Originally introduced to represent compressed suffix arrays, it has found application in several contexts. The tree is defined by recursively partitioning the alphabet into pairs of subsets; the leaves correspond to individual symbols of the alphabet, and at each node a bitvector stores whether a symbol of the string belongs to one subset or the other.
The name derives from an analogy with the wavelet transform for signals, which recursively decomposes a signal into low-frequency and high-frequency components.
If the tree is balanced, the operations , , and can be supported in time.
Several extensions to the basic structure have been presented in the literature. To reduce the height of the tree, multiary nodes can be used instead of binary. The data structure can be made dynamic, supporting insertions and deletions at arbitrary points of the string; this feature enables the implementation of dynamic FM-indexes. This can be further generalized, allowing the update operations to change the underlying alphabet: the Wavelet Trie exploits the trie structure on an alphabet of strings to enable dynamic tree modifications.
- Wavelet Trees. A blog post describing the construction of a wavelet tree, with examples.
- R. Grossi, A. Gupta, and J. S. Vitter, High-order entropy-compressed text indexes, Proceedings of the 14th Annual SIAM/ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), January 2003, 841-850.
- P. Ferragina, R. Giancarlo, G. Manzini, The myriad virtues of Wavelet Trees, Information and Computation, Volume 207, Issue 8, August 2009, Pages 849-866
- H.-L. Chan, W.-K. Hon, T.-W. Lam, and K. Sadakane, Compressed Indexes for dynamic text collections, ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 3(2), 2007
- R. Grossi and G. Ottaviano, The Wavelet Trie: maintaining an indexed sequence of strings in compressed space, In Proceedings of the 31st Symposium on the Principles of Database Systems (PODS), 2012