Vegetarianism and religion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
A vegetarian thali from Rajasthan, India. Since Hinduism is practiced by majority of India's populace, Indian cuisine offers a wide variety of vegetarian delicacies.

Vegetarianism and religion are strongly linked in a number of religions that originated in ancient India (Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism). In Jainism vegetarianism is mandatory for everyone, in Hinduism and Mahayana Buddhism it is advocated by some influential scriptures and religious authorities.[1][2] Comparatively, in the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) and in Sikhism[3], vegetarianism is not promoted by mainstream authorities. In Christianity[4][5] and Sikhism,[6] however, there are groups promoting vegetarianism on religious grounds.

Contents

[edit] Religions of Indian origin

[edit] Hinduism

Vegetarianism plays a strong role in Hindu tradition, although there are a wide variety of practices and beliefs that have changed over time.[7] It is estimated some 30% of all Hindus are vegetarian.[8][unreliable source?]. Other sects of Hindus do not observe vegetarianism.[9]

[edit] Nonviolence

A variety South Indian dishes served on a banana leaf.

The principle of nonviolence applied to animals is connected with the intention to avoid negative karmic influences which result from violence. The suffering of all beings is believed to arise from craving and desire, conditioned by the karmic effects of both animal and human action. The violence of slaughtering animals for food, and its source in craving, reveal flesh eating as one mode in which humans enslave themselves to suffering.[10] Hinduism holds that such influences affect he who permits the slaughter of an animal, he who cuts it up, he who kills it, he who buys or sells meat, he who cooks it, he who serves it up, and he who eats it. They must all be considered the slayers of the animal.[11] The question of religious duties towards the animals and of negative Karma incurred from violence (himsa) against them is discussed in detail in Hindu scriptures and religious law books.

Hindu scriptures belong or refer to the Vedic period which lasted till about 500 BCE according to the chronological division by modern historians. In the historical Vedic religion, the predecessor of Hinduism, meat eating was not banned in principle, but was restricted by specific rules. Several highly authoritative scriptures bar violence against domestic animals except in the case of ritual sacrifice. This view is clearly expressed in the Mahabharata (3.199.11-12[12]; 13.115; 13.116.26; 13.148.17), the Bhagavata Purana (11.5.13-14), and the Chandogya Upanishad (8.15.1). It is also reflected in the Manu Smriti (5.27-44), a particularly renowned traditional Hindu law book (Dharmaśāstra). These texts strongly condemn the slaughter of animals and meat eating unless it happens in the context of the appropriate sacrifice ritual administered by priests. The Mahabharata allows people who are warriors by profession (Kshatriyas) to hunt and to eat meat "acquired by expenditure of prowess" (13.115.59-60; 13.116.15-18), but opposes such activities in the case of hermits who must be strictly nonviolent.[13]

The Mahabharata (12.260[14]; 13.115-116; 14.28) and the Manu Smriti (5.27-55) contain lengthy discussions about the legitimacy of ritual slaughter and subsequent consumption of the meat. In the Mahabharata both meat eaters and vegetarians present various arguments to substantiate their viewpoints. Apart from the debates about domestic animals, there is also a long discourse by a hunter in defence of hunting and meat eating.[15] These texts show that both ritual slaughter and hunting were challenged by advocates of universal non-violence and their acceptability was doubtful and a matter of dispute.[16] In modern Hinduism slaughter according to the rituals permitted in the Vedic scriptures has virtually disappeared.

[edit] Spiritual aspects

In some traditions, especially within Vaishnavism, it is essential that devotees offer all their food to their chosen deity before eating it as prasad.[17] This rule is strictly observed by the disciples of the schools of Bhakti Yoga, especially the Gaudiya Vaishnavas. They worship Vishnu or Krishna, and according to the scriptural injunctions they obey, only vegetarian food is acceptable as prasad.[18]

Vegetarianism is also mandatory for the practitioners of Hatha Yoga.[19] They follow the advice of scriptures such as the Bhagavad Gita[20] to eat only high-quality food, because they are convinced that food shapes the personality, mood and mind. Meat is said to promote sloth and ignorance and an undesirable mental state known as tamas, while a vegetarian diet is considered to promote the desirable sattvic qualities essential for spiritual progress.

