User talk:WikiDan61

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Please post all new discussions at the END of the page, to allow for easier chronological tracking! Thank you! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Arjun Tendulkar should be on wikipedia[edit]

At least he is notable celebrity whatever of sachin tendulkar he has done great thing in cricket as there are only few of cricketer of age 14 who has got this type of achievment that arjun and there are many fake pages on wikipedia which you are not deleting i am giving you one page link that is pure a fake and is on wikipedia how see this ---

And I request you to not delete the article of Arjun but as you wish what you want will do .

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khadeeralisk (talkcontribs) 13:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

@Khadeeralisk: I will say again that if you wish to weigh in on the deletion of this article, you must do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arjun tendulkar. What you say here will have no impact on that discussion: I will not be the one to delete the article; rather an administrator will weigh the opinions given at the Articles for deletion page against Wikipedia policies to decide whether the page stays or goes. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


why are you being so persistent in deleting accurate information?

it is entirely obvious that the name 'real sally mason' is NOT impersonating anyone

please stop trolling — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Real Sally Mason (talkcontribs) 04:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


Hey buddy. Why you deleting my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DennisCMP225 (talkcontribs) 18:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

@DennisCMP225: You created an article about your computer class. There is no indication that this class meets the criteria for inclusion. Although anyone can edit Wikipedia, that does not mean that any topic you choose to write about will be appropriate. Only topics that have been demonstrated to be notable based on significant coverage in independent sources are included in Wikipedia.

As for your contention that "need it for our class grade. We add content on wednesday", that is unfortunate, but it doesn't change the fact that all articles must meet the criteria for inclusion or face deletion. If your teacher has asked you to create a Wikipedia article specifically about this class, then your teacher has given you a poor assignment, and should be directed to WP:School and university projects in order to better understand how to use Wikipedia in an academic situation. If, on the other hand, your teacher has told you to create a new Wikipedia article, and the topic you chose was your own class, then the failure is yours for choosing a poor topic. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop leaving me messages[edit]

S'il vous plaît arrêter de me laisser des messages comme celui-ci, je ne trouve pas les divertissant, mais je me sens comme vous vous êtes introduit chez moi et que estampage autour comme si vous êtes un cheval géant avec de grands pieds lourds. Karle Stymon (talk) 16:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Translating the above message from French to English (this is the English Wikipedia, we use English here, thanks!):
Please stop leaving me messages like this, I do not find them entertaining, but I feel like you have entered my home and stamped around like a giant horse with big heavy feet.
@Karle Stymon: I will stop leaving you messages when you stop creating inappropriate articles. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

GOCE October 2014 newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors October 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights:

– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Benjamin Walter and Pink Zone[edit]

Hi, why on earth are Pink Zone and Benjamin Walter still being deleted ? I gave wikipedia my copyright ownership ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 22:32, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Most recently, the articles were deleted because it was obvious that the creator of the articles had created a new account in order to evade a block placed on an earlier account, which is against the rules. Then, using this illegal account, the creator create these articles, which, having been created by a blocked user in violation of their block, were eligible for speedy deletion for this reason alone. However, on a deeper level, the articles were deleted for being spammy articles about a not particularly notable film by an almost completely non-notable director. Copyright issues had nothing to do with the matter, although it is generally pointless to donate copyrighted material from your film's website as the material is guaranteed to be promotional. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brandon Auret, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aladdin (musical). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Omid Soltani's Nomination for Deletion[edit]

--Victoria Herrera 08 (talk) 12:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, WikiDan61. You have new messages at Victoria Herrera 08's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi WikiDan61 , you are free to edit the article Omid Soltani to correct all my mistakes in the said article. Just to make sure that my work has no more mistakes. Thank You.

