Waiting for "Superman"

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Waiting for "Superman"
Waiting for Superman.jpg
Directed by Davis Guggenheim
Produced by Lesley Chilcott
Written by Davis Guggenheim
Billy Kimball
Starring Geoffrey Canada
Music by Christophe Beck
Cinematography Bob Richman
Erich Roland
Editing by Jay Cassidy
Greg Finton
Kim Roberts
Studio Walden Media
Participant Media
Distributed by Paramount Vantage
Release dates
  • January 22, 2010 (2010-01-22) (Sundance)
  • September 24, 2010 (2010-09-24) (US)
Running time 102 min[1]
Country United States
Language English
Box office $6,426,457[1]

Waiting for "Superman" is a 2010 documentary film from director Davis Guggenheim and producer Lesley Chilcott.[2] The film analyzes the failures of the American public education system by following several students as they strive to be accepted into a charter school.

The film received the Audience Award for best documentary at the 2010 Sundance Film Festival.[3] The film also received the Best Documentary Feature at the Critics' Choice Movie Awards.[4][5]

Synopsis[edit]

Geoffrey Canada describes his journey as an educator and his surprise when he realizes upon entering adulthood that Superman is a fictional character and that no one is powerful enough to save us all.

Throughout the documentary, different aspects of the American public education system are examined. Things such as the ease in which a public school teacher achieves tenure, the inability to fire a teacher who is tenured, and how the system attempts to reprimand poorly performing teachers are shown to have an impact on the educational environment. Teaching standards are called into question as there is often conflicting bureaucracy between teaching expectations at the school, state, or federal level.

The film also examines teacher's unions. Michelle Rhee, the former chancellor of the Washington, D.C. public schools (the district with some of the worst-performing students at the time), is shown attempting to take on the union agreements that teachers are bound to, but suffers a backlash from the unions and the teachers themselves.

Statistical comparisons are made between the different types of primary or secondary educational institutions available: state school, private school, and charter school. There are also comparisons made between schools in affluent neighborhoods versus schools in poorer ones. Since charter schools do not operate with the same restrictions as public institutions, they are depicted as having a more experimental approach to educating students.

Since many charter schools are not large enough to accept all of their applicants, the selection of students is done by lottery. The film follows several families as they attempt to gain access to prominent charter schools for their children.

Details[edit]

Cast[edit]

Release[edit]

Waiting for "Superman" premiered in the US on September 24, 2010, in theaters in New York and Los Angeles, with a rolling wider release that began on October 1, 2010. During its opening weekend in New York City and Los Angeles, the film grossed $141,000 in four theaters, averaging $35,250 per theater.[1]

Title[edit]

The film's title is based on an interview with Geoffrey Canada wherein he recounts being told (as a child) by his mother that Superman was not real, and how he was frightened because there was nobody to save him.[citation needed]

Critical and media reception[edit]

The film has earned both praise and negative criticism from commentators, reformers, and educators.[6] As of May 1, 2011, the film has an 89% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.[7]

President Barack Obama greets members of the cast at the White House.

Roger Ebert gave the movie 3.5 stars out of 4 and wrote, "What struck me most of all was Geoffrey Canada's confidence that a charter school run on his model can make virtually any first-grader a high school graduate who's accepted to college. A good education, therefore, is not ruled out by poverty, uneducated parents or crime – and drug-infested neighborhoods. In fact, those are the very areas where he has success."[8] Scott Bowles of USA Today lauded the film for its focus on the students: "it's hard to deny the power of Guggenheim's lingering shots on these children."[9] Lisa Schwarzbaum of Entertainment Weekly gave the film an A−, calling it "powerful, passionate, and potentially revolution-inducing."[10] The Hollywood Reporter focused on Geoffrey Canada's performance as "both the most inspiring and a consistently entertaining speaker," while also noting it "isn't exhaustive in its critique."[11] Variety characterized the film's production quality as "deserving every superlative" and felt that "the film is never less than buoyant, thanks largely to the dedicated and effective teachers on whom Guggenheim focuses."[12] Geraldo Rivera praised the film for promoting discussion of educational issues.[13] Deborah Kenny, CEO and founder of the Harlem Village Academy, made positive reference to the film in a The Wall Street Journal op-ed piece about education reform.[14]