[edit] Essential scriptural evidence

"What need there be said of those innocent and healthy creatures endued with love of life, when they are sought to be slain by sinful wretches subsisting by slaughter? For this reason, O monarch, know that the discarding of meat is the highest refuge of religion, of heaven, and of happiness. Abstention from injury is the highest religion. It is, again, the highest penance. It is also the highest truths from which all duty proceeds. Flesh cannot be had from grass or wood or stone. Unless a living creature is slain, it cannot be had. Hence is the fault in eating flesh. … That man who abstains from meat, is never put in fear, O king, by any creature. All creatures seek his protection. He never causes any anxiety in others, and himself has never to become anxious. If there were nobody who ate flesh there would then be nobody to kill living creatures. The man who kills living creatures kill them for the sake of the person who eats flesh. If flesh were regarded as inedible, there would then be no slaughter of living creatures. It is for the sake of the eater that the slaughter of living creatures goes on in the world. Since, O thou of great splendour, the period of life is shortened of persons who slaughter living creatures or cause them to be slaughtered, it is clear that the person who wishes his own good should give up meat entirely. … The purchaser of flesh performs himsa [violence] by his wealth; he who eats flesh does so by enjoying its taste; the killer does himsa by actually tying and killing the animal. Thus, there are three forms of killing. He who brings flesh or sends for it, he who cuts off the limbs of an animal, and he who purchases, sells, or cooks flesh and eats it - all of these are to be considered meat-eaters." (Mahabharata 13.115)[21]

"Those sinful persons who are ignorant of actual religious principles, yet consider themselves to be completely pious, without compunction commit violence against innocent animals who are fully trusting in them. In their next lives, such sinful persons will be eaten by the same creatures they have killed in this world." (Bhagavata Purana 11.5.14)[22]

"A person fully aware of religious principles should never offer anything like meat, eggs or fish in the Sraddha ceremony, and even if one is a Ksatriya (warrior), he himself should not eat such things." (Bhagavata Purana 7.15.7)[23]

[edit] Current situation

In modern India the food habits of Hindus vary according to their community or caste and according to regional traditions. Hindu vegetarians usually eschew eggs but consume milk and dairy products, so they are lacto-vegetarians.

According to a survey of 2006, vegetarianism is weak in coastal states and strong in landlocked northern and western states and among Brahmins in general, 55 percent of whom are vegetarians.[24] Many coastal habitants are fish eaters. In particular Bengali Hindus have romanticized fishermen and the consumption of fish through poetry, literature and music.

In India, latest reports indicate that meat consumption is actually going up [25].

[edit] Buddhism

The first lay precept in Buddhism prohibits killing.[26] Unlike the Biblical commandment (Thou Shalt Not Kill), which Jewish and Christian authorities have typically applied only to human beings, the First Precept has always been held to apply to animals as well as humans.[27] Many see this as implying that Buddhists should not eat the meat of animals. There are however differing points of view. The Buddha made distinction between killing an animal and consumption of meat, stressing that it is immoral conduct that makes one impure, not the food one eats. At one point the Buddha specifically refused to institute vegetarianism. There were, however, rules prohibiting certain types of meat, such as human, leopard or elephant. Monks are also prohibited from consuming meat if they witnessed the animal's death or know it was killed specifically for them.[28]

On the other hand, the Buddha in certain Mahayana sutras strongly denounces the eating of meat. In the Mahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra, the Buddha states that "the eating of meat extinguishes the seed of great compassion", adding that all and every kind of meat and fish consumption (even of animals already found dead) is prohibited by him. The Buddha goes on to emphasize that meat-eating cannot coexist with the great compassion and calls for not just a vegetarian, but a vegan lifestyle.[29] The Buddha also predicts in this sutra that later monks will "hold spurious writings to be the authentic Dharma" and will concoct their own sutras and mendaciously claim that the Buddha allows the eating of meat, whereas in fact (he says) he does not.[30]· The Lankavatara Sutra (a Mahayana scripture), in particular, devotes an entire chapter to the Buddha’s response to the request of a disciple named Mahamati to “teach us as to the merit and vice of meat-eating”.[31] A long passage in the Lankavatara Sutra shows the Buddha weighing strongly in favor of vegetarianism, since the eating of the flesh of fellow sentient beings is said by him to be incompatible with the compassion a Bodhisattva should strive to cultivate.[32] Several other Mahayana sutras also emphatically prohibit the consumption of meat.

