User talk:Wshun

Archive (Feb 2007)

Image:Vecab.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vecab.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 04:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC) —Remember the dot (t) 04:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of one-time characters in The Simpsons

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of one-time characters in The Simpsons, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of one-time characters in The Simpsons (2nd nomination). Thank you. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect Persection of Muslims

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Persection of Muslims, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Persection of Muslims is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Persection of Muslims, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Persection of Muslims

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Persection of Muslims, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

completely implausible redirect created by mistyped original page name

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -Zeus-^u_c 21:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of one-time characters in The Simpsons

I have nominated List of one-time characters in The Simpsons, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of one-time characters in The Simpsons (6th nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 18:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion

Hi. I've started a discussion here. (Actually, it's a restart of a prior discussion that went cold; you can just scroll directly down to the first post I made today in that section if you want.) Can you offer your thoughts? I think it's very important. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:53, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Lee for deletion

The article Lee is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nem1yan (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)