Weld quality assurance
Weld quality assurance is the use of technological methods and actions to test or assure the quality of welds, and secondarily to confirm the presence, location and coverage of welds.[original research?] In manufacturing, welds are used to join two or more metal surfaces. Because these connections may encounter loads and fatigue during product lifetime, there is a chance they may fail if not created to proper specification.
- 1 Weld testing and analysis
- 2 Weld monitoring
- 3 See also
- 4 References
- 5 Further reading
Weld testing and analysis
Methods of weld testing and analysis are used to assure the quality and correctness of the weld after it is completed. This term generally refers to testing and analysis focused on the quality and strength of the weld, but may refer to technological actions to check for the presence, position and extent of welds. These are divided into destructive and non-destructive methods. A few examples of destructive testing include macro etch testing, fillet-weld break tests, transverse tension tests, and guided bend tests. Other destructive methods include acid etch testing, back bend testing, tensile strength break testing, nick break testing, and free bend testing. Non-destructive methods include fluorescent penetrate tests, magnaflux tests, eddy current (electromagnetic) tests, hydrostatic testing, tests using magnetic particles, X-rays and gamma ray based methods and acoustic emission techniques. Other methods include ferrite and hardness testing.
Visible light imaging
Inspection may be manual, conducted by an inspector using imaging equipment, or automated using machine vision. Since the similarity of materials between weld and workpiece, and between good and defective areas, provides little inherent contrast, the latter usually requires methods other than simple imaging.
One (destructive) method involves the microscopic analysis of a cross section of the weld.
Ultrasonic- and acoustic-based methods
Ultrasonic testing uses the principle that a gap in the weld changes the propagation of ultrasonic sound through the metal. One common method uses single-probe ultrasonic testing involving operator interpretation of an oscilloscope-type screen. Another senses using a 2D array of ultrasonic sensors.  Conventional, phased array and time of flight diffraction (TOFD) methods can be combined into the same piece of test equipment.
Acoustic emission methods monitor for sound created by the loading or flexing of the weld.
Peel testing of spot welds
This method includes tearing the weld apart and measuring the size of the remaining weld.
Weld monitoring methods are used to assure the quality and correctness of the weld during the process of welding. The term is generally applied to automated monitoring for weld-quality purposes and secondarily for process-control purposes such as vision-based robot guidance. Visual weld monitoring is also performed during the welding process.
On vehicular applications, weld monitoring has the goal of enabling improvements in the quality, durability, and safety of vehicles – with cost savings in the avoidance of recalls to fix the large proportion of systemic quality problems that arise from suboptimal welding. Quality monitoring in general of automatic welding can save production downtime, and can reduce the need for product reworking and recall.
Industrial monitoring systems encourage high production rates and reduce scrap costs.
Transient thermal analysis method
Transient thermal analysis is used for range of weld optimization tasks.
Signature image processing method
Signature image processing (SIP) is a technology for analyzing electrical data collected from welding processes. Acceptable welding requires exact conditions; variations in conditions can render a weld unacceptable. SIP allows the identification of welding faults in real time, measures the stability of welding processes, and enables the optimization of welding processes.
The idea of using electrical data analyzed by algorithms to assess the quality of the welds produced in robotic manufacturing emerged in 1995 from research by Associate Professor Stephen Simpson at the University of Sydney on the complex physical phenomena that occur in welding arcs. Simpson realized that a way of determining the quality of a weld could be developed without a definitive understanding of those phenomena. The development involved:
- a method for handling sampled data blocks by treating them as phase-space portrait signatures with appropriate image processing. Typically, one second's worth of sampled welding voltage and current data are collected from GMAW pulse or short arc welding processes. The data is converted to a 2D histogram, and signal-processing operations such as image smoothing are performed.
