User talk:Wikidemon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Wikidemo)
Jump to: navigation, search


Hey Wikidemon. Sorry, I deleted the content on the other page again. It is extremely bias for Acme, clearly. I noticed that you were the one who did the page for Acme as well. Yaboi9181 (talk) 00:57, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Discussion invitation[edit]

British Royalty Hi Wikidemon, I would like to invite you and anyone watching who shares an interest in moving forward constructively to a discussion about Biographies of Living People

New editors' lack of understanding of Wikipedia processes has resulted in thousands of BLPs being created over the last few years that do not meet BLP requirements. We are currently seeking constructive proposals on how to help newcomers better understand what is expected, and how to improve some 48,000 articles about living people as created by those 17,500 editors, through our proper cleanup, expansion, and sourcing.

These constructive proposals might then be considered by the community as a whole at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people.

Please help us:

Proposal[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Wikidemon. You have new messages at Talk:List of Jewish actors.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Notice[edit]

craigslist[edit]

Spam, harassment[edit]

Posters can choose to anonymize there email address to a temporary craigslist address, who will then relay any messages sent to that address to the poster's actual email address. Replying to a post, email address will be visible to the poster. The same Flagging group of individuals using sending addressing only once also send spam in mass to posters inundating there inbox with what look like blank responses These messages have the potential of having Javascript or embedded objects in there e-mails.57 Craigslist posters have also reported the tracking cookie (Ad.yieldmanager.com) and (207.net)in there browser history.

http://www.craigslist.org/about/anonymize

http://www.craigslist.org/about/help/replying_to_posts

http://www.spywareremove.com/removeAdyieldmanagercom.html

unless you have been there you realy do not know

http://chicago.craigslist.org/wcl/zip/3291189601.html

Don't include html forms in emails. The Yahoo! Mail client warns users that submitting forms in email can be dangerous

Don't include Javascript in emails

Don't include embedded objects in emails (like flash or active-x).

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Madison Young may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • php}date=August 16, 2007|author=Violet Blue|title=Madison Young: Bondage Model. Artist. Feminist }}</ref> She has received awards for her bondage and suspension work and has been called "an auteur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

No, sir bot, you are welcome on my page at anytime. Most helpful. - Wikidemon (talk) 04:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of bondage models by decade may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Jewell Marceau]] (aka Scarlet Fever)<ref>{{cite news|publisher=xcritic|url=http://www.xcritic.com/columns/column.php?columnID=2446|title=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Simon Oxley[edit]

Hello Wikidemon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Simon Oxley for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MaxineBangs (talk) 07:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, removed. Please be more careful next time. - Wikidemon (talk) 07:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simon Oxley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Octocat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simon Oxley[edit]

Hello, Wikidemon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Simon Oxley, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Simon Oxley to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, MaxineBangs (talk) 13:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

You're unfortunately on some kind of future hit list by one of your known "friends". Guy1890 (talk) 20:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Not a hit list, just a record of BLP violations. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 20:26, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes, It does appear to be a hit list for some kind of renewed campaign against editors who dispute Squeakbox's unhelpful approach here, which is troubling. I believe this violates Wikipedia policy about using one's own to make personal attacks. I'll ask Squeakbox to remove it. - Wikidemon (talk) 23:12, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
FWIW, he's already been asked to delete the page and basically refused. I wouldn't be surprised if he just deleted any messages from you on his talk page, as I think he tried to "ban" you from there recently in one of his edit summaries there. Good luck... Guy1890 (talk) 23:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm following best practices. Ban or no ban, if an editor is using their userspace to plan personal attacks on me, it is most appropriate and collegial that I give them a courtesy notice before any more formal dispute resolution. I'm not sure what the right forum would be, though, or if there is any. - Wikidemon (talk) 23:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Porn and BLP[edit]

You are included in ym request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Porn and BLP. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 22:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested[edit]

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Porn and BLP". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 31 August 2014.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 22:25, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Cavarrone 23:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

HW[edit]

He seems to be extra cranky today. In case you missed it before he deleted my comments, in the span of a day he accused me of making racists comments and that I'm a paid editor. This is out of character even for him. Its probably not worth the effort to reasonably "discuss" anything with him for a bit. He's been calling us both trolls for the last dozen or so edits. Par for the course... :) --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 04:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I saw all that. Thanks for the note though. If you're not a racist or a troll, you shouldn't worry if someone calls you that. Best give him a little time and room to blow off steam. The social breaching and button pushing is unfortunate, but it's not worth the bother to engage with that. I'm gaining considerable respect for this editor. I can tell he's good, and taking pains to be correct and non-disruptive in article space even if I disagree with some. Even his less cautious compatriot, Squeak, has made some self-revelations (see his user page) about his motivations that reveal a genuine desire to help the encyclopedia and the world at large. These policy disputes only matter when they result in large-scale content degradation, or affect an article you're vested in improving. Otherwise, no point getting involved in a tussle just because someone's being ornery. - Wikidemon (talk) 04:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Do you miss the good ol' days?[edit]

Seems like only yesterday that a story like this would result in the creation of and ensuing battle over Obama coffee cup salute controversy. Tarc (talk) 17:01, 24 September 2014 (UTC)