User talk:X201

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


niemti[edit]

please dont bring up such an editor again on a discussion i brought up. this editor uses every chance he gets to harass me. and i rather not let that happen again. the fact that it wasn't necessary to point this editor out over navbox organization (anyone can do it, and everyone in WP:VG has) feels almost intentional. Lucia Black (talk) 15:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

@Lucia Black: Didn't know about your problems with him. Only knew him from noticing that he'd improved infoboxes on articles I have passed through. Sorry if its caused you any upset. - X201 (talk) 15:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
It is fine. i hope more editors being more opinions in. Lucia Black (talk) 16:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tropico 5 logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tropico 5 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LittleBigPlanet 3 logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LittleBigPlanet 3 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Edge Games COI[edit]

I might be misunderstanding the context here, but when you say "Now if I'm correct, and you are either Mr Langdell, a relative or an agent or employee of Edge Games, you do not have to declare your interest, but it would create a bucket load of goodwill and make this whole process easier if you are and did.", hasn't the user already gone beyond that? They haven't merely declined to comment on a possible conflict of interest, they've explicitly said that they are "not affiliated with the topic". If this is a lie on their part, they're in breach of Wikimedia's terms of use. --McGeddon (talk) 09:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

This has been going on so long I forgot about that bit, thank you for pointing it out, have edited my comments on the Edge page accordingly. I think its fairly obvious that the involved editors are having trouble believing that Vertisis is not a duck. Because of good faith and giving him/her/it a fair representation and a chance to voice their opinion of the article, I'm willing to suspend my disbelief and work with them on any sane suggestion for improvement, rather than have them blocked and them turn up in a range of accounts to nudge and hack the article to remove any critical comment. I think Czar's, PresN's and my comments were just three people needing to vent. - X201 (talk) 09:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
No problem. Might be easier just to delete your comments since nobody has replied to them yet. (And if you're going for full on grin-and-bear-it AGF in the hope that Vertisis will behave in response, the "I assume you are lying" Scooby Doo gag rather undermines that.) --McGeddon (talk) 09:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Isn't there some point where the duck test applies, or some such similar policy? The SPA has a clear agenda with this article. -- ferret (talk) 23:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Quick question[edit]

WP:VG's Newsletter department is looking for editors to interview for our Featured Editor column, and your name has come up in discussions during the last several quarters as a likely candidate. The interview consists of some 15 questions that you can answer however you like and which you can tinker with up until the newsletter is published. Our hope is to have a small number of interviewees (~3) cued up for upcoming Featured Editor columns so your interview would most likely appear in the 4th Quarter (January 2015) issue. You can review previous interview questions here to get a sense of the kinds of questions you would be asked. If you would be willing to answer some questions, please let me know at my talk page. -Thibbs (talk) 13:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014[edit]

Gamepad.svg

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2014
Fairytale left.png Previous issue | Index | Next issue Fairytale right.png

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2014, the project has:


Content


To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Development of L.A. Noire[edit]

Hey X201. I've been working on an article for a little while over on my sandbox. It's about the development of L.A. Noire, and I feel like it's now complete. However, before I publish it, I just wanted to make sure that you're okay with it, seeing as you're the main contributor on the main L.A. Noire article. When the article's published, the Development section on the main article will have to be updated accordingly, but I can take care of that if you wish.

Please let me know if you have any concerns, and I'll be sure to try and address them. I don't want to suddenly jump in and burden you with this development article without warning, so I'd like your approval first. You don't even have to read the article, just let me know of anything you need. Thanks! -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 10:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

@Rhain1999: Looks great. I'd come to the conclusion that to get L.A Noire to FA, the development section either needed shrinking and turning into an incomplete section, or hiving it off into its own article in order to do it justice. I've started looking to add to the research section with info about the crimes used as inspiration.(User:X201/sandbox#Dev) Thanks for giving me the heads up on this. I need to find the time to prep L.A Noire for FA one day. The Dev article looks great, hit the button and move it. - X201 (talk) 11:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Grand Theft Auto V logo - transparent background.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grand Theft Auto V logo - transparent background.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Rockstar Japan[edit]

Since you seem to have interest in Rockstar Games related topics, what are your thoughts on deleting/moving Rockstar Japan to defunct status? I've outlined my points on the Talk:Rockstar Games page. Thanks! Gamerzworld (talk) 16:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

I meant to comment on that. - X201 (talk) 16:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:Infobox video game with deprecated parameters[edit]

How you fix these errors? Try fixing the one of Capcom Platinum Hits Triple Pack, so I can watch. Thanks OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 11:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

@OccultZone: We're currently in the process of tidying up all of the video game infoboxes. About 4 years ago numerous outdated fields were removed from the Video Game Infobox. Even though the code for these fields may be in an article, the fields will no longer show. At the start there were 12,000 articles that contained non-working fields. In order to find which articles need cleaning, the Video Game infobox has been altered to make the articles with old fields appear in Category:Infobox video game with deprecated parameters. I've removed the three old fields that were in the Capcom article, so it has now been moved out of the category. There are 16 old fields in total, some articles have just one of them, some articles have all of them, but having just one is enough to make the article appear in the category. Hope this helps. - X201 (talk) 13:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Can you name all those 16 fields? OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 17:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Just to inform you, I had checked Template:Infobox_VG#Field_changes and I have started working on this category.[1] is probably my first edit. Although error still shows on pages like The Cameron Files: Secret at Loch Ness, which field is causing error? If you receive any updates you can let me know. Thanks OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 12:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
@OccultZone: We appreciate the help, but could you please stop. This is not just about removing the fields. There are other things tied into it as well. - X201 (talk) 14:20, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
That's why just did 100 for now. I had seen that there were some details but provided in article too. Keep updating, thanks. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 14:29, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Date formatting in Abyss Odyssey[edit]

Hey X201! It's been a long time!

