User talk:Zhumaf

Welcome!

Hello, Zhumaf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- RHaworth 18:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sandbox[edit]

Well done for developing your article outside the (Main) namespace. This can save you a lot of problems from new page patrollers. But please use User:Zhumaf/sandbox and not your talk page.

If you start an article on a wrong title, use a move command to correct the error. Do not just leave the old title for others to clean up.

Despite your use of a sandbox, this NP patroller is still worried about Action Research for Personal, Group, and Organizational Development and 27 types of Action Inquiry. These articles feel to me like original research. Please make sure that they have good external references to establish that the ideas are accepted among the social science community. -- RHaworth 18:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RHaworth, Thanks for your comments on my talk. The content of Action Research for Personal, Group, and Organizational Development is definitely not an original rsearch. Those methods have been developed over 40 years and it originates from psychology research of human behaviors. Now this research has been extended into group, and organizational behaviors. They are widely used in Executive Coach, and in Organization Change consulting. The most recent publishing of one of above theory (Action Inquiry) I am familiar is the "Seven Transformations of Leadership" by Rooke and Torbert on Harvard Business Review, April 2005.

I think the title may be misleading because I was tring to make all those three methods together. I take your point of this and think to split into three papes with a clear title like: Action Science, Cooperative Inquiry and Action Inquiry, which is also more parallel to the existing Action Research method pages in wiki (Participatory Action Research, Appreciative Inquiry Research). I will make the first two a stub so other people will be more willing to add in. I am more familiar with Action Inquiry. I may be able to summerize it even better.

Regarding the 27 types of Action Inquiry is a summery of detailed methods. I will think of more about how to write it. And thank you very much for your help. Zhumaf 00:15, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wikify[edit]

You have twice removed {{wikify}} from Action Research for Personal, Group, and Organizational Development. It is OK if you are not willing to do the job, but leave the tag there to invite others to wikify it for you. -- RHaworth 09:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sandbox usage[edit]

Please answer whether you still need your sandbox. Thank you, Mukadderat 16:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:27AR.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:27AR.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you created this image yourself, please look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators, select one of those tags, and add it to the image. To do that, simply go to Image:27AR.jpg, click "edit this page", and add the appropriate tag. Be sure to remove the current tag indicating a lack of licensing!

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at User talk:Angr or at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —An gr 19:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Co inq.gif[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Co inq.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]