The film has also garnered praise from a number of conservative critics.[15] Joe Morgenstern, writing for The Wall Street Journal, gave the movie a positive review saying, "when the future of public education is being debated with unprecedented intensity," the film "makes an invaluable addition to the debate."[16] The Wall Street Journal's William McGurn also praised the film in an op-ed piece, calling it a "stunning liberal exposé of a system that consigns American children who most need a decent education to our most destructive public schools."[17] Kyle Smith, for the New York Post, gave the movie 4.5 stars, calling it an "invaluable learning experience."[18] Forbes' Melik Kaylan similarly liked the film, writing, "I urge you all to drop everything and go see the documentary Waiting For "Superman" at the earliest opportunity."[19]

The film also received negative criticism. Andrew O'Hehir of Salon wrote a negative review of the movie, saying that while there's "a great deal that's appealing," there's also "as much in this movie that is downright baffling."[20] Melissa Anderson of The Village Voice was critical of the film for not including enough details of outlying socioeconomic issues, saying, "macroeconomic responses to Guggenheim's query... go unaddressed in Waiting for "Superman," which points out the vast disparity in resources for inner-city versus suburban schools only to ignore them."[21] Anderson also opined that the animation clips were overused. In New York City, a group of local teachers protested one of the documentary's showings, calling the film "complete nonsense", saying that "there is no teacher voice in the film."[22]

Educational reception and allegations of inaccuracy[edit]

A 2009 study done by Stanford University found that, on average, charter schools perform about the same or worse than their traditional public school virtual twins.[23] The film does note, however, that most charter schools do not outperform public schools and focuses on those that do. It also states that only one in five charter schools outperform public schools (close to the 17% statistic).

Author and academic Rick Ayers lambasted the accuracy of the film, describing it as "a slick marketing piece full of half-truths and distortions."[24] In Ayers' view, the "corporate powerhouses and the ideological opponents of all things public" have employed the film to "break the teacher's unions and to privatize education," while driving teachers' wages even lower and running "schools like little corporations."[24] According to the film inflation-adjusted per-student spending has more than doubled since 1971, "from $4,300 to more than $9,000 per student," but that over the same period, test scores have "flatlined." Ayers also critiqued the film's promotion of a greater focus on "top-down instruction driven by test scores," positing that extensive research has demonstrated that standardized testing "dumbs down the curriculum" and "reproduces inequities," while marginalizing "English language learners and those who do not grow up speaking a middle class vernacular."[24] Lastly, Ayers contends that "schools are more segregated today than before Brown v. Board of Education in 1954," and thus criticized the film for not mentioning that in his view, "black and brown students are being suspended, expelled, searched, and criminalized."[24]

Diane Ravitch, Research Professor of Education at New York University and a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, similarly criticizes the film's lack of accuracy.[25] Ravitch notes that a study by Stanford University economist Margaret Raymond of 5000 charter schools found that only 17% are superior in math test performance to a matched public school, casting doubt on the film's claim that privately managed charter schools are the solution to bad public schools.[25] The film does note however that most charter schools do not outperform and that it focuses on those that do. As well, the film explicitly stated that one in five charter schools (close to the 17% statistic previously stated) were the overreaching, superior charter schools. Ravitch writes that many charter schools also perform badly, are involved in "unsavory real estate deals" and expel low-performing students before testing days to ensure high test scores.[25] The most substantial distortion in the film, according to Ravitch, is the film's claim that "70 percent of eighth-grade students cannot read at grade level," a misrepresentation of data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress.[25] Ravitch served as a board member with the NAEP and notes that "the NAEP doesn't measure performance in terms of grade-level achievement," as claimed in the film, but only as "advanced," "proficient," and "basic." The film assumes that any student below proficient is "below grade level," but this claim is not supported by the NAEP data.

