Verbal arithmetic, also known as alphametics, cryptarithmetic, crypt-arithmetic, cryptarithm or word addition, is a type of mathematical game consisting of a mathematical equation among unknown numbers, whose digits are represented by letters. The goal is to identify the value of each letter. The name can be extended to puzzles that use non-alphabetic symbols instead of letters.
The equation is typically a basic operation of arithmetic, such as addition, multiplication, or division. The classic example, published in the July 1924 issue of Strand Magazine by Henry Dudeney, is:
The solution to this puzzle is O = 0, M = 1, Y = 2, E = 5, N = 6, D = 7, R = 8, and S = 9.
Traditionally, each letter should represent a different digit, and (as in ordinary arithmetic notation) the leading digit of a multi-digit number must not be zero. A good puzzle should have a unique solution, and the letters should make up a cute phrase (as in the example above).
Verbal arithmetic puzzles are quite old and their inventor is not known. An 1864 example in The American Agriculturist disproves the popular notion that it was invented by Sam Loyd. The name "cryptarithmie" was coined by puzzlist Minos (pseudonym of Simon Vatriquant) in the May 1931 issue of Sphinx, a Belgian magazine of recreational mathematics, and was translated as "cryptarithmetic" by Maurice Kraitchik in 1942. In 1955, J. A. H. Hunter introduced the word "alphametic" to designate cryptarithms, such as Dudeney's, whose letters form meaningful words or phrases.
Solving a cryptarithm by hand usually involves a mix of deductions and exhaustive tests of possibilities. For instance, the following sequence of deductions solves Dudeney's SEND + MORE = MONEY puzzle above (columns are numbered from right to left):
- From column 5, M = 1 since it is the only carry-over possible from the sum of two single digit numbers in column 4.
- Since there is a carry in column 5, O must be less than or equal to M (from column 4). But O cannot be equal to M, so O is less than M. Therefore O = 0.
- Since O is 1 less than M, S is either 8 or 9 depending on whether there is a carry in column 3. But if there were a carry in column 3, N would be less than or equal to O (from column 3). This is impossible since O = 0. Therefore there is no carry in column 3 and S = 9.
- If there were no carry in column 3 then E = N, which is impossible. Therefore there is a carry and N = E + 1.
- If there were no carry in column 2, then ( N + R ) mod 10 = E, and N = E + 1, so ( E + 1 + R ) mod 10 = E which means ( 1 + R ) mod 10 = 0, so R = 9. But S = 9, so there must be a carry in column 2 so R = 8.
- To produce a carry in column 2, we must have D + E = 10 + Y.
- Y is at least 2 so D + E is at least 12.
- The only two pairs of available numbers that sum to at least 12 are (5,7) and (6,7) so either E = 7 or D = 7.
- Since N = E + 1, E can't be 7 because then N = 8 = R so D = 7.
- E can't be 6 because then N = 7 = D so E = 5 and N = 6.
- D + E = 12 so Y = 2.
The use of modular arithmetic often helps. For example, use of mod-10 arithmetic allows the columns of an addition problem to be treated as simultaneous equations, while the use of mod-2 arithmetic allows inferences based on the parity of the variables.
In computer science, cryptarithms provide good examples to illustrate the brute force method, and algorithms that generate all permutations of m choices from n possibilities. For example, the Dudeney puzzle above can be solved by testing all assignments of eight values among the digits 0 to 9 to the eight letters S,E,N,D,M,O,R,Y, giving 1,814,400 possibilities. They provide also good examples for backtracking paradigm of algorithm design.
When generalized to arbitrary bases, the problem of determining if a cryptarithm has a solution is NP-complete. (The generalization is necessary for the hardness result because in base 10, there are only 10! possible assignments of digits to letters, and these can be checked against the puzzle in linear time.)
- H. E. Dudeney, in Strand Magazine vol. 68 (July 1924), pp. 97 and 214.
- American Agriculturist 23 (12). December 1864. p. 349.
- Maurice Kraitchik, Mathematical Recreations (1953), pp. 79-80.
- J. A. H. Hunter, in the Toronto Globe and Mail (27 October 1955), p. 27.
- David Eppstein (1987). "On the NP-completeness of cryptarithms". SIGACT News 18 (3): 38–40. doi:10.1145/24658.24662.
||This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (July 2010)|
- Martin Gardner, Mathematics, Magic, and Mystery. Dover (1956)
- Journal of Recreational Mathematics, has a regular alphametics column.
- Jack van der Elsen, Alphametics. Maastricht (1998)
- Kahan S., Have some sums to solve: The complete alphametics book, Baywood Publishing, (1978)
- Brooke M. One Hundred & Fifty Puzzles in Crypt-Arithmetic. New York: Dover, (1963)