Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
Purge

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Purge server cache

Contents

Lindy Barber[edit]

Lindy Barber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lindy Barber" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article about an athlete and later cross-fit trainer appears to have no coverage in reliable sources for Ms Barber's soccer career. Shirt58 (talk) 11:19, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Muneesh Sappel[edit]

Muneesh Sappel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Muneesh Sappel" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

An apparent vanity project (the article creator has the same name as the subject). All six sources at present are unsuitable. Pax 10:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Meghan Trainor discography[edit]

Meghan Trainor discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Meghan Trainor discography" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Creation of this article is drastically premature and a result of WP:FANCRUFT by User:MaranoFan. Trainor has released four albums, but only one is a major record released with chart and sales info. The other three are just blank. Trainor has only released three singles, too. Her discography is far too small to warrant a separate, standalone article. This article should be deleted and a simple table for both albums and her few singles should be included on Meghan Trainor and Title (Meghan Trainor album). Sales and chart info are present on Title (Meghan Trainor album), "All About That Bass", "Lips Are Movin" and "Dear Future Husband" in the form of tables and prose anyway. Article is currently nominated for FLC, but it clearly fails 3B of the FL criteria "In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article." I laid out these issues on the Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Meghan Trainor discography/archive1 nomination, and two other editors concurred with me (Winkelvi and Chasewc91). I have also raised a similar issue with regard to WP:FORK and WP:FANCRUFT by the same user on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Title (EP).  — ₳aron 10:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

  • SUPPORT: I've seen larger discographies listed on artist pages, agree that one studio album and three singles shouldn't constitute as reason for a separate page. don't see any issue with a merge to Trainor's main page. Azealia911 talk 11:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Title (EP)[edit]

Title (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Title (EP)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article is clearly a case of WP:FORK. It is simply a regurgitation of Title (Meghan Trainor album), "All About That Bass", "Dear Future Husband", All About That Bass#Anti-feminism claims and Meghan Trainor, and is information already present in those more notable articles. I can't see how this even passed at GAN when this EP article is essentially what is already covered in the album article, two single release articles and her bio. This article should be deleted, and a short paragraph explaining what the EP is should be included as a section on Title (Meghan Trainor album). There is clearly some WP:FANCRUFT going on here, specifically with User:MaranoFan, which has already been outlined by myself and concurred with by two other editors on MaranoFan's Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Meghan Trainor discography/archive1 nomination. Both Title (EP) and Meghan Trainor discography are Trainor fan creations by MaranoFan.

WP:FORK in a nutshell: "Articles should not be split into multiple articles just so each can advocate a different stance on the subject."  — ₳aron 10:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Robert Lepkofker[edit]

Robert Lepkofker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Robert Lepkofker" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable as a Judo athlete. None of the triva cited contributes to notability including appearing on the Jonney Carson show. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Roger Ver[edit]

Roger Ver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Roger Ver" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable individual, fails even WP:ONEEVENT. Minor criminal and tax protestor/self-exile, nothing of note except criminal activities. Tenaqzn'f Fbvyrq Gubat (talk) 09:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Meal preparation[edit]

Meal Preparation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Meal Preparation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This looks like a nonsense article with content, but absolutely not notable one Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Victoria Prentis[edit]

Victoria Prentis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Victoria Prentis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Delete. the only claim to notability is political, and she fails WP:NPOL. This article is WP:TOOSOON if ever. By the way she was not the head of a government department, she lead the "justice and security team" at the Treasury's Solicitor's Department. --Bejnar (talk) 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Wanessa Milhomem[edit]

Wanessa Milhomem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Wanessa Milhomem" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I had this as a blp prod then I noticed the refs are here but put oddly. I'm not sure if she reaches guidelines for wiki or not. Wgolf (talk) 00:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. After going through the references listed in the article, then most of the potential sources I could find on the internet, I couldn't find any significant coverage. Fails GNG. APerson (talk!) 04:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Wanessa is a recognized model all over the world! Have been worked with the most important fashion clients. Is represented by most important agencies such as Marilyn NY , Elite London , Metropolitan Paris , Wilhelmina Miami and should have a profile talking about her! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leozitchus (talkcontribs) 00:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

She is a great model and she has lots of references she is been in the spot light and very recognised in fashion . She has more things online then a lot other fashion models who are on Wikipedia . She should be in it .

Note: Struck sockpuppet comment, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 00:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • 'Delete Fails WP:BLPNOTE for lack of significant coverage. Mere directory listings such as the cited NY Magazine, and tabloid stuff about being Anthony Kiedis's main squeeze are not that kid of coverage. Notability is not inherited. Neither is passing mention in articles about fashions shows, anything more than "passing mention". --Bejnar (talk) 07:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

EP 2 (Basement Jaxx EP)[edit]

EP 2 (Basement Jaxx EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EP 2 (Basement Jaxx EP)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [1], which lead me to [2]. Other mentions: guardian.com[3], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [4], the BBC [5] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

High range book of world records[edit]

High range book of world records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "High range book of world records" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No secondary sources, book/organization does not appear notable. Agtx (talk) 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete I was not able to find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

EP 1 (Basement Jaxx EP)[edit]

EP 1 (Basement Jaxx EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EP 1 (Basement Jaxx EP)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [6], which lead me to [7]. Other mentions: guardian.com[8], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [9], the BBC [10] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Sleazycheeks[edit]

Sleazycheeks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Sleazycheeks" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [11], which lead me to [12]. Other mentions: guardian.com[13], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [14], the BBC [15] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Redirect to Basement Jaxx discography. I'd also recommend bundling some of these nominations. Note that the notability of the band is not in question here just this specific release from the band. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Jaxx Unreleased[edit]

