User talk:Wikipedical

GA review

Please see Talk:De Profundis (letter)/GA1. Drmies (talk) 04:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Daytime Emmy Award.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Daytime Emmy Award.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 10:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Georgetown Improv Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Georgetown Improv Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Georgetown Improv Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GrapedApe (talk) 03:40, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:De Profundis (letter)/GA1

I just failed the GA review and closed it. I spend considerable time and energy on the review, and you had nominated it for that--and then you never returned to the article or the review. Thanks for a complete waste of time. I suggest you never submit anything for GA review again unless you are prepared to stay on top of it. Drmies (talk) 03:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

• Worse, you did it twice: you asked for a peer review, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Physical history of the United States Declaration of Independence/archive1, and then you did nothing with the results. Drmies (talk) 03:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)