A solution to this problem arose when monks from the Indian sphere of influence migrated to China, as of the year 65 CE. There they met followers who provided them with money instead of food. From those days onwards Chinese monastics, and others who came to inhabit northern countries, cultivated their own vegetable plots and bought everything else they needed in terms of food in the market.

In the modern Buddhist world, attitudes toward vegetarianism vary by location. on China and Vietnam, monks typically eat no meat (and with other restrictions as well – see Buddhist cuisine). In Japan or Korea some schools do not eat meat, while most do. Theravadins in Sri Lanka and South-east Asia do not practice vegetarianism. All Buddhists however, including monks, are allowed to practice vegetarianism if they wish to do so. Experts have estimated that worldwide about half of all Buddhists are vegetarian. [33]

[edit] Sikhism

In Sikhism, only vegetarian food is served in the Gurdwara (called Langar), but Sikhs are not totally bound to be meat-free[34].The exception to vegetarian langar is when Nihangs (in India) serve meat[35] on the occasion of Holla Mohalla, and call it Mahaprashad. There are also variation on the Vegetarian Langaar, for example at Hazur Sahib [36]. The general consensus is that Sikhs are free to choose whether to adopt the vegetarian diet or meat eating diet. Sikhism is a liberal, tolerant faith that acknowledges personal liberty and the crucial proponent of human nature, free will. As such, Sikh philosophy and Scriptures are not didactic in nature, for Sikhism offers spiritual, ethical and moral guidance to a fulfilling way of life rather than a tightly-construed and strict religious discipline.

The reason for serving vegetarian food is that the Langar is open to all. Since many faiths and people have varying taboos on what to eat and how meat should be prepared etc, and since Sikhs accept these restrictions and accommodate people no matter their faith or culture, the safest option thought by the Sikh Guru's was to adopt vegetarian food for Langar. Sikhs are bound to avoid meat that is killed in a ritualistic manner e.g. Halal, Kosher etc.[37][38]

Sikhism argues that the soul can possibly undergo millions of transformations as various forms of life before ultimately becoming human. These life forms could be a rock, vegetation or animal. Sikhism does not see a difference between mineral, vegetation and animal. The only distinction made is that between these (mineral, vegetation and animal), and human.[citation needed]

The first Sikh Guru Nanak Dev Ji said it was a pointless argument to debate the merits of either not eating or eating meat in the context of religion, as maintaining a strict diet does not make one blessed or elevate one to a superior status, spiritually or otherwise, over another. Being a member of a religion incorporates not merely one's dietary customs but the entire way in which they govern their lifestyle.[citation needed] He advocated a lifestyle consisting of honest, hard work and humility [Kirit Karo], focus and remembrance of God [Naam Jaapo] and compassion for all of humanity and God's creation all around Vaand Chakhna, with these three key principles taking far greater precedence over one's mere dietary habits.

[edit] Jainism

Vegetarianism in Jainism is based on the principle of nonviolence (ahimsa) like in Hinduism, but it is stricter than in the main Hindu traditions and mandatory for everyone. Jains are either lacto-vegetarians or vegans. No use or consumption of products obtained from dead animals is allowed. Moreover Jains try to avoid unnecessary injury to plants and suksma jiva (Sanskrit for subtle life forms; minuscule organisms). The goal is to cause as little violence to living things as possible, hence they avoid eating roots, tubers and anything that involves uprooting (and thus eventually killing) a plant to obtain food.

[edit] Abrahamic religions

Judaic, Christian, and Muslim traditions (Abrahamic religions) all have strong connections to the biblical ideal of the Garden of Eden, which includes references to a diet similar to fruitarianism (see Genesis 1:29, 9:2-4; Isaiah 11:6-9). However, only minorities within these populations actually practice and advocate such strict diets, since the same book of the Bible, Genesis, later gives permission to Noah (and presumably his descendants) to consume animal flesh due to an emergency lack of food situation.[citation needed]

[edit] Judaism

Rabbinical Judaism discourages ascetic practices in general, and encourages one to enjoy the bounty of this world in a proper fashion. With respect to food, this teaching may be summarized by the Talmudic statement, "Man will have to account for everything he saw but did not eat." (This refers to permissible or kosher foods only, not to forbidden animal species such as pork.) On the other hand, the Talmud discourages indulgence and states that it is preferable that one's diet consist mostly of non-meat products.[citation needed] To Jewish vegetarians wishing to remain consistent with this teaching, vegetarianism is not a form of self-deprivation, because the vegetarian does not desire to eat meat and believes it is healthier not to eat meat.

