Wagstaff prime

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wagstaff prime
Named after Samuel S. Wagstaff, Jr.
Publication year 1989[1]
Author of publication Bateman, P. T., Selfridge, J. L., Wagstaff Jr., S. S.
Number of known terms 43
First terms 3, 11, 43, 683
Largest known term (213372531+1)/3
OEIS index A000979

In number theory, a Wagstaff prime is a prime number p of the form

p={{2^q+1}\over 3}

where q is another prime. Wagstaff primes are named after the mathematician Samuel S. Wagstaff Jr.; the prime pages credit François Morain for naming them in a lecture at the Eurocrypt 1990 conference. Wagstaff primes are related to the New Mersenne conjecture and have applications in cryptology.

Examples[edit]

The first three Wagstaff primes are 3, 11, and 43 because


\begin{align}
3 & = {2^3+1 \over 3}, \\[5pt]
11 & = {2^5+1 \over 3}, \\[5pt]
43 & = {2^7+1 \over 3}.
\end{align}

Known Wagstaff primes[edit]

The first few Wagstaff primes are:

3, 11, 43, 683, 2731, 43691, 174763, 2796203, 715827883, 2932031007403, 768614336404564651, … (sequence A000979 in OEIS)

As of October 2014, known exponents which produce Wagstaff primes or probable primes are:

3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 31, 43, 61, 79, 101, 127, 167, 191, 199, 313, 347, 701, 1709, 2617, 3539, 5807, 10501, 10691, 11279, 12391, 14479, 42737, 83339, 95369, 117239, 127031, 138937, 141079, 267017, 269987, 374321, 986191, 4031399, …, 13347311, 13372531 (sequence A000978 in OEIS)

In February 2010, Tony Reix discovered the Wagstaff probable prime:

\frac{2^{4031399}+1}3

which has 1,213,572 digits and was the 3rd biggest probable prime ever found at this date.[2]

In September 2013, Ryan Propper announced the discovery of two additional Wagstaff probable primes:[3]

\frac{2^{13347311}+1}3

and

\frac{2^{13372531}+1}3

Each is a probable prime with slightly more than 4 million decimal digits. It is not currently known whether there are any exponents between 4031399 and 13347311 that produce Wagstaff probable primes.

Primality testing[edit]

These numbers are proven to be prime for the values of q up to 42737. Those with q > 42737 are probable primes as of February 2010. The primality proof for q = 42737 was performed by François Morain in 2007 with a distributed ECPP implementation running on several networks of workstations for 743 GHz-days on an Opteron processor.[4] It was the third largest primality proof by ECPP from its discovery until March 2009.[5]

Currently, the fastest known algorithm for proving the primality of Wagstaff numbers is ECPP.

The LLR (Lucas-Lehmer-Riesel) tool by Jean Penné is used to find Wagstaff probable primes by means of the Vrba-Reix test. It is a PRP test based on the properties of a cycle of the digraph under x^2-2 modulo a Wagstaff number.

Generalizations[edit]

It is natural to consider[6] more generally numbers of the form

Q(b,n)=\frac{b^n+1}{b+1}

where the base b \ge 2. Since for n odd we have

\frac{b^n+1}{b+1}=\frac{(-b)^n-1}{(-b)-1}=R_n^{(-b)}

these generalized Wagstaff numbers are sometimes considered[7] a case of the repunit numbers with negative base -b.

For some specific values of b, all Q(b,n) (with a possible exception for very small n) are composite because of an "algebraic" factorization. Specifically, if b has the form of a perfect power with odd exponent (like 8, 27, 32, 64, 125, 128, 216, 243, etc. (sequence A070265 in OEIS)), then the fact that x^m+1, with m odd, is divisible by x+1 shows that Q(a^m, n) is divisible by a^n+1 in these special cases. Another case is b=4k^4, with k positive integer (like 4, 64, 324, 1024, 2500, 5184, etc. (sequence A141046 in OEIS)), where we have the aurifeuillean factorization.

However, when b does not admit an algebraic factorization, it can be conjectured that an infinite number of n values make Q(b,n) prime. (For b ≤ 300, there are 9 bases, 97, 103, 113, 175, 186, 187, 188, 220, and 284, without any known prime or PRP, and other 7 bases, 53, 124, 150, 182, 205, 222, and 296, with known PRP but no proved prime, see the list, notice all ns are odd primes)

(sequence A084742 in OEIS)

Base +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +10 +11 +12 +13 +14 +15 +16 +17 +18 +19 +20
0+ None 3 3 3 5 3 3 None 3 5 5 5 3 7 3 3 7 3 17 5
20+ 3 3 11 7 3 11 None 3 7 139 109 None 5 3 11 31 5 5 3 53
40+ 17 3 5 7 103 7 5 5 7 1153 3 7 21943 7 3 37 53 3 17 3
60+ 7 11 3 None 19 7 3 757 11 3 5 3 7 13 5 3 37 3 3 5
80+ 3 293 19 7 167 7 7 709 13 3 3 37 89 71 43 37 >10000 19 7 3
100+ 7 3 >10000 673 11 3 103 13 59 23 3 3 >10000 7 7 113 271 3 29 3
120+ 5 293 29 16427 None 5 317 7 17 467 5 3 5 13 5 5 101 103 3 59
140+ 5 3 7 3 7 17 11 3 17 6883 3 13 13 3 5 3 5 5 283 11
160+ 31 3 3 7 3 17 17 3 3 7 13 37 7 3 >10000 5 3 61 827 5
180+ 449 1487 11 19 11 >10000 >10000 >10000 3 3 479 109 3 19 3 43 31 37 313 7
200+ 43 229 5 3 5449 101 3 61 311 3 79 101 59 73 277 3 499 241 3 >10000
220+ 149 1657 5 7 383 7 89 7 11 13 7 3 11 7 223 11 3 23 59 7
240+ 19 5 None 71 5 3 3 7 19 857 5 43 5 569 7 5 5 5 19 397
260+ 109 7 13 19 5 31 3 5 11 17 401 103 3 61 7 5 59 167 3 3
280+ 7 7 37 >10000 29 5 137 3 3 5 3 19 47 3 29 1303 5 7 17 97

There are only probable prime for that b = 53, 124, 150, 182, 205, 222, and 296.

No known primes or PRPs for that b = 97, 103, 113, 175, 186, 187, 188, 220, and 284.

Because of the algebra factorization, there are no primes for that b = 8, 27, 32, 64, 125, and 243. (The case of b = 1 are all 1, but 1 is not prime)

It is expected that all odd primes are in the list.

For b=10, the primes themselves have the following appearance: 9091, 909091, 909090909090909091, 909090909090909090909090909091, … (sequence A097209 in OEIS), and these ns are: 5, 7, 19, 31, 53, 67, 293, 641, 2137, 3011, 268207, ... (sequence A001562 in OEIS).

The least base b such that Q(b, prime(n)) is prime are

2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 7, 2, 16, 61, 2, 6, 10, 6, 2, 5, 46, 18, 2, 49, 16, 70, 2, 5, 6, 12, 92, 2, 48, 89, 30, 16, 147, 19, 19, 2, 16, 11, 289, 2, 12, 52, 2, 66, 9, 22, 5, 489, 69, 137, 16, 36, 96, 76, 117, 26, 3, ... (This sequence starts with n = 2) (sequence A103795 in OEIS)

An open question is whether every natural number expect perfect powers with an odd exponent and numbers of the form 4k4 appears in this sequence? For example, 11 does not appear until the prime 179, and that 17 does not appear until the prime 967.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Bateman, P. T.; Selfridge, J. L.; Wagstaff, Jr., S. S. (1989). "The New Mersenne Conjecture". American Mathematical Monthly 96: 125–128. JSTOR 2323195. 
  2. ^ PRP Records
  3. ^ New Wagstaff PRP exponents, mersenneforum.org
  4. ^ Comment by François Morain, The Prime Database: (242737 + 1)/3 at The Prime Pages.
  5. ^ Caldwell, Chris, The Top Twenty: Elliptic Curve Primality Proof, The Prime Pages 
  6. ^ Dubner, H. and Granlund, T.: Primes of the Form (bn + 1)/(b + 1), Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 3 (2000)
  7. ^ Repunit, Wolfram MathWorld (Eric W. Weisstein)

External links[edit]