# Kummer–Vandiver conjecture

(Redirected from Vandiver's conjecture)

In mathematics, the Kummer–Vandiver conjecture, or Vandiver conjecture, states that a prime p does not divide the class number hK of the maximal real subfield $K=\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_p)^+$ of the p-th cyclotomic field. The conjecture was first made by Ernst Kummer in 1849 December 28 and 1853 April 24 in letters to Leopold Kronecker, reprinted in (Kummer 1975, pages 84, 93, 123–124), and independently rediscovered around 1920 by Philipp Furtwängler and Harry Vandiver (1946, p. 576),

As of 2011, there is no particularly strong evidence either for or against the conjecture and it is unclear whether it is true or false, though it is likely that counterexamples are very rare.

## Background

The class number h of the cyclotomic field $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_p)$ is a product of two integers h1 and h2, called the first and second factors of the class number, where h2 is the class number of the maximal real subfield $K=\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_p)^+$ of the p-th cyclotomic field. The first factor h1 is well understood and can be written explicitly in terms of Bernoulli numbers, and is usually rather large. The second factor h2 is not well understood and seems hard to compute explicitly.

Kummer showed that if a prime p does not divide the class number h, then Fermat's last theorem holds for exponent p.

Kummer also showed that if p divides the second factor, then it also divides the first factor. In particular the Kummer–Vandiver conjecture holds for regular primes.

## Evidence for and against the Kummer–Vandiver conjecture

Kummer verified the Kummer–Vandiver conjecture for p less than 200, and Vandiver extended this to p less than 600. Joe Buhler, Richard Crandall, and Reijo Ernvall et al. (2001) verified it for p < 12 million. Harvey (2008) extended this to primes less than 163 million.

Washington (1996, p. 158) describes an informal probability argument, based on rather dubious assumptions about the equidistribution of class numbers mod p, suggesting that the number of primes less than x that are exceptions to the Kummer–Vandiver conjecture might grow like (1/2)log log x. This grows extremely slowly, and suggests that the computer calculations do not provide much evidence for Vandiver's conjecture: for example, the probability argument (combined with the calculations for small primes) suggests that one should only expect about 1 counterexample in the first 10100 primes, suggesting that it is unlikely any counterexample will be found by further brute force searches even if there are an infinite number of exceptions.

Schoof (2003) gave conjectural calculations of the class numbers of real cyclotomic fields for primes up to 10000, which strongly suggest that the class numbers are not randomly distributed mod p. They tend to be quite small and are often just 1. For example, assuming the generalized Riemann hypothesis, the class number of the real cyclotomic field for the prime p is 1 for p<163, and divisible by 4 for p=163. This suggests that Washington's informal probability argument against the conjecture may be misleading.

Mihăilescu (2010) gave a refined version of Washington's heuristic argument, suggesting that the Kummer–Vandiver conjecture is probably true.

## Consequences of the Kummer–Vandiver conjecture

Kurihara (1992) showed that the conjecture is equivalent to a statement in the algebraic K-theory of the integers, namely that Kn(Z) = 0 whenever n is a multiple of 4. In fact from the Kummer–Vandiver conjecture and the norm residue isomorphism theorem follow a full conjectural calculation of the K-groups for all values of n; see Quillen–Lichtenbaum conjecture for details.