Genesis 1:29 states "And God said: Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree that has seed-yielding fruit - to you it shall be for food." According to some classical Jewish Bible commentators this means that God's original plan was for mankind to be vegetarian, and that God only later gave permission for man to eat meat because of man's weak nature.[39]· As the ideal images of the Torah are vegetarian, it is natural to similarly see the laws of kashrut as actually designed to wean us away from meat eating towards the vegetarian ideal.[40] The rituals of kashrut remind us of the magnitude of what we do each time we kill a living being.[41] Other commentators argue that people may eat animals because God gave Adam and Eve dominion over them.[citation needed]

Generally speaking, Judaism has not promoted vegetarianism. However, some prominent rabbis have promoted vegetarian lifestyle, among them the first Chief Rabbi of Palestine, Abraham Isaac Kook, his student David Cohen (known as "Ha-Nazir"), and Chief Rabbi of Israel Shlomo Goren. Rabbi Isaac ha-Levi Herzog said:[citation needed]

"Jews will move increasingly to vegetarianism out of their own deepening knowledge of what their tradition commands... A whole galaxy of central rabbinic and spiritual leaders...has been affirming vegetarianism as the ultimate meaning of Jewish moral teaching."
"Man ideally should not eat meat, for to eat meat a life must be taken, an animal must be put to death."

Rabbi Milgrom regards the commandment against blood as a law that permits man to "indulge in his lust for meat and not be brutalized in the process."[citation needed]

Some Orthodox authorities have ruled that it is forbidden for an individual to become a vegetarian if they do so because they believe in animal rights;[citation needed] however, they have ruled that vegetarianism is allowed for pragmatic reasons (if kosher meat is expensive or hard to come by in their area), health concerns, or for reasons of personal taste (if someone finds meat unpalatable). Some believe that halakha encourages the eating of meat at the Sabbath and Festival meals, thus some Orthodox Jews who are otherwise vegetarian will nevertheless consume meat at these meals.[citation needed]

There are several arguments from Judaism used by Jewish vegetarians. For the Jewish vegetarian there are three main components which prove vegetarianism to be an ethical mitzvah: tsar baalei haim, pikuah nefesh and bal tashchit. Tsaar Baalei Haim is the injunction not to cause ‘pain to living creatures’. Pikkuah Nefesh is not only the regard for human life which is in immediate danger. Bal Tashchit is the law which prohibits waste.[42] Another argument is that, since Adam and Eve were not allowed to eat meat and that, according to some opinions, in the Messianic era, the whole world will be vegetarian, not eating meat is something that brings the world closer to that ideal. In his booklet summarizing many of Rav Kook’s teachings, Joseph Green, a 20th-century South African Jewish vegetarian writer, concludes that Jewish religious ethical vegetarians are pioneers of the messianic era; they are leading lives that make the coming of the Messiah more likely. The Jewish tradition asserts that one way to speed the coming of the Messiah is to start practicing the ways that will prevail in the messianic time.[43] A second one is that the laws of shechita are meant to prevent the suffering of animals and today, with factory farming and high-speed, mechanized slaughterhouses, even kosher slaughterhouses are considered by some authorities not to fulfill enough of the requirements to render the meat kosher. A third one is that the Sages only mandated eating an olive's bulk of meat during festivals, but even then, this was because in Talmudic times, meat was considered essential for one's diet (whereas a vegetarian will probably be of the opinion that current science has shown otherwise).[citation needed]

Sacrifices were used as an excuse to eat meat, and later denounced.

