(Vigors & Horsfield, 1827)
- 1 Description
- 2 Identification
- 3 Similar species
- 4 Habitat
- 5 Distribution
- 6 Behaviour
- 7 Threats and human interactions
- 8 Status and conservation
- 9 Also known as
- 10 References
The White-browed Babbler (Pomatostomus superciliosus) is a small, gregarious species of bird in the Pomatostomidae family. They are endemic to the open woodlands and shrubby areas of central and southern Australia. The Latin name superciliosus refers to the supercilium or ‘eyebrow’, which is a feature synonymous with the pomatostomine babblers (Hall’s Babbler, Chestnut-crowned Babbler, Grey-crowned Babbler and White-browed Babbler).
Ranging from 17 cm to 21 cm in length the White-browed Babbler is the smallest of the Australian babblers. It is a medium sized terrestrial bird with a long and decurved bill. The wings are short and rounded in shape adjoining to a plump, full body which is similar, but slightly smaller than the Chestnut-crowned or Hall’s Babbler. The tail is long and graduated ending with a rounded tip. The gregarious nature of this species means that the tail is often fanned or raised or any mix of the two. There are many variations to colour, however the adult babbler generally varies from a dark grey-brown to solid dark brown with distinguished white supercilium and dark brown eye stripe. The underside is usually lighter in colour, varying from light grey or white to light brown, sometimes lighter for females, but generally sexes are similar. Juvenile individuals often have more pronounced dark plumage with a chestnut or cinnamon motif, especially on the underside. Breeding adult males may sometimes have a more pronounced brown ‘cap’ compared to females or juvenile individuals.
Hall's Babbler (Pomatostomus halli)
The species most often confused with the White-browed Babbler because of their similarity in size, the two can best be distinguished by comparing the supercilium; Hall’s Babbler has a narrow and very dark brown crown-stripe with a much broader, vivid white supercilium. Secondly, Hall’s Babbler does not have a ‘fading’ eye-stripe towards the rear of the head where there is more chestnut brown colouration. Individuals will have vivid colouration on the face and will never have a white dot under the eye which is sometimes present in the White-browed Babbler. The tail will also have a square edge rather than a round edge which the White-browed Babbler would have, however this feature is sometimes not as reliable in juvenile individuals.
Chestnut-crowned Babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps)
Chestnut-crowned Babblers are most easily defined by the colour of their cap and wing patterns. They have a much lighter ‘chestnut’ coloured cap and distinct double white wing-bars across coverts.
Grey-crowned Babbler (Pomatostomus temporalis)
The Grey-crowned Babbler is significantly larger than its White-browed counterpart. Their size means that to conserve energy their wing beat pattern changes to a more sporadic flapping and gliding rather than even and fast wing beats.
The habitat for the White-browed Babbler varies across the southern regions of Australia from dry sclerophyll woodlands, shrublands, heathland, semi-arid grasslands or open forests. They prefer areas with a dense understory of shrubs or spinifex for protection and nesting. Their range extends through arid and semi arid areas all the way across the South Australian coastline to Western Australia, and by doing so crosses many different ecological vegetation classes (EVCs). No preference seems to be shown with the overall composition of habitat, only that when the understory provides a good quality protection from the environment and predators the species is more successful. Populations have been found in many locations across southern Australia including dry, rocky gibber desert, Mulga, Eucalypt or Acacia woodlands Studies have also found many populations in and around human related infrastructure (see below).
Babblers spend the majority of their time foraging through leaf litter on the ground, although during nesting periods they retreat to nests inside hollowed logs, grass clumps, fallen branches or shrubs.
Populations of White-browed Babbler live throughout the southern mainland of Australia. Generally they are located south of the tropic of Capricorn from the east to west coast of Australia. The populations that exist in the central areas of Australia tend to be more isolated than those nearer to the coastline.
Breeding is widespread throughout the year and across distribution, it depends mostly on environmental conditions. During drought breeding is less prevalent, or the amount of eggs laid can be reduced from four or five to two. Co-operative breeding is common within this species. This is when groups of between two to four breeding pairs and various other individuals form a breeding community which take turns incubating eggs and repairing nests. Incubation takes around 19 days followed by a further 20 days developing in the nest.
