't see how you block me when i'm already blocked :-X

Decline reason:

I see no evidence that unblocking you would lead to an improvement of this website, encyclopedia, or indeed, society in general. TN X Man 02:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, that's not what happened. Your 24-hour block expired, and you vandalized my user page with your first edit, so I re-blocked you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your version of the story is plausible, but there's very little point in my unblocking you if you don't know how to make a useful edit, because I'll just have to block you again. Are you able to explain your plan for editing differently in the future? (You might find WP:V and WP:NPOV helpful, if you aren't sure.)-FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|vandalism "willful wanton and malicious destruction of the property of others", yes that's clearly "ff" or whatever it was clearly was, it clearly destroyed your page, destroy it so much that I wasn't even sure it was there without searching for it. *THUMBS UP BRO*}} I already told you- I believe you when you say that was an accident of your not realizing you were unblocked, but your edits have been of such poor quality so far that I would really like to know that you are familiar enough with the rules to make good edits in the future. What will you differently in the future? (Reviewing admins, I have strep throat and I'm going to bed, so if he gives a reasonable one-sentence explanation of WP:V and WP:NPOV, which are the two rules he's breaking in every edit I looked at, feel free to unblock for me)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Dichol.svg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Dichol.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 23:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Failure. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 19:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Lost (TV series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. the wub "?!" 15:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Heroes (TV series). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 15:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]