Jaxx Unreleased (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jaxx Unreleased" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish notability for this subject outside of an AllMusic review. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [16], which lead me to [17]. Other mentions: guardian.com[18], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [19], the BBC [20] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Atlantic Jaxx Recordings: A Compilation Vol. 2[edit]

Atlantic Jaxx Recordings: A Compilation Vol. 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Atlantic Jaxx Recordings: A Compilation Vol. 2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [21], which lead me to [22]. Other mentions: guardian.com[23], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [24], the BBC [25] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • The page needs citations and references on the actual page. I did a brief look on the Internet and found lots of mentions and listings of "Atlantic Jaxx Recordings: A Compilation Vol. 2." If anyone can find some reviews would be helpful. I am neutral for now until more data emerges.--Groulsom (talk) 20:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Focus on Atlantic Jaxx[edit]

Focus on Atlantic Jaxx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Focus on Atlantic Jaxx" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish this subject as deserving of its own article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [26], which lead me to [27]. Other mentions: guardian.com[28], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [29], the BBC [30] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Jaxx Unreleased II[edit]

Jaxx Unreleased II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jaxx Unreleased II" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [31], which lead me to [32]. Other mentions: guardian.com[33], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [34], the BBC [35] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep per the sources found by IamM1rv Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Basement Jaxx. The sources noted suggest the band is notable without any referernce to this particular album. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Unreleased Mixes[edit]

Unreleased Mixes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Unreleased Mixes" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [36], which lead me to [37]. Other mentions: guardian.com[38], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [39], the BBC [40] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep per the sources found by IamM1rv Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Basement Jaxx. The sources noted suggest the band is notable but reliable sources for this album are sorely lacking. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Remixes (Basement Jaxx EP)[edit]

Remixes (Basement Jaxx EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Remixes (Basement Jaxx EP)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [41], which lead me to [42]. Other mentions: guardian.com[43], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [44], the BBC [45] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Junction (EP)[edit]

Junction (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Junction (EP)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [46], which lead me to [47]. Other mentions: guardian.com[48], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [49], the BBC [50] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

EP3 (Basement Jaxx EP)[edit]

EP3 (Basement Jaxx EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "EP3 (Basement Jaxx EP)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- Easily verified notability. Google mentions books reviewing them that were published to the Library of Congress, Amazon, there's professionally made music videos, vice.com has articles on them etc. [51], which lead me to [52]. Other mentions: guardian.com[53], MTV[www.mtv.com/artists/basement-jaxx], Rolling Stone Mag [54], the BBC [55] -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
The band has not been nominated for deletion as this is just for a specific release from the band. A band being notable does not make every album they release notable (see WP:NOTINHERITED). However, if even some non-substantial and trivial sources can be found, a redirect is probably in order. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: ... did you know that this particular release made it into a top 50 list published in a book release in Britain before you posted? I pulled 6 references, not going to bother to copypasta here, just making sure you're informed about this specific report and the nature of all related reports for Jaxx. I did a copy & paste to all of the Jaxx albums, because that's exactly what the poster here did to all of the albums without fact checking the band or the albums. Read down the list of deletes for this particular day and you will see they reported a reputable and notable band that put these out too - which shows that they did not do any research as required by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#Nominating article(s) for deletion. It essentially wastes the time of other wiki users as they did not do due diligence or even have the courtesy of using a "bundle" report. -- IamM1rv (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Update Creating User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ...not sure what happened here, but it looks like this person might have been trolling people or their account seized by someone & they were removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamM1rv (talkcontribs) 14:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

B-Sides Volume 1[edit]

B-Sides Volume 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "B-Sides Volume 1" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The Remixes Volume 06[edit]

The Remixes Volume 06 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Remixes Volume 06" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in establishing the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Live 05[edit]

Live 05 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Live 05" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in establishing the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - All the normal music sales, streaming services and additionally, this album is mentioned in billboard magazine. Found a google book of it[56]. -- IamM1rv (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Sateliti[edit]

Sateliti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Sateliti" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Pretty obscure band. Seems to be a non-notable one. malconfort (talk) 23:22, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment I did find mention of them in an English language book here. I am reluctant to delete without a search for sources in the Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian languages. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

To je zivot pravi[edit]

To je zivot pravi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "To je zivot pravi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable album. malconfort (talk) 23:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Stacie Monroe[edit]

Stacie Monroe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Stacie Monroe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fictional character who might not meet wiki guidelines for this. Wgolf (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

BTW I put up a prod for Billy Bond who seems to be the only other character for this show that has a page. Wgolf (talk) 21:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment The merger discussion seemed to result in enough of a consensus for merging. Boleyn (talk) 22:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
I actually noticed the merger thing right after I put this up. Though I notice it says since 2012-so did the merger convo actually happen then? Wgolf (talk) 22:52, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • merge The article can be combined with an article about either hustle or the hustle characters Alligators1974 (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Jordan Meads[edit]

Jordan Meads (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jordan Meads" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Contested prod. Clearly fails WP:RLN, and not enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG either. J Mo 101 (talk) 21:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

  • The Rugby League European Federation is an official governing body of the sport of rugby league and the Newcastle Thunder are a professional club. How are they not reliable enough to satisfy criteria. I have loads more references if you want them? (sorry I'm new to the whole wiki thing) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeStilly (talkcontribs) 21:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
They're a third tier club who are semi-pro at best - far below the requirement in WP:RLN (playing in either Super League or NRL). If you can provide evidence that's he received significant coverage (i.e. not just trivial mentions or routine coverage such as match reports or transfer news), then people will vote to keep it. I was only able to find this article [57], but multiple independent sources are needed to satisfy WP:GNG. J Mo 101 (talk) 07:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Tentative keep as WP:RLN looks like it may need reviewing. The Balkans Cup is an international event and in most other