User talk:Wwwwolf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  1. 2004–2005
  2. 15 January 2006 – 28 June 2006
  3. 29 June 2006 – 31 December 2006
  4. 1 January 2007 – 17 June 2007
  5. 18 June 2007 – 31 December 2007
  6. 2008
  7. 2009
  8. 2010
  9. 2011
  10. 2012

Articles for Creation:Dayton Performing Arts Alliance[edit]

Hi! I submitted the AFC article [Performing Arts Alliance], and have been attempting to improve it for acceptance. Editors have raised objections to the topic notability and the article's style. I feel that the current citations are pretty solid for establishing notability. Do you have any concrete suggestions for improving this article? Katherine M. Harris (talk) 18:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

I agreed with Katherine M. Harris's assessment of the organization's notability and have accepted the draft. You can find it at Dayton Performing Arts Alliance. Huon (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for being a bit late. =) It looks like the article refers to reputable third-party sources that discuss the subject in non-trivial capacity, so I agree that the notability is definitely established. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:24, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013[edit]


The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Fairytale left.png Previous issue | Index | Next issue Fairytale right.png

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:


To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

Orphaned non-free image File:FATE 2e pdf cover page.jpg[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:FATE 2e pdf cover page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Feku Page Deletion[edit]

I had made the Feku page which redirected to Narendra Modi. The fact is that "Feku" is the Hindi translation of "liar". Modi, a Prime Ministerial candidate in India has been lying and trying to fool the people into believing that he is a messiah, which is why he has been christened "Feku" I request you to check Google for the authenticity of my claims. Thanks Arjun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjunmittal (talkcontribs) 16:43, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:57, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

unprotect Esco[edit]

Hi, Wwwwolf, would you please unprotect Esco, which you deleted on 24 March 2007? It can redirect ESCO. Thank you! --Neo-Jay (talk) 02:37, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

I see no harm in that. Unprotected and created. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Many thanks! --Neo-Jay (talk) 03:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thank you for explaining notability in the Reddit thread (off Wikipedia) about The Sarkeesian Effect! Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 14:12, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. Though I still won't be touching the debate in question, as I stated - both because someone might question my impartiality on the matter, and because I personally still have reservations about Wikipedia deletion process. For the record, I'm personally not actually opposed to having articles about unreleased films. It's just that in this case, there's no mainstream media coverage which would qualify as reliable secondary sources at this time. But as I said, if those issues are rectified while the AFD is still running, maybe they still have a chance. It's just unfortunate that the time window is very strict and many editors tend to go faffing about instead of getting the right things done. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 00:38, 25 October 2014 (UTC)