Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard
|
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page. |
| Announcement archives: 0 · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10
|
Contents
- 1 Personnel changes in the Oversight team
- 2 New appointment to the Oversight team
- 3 Proposed change to Arbitration Committee internal procedures
- 4 CheckUser for 2014 Election Scrutineers
- 5 Arbitration motion amending and rescinding some discretionary sanctions remedies
- 6 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF closed
- 7 Arbitration motion regarding Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement (Xenophrenic)
Personnel changes in the Oversight team
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk · contribs) is hereby reappointed as a member of the Oversight team, following a leave of absence from the role due to lack of time.
Richwales (talk · contribs), formerly a member of the Audit Subcommittee, is hereby appointed as a member of the Oversight team.
For the Arbitration Committee, LFaraone 01:22, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
New appointment to the Oversight team
In compliance with the relevant policy, as a sitting arbitrator, Seraphimblade (talk · contribs) is hereby appointed as a member of the Oversight team.
- Support: GorillaWarfare, Newyorkbrad, Timotheus Canens, LFaraone, Beeblebrox, Salvio giuliano, Roger Davies, AGK, Carcharoth, Worm That Turned.
- Not voting: David Fuchs, NativeForeigner.
- Recused: Seraphimblade.
For the Arbitration Committee, Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Proposed change to Arbitration Committee internal procedures
The Arbitration Committee is currently considering a change to its internal rules and procedures regarding arbitrator requests for self-assignment of CheckUser or Oversight permissions. The proposed motion can be viewed on this page, community members are invited to comment on the motion in the appropriate section on that page. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
CheckUser for 2014 Election Scrutineers
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
For the purpose of scrutineering the 2014 Arbitration Committee elections, stewards User:Matanya, User:Barras, and User:Trijnstel, appointed as scrutineers, are granted temporary local CheckUser permissions effective from the time of the passage of this motion until the certification of the election results.
For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration motion amending and rescinding some discretionary sanctions remedies
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Following a request to amend several prior decisions to terminate discretionary sanctions provisions that may no longer be necessary,
- Remedy 14 of the Ayn Rand case is rescinded;
- Remedy 5 of the Monty Hall problem case is rescinded;
- Remedy 1 of the Longevity case is rescinded;
- The discretionary sanctions authorised explicitly for the Cold fusion 2 and the Homeopathy cases are rescinded. The discretionary sanctions authorised for the Pseudoscience and "Fringe science" cases continue to apply. Additionally, Remedy 14 of the Pseudoscience case is amended by replacing the word "articles" with the word "pages" for consistency;
- Remedy 5 of the Tree shaping case is rescinded;
- Remedy 10 of the Gibraltar case is rescinded;
- Nothing in this motion provides grounds for appeal of remedies or restrictions imposed while discretionary sanctions for the foregoing cases were in force. Such appeals or requests to lift or modify such sanctions may be made under the same terms as any other appeal;
- In the event that disruptive editing resumes in any of these topic-areas, a request to consider reinstating discretionary sanctions in that topic-area may be made on the clarifications and amendments page.
- A record of topics for which discretionary sanctions have been authorised and subsequently terminated is to be established and maintained on the discretionary sanctions main page.
The archived copy of the amendment request and discussion can be viewed here. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:03, 30 November 2014 (UTC)\
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF closed
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
-
- Editors topic banned by the Committee under this remedy are prohibited on the English Wikipedia from: (i) editing the pages of the Gender Gap Task Force; (ii) discussing the gender disparity among Wikipedians; and (iii) participating in any process broadly construed to do with these topics. An uninvolved admin may remove any comments that breach this remedy, and impose blocks as necessary. The Committee's standard provisions on enforcement of arbitration provisions and appeals and modifications of arbitration enforcements apply.
- Carolmooredc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely topic banned from the Gender gap topic.
- For her actions discussed in this case, Carolmooredc is indefinitely banned from the English Language Wikipedia. She may request reconsideration of the ban twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Eric Corbett (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely topic banned from the Gender gap topic.
- Eric Corbett agrees to a restriction prohibiting him from shouting at, swearing at, insulting and/or belittling other editors. The restriction comes into immediate effect on the passing of this motion.
If Eric Corbett finds himself tempted to engage in prohibited conduct, he is to disengage and either let the matter drop or refer it to another editor to resolve.
If however, in the opinion of an uninvolved administrator, Eric Corbett does engage in prohibited conduct, he may be blocked. The first two such blocks shall be of 72 hours duration, increasing thereafter for each subsequent breach to one week, one month, and three months. Any blocks under this provision are arbitration enforcement actions and may only be reviewed or appealed at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Should a fifth block (three months) prove necessary, the blocking administrator must notify the Arbitration Committee of the block via a Request for Clarification and Amendment so that the remedy may be reviewed.
The enforcing administrator may also at their discretion fully protect Eric Corbett's talk page for the duration of the block.
Nothing in this remedy prevents enforcement of policy by uninvolved administrators in the usual way.
- Neotarf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely topic banned from the Gender gap topic. Neotarf is also warned that complaints about usernames should be made through appropriate channels and that further accusations, as well as unnecessary antagonism, may result in sanctions.
- For their actions discussed in this case, and in particular for adopting a consistently hostile attitude to other contributors, Neotarf is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia. They may request reconsideration of the ban twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Sitush (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is warned not to create articles regarding editors he is in dispute with.
- Sitush and Carolmooredc are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, each other anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).
- The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed one-way interaction ban preventing SPECIFICO (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) from interacting with Carolmooredc.[1][2] It is converted to an Arbitration Committee-imposed ban, and enforcement of the ban should be discussed at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. SPECIFICO is cautioned that if they continue to disrupt and breach restrictions, they may be subject to increasingly severe sanctions.
- Two kinds of pork (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely topic banned from the Gender gap topic.
- Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for pages relating to the Gender gap task force. The availability of sanctions is not intended to prevent free and candid discussion on these pages, but sanctions should be imposed if an editor severely or persistently disrupts the discussion.
For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 08:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement (Xenophrenic)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)