- a technique for analyzing welding signatures based on statistical methods from the social sciences, such as principal component analysis. The relationship between the welding voltage and the current reflects the state of the welding process, and the signature image includes this information. Comparing signatures quantitatively using principal component analysis allows for the spread of signature images, enabling faults to be detected and identified The system includes algorithms and mathematics appropriate for real-time welding analysis on personal computers, and the multidimensional optimization of fault-detection performance using experimental welding data. Comparing signature images from moment to moment in a weld provides a useful estimate of how stable the welding process is. "Through-the-arc" sensing, by comparing signature images when the physical parameters of the process change, leads to quantitative estimates—for example, of the position of the weld bead.
Unlike systems that log information for later study or that use X-rays or ultrasound to check samples, SIP technology looks at the electrical signal and detects faults when they occur. Data blocks of 4,000 points of electrical data are collected four times a second and converted to signature images. After image processing operations, statistical analyses of the signatures provide quantitative assessment of the welding process, revealing its stability and reproducibility, and providing fault detection and process diagnostics. A similar approach, using voltage-current histograms and a simplified statistical measure of distance between signature images has been evaluated for tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding by researchers from Osaka University.
SIP provides the basis for the WeldPrint system, which consists of a front-end interface and software based on the SIP engine and relies on electrical signals alone. It is designed to be non-intrusive and sufficiently robust to withstand harsh industrial welding environments. The first major purchaser of the technology, GM Holden provided feedback that allowed the system to be refined in ways that increased its industrial and commercial value. Improvements in the algorithms, including multiple parameter optimization with a server network, have led to an order-of-magnitude improvement in fault-detection performance over the past five years.[when?]
WeldPrint for arc welding became available in mid-2001. About 70 units have been deployed since 2001, about 90% of them used on the shop floors of automotive manufacturing companies and of their suppliers. Industrial users include Lear (UK), Unidrive, GM Holden, Air International and QTB Automotive (Australia). Units have been leased to Australian companies such as Rheem, Dux, and OneSteel for welding evaluation and process improvement.
The WeldPrint software received the Brother business software of the year award (2001); in 2003, the technology received the A$100,000 inaugural Australasian Peter Doherty Prize for Innovation; and WTi, the University of Sydney's original spin-off company, received an AusIndustry Certificate of Achievement in recognition of the development.
SIP has opened opportunities for researchers to use it as a measurement tool both in welding and in related disciplines, such as structural engineering. Research opportunities have opened up in the application of biomonitoring of external EEGs, where SIP offers advantages in interpreting the complex signals
- http://www.esabna.com/us/en/education/knowledge/weldinginspection/Destructive-Testing-of-Welds.cfm Destructive Testing of Welds by ESAB [unreliable source?]
- http://www.angelfire.com/my/welding/test.html[unreliable source?]
- http://www.clemex.com/pdf/reports/WeldingAnalysis692.pdf Welding Analysis – Image Analysis Report #692, Clemex Technologies Inc.[unreliable source?]
- http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/109/2/j92den.pdf Spot Weld Analysis with 2D ultrasonic Arrays Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Volume 109, Number 2, March-April 2004 A.A. Denisov, C.M Shakarji, B.B. Lawforfd, R. Gr. Maev J.M Paille
- On-Site Ultrasonics, Marc-Antoine Blanchet, Quality Magazine, April 2012, pages 6-7 (NDT section)
- Sun, A. S. (2001). "Time-frequency analysis of laser weld signature". Proceedings of SPIE 4474. p. 103. doi:10.1117/12.448639. "Reliable monitoring methods are essential for maintaining a high level of quality control in laser welding. In industrial processes, monitoring systems allow for quick decisions on the quality of the weld, allowing for high productions rates and reducing overall cost due to scrap."