Breeding pairs are usually monogamous even though co-operative breeding takes place. Pairs spend almost the entire year in close proximity, preening each other regularly and working in unison to defend territory or feeding together. Prospective males perch next to females facing the same direction and begin a loud chatter jumping from one side of female to the other and then fluttering their wings with their head thrown back. Females then mimic the chatter and wing fluttering. Usually this occurs from late August to mid September although can occur at other times before breeding.
Nests are dome-like in shape with a hooded entrance, usually made from small sticks from surrounding environment. Some nests in colder areas have been found to be lined with soft scavenged furs. On some occasions they build two nests, one for roosting and the other for brooding, in other words one for resting and the other for raising young.
Feeding and diet
The diet of the White-browed Babbler varies depending on the area that they live in and the availability of food sources. Insects, spiders, amphibians, crustaceans, reptiles, fruit, seeds and nuts have been found to be part of their diet, most commonly varieties of these which can be found on the ground where they spend the majority of their time. Adult feeding individuals have a log or branch from which they hide in and return to, rarely venturing from their nest or feeding areas that are known to them. Juveniles without partners tend to be more adventurous while feeding or searching for partners, although they still move between safe areas.
The most common call heard is a low repeated ‘chuck’ call which is thought to be a contact call while foraging. The long distance call consists of chattering ‘mee’ sounds repeated three or more times followed by whistled ‘wee-aw’ which rises in pitch. As the name suggests this may be used for communication over long distances with individuals removed from the group, it tends to be much louder than other calls.
When a group is in distress they all form a chorus of ‘churring’ sounds, this combined with moving from perch to perch seems to communicate danger and serves as an alarm. There have been studies that suggest that varying numbers of these calls or the speed of them suggest varying levels of danger.
Threats and human interactions
Threats to the species are generally associated with habitat clearing and fragmentation from expanding agriculture and forestry. The most prevalent areas of agriculture are in the Western Australian wheat belt area, where land clearing has led to highly disconnected vegetation. Forestry and landscape sized bushfires in Victoria are responsible for widespread clearing of remnant vegetation.
Pressure from predation also occurs from introduced species such as cats and foxes. These species, among others have a complex and widespread impact on the ecosystem. Models that predict the effects of these species suggest that they could have an impact on the numbers of native birds in the long term.
Some studies have found nesting sites on roadsides, golf courses, orchards, agricultural areas and buildings. Other studies indicate that anywhere that understory and groundcover was dense or protection was offered there were likely to be higher densities of White-browed Babbler.
Status and conservation
- Commonwealth status: Not listed
- State of Victoria: Least concern
- State of South Australia: Least concern
- State of Western Australia: Least concern
Given the large range of the species the IUCN has deemed that the population of White-browed Babblers in Australia does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion. The size and density has generally been in decline since the 1970s although the rate at which this is occurring suggests that there is little need for concern for the species.
Given that the persistence of the species is of little concern there are no conservation efforts tailored specifically for it, however there is significant decline of other species in the ecosystems which the White-browed Babbler inhabits. Many of these studies suggest that remnant vegetation is integral to the health of these ecosystems, and that their removal can cause higher levels of competition in an area. This leads to interspecies competition for remnant vegetation and the species that rely on them decline in number. Others suggest that the generalist style of feeding is best suited to these degraded landscapes, and therefore the White-browed Babbler is least susceptible to degraded conditions.
Also known as
White-eyebrowed Babbler, White Eyebrowed Chatterer, White-browed Chatterer, Cackler, Catbird, Chatterer, Go-always, Happy Family, Hopping Dick, Hopping Jenny, Jumper, Kangaroo Bird, Stickbird, Yahoo.
- BirdLife International (2012). "Pomatostomus superciliosus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
- Higgins, P.; Peter, J. (2003). Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds 6. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
- Ford, J. (1977). "Sympatry in Hall's and White-browed Babblers in New South wales". Emu 77 (1): 40. doi:10.1071/MU9770040.
- Briggs, S. V.; Seddon, J. A.; Doyle, S. J. (2007). "Structures of bird communities in woodland remnants in central New South Wales Australia". Australian Journal of Zoology 55 (1): 29–40. doi:10.1071/ZO06064.
- Oppenheimer, S.; Astheimer, L.; Anderson, M. J.; Buttemer, B. (2007). "Morphometric measures as a moderate predictor of gender in the white-browed babbler Pomatostomus superciliosus gilgandra". Corella 31 (1): 15–18.
- Thomson, J. R.; Mac Nally, R.; Fleishman, E.; Horrocks, G. (2007). "Predicting Bird Species Distributions in Reconstructed Landscapes". Conservation Biology 21 (3): 752–766. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00687.x.
- Miura, G.I.; Edwards, S.V. (2001). "Cryptic differentiation and geographic variation in genetic diversity of Hall's Babbler Pomatostomus halli". Journal of Avian Biology 32 (2): 102–110. doi:10.1034/j.1600-048X.2001.320202.x.
- Gill, B.; Dow, D. (1983). "Morphology and Development of Nestling Grey-crowned and Hall's Babblers". Emu 83 (1): 41–43. doi:10.1071/MU9830041.
- Brown, J.L.; Balda, R.P. (1977). "The Relationship of Habitat Quality to Group Size in Hall's Babbler (Pomatostomus halli)". The Condor 79 (3): 312–320. doi:10.2307/1368008.
- Allen, C.R.; Saunders, D.A. (2002). "Variability between Scales: Predictors of Nomadism in Birds of an Australian Mediterranean-climate Ecosystem". Ecosystems 5 (4): 348–359. doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0079-z.
- Pavey, C.R.; Nano, C.E.M. (2009). "Bird assemblages of arid Australia: Vegetation patterns have a greater effect than disturbance and resource pulses". Journal of Arid Environments 73 (6–7): 634–642. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.01.010.
- Taylor, S.G.; Paul, W.L. (2006). "Minimal diurnal change in foraging time in an Australian passerine, the white-browed babbler Pomatostomus superciliosus". Journal of Avian Biology 37 (5): 527–531. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2006.03530.x.
- Arnold, G.W.; Weeldenburg, J.R. (1998). "The effects of isolation, habitat fragmentation and degradation by livestock grazing on the use by birds of patches of Gimlet Eucalyptus salubris woodland in the wheatbelt of Western Australia". Pacific Conservation Biology 4 (2): 155–163.
- Fulton, G.R.; Majer, J.D. (2006). "The effect of recent chaining on birds in the eastern wheatbelt of Western Australia". Pacific Conservation Biology 12 (3): 168–174.
- Lynch, J.F.; Carmen, W.J.; Saunders, D.A.; Cale, P. (1996). "Use of vegetated road verges and habitat patches by four bird species in the central wheatbelt of Western Australia". Nature Conservation 4: The role of networks. Surrey Beatty. pp. 34–42. ISBN 0949324655.
- Antos, M.J.; Bennett, A.F. (2006). "Foraging ecology of ground-feeding woodland birds in temperate woodlands of southern Australia". Emu 106 (1): 29–40. doi:10.1071/MU05039.
- Cunningham, R.B.; Lindenmayer, D.B.; Crane, M.; Michael, D.; MacGregor, C.; Montague-Drake, R.; Fischer, J. (2008). "The Combined Effects of Remnant Vegetation and Tree Planting on Farmland Birds". Conservation Biology 22 (3): 742–752. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00924.x.
- MacNally, R.; Horrocks, G.; Bennett, A.F. (2002). "Nestedness in fragmented landscapes: birds of the box-ironbark forests of south-eastern Australia". Ecography 25 (6): 651–660. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250602.x.
- Antos, M.J.; Bennett, A.F.; White, J.G. (2008). "Where exactly do ground-foraging woodland birds forage? Foraging sites and microhabitat selection in temperate woodlands of southern Australia". Emu 108 (3): 201–211. doi:10.1071/MU08005.
- Luck, G.W.; Possingham, H.P.; Paton, D.C. (1999). "Bird responses at inherent and induced edges in the Murray Mallee, South Australia. 1. Differences in abundance and diversity". Emu 99 (3): 157–169.
- Attiwill, P.M. (1994). "Ecological disturbance and the conservative management of eucalypt forests in Australia". Forest Ecology and Management 63 (2-3): 301–346. doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)90115-5.
- Short, J.; Kinnear, J.E.; Robley, A (2002). "Surplus killing by introduced predators in Australia—evidence for ineffective anti-predator adaptations in native prey species?". Biological Conservation 103 (3): 283–301. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00139-2.
- James, C.D. (2003). "Response of vertebrates to fenceline contrasts in grazing intensity in semi-arid woodlands of eastern Australia". Austral Ecology 28 (2): 137–151. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01259.x.
- Cooney, S.J.N.; Watson, D.M.; Young, J. (2006). "Mistletoe nesting in Australian birds: a review". Emu 106 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1071/MU04018.