They offer sacrifices to me because they are those who eat the meat, but Hashem does not accept their sacrifices, for He is mindful of their sin and remembers their wickedness
  • Hosea 6:6
For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
22 For when I brought your forefathers out of Egypt and spoke to them, I did not give them commands about burnt offerings and sacrifices, 23 but I gave them this command: Obey me, and I will be your God and you will be my people. Walk in all the ways I command you, that it may go well with you.
  • Isaiah 66:3
But whoever sacrifices a bull is like one who kills a man, and whoever offers a lamb, like one who breaks a dog's neck and whoever makes a grain offering is like one who presents pig's blood, and whoever burns memorial incense, like one who worships an idol. They have chosen their own ways, and their souls delight in their abominations;

In Israel there is one vegetarian moshav (village), called Amirim. Its vegetarianism is based on general principles of health and ethics and not on the Jewish religion.[citation needed]

[edit] Christianity

Several Christian monastic groups, including the Desert Fathers, Trappists, Benedictines and Carthusians, and also Christian esoteric groups, such as the Rosicrucian Fellowship,[44][45] have encouraged vegetarianism. Some Christian groups, such as Seventh-day Adventists and Christian anarchists, take a literal interpretation of the Biblical prophecies of universal vegetarianism and encourage vegetarianism as a preferred, though not required, lifestyle. However, most evangelical groups are unaware of the existence of any such prophecies, and point instead to the explicit prophecies of temple sacrifices in the Messianic Kingdom, many of which are eaten—see Ezekiel 46:12 where peace offerings and freewill offerings will be offered, and Leviticus 7:15-20 where it states that such offerings are eaten. Some Christian vegetarians argue that Jesus himself was a vegetarian. There is one argument that Jesus was an Essene (vegetarian inhabitants of the Dead Sea community at Qumran). The present academic consensus is that Jesus was not an Essene.[46] While it is true that there is a great deal that is not known about Jesus’ precise attitudes to animals, there is a strand in his ethical teaching about the primacy of mercy to the weak, the powerless and the oppressed.[47] Some key Christian historical figures such as St. Augustine and Saint David became vegetarians for ascetic reasons, not necessarily because of a religious edict to that effect. In the 19th century, members of the Bible Christian sect established the first vegetarian groups in England and the United States.

In God’s initial and ideal world, represented in the book of Genesis by the Garden of Eden, there was no suffering, no exploitation, and no violence at all. People and animals were vegetarians, as we read in the first chapter of Genesis: “God said, ‘See, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is upon the face of all the Earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit; you shall have them for food’” (1:29). Immediately after creating this beautiful, nonviolent, non-exploitative world, God describes it as “very good.” This is the only time in the narrative that God calls creation “very good” instead of merely “good” – and this immediately follows God’s command with regard to vegetarianism.[48]

However, it has been argued that the anthropocentric viewpoint of the Bible encourages human exploitation of animals and meat eating. Ge 1:26-28 has been interpreted to condemn vegetarianism. The Bible says: "..And God said, Let us make man in our image, and after our likeness: and let him have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth." In addition, another verse states "And God blessed them, Be fruitful and multiply, and subdue the earth; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth." However, some vegetarians point out that the Queen of England has dominion over her subjects, and that doesn't mean that she's allowed to eat them.[49]

In Genesis 1:30: "And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so." Continuing into Genesis 1:31, the Bible says: "And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."

Non-vegetarian Christians sometimes quote Numbers 11:31-32. “And there went forth a wind from the LORD, and brought quails from the sea, and let them fall by the camp, as it were a day's journey on this side, and as it were a day's journey on the other side, round about the camp, and as it were two cubits high upon the face of the earth. And the people stood up all that day, and all that night, and all the next day, and they gathered the quails: he that gathered least gathered ten homers: and they spread them all abroad for themselves round about the camp.” But the next verse says, “And while the flesh was yet between their teeth, ere it was chewed, the wrath of the LORD was kindled against the people, and the LORD smote the people with a very great plague.”