I noticed that you recently did this this edit, where you changed the date formatting per author nationality. I'm a bit confused, the game was created by a Chilean developer but I'm not sure why that would have bearing on an article like Abyss Odyssey. I checked out WP:STRONGNAT but it didn't seem relevant to the article at all. I usually have the date formatted like that because I prefer to work with the dates like that... would you have any objection if I reverted your change to the article? Nomader (talk) 00:47, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

No problem with you changing it. I just think its more appropriate to have the article in the date format of the developer rather than US date format which has no relation to it. When I create an article I follow what MOS:TIES recommends for books, "use the engvar of the author", I can't see the point in putting a date format/engvar that isn't related to an article on it. - X201 (talk) 13:40, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Help on List of PlayStation 4 games[edit]

A user keeps removing Infamous First Light from List of PlayStation 4 games. I don't know why. I've asked the user to justify the actions but they keep removing it. I've already reverted a bunch of times, violating 3RR if one would not consider this vandalism (although I do). I've reported them in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring but no result yet 24 hours later. I see you've made various edits on the list so any assistance you could provided would be helpful. WhereAmI (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

User was blocked for 24 hours. If they try again after that time, do you know if I'd go back to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring again? WhereAmI (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
The process basically resets itself. If they vandalise you revert, notify them pointing out its referenced (and that its a stand alone game - not DLC, which is where I think the problem may lie) then you notify the admins again, mentioning they've already been blocked for it. But above all, stay calm, there's plenty of time to fix it. - X201 (talk) 05:18, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Mario RPG revert[edit]

You said people with sight problems would need the full description, and that is why its so long. Can you point to the policy that says this? As on other articles Wikipedia does not use such a lengthy description for screenshots. I would not mind of course changing it to be a bit longer. So that bowers keep would be included. But I think talking about all the buttons etc, is more then a little bit excessive and does not add anything, except sounding like a manual or a faq. NathanWubs (talk) 18:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Bank of England[edit]

Your edit summary of "Copyright of the royalmint" makes no sense as the coins are also Copyright of the royal mint. Explain the difference please. Thanks, WikiImprovment78 (talk) 15:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

The coins are used by express permission of The Royal Mint, the permission has to be renewed annually. Your images of the bank notes was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons which does not accept copyright material like the notes, uploading the notes to Wikipedia will require the same kind of permission as the coins. - X201 (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to TOCA 2 Touring Cars may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

AWB reminder[edit]

Hi X201. I've noticed a lot of edits like this one on my watchlist this morning. Just as a reminder, the AWB rules of use are pretty specific about not making edits like that:

4. Do not make insignificant or inconsequential edits. An edit that has no noticeable effect on the rendered page is generally considered an insignificant edit. If in doubt, or if other editors object to edits on the basis of this rule, seek consensus at an appropriate venue before making further edits.

In general there is no benefit to adjusting whitespace within reference templates, and doing so with an automated or semi-automated tool unnecessarily clutters the watchlists of editors, which is why the AWB rules disallow it. Thanks, 28bytes (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@28bytes:I generated the list of articles from the Database dump. It wasn't for cosmetic purposes, it was to help with the major cleanup of WP:VG articles that is currently on-going. A future phase of it will be to list fields that are incorrectly named, have been invented or any other info that is lurking in the article code that should be either on display or removed. The 90 edits were to help with the coding of the template when we get to that stage. With hindsight, I should have put a better explanation in the edit summary and either got the OK over at WP:AWB or tried to get it tied to another job. Sorry. - X201 (talk) 15:50, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks X201. 28bytes (talk) 16:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Platform→Platforms parm[edit]

Hello, I noticed your AWB edits include deleting a "platform" parameter, which I see is still in the template as "platforms". Apparently you are deleting encyclopedic information? Prhartcom (talk) 13:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting it. Its because both Platform and Platforms are allowed in the infobox. I'll fix the AWB code so it checks for both. - X201 (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Well, you should now go back and restore that parameter to those articles which you have deleted this information. Will you do this? Prhartcom (talk) 13:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
It will only be articles that use platform, instead of platforms. I'll run a scan if the database and compile a list of articles that use platform and sort any affected. - X201 (talk) 13:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
@Prhartcom: I've checked all the edits of everyone taking part in this cleanup and only one other article was affected. - X201 (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Good news; glad nothing was lost. Cheers; going through what must be 20-30K articles even with AWB must be a job. Prhartcom (talk) 19:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC)