User talk:Yamla

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Juanacho Block[edit]

Hey, I need your help. Juanacho is messing up some pages by deleting some sources and necessary elements. I want her/him to be blocked again with your help since you have done that before...I guess. Please do reply soon. I want Wikipedia to be a resourceful place but he/she is ruining it. Kikkokalabud (talk)


Hi Yalma, this is Brexx, you blocked me way back in 2008, and ok, yes before i deserved it, because i wasn't very familiar with the rules of wikipedia…but now im different …i total changed….I pledge to not put anything that i didn't personally write and not upload images or other media that are not entirely my own work. I understand that copyrighted material should not be put in wikipedia and that there will be consequences if users don't follow the rules of wikipedia and of the law. Anyone who wishes to edit wikipedia should follow their rules and take them seriously.

I have read the relevant policy pages on Wikipedia and some Wikipedia articles on the subject of copyright, i read the Wikipedia:Copyrights and the Wikipedia:Copyright violations articles several times and understand them completely. Wikipedia is very dear to my heart and now i fully comply with the rules of copyright and the rules of wikipedia and i will only assume good faith…….if you see all my edits from all my recent accounts, you will see that all im doing is adding reliable information with reliable sources…….please, i don't want to keep going from account to account…i want stability……ill do anything….i admit i should not have created all these new accounts, but what's done is done, and im begging for forgiveness and closure………if your still spectical, you can unblock me and have someone monitor my edits, im more than ok with that because i know that im now editing in good faith and adding reliable information with relialbe sources…..please open a discussion about unblocking me here and see what other admins think:

side note about my brexx account: I forgot my Brexx password and the e-mail i registered when i created the account got deleted because i did not use it for a long time, , so i cant recover my wikipedia password, so i can't use the brexx account anymore...everytime i create a new account, i get blocked.....

Official sources for National Animals, don't worry[edit]

About the National Animal article, we sometimes don't need the official sources or references, the people of a country can tell you what animal it is. For example, the Kazakhs told us that their national animals is the snow leopard and the golden eagle. If you want to know a national animal that is not mentioned on the article. Go to a country and ask the people, what animal is their country's national animal. change the animal from lynx to bison. She is from Romania, the people of her country told her that the national animal is a bison. No concerns for that, OK. (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

This is incorrect. Wikipedia requires that information is verified. "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material." So, what you are suggesting is not acceptable. The information does indeed need a citation. We very regularly get false information on that page. --Yamla (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Then who can I ask? their governments. What happens if Wikipedia is filled with false information in all articles? (talk) 01:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Any sort of reliable source would work. For Canada, for example, we use [1] and the related page, [2]. You can see that these are official government pages. We don't _need_ a government page, though, just a reliable source. If you find an article that you think has incorrect information (or even if you aren't sure, but there's no reliable source), you can (and probably should) challenge it. See [3] for more information on that. Specifically, you add a citation needed tag. --Yamla (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
If I couldn't find any evidence, what can I do now? (talk) 22:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
If you are trying to add information, you can't do it. If you are trying to challenge existing information, add a citation needed tag. :) --Yamla (talk) 02:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm a guy without a real user page.[edit]

Why did you said "I'm a guy without a real user page." Every Wikipedian has information on who they are. (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about the mistake. This is due to mouse problems on my computer. (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


Zennie has asked to be unblocked (UTRS appeal #13133). I'm tempted to go ahead and accept that request; IMO, whatever the original block reason, over 7 years is more than enough time to justify a second chance. Are there some circumstances that would make this otherwise, such as abuse more recent than 2007 that I might not be aware of? ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  02:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

I believe all of this user's contributions were spam. So long as they no longer plan on posting inappropriate external links on Wikipedia, it would be entirely reasonable to unblock them. To be clear, it'd also be perfectly fine to just assume good faith, unblock them without any such promise, and then just reblock them if they resume spamming. So, nope, no objection. --Yamla (talk) 21:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Company adding[edit]


I want to add company page on wikipedia . Is it possible to add?If yes can you please guide me?

This would generally not be appropriate. See WP:COI. You are free to create it in your sandbox, though, and have someone look over your work! --Yamla (talk) 17:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)