[edit] Islam

Islam explicitly prohibits eating of some kinds of meat, especially pork. However, one of the most important Islamic celebrations, Eid ul-Adha, involves animal sacrifices. Muslims who can afford to do so sacrifice their best domestic animals (usually sheep, but also camels, cows, and goats). According to the Quran[citation needed] a large portion of the meat has to be given towards the poor and hungry people so they can all join in the feast on Eid-ul-Adha. The remainder is cooked for the family celebration meal in which relatives and friends are invited to share. The regular charitable practices of the Muslim community are demonstrated during Eid ul-Adha by the concerted effort to see that no impoverished Muslim is left without sacrificial food during these days. Since these practices are justified by Koran, advocacy of vegetarianism by implying that God ordained diet to be immoral could be seen as contrary to Islam.[citation needed] Certain Islamic orders are mainly vegetarian; many Sufis maintain a vegetarian diet,[50] as do the Druze of Lebanon,[51] who, for instance, often frown upon the consumption of port.[52]

[edit] Rastafari

Rastafarians generally follow a diet called "I-tal", which eschews the eating of food that has been artificially preserved, flavoured, or chemically altered in any way. Many Rastafarians consider it to also forbid the eating of meat.

[edit] Bahá'í Faith

While there are no dietary restrictions in the Bahá'í Faith, `Abdu'l-Bahá, the son of the founder of the religion, noted that a vegetarian diet consisting of fruits and grains was desirable, except for people with a weak constitution or those that are sick.[53] He stated that there are no requirements that Bahá'ís become vegetarian, but that a future society would gradually become vegetarian.[53][54][55] `Abdu'l-Bahá also stated that killing animals was somewhat contrary to compassion.[53] While Shoghi Effendi, the Guardian of the Bahá'í Faith stated that a purely vegetarian diet would be preferable since it avoided killing animals,[56] both he and the Universal House of Justice, the governing body of the Bahá'ís have stated that these teachings do not constitute a Bahá'í practice and that Bahá'ís can choose to eat whatever they wish, but to be respectful of others beliefs.[53]

[edit] Other religions

[edit] Taoism

In Chinese societies, "simple eating" (素食 Mandarin: sù shí) refers to a particular restricted diet associated with Taoist monks, and sometimes practiced by members of the general population during Taoist festivals. It is referred to by the English word "vegetarian"; however, though it rejects meat, eggs, and milk, this diet does include oysters and oyster products.

[edit] Zoroastrianism

One of the main precepts in Zoroastrianism is respect and kindness towards all living things, condemnation of cruelty against animals and the sacrifice of animals.

[edit] Neopaganism

There is no set teaching on vegetarianism within the diverse neopagan communities, however many do follow a vegetarian diet often connected to ecological concerns as well as the welfare and rights of animals. Vegetarian practitioners of Wicca will often see their standpoint as a natural extension of the Wiccan Rede and Odinists of Odinism. Organisations like SERV refer to the historic figures of Porphyry, Pythagoras and Iamblichus as sources for the Pagan view of vegetarianism. [1] During the 1970s the publication Earth Religion News, focused on articles related to neopaganism and vegetarianism, it was edited by the author Herman Slater. [2]