A little piece of advice[edit]

Dear Sir what if i make some amends to the article and then delete the speedy deletion tag. Would it be ok? My Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rangergirl34 (talkcontribs) 13:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Since Educate My Girl has already been deleted once based on a valid AFD discussion, recreating it one day later may be problematic. Your best plan, if you insist on moving forward, and if you are not eventually blocked as a sock of Nandinigoel.india (talk · contribs) as I suspect you will be, is to create a draft article at either Draft:Educte My Girl or at User:Rangergirl34/Educate My Girl, and then, once you have gotten it into a form you think is ready, submit it through the articles for creation process. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:24, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Dear Sir. This is the link to the fundraiser we did an year back. . I hope this might be a little proof of our notability. Regards. Waiting for your honoured decision. --Rangergirl34 (talk) 13:49, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
@Rangergirl34: No, that is no proof at all. All charitable organizations hold fundraisers; that doesn't make them notable. And again, because this article has already been through a deletion discussion, I suggest you consider creating a draft article with all the sources you can find, and then allow that article to be reviewed. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[edit]

Hello WikiDan,

Thanks for getting back with me. Yes, I am affilitated however I do understand that neutrality is key to Wikipedia and therefore I wrote the post in a very neutral manner. I am not trying to make an advertisement simply posting an informational page. I do have some interesting info and facts to add including that fact that our parent company has the oldest shoe store in the United States along with some other interesting historical information. I didn't have time to write a long post today and plan on completing the article later this week. Would it be worth my time or will it not be within the Wikipedia guidelines due to the fact that I am affilitated? Thanks for the help and info!

-Brady Stout — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albstout (talkcontribs) 19:56, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

@Albstout: It sounds to me like the parent store might be more notable (as the oldest shoe store in America) than the website (but only if that factoid can be verified). My suggest would be to write your article as a draft (at Draft:Stout Shoes or similar title) and then submit for review through the articles for creation process. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:15, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, WikiDan61. You have new messages at CRamsby's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CRamsby (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

ComVey deletion[edit]

Dear WikiDan61,

My name is Dan Miklosz, I am the founder/CEO of the startup ComVey.

You motioned to delete the short article I proposed to upload about my company, ComVey.

I would greatly appreciate if you would change your stance on this issue. We will begin testing ComVey this November and anything on the internet about us will help greatly. When people see the businesses we are testing with and google us, if they can see our Wikipedia page that would leave a great impression.

If you stand firm that this article is not a best fit for Wikipedia, what can I do to make it to a point where Wikipedia would accept it.

Email me for a fast response:

Best regards,

Dan Miklosz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djmiklosz (talkcontribs) 14:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

@Djmiklosz: Wikipedia does not exist for your to promote your product. All topics at Wikipedia must meet the general notability guidelines which state that the topic must have been the subject of multiple instances of significant coverage from independent sources. A software application, written by a group of students, and not yet even tested or fielded, is unlikely to have received such coverage, as indicated by the fact that your Wikipedia page appears to be the only information available about your application. Come back when you've launched your product and received any significant press for it, and then perhaps an article can be created. Also note that, as the CEO of the company, you have a fairly obvious conflict of interest. Your desire to promote your product is not in line with Wikipedia's aim not to promote products. Therefore, you may not be the best person to create the article about this product. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

How about the article written like this, or should I erase the company's vision aswell?

The Management School London[edit]

The group was established in 1980 and has over 30 years of global experience developing programmes for executives worldwide, across a diverse industry mix. The school has operational bases in Europe, United States of America and Africa.

The following schools are members of The Management School London:

  • The International School of Public Relations
  • The International School of Marketing
  • The International School of Banking and Finance
  • The international School of Management

The Management School London vision is: “to be a centre of excellence – a professional and credible institution – working in the public interest, and supporting the achievement of the national and international economic development goals. “ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tmsprogrammes (talkcontribs) 14:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

@Tmsprogrammes: That's a lovely ad; it has no place on Wikipedia. And your username indicates that you probably have a significant conflict of interest. Let it lie or request an article and let someone else write it. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Creative Sciences[edit]

You're killing me. Not sure how to make the page more legit. I've cited the only source on the internet using the term in a way that actually refers to a theoretical practice. I know it points to a book seller, but I'm not sure of a better way to cite printed materials. The rest of the definition comes from Campbell Mithun who hasn't made it available online yet, but will be releasing materials that can be cited soon (at which point I'll link the citations to the media making reference).

It's obvious I'm not just trolling the internet (there are plenty of other places to do that ... and really would I troll with Creative Sciences).

I think it would be helpful that instead of citing obscure guidelines buried among thousands of pages on Wikipedia - you could offer some input about what parts of the post that don't follow the strict rules of Wiki. I also wouldn't be opposed to you taking a stab at offering some edits.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreux2014 (talkcontribs) 22:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

@Andreux2014: The problem is that "Creative Sciences" appears to be one company's term for their particular brand of marketing science. It is not a generally accepted term used in any consistent manner. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 00:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)