User talk:Wikizin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Wikizin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  DS 20:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Copa del Rey[edit]

Ok, I asked for this discussion to take place on the talk page of the article, not here, thanks. If this edit war continues I will have no choice but to protect the page from editing until the issue is resolved. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Mediation[edit]

Please see my comments at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-05-08 Copa del Rey and then head over to Talk:Copa del Rey and indicate if you are happy with both the a) and the b) I posted there. Thanks. --Dweller (talk) 12:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Erm, I thought you wanted help to sort this out? --Dweller (talk) 14:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Message[edit]

I am leaving the same message in all parties talk pages.

Please read my requests carefully and stick to them. If we're going to have a successful mediation, it is important to do this a stage at a time and not to argue amongst ourselves while the dispute is still fresh and far from resolved.

All I have asked for now is for comments on the proposed paragraph. Please make them in your own area. Thanks. --Dweller (talk) 22:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Sorry, but i don't agree, cause it would be confusing and erroneus as i have said in previous discussions. For me the best option, if puting the simple '23' its not possible, is like it appears right now, 23 with an asterisk showing the note with the information of Bilbao claiming to have one more. Another question of that proposal would be if in Vizcaya line it will show 1/0 :D. Greets. Wikizin (talk) 21:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi Wikizin. I'm posting here to ensure we keep things as calm as possible. First, I want to be clear that I have no problems with you expressing unease with my proposal. Things have gone really well so far and I thank you for fantastic co-operation.

OK, let's take these things one at a time. And maybe in reverse order ;-)

  1. I don't think anyone doubts or disputes that Vizcaya won the cup, so we don't need a zero alongside them. However a note that they are now merged to Atheltic Bilbao wouldn't go amiss. (Same for any other defunct or merged clubs on the list)
  2. Putting either 23 or 24 with an asterisk would mean Wikipedia has "taken sides" in the argument. This is bad - it would definitely contravene WP:NPOV. We can't go for 23* for the same reason we can't go for 24*.

As you know, I have no real interest in pushing either side of this dispute. Having read what I write above, do you still feel that you cannot possibly agree to "23 / 24*"?

NB I may not be able to reply to your answer for some days, as I'm taking a loooong weekend. --Dweller (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


Don't take this like i was a true stubborn, but if '23/24' appears, some people would think that Bilbao have 24 cups, and that's erroneus, that's why i didn't support that proposal in the first time. Examples of this is that in Italian football champions table, Juventus have 27 scudettos, and not 28, or Floyd Landis didn't appear in Tour de France winners, because the organization didn't recognized their titles. In these articles and in this one, a note or an asterisk is the best option, and that is what i support.
In any case, cause i suppose that the other part would not accept any resolution that don't include the 24 in the table (I think that he could be changing it for the rest of the days), i suggest another solution: 23 (24*), maybe with the 23 in bold (and so the rest of cup wins of the rest of the teams). That would clarify a neutral reader the real number of cups that Bilbao have -23-, the exception of the other part of the dispute claims -that his team have one more win-, and let you maintain the NPOV.
I saw it comming, i was the part that have to hand over... :D --Wikizin (talk) 14:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. I'm not necessarily averse to 23 (24*). Not sure about the bolding. Anyway, let me discuss it with Deibid. --Dweller (talk) 15:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

    • Please Wikizin, the word "real" is not very realistic in this case. Because the cup can be viewed, and is quite "real", in San Mamés. Other thing is "official", but don't continue to mess with reality. I agree with 23 (24*), it's ok. Of course, not bolded, because no other numbers are bolded in the table and bold is not the style of preference for contents of a table in Wikipedia. David (talk) 10:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Copa article[edit]

Do you have any outstanding problems with this article? --Dweller (talk) 13:26, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

I think you've got an agreed wording you can apply there too, yes. Good luck, my job seems to be done! --Dweller (talk) 19:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Que cuál es el problema?? el problema es tuyo, chaval. Problema de prepotencia y de ir por ahi creyendo que todo el monte es orégano. Que porque varios usuarios hayamos acordado como debe ser un artículo en mediación, vas tu y te saltas a la torera todas las normas y modificas todo lo que se cruza en tu camino sin firmar y sin discutir las cosas. Qué tiene que ver el Athletic con el artículo de la Copa del Rey? no te dijo el administrador que el tema estaba cerrado para Copa del Rey? te dijo algo cuando preguntaste sobre el artículo del Athletic? y que tiene que ver la Wiki española con esta mediación?