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Tähtinen, Unto (1976). Ahimsa. Non-Violence in Indian Tradition. London. pp. 107-111. 
  2. ^ Walters, Kerry S.; Lisa Portmess (2001). Religious Vegetarianism From Hesiod to the Dalai Lama. Albany. pp. 37-91. 
  3. ^ "http://www.sikhism.com/rehatmaryada". Sikhism: A Universal Message. 2009-03-13. http://www.sikhism.com/rehatmaryada. Retrieved on 2009-05-26. 
  4. ^ Walters, Kerry S.; Lisa Portmess (2001). Religious Vegetarianism From Hesiod to the Dalai Lama. Albany. pp. 123-67. 
  5. ^ Iacobbo, Karen; Michael Iacobbo (2004). Vegetarian America. A History. Westport. pp. 3-14, 97-99, 232-233. 
  6. ^ "[www.sikhism101.com/node/288 What do you know of the Akhand Kirtani Jatha?]". Sikhism 101. UniversalFaith.net. www.sikhism101.com/node/288. Retrieved on 2009-05-26. 
  7. ^ Klostermaier, Klaus K. (in English). A survey of Hinduism (Edition: 2 ed.). SUNY Press. pp. 165. ISBN ISBN 0791421090, 9780791421093. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=avYkrkSmImcC. 
  8. ^ Grygus, Andrew (2007). "Hindu Dietary Customs" (in English). http://www.clovegarden.com/diet/hindu.html. Retrieved on 2009-06-13. 
  9. ^ Antoine Dubois, Jean; Carrie Chapman Catt. Hindu Manners, Customs and Ceremonies: The Classic First Hand Account of India in the Early Nineteenth Century. Henry K. Beauchamp. Courier Dover Publications. pp. 110. ISBN ISBN 0486421155, 9780486421155. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=A7kcabXnH00C. 
  10. ^ Walters, Kerry S. and Portmess, Lisa. Religious Vegetarianism: From Hesiod to the Dalai Lama. State University of New York Press. New York, 2001. p.41, 42, 61, 62, 187, 191. ISBN 0-7914-4972-6.
  11. ^ Walters, Kerry S. and Portmess, Lisa. Religious Vegetarianism: From Hesiod to the Dalai Lama. State University of New York Press. New York, 2001. p.41, 42, 61, 62, 187, 191. ISBN 0-7914-4972-6.
  12. ^ Mahabharata 3.199 is 3.207 according to another count.
  13. ^ Alsdorf p. 592-593.
  14. ^ Mahabharata 12.260. Mahabharata 12.260 is 12.268 according to another count.
  15. ^ Mahabharata 3.199. Mahabharata 3.199 is 3.207 according to another count.
  16. ^ Alsdorf p. 572-577 (for the Manu Smriti) and p. 585-597 (for the Mahabharata).
  17. ^ Bhagavad Gita 3.13.
  18. ^ Mahabharata 12.257 (note that Mahabharata 12.257 is 12.265 according to another count); Bhagavad Gita 9.26; Bhagavata Purana 7.15.7.
  19. ^ Gherand Samhita 5.17-21.
  20. ^ Bhagavad Gita 17.7-10.
  21. ^ Mahabharata 13.115.
  22. ^ Bhagavata Purana 11.5.14.
  23. ^ Bhagavata Purana 7.15.7.
  24. ^ Yadav, Y.; Kumar, S (August 14, 2006). "The food habits of a nation". The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/2006/08/14/stories/2006081403771200.htm. Retrieved on 2006-11-17. 
  25. ^ http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/business/increased-meat-consumption-in-india-china-driving-global-food-prices-eu_10045826.html
  26. ^ Leading a Buddhist Life - Five Precepts
  27. ^ Phelps, Norm. The Great Compassion: Buddhism & Animal Rights. Lantern Books. New York, 2004. p.XIII, 31, 32, 34, 49, 61, 62, 65, 85, 147. ISBN 1-59056-069-8.
  28. ^ What the Buddha Said About Eating Meat
  29. ^ Phelps, Norm. The Great Compassion: Buddhism & Animal Rights. Lantern Books. New York, 2004. p.XIII, 31, 32, 34, 49, 61, 62, 65, 85, 147. ISBN 1-59056-069-8.
  30. ^ Nirvana Sutra: Appreciation of the "Mahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra"
  31. ^ Phelps, Norm. The Great Compassion: Buddhism & Animal Rights. Lantern Books. New York, 2004. p.XIII, 31, 32, 34, 49, 61, 62, 65, 85, 147. ISBN 1-59056-069-8.
  32. ^ Lankavatara Sutra & The Faults of Eating Meat - 1/8
  33. ^ Phelps, Norm. The Great Compassion: Buddhism & Animal Rights. Lantern Books. New York, 2004. p.XIII, 31, 32, 34, 49, 61, 62, 65, 85, 147. ISBN 1-59056-069-8.
  34. ^ "Sikh Identity: An Exploration of Groups Among Sikhs" by Opinderjit Kaur Takhar, pg. 51, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, 2005, ISBN 0754652025
  35. ^ www.singhsabha.com/holla_mohalla.htm
  36. ^ http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=8G8gUr9fIKc Jhatka at Hazur Sahib Sikh Gurudwara
