Value within the context of law, particularly with respect to contracts, is a concept closely related, but not identical, to that of consideration.
At common law, certain transferrable obligations were only enforceable if the transferee had acquired them for value. Under the rules of equity, the rights of a bona fide purchaser for value would not be interfered with. State courts of various jurisdictions in the US adopted varying definitions of what constituted "value".
Under the Uniform Commercial Code, except with respect to Article 3, a person gives value for rights if he acquires them in exchange for:
- a binding commitment to extend credit or for the extension of immediately available credit;
- as security for or in total or partial satisfaction of a preexisting claim;
- accepting delivery pursuant to a preexisting contract for purchase;
- generally, any consideration sufficient to support a simple contract.
Under Article 3 of the Code, a negotiable instrument is transferred for value if the transferee receives in exchange:
- a promise of performance, to the extent the promise has been performed;
- a security interest or other lien in the instrument other than a lien obtained by judicial proceeding;
- the total or partial discharge of an antecedent claim against any person, whether the claim is due;
- another negotiable instrument; or
- an irrevocable obligation to a third party by the person taking the instrument.
The setting forth in express terms of what is "value" in the context of commercial transactions was a bold step forward by the drafters of the UCC, since the jurisdictional distinctions as to value made certain transactions valid in one state and invalid in another.
|This legal term article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|