En el artículo del Athlétic aplica poner 24, porque en la PRINCIPAl fuente oficial de este artículo, o sea, el Athletic Club de Bilbao nos dicen que sion 24 copas las que tiene el club. La controversia se pone como nota aclaratoria y ya. La RFEF de puta madre, que ponga lo que quiera, pero aqui llevabamos ya varios meses con el tema arreglado y consensuado, y lo suyo costó! En fin... que búscate otro equipo para fastidiar hombre! vete a joder al Sporting!David (talk) 11:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Man, truly, the number of cups of Bilbao seems the smallest of your problems. The approbation of the admin is in the second paragraph of this section. Greetings and good luck. Wikizin (talk) 13:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:CB Gran Canaria[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:CB Gran Canaria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2008-2009 ACB season[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2008-2009 ACB season, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable basketball league wikipedia is not a place a website to keep information like this on here

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 18:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

3 revert rule and edit warring[edit]

You have broken the 3RRR Wikipedia site rule. In doing so you also seemed intent to send me a message claiming I was "vandalizing" and that I should be reported to admin. I have done nothing wrong, I am simply making honest edits and updates, including ones that are sourced and can be verified. To which you seem to have a personal issue with. You also seem to be trying to instigate some kind of argument or dispute through your edit summaries. Please do not do that if at all possible. So please kindly in the future follow site guidelines like the 3RRR and do not send messages accusing me falsely of "vandalism". I would really appreciate that if it is possible. Thank you for your help in editing the site.Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 21:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Rosters and depth charts[edit]

It's very simple. If you cannot keep them updated then they are not "current" and should be either not called "current" or should be removed. You list non current rosters and call them "current" - that is incorrect. No need for that to be called "current" when it is not. Especially depth charts.

Also, on this "official" thing - you bring up Hermann as not being official and yet the very team already announced him. You say there is 10 days until it is official that he is with them. No sir, you are simply wrong. It already is official and there are 10 days until he might go to another team, not 10 days until he is on their roster. It means he is with Caja Laboral and will be for the next 10 days and could possibly not be after that. So in fact I am right to have him on the team in current time and you sir are in fact wrong to not have him on it. So again please stop saying I am "vandalizing" simply for making proper and updated edits. Currently, he is in fact with that team and will be for the next 10 days for sure. So please stop making "vandalism" accusations over simple true facts. And please remember to follow the 3RRR policy. So just continue to contribute to the site without some of the other stuff. Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 22:43, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Depth charts and rosters[edit]

Notice how every single change edit I made to depth charts and rosters is true and 100% correct? I hope very STRONGLY in the future that you stop reverting edits that I make and don't send any more personal messages insulting me and falsely accusing me of things over it. As you can clearly see, I made only absolutely correct and true edits and was entirely helping the site. Wiki Greek Basketball (talk) 09:09, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:MerAlicante.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading File:MerAlicante.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 22:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Basquet-manresa.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Basquet-manresa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 19:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:REGALFCBARCELONA.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:REGALFCBARCELONA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

edit[edit]

Hello, I see that you contribute a lot to update the current sport seasons' pages. How do you find the time for that? Do you have a bot to update them faster? 82.240.207.81 (talk) 18:15, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pallacanestro Treviso[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Pallacanestro Treviso has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Olympic medal table[edit]

Please do not add medals to the Olympic medal table until the event is completely over, even if the same country two athlets are facing off for the gold and we know the bronze. Otherwise, things get added twice. I notice you did this with mixed doubles badminton. Thanks. Smartyllama (talk) 11:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Men's high jump[edit]

Why did you twice delete sourced and relevant info about the men's high jump three way tie from the Olympic medal table? You were reverted again, don't redelete it. Smartyllama (talk) 20:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of Spanish football transfers summer 2013–14[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of Spanish football transfers summer 2013–14. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of Spanish football transfers summer 2013. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Spanish football transfers summer 2013 – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Spanish football transfers summer 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • no=|nat=THA|pos=FW|name=[[Teerasil Dangda]]|other=on loan from [[Muangthong United]]}}<ref>''[http://www.udalmeriasad.com/-/el-almeria-ficha-al-delantero-teerasil-dangda-la-estrella-del-futbol-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:44, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Spanish football transfers summer 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Enrique Martínez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Spanish football transfers summer 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seydou Keita (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)