  37. ^ Misconceptions About Eating Meat - Comments of Sikh Scholars by Sandeep Singh Brar
  38. ^ Faithandfood Fact Files - Sikhism
  39. ^ Schwartz, Richard H. Judaism and Vegetarianism. Lantern Books. New York, 2001. p.1, 12, 16, 19, 188. ISBN 1-930051-24-7.
  40. ^ Kalechofsky, Roberta. Rabbis and Vegetarianism: An Evolving Tradition. Micah Publications. Massachusetts, 1995. p.16, 54, 55, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71. ISBN 916288-42-0.
  41. ^ Kalechofsky, Roberta. Rabbis and Vegetarianism: An Evolving Tradition. Micah Publications. Massachusetts, 1995. p.16, 54, 55, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71. ISBN 916288-42-0.
  42. ^ Kalechofsky, Roberta. Rabbis and Vegetarianism: An Evolving Tradition. Micah Publications. Massachusetts, 1995. p.16, 54, 55, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71. ISBN 916288-42-0.
  43. ^ Schwartz, Richard H. Judaism and Vegetarianism. Lantern Books. New York, 2001. p.1, 12, 16, 19, 188. ISBN 1-930051-24-7.
  44. ^ Article The Wisdom of the Vegetarian Diet by The Rosicrucian Fellowship (Esoteric Christians)
  45. ^ Max Heindel (1910s), New Age Vegetarian Cookbook, The Rosicrucian Fellowship (publisher), 492 pages
  46. ^ Young, Richard Alan. Is God a Vegetarian?. Carus Publishing Company. Chicago, 1999. p.4, 7, 56, 117. ISBN 0-8126-9393-0.
  47. ^ Walters, Kerry S. and Portmess, Lisa. Religious Vegetarianism: From Hesiod to the Dalai Lama. State University of New York Press. New York, 2001. p.41, 42, 61, 62, 187, 191. ISBN 0-7914-4972-6.
  48. ^ Dear, Fr. John. Christianity and Vegetarianism: Pursuing the Nonviolence of Jesus. 2003. p. 4,6,16.
  49. ^ http://animalliberationfront.com/Philosophy/Morality/moralityFAQ.htm#faq16
  50. ^ Arzenjani, Mohd. Almamoon (1957). "Sufism". 15th World Vegetarian Congress 1957. International Vegetarian Union. http://www.ivu.org/congress/wvc57/souvenir/sufism.html. Retrieved on 2009-05-26. 
  51. ^ Borowski, Oded (2003). Daily life in biblical times. Society of Biblical Literature. p. 65. ISBN 9781589830424. http://books.google.com/books?id=cIOjVnRo41wC&client=firefox-a. 
  52. ^ Betts, Robert Brenton (1990). The Druze. Yale University Press. pp. 37-38. ISBN 9780300048100. http://books.google.com/books?id=Z9nnPg1EDOEC. 
  53. ^ a b c d Smith, Peter (2000). "Diet". A concise encyclopedia of the Bahá'í Faith. Oxford: Oneworld Publications. pp. p. 121-122. ISBN 1-85168-184-1. 
  54. ^ Esslemont, J.E. (1980). Bahá'u'lláh and the New Era (5th ed.). Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. ISBN 0877431604. http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/o/BNE/bne-83.html.iso8859-1?. 
  55. ^ `Abdu'l-Bahá (1912). MacNutt. ed. The Promulgation of Universal Peace. Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. 1982. ISBN 0877431728. http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/ab/PUP/pup-60.html.iso8859-1?. 
  56. ^ The Research Department of the Universal House of Justice. "Extracts from The Writings Concerning Health, Healing, and Nutrition". http://www.bahai-library.org/compilations/health.healing.html#III. Retrieved on 2009-05-25. 

[edit] Further reading

  • Religious Vegetarianism: From Hesiod to the Dalai Lama (2001) edited by: Kerry Walters; Lisa Portmess
  • Steven J. Rosen, Diet for Transcendence (formerly published as Food for the Spirit): Vegetarianism and the World Religions, foreword by Isaac Bashevis Singer (Badger, California: Torchlight Books, 1997)
  • Steven J. Rosen, Holy Cow: The Hare Krishna Contribution to Vegetarianism and Animal Rights (New York: Lantern Books, 2004)
  • Roberta Kalechofsky, Rabbis and Vegetarianism: An Evolving Tradition. (Micah Publications. Massachusetts, 1995. ISBN 916288-42-0.)
  • Richard H. Schwartz, Judaism and Vegetarianism. (Lantern Books. New York, 2001. ISBN 1-930051-24-7.)
  • Richard Alan Young, Is God a Vegetarian? (Carus Publishing Company. Chicago, 1999. ISBN 0-8126-9393-0.)
  • Norm Phelps, The Great Compassion: Buddhism & Animal Rights. (Lantern Books. New York, 2004.ISBN 1-59056-069-8.)

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Languages