User talk:Zjec

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Evanh2008. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Stan Lee without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 21:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Fnlayson (talk) 18:41, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Musdan77 (talk) 19:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Seconded - At the moment your actions are damaging, whether it is your intention or not, the articles and templates related to the live action TV show and you are ignoring other editors. You can use the talk pages to try and get a consensus for your changes, but stop you unilateral editing. - J Greb (talk) 01:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

August 2013[edit]

I see other editors have had issues with you. Your edits at Blade (comics) violated WikiProject Comics guidelines regarding plot overdetails of animated-series episodes in character entries. And your uncited POV observations about the character violate Wikipedia policies of original-research synthesis and personal observation. By not going to the talk page to discuss these issues but summarily reverting even when told these are vios, you are engaging in edit-warring. Now please discuss your issue on the article's talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Zjec I have little interest in talking over my edits, I'm simply logical -- The previous comment was incorrectly signed by Zjec (talk) 14:02, 18 August 2013

Your enthusiasm is great. Please work with others and discuss your edits. Your pattern of adding redundant information, original conclusions, and unsourced statements, however true they might be, is disruptive, and your argumentative edit comments make you look like a possible trying to get blocked from Wikipedia. Wikipedia a community and we all work together to create this online encyclopedia. Thank you. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 05:40, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Zjec I admit I can be a little impulsive; but I just want to show people the truth. And last time I checked Wikipedia wasn't just a website, it's also an Encyclopedia; and encyclopedia's are supposed to be truthful and based on fact's.

Please slow down. You create extra and unnecessary work for others when you add excessive details, add redundant information, write incorrectly, and fail to follow Wikipedia's style guide. Here are a few tips: Refer to Wikipedia's Manual of Style to help you format correctly. In the reply you just posted, you used semi-colons incorrectly and put inappropriate apostrophes in plural words that should have been encyclopedias and facts. To sign your talk posts correctly, type ~ four times at the end of your message. Signing your username as Zjec at the start puts it in the wrong place, which will create confusion, and links it to nothing.
If you don't work with others, you are highly likely to get banned from Wikipedia. Looking back through your talk page history, I see that you have been warned about that before. Looking through your edit history, I see that many different people have been correcting your edits over the course of time. Please consider that some of them might know what they are doing. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 00:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Rick Stone (DC).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rick Stone (DC).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Not sure how to do that?

March 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Flash (1990 TV series), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

I need some help, I created a new page and the title is only supposed to say Daisy Watkins (DC Comics), but instead it says User:217.42.241.147/Daisy Watkins (DC Comics)

Fixed. In the future I'd recommend using the {{helpme}} template when you're in need of assistance. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Still not enough, now it says User:Daisy Watkins (DC Comics), its only supposed to say Daisy Watkins (DC Comics). I want it be an article.
Mea culpa; didn't realize it was still in userspace. Fixed. DonIago (talk) 20:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Minor edits[edit]

You need to stop marking almost all of your edits as minor because most of them are not minor. A minor edit only involves "superficial differences between the current and previous versions". Incorrectly marking your edits as minor can lead to a block if you do not correct your behavior. Thank you. Spidey104 14:45, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Continuing to incorrectly mark your edits as minor is disruptive editing and you can be blocked from editing if you do not stop. It is better to accidentally not mark a minor edit as minor than it is to accidentally mark an edit as minor when it is not.
This is a minor edit. However, this and this are not minor edits. Spidey104 18:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Peter Hooten[edit]

Hello, and thanks for creating this article. Just as an FYI, all new articles about living people must have at least one reference to a reliable source, or they can be deleted after a 7-day grace period. The article has not yet been tagged as such, but it is likely to be until a reference can be added. Just so you know! Electric Wombat (talk) 01:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

H.G. Peter[edit]

I've started a discussion regarding H.G. Peter at Talk:Wonder Woman#H.G. Peter.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hulk (comics). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Musdan77 (talk) 21:05, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

I request page protection because this is getting frustrating and tiresome Zjec 21:07, 14 November (UTC)

Hinata Hyuga[edit]

The article Hinata Hyuga has been merged back to the character list due to failing. WP: Notability. By that, I mean that the article lacked real world information into the form of a reception section commonly seen in other article such as Naruto Uzumaki, Jiraya (Naruto), etc. If you think Hinata can have a reception pratise in your sandbox and then bring it to a top section. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)