- http://www.ansys.net/ansys/papers/ARTICLE1.pdf Transient Thermal Analysis of Spot Welding Electrodes by K.S. Yeung and P.H. Thorton January 1999 Supplement to the Welding Journal, American Welding Society and the Welding Research Council
- Simpson SW and Gillespie P (1998) "In-process monitoring of welding processes—a commercial success", Australasian Welding Journal, 43, 16–17
- Simpson SW, Weld quality measurement, WIPO PCT WO9845078 (1998); US 6288364 (2001); Australia 741965 (2002); Europe (14 countries) 1007263 (2003); Canada 2285561 (2004); South Korea 0503778 (2005)
- Simpson SW, Welding assessment, WIPO PCT WO0143910 (2001); Australia 763689, US 6660965 (2003); Canada 2393773 (2005); PAs: Japan 2001-545030 (2001); China 00817251.X, S. Korea 2002-7007624, India IN/PCT/2002/00740 2002), Brazil PI0016401-1, EU 00984649.4 (2002)
- Simpson SW (2007) "Signature images for arc welding fault detection", Science & Technology of Welding and Joining, 12(6), 481–86
- Simpson, SW (2007) "Statistics of signature images for arc welding fault detection", Science & Technology of Welding and Joining, 12(6), 557–64
- Simpson SW (2008) "Fault identification in gas metal arc welding with signature images", Science & Technology of Welding and Joining, 13(1), 87–96
- Simpson SW, "Statistics of signature images for arc welding fault detection", Science & Technology of Welding and Joining, 12(6), 557–64, 2007
- Simpson SW (2008) "Signature image stability and metal transfer in gas metal arc welding", Science & Technology of Welding and Joining, 13(2), 176–83
- Simpson SW (2009) "Automated fault detection in gas metal arc welding with signature images", Australasian Welding Journal – Welding Research Supplement, 54, 41–47
- Simpson SW (2008) "Through The arc sensing in gas metal arc welding with signature images", Science & Technology of Welding and Joining, 13(1), 80–86
- Australian Technology Showcase - Welding Technologies Innovations
- Matsubara T, Terasaki H, Otsuka H, and Komizo Y (2010) "Developments of real-time monitoring method of welding" (paper RAJU-VE1), Proceedings of the Visual-JW2010
- "Holden orders award-winning weldprint welding technology", Techwatch, Price Waterhouse Coopers, 12(6), 2002,
- "Holden purchases award winning weldprint welding technology", Australian Technology Showcase http://www.techshowcase.nsw.gov.au/ News and Events (2002)
- "University weld checker to be used by Holden", Australian Innovation Magazine, 3–5/02, 29
- "Bright sparks join forces to take out Doherty Prize", The Australian (national newspaper)—Higher Education Supplement, 2 April 2003
- *"Weldprint Wins Award". Innovations. Radio Australia. 11 May 2003. Retrieved 19 January 2011.
- Nguyen NT, Mai Y-W, Simpson SW and Ohta A (2004) “Analytical approximate solution for double-ellipsoidal heat source in finite thick plate”, Welding J, 83, 82s
- The LH and Hancock GJ (2005) "Strength of welded connections in G450 sheet steel", J Struct Eng, 131, 1561
- "Car plant technology has medical spin-off", UniNews, USyd, 34(1), 1 (2002)
- ISO 3834-1: "Quality requirements for fusion welding of metallic materials. Criteria for the selection of the appropriate level of quality requirements" 2005)
- ISO 3834-2: "Quality requirements for fusion welding of metallic materials. Comprehensive quality requirements" (2005)
- ISO 3834-3: "Quality requirements for fusion welding of metallic materials. Standard quality requirements" (2005)
- ISO 3834-4: "Quality requirements for fusion welding of metallic materials. Elementary quality requirements" (2005)
- ISO 3834-5: "Quality requirements for fusion welding of metallic materials. Documents with which it is necessary to conform to claim conformity to the quality requirements of ISO 3834-2, ISO 3834-3 or ISO 3834-4"
- ISO/TR 3834-6: "Quality requirements for fusion welding of metallic materials. Guidelines on implementing ISO 3834" (2007)