Weight (representation theory)
In the mathematical field of representation theory, a weight of an algebra A over a field F is an algebra homomorphism from A to F – a linear functional – or equivalently, a one dimensional representation of A over F. It is the algebra analogue of a multiplicative character of a group. The importance of the concept, however, stems from its application to representations of Lie algebras and hence also to representations of algebraic and Lie groups. In this context, a weight of a representation is a generalization of the notion of an eigenvalue, and the corresponding eigenspace is called a weight space.
Contents |
[edit] Motivation and general concept
[edit] Weights
Given a set S of matrices, each of which is diagonalizable, and any two of which commute, it is always possible to simultaneously diagonalize all of the elements of S.[note 1][note 2] Equivalently, for any set S of mutually commuting semisimple linear transformations of a finite-dimensional vector space V there exists a basis of V consisting of simultaneous eigenvectors of all elements of S. Each of these common eigenvectors v ∈ V, defines a linear functional on the subalgebra U of End(V) generated by the set of endomorphisms S; this functional is defined as the map which associates to each element of U its eigenvalue on the eigenvector v. This "generalized eigenvalue" is a prototype for the notion of a weight.
The notion is closely related to the idea of a multiplicative character in group theory, which is a homomorphism χ from a group G to the multiplicative group of a field F. Thus χ: G → F× satisfies χ(e) = 1 (where e is the identity element of G) and
- χ(gh) = χ(g)χ(h) for all g, h in G.
Indeed, if G acts on a vector space V over F, each simultaneous eigenspace for every element of G, if such exists, determines a multiplicative character on G; the eigenvalue on this common eigenspace of each element of the group.
The notion of multiplicative character can be extended to any algebra A over F, by replacing χ: G → F× by a linear map χ: A → F with
- χ(ab) = χ(a)χ(b) for all a, b in A.
If an algebra A acts on a vector space V over F to any simultaneous eigenspace corresponds an algebra homomorphism from A to F assigning to each element of A its eigenvalue.
If A is a Lie algebra, then the commutativity of the field and the anticommutativity of the Lie bracket imply that this map vanish on commutators : χ([a,b])=0. A weight on a Lie algebra g over a field F is a linear map λ: g → F with λ([x,y])=0 for all x, y in g. Any weight on a Lie algebra g vanishes on the derived algebra [g,g] and hence descends to a weight on the abelian Lie algebra g/[g,g]. Thus weights are primarily of interest for abelian Lie algebras, where they reduce to the simple notion of a generalized eigenvalue for space of commuting linear transformations.
If G is a Lie group or an algebraic group, then a multiplicative character θ: G → F× induces a weight χ = dθ: g → F on its Lie algebra by differentiation. (For Lie groups, this is differentiation at the identity element of G, and the algebraic group case is an abstraction using the notion of a derivation.)
[edit] Weight space of a representation
Let V be a representation of a Lie algebra g over a field F and let λ be a weight of g. Then the weight space of V with weight λ: g → F is the subspace
A weight of the representation V is a weight λ such that the corresponding weight space is nonzero. Nonzero elements of the weight space are called weight vectors.
If V is the direct sum of its weight spaces
then it is called a weight module; this corresponds to having an eigenbasis (a basis of eigenvectors), i.e., being a diagonalizable matrix.
Similarly, we can define a weight space Vλ for any representation of a Lie group or an associative algebra.
[edit] Semisimple Lie algebras
Let g be a Lie algebra, h a maximal commutative Lie subalgebra consisting of semi-simple elements (sometimes called Cartan subalgebra) and let V be a finite dimensional representation of g. If g is semisimple, then [g,g] = g and so all weights on g are trivial. However, V is, by restriction, a representation of h, and it is well known that V is a weight module for h, i.e., equal to the direct sum of its weight spaces. By an abuse of language, the weights of V as a representation of h are often called weights of V as a representation of g.
Similar definitions apply to a Lie group G, a maximal commutative Lie subgroup H and any representation V of G. Clearly, if λ is a weight of the representation V of G, it is also a weight of V as a representation of the Lie algebra g of G.
If V is the adjoint representation of g, its weights are called roots, the weight spaces are called root spaces, and weight vectors are sometimes called root vectors.
We now assume that g is semisimple, with a chosen Cartan subalgebra h and corresponding root system. Let us suppose also that a choice of positive roots Φ + has been fixed. This is equivalent to the choice of a set of simple roots.
[edit] Ordering on the space of weights
Let
be the real subspace of
(if it is complex) generated by the roots of
.
There are two concepts how to define an ordering of
.
The first one is
- μ ≤ λ if and only if λ − μ is nonnegative linear combination of simple roots.
The second concept is given by an element
and
- μ ≤ λ if and only if μ(f) ≤ λ(f).
Usually, f is chosen so that β(f) > 0 for each positive root β.
[edit] Integral weight
A weight
is integral (or
-integral), if
for each coroot Hγ such that γ is a positive root.
The fundamental weights
are defined by the property that they form a basis of
dual to the set of simple coroots
.
Hence λ is integral if it is an integral combination of the fundamental weights. The set of all
-integral weights is a lattice in
called weight lattice for
, denoted by
.
A weight λ of the Lie group G is called integral, if for each
such that
. For G semisimple, the set of all G-integral weights is a sublattice
. If G is simply connected, then
. If G is not simply connected, then the lattice P(G) is smaller than
and their quotient is isomorphic to the fundamental group of G.
[edit] Dominant weight
A weight λ is dominant, if
for each coroot Hγ such that γ is a positive root. Equivalently, λ is dominant, if it is a non-negative linear combination of the fundamental weights.
The convex hull of the dominant weights is sometimes called the fundamental Weyl chamber.
Sometimes, the term dominant weight is used to denote a dominant (in the above sense) and integral weight.
[edit] Highest weight
A weight λ of a representation V is called highest-weight, if no other weight of V is larger than λ. Sometimes, it is assumed that a highest weight is a weight, such that all other weights of V are strictly smaller than λ in the partial ordering given above. The term highest weight denotes often the highest weight of a "highest-weight module".
Similarly, we define the lowest weight.
The space of all possible weights is a vector space. Let's fix a total ordering of this vector space such that a nonnegative linear combination of positive vectors with at least one nonzero coefficient is another positive vector.
Then, a representation is said to have highest weight λ if λ is a weight and all its other weights are less than λ.
Similarly, it is said to have lowest weight λ if λ is a weight and all its other weights are greater than it.
A weight vector
of weight λ is called a highest-weight vector, or vector of highest weight, if all other weights of V are smaller than λ.
[edit] Highest-weight module
A representation V of
is called highest-weight module if it is generated by a weight vector
that is annihilated by the action of all positive root spaces in
.
This is something more special than a
-module with a highest weight.
Similarly we can define a highest-weight module for representation of a Lie group or an associative algebra.
[edit] Verma module
For each weight
, there exists a unique (up to isomorphism) simple highest-weight
-module with highest weight λ, which is denoted L(λ).
It can be shown that each highest weight module with highest weight λ is a quotient of the Verma module M(λ). This is just a restatement of universality property in the definition of a Verma module.
A highest-weight module is a weight module. The weight spaces in a highest-weight module are always finite dimensional.
[edit] See also
[edit] Notes
- ^ The converse is also true – a set of diagonalizable matrices commutes if and only if the set is simultaneously diagonalisable (Horn & Johnson 1985, pp. 51–53).
- ^ In fact, given a set of commuting matrices over an algebraically closed field, they are simultaneously triangularizable, without needing to assume that they are diagonalizable.
[edit] References
- Fulton, William; Harris, Joe (1991), Representation theory. A first course, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Readings in Mathematics, 129, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-97495-8, MR1153249, ISBN 978-0-387-97527-6.
- Goodman, Roe; Wallach, Nolan R. (1998), Representations and Invariants of the Classical Groups, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0521663489.
- Humphreys, James E. (1972a), Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, Birkhäuser, ISBN 978-0387900537.
- Horn, Roger A.; Johnson, Charles R. (1985), Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-38632-6
- Humphreys, James E. (1972b), Linear Algebraic Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 21, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90108-4, MR0396773
- Knapp, Anthony W. (2002), Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction (2nd ed.), Birkhäuser, ISBN 978-0817642594.