A teacher-backed group called the Grassroots Education Movement produced a rebuttal film titled The Inconvenient Truth Behind Waiting for Superman. This film criticizes some public figures featured in Waiting for "Superman" and proposes different policies to improve education in the United States.[26]

Book release[edit]

There is also a companion book titled Waiting For "Superman": How We Can Save America's Failing Public Schools.[27]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Waiting for "Superman" at Box Office Mojo
  2. ^ Bill Gates Goes to Sundance, Offers an Education, Reuters, September 21, 2010
  3. ^ ""Winter's Bone," "Restrepo" Lead Sundance Award Winners". IndieWire. 2010-01-30. Retrieved 2010-01-30. 
  4. ^ "At the Critic's Choice Awards: Winners Are Social Network, Inception, Firth, Portman, Leo, Bale"
  5. ^ "Catching up with WAITING FOR SUPERMAN's Davis Guggenheim"
  6. ^ "'Waiting for "Superman" ': A simplistic view of education reform?". The Christian Science Monitor. 2010-09-24. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  7. ^ "Waiting for Superman Movie Reviews, Pictures". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 2011-04-01. 
  8. ^ Roger Ebert, Waiting for Superman Chicago Sun-Times, September 29, 2010
  9. ^ Bowles, Scott (2010-09-24). "The children are the heroes of Waiting for "Superman"". USA Today. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  10. ^ Schwarzbaum, Lisa (2010-09-25). "movie review: Waiting for "Superman" (2010)". Entertainment Weekly (New York, New York: Time). Retrieved 2010-09-26. 
  11. ^ DeFore, John (October 14, 2010). "Waiting For Superman – Film Review". The Hollywood Reporter. 
  12. ^ Anderson, John (January 23, 2010). "Waiting for Superman". Variety. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  13. ^ "Geraldo at Large." Broadcast: Saturday, September 25, 2010. Fox News.
  14. ^ Kenny, Deborah (2010-09-22). "A Teacher Quality Manifesto". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  15. ^ Guggenheim, Davis (2010-09-24). "How did 'Waiting for 'Superman's' ' Davis Guggenheim become the right wing's favorite liberal filmmaker?". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  16. ^ Morgenstern, Joe (2010-09-23). "A Subprime 'Wall Street'". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  17. ^ McGurn, William (2010-09-21). "An Even More Inconvenient Truth". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  18. ^ Smith, Kyle (2010-09-24). "Film's anguished lesson on why schools are failing". New York Post. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  19. ^ Kaylan, Melik (2010-09-24). "'Waiting For Superman' Is A Must-see". Forbes. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  20. ^ O'Hehir, Andrew. ""Waiting for 'Superman'": Can public education be saved?". Salon. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  21. ^ Anderson, Melissa (2010-09-22). "Ignoring the Inconvenient Truths in Waiting for Superman". The Village Voice. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  22. ^ DeMarche, Edmund (2010-09-25). "Protesting teachers give 'Waiting for Superman' an 'F'". New York Post. Retrieved 2010-10-20. 
  23. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Charter_School_Performance_Study.svg
  24. ^ a b c d Rick Ayers, An Inconvenient Superman: Davis Guggenheim's New Film Hijacks School Reform, The Huffington Post, September 17, 2010
  25. ^ a b c d Ravitch, Diane (2010-11-11). "The Myth of Charter Schools". The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 2010-10-26. 
  26. ^ Resmovits, Joy (2011-07-24). "NYC teachers counter 'Waiting for Superman' with film of their own". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2011-11-30. 
  27. ^ TakePart (2010). "Waiting For "Superman": How We Can Save America's Failing Public Schools". Waiting For "Superman". TakePart LLC. Retrieved 6 May 2012. 

External links[edit]

The Birth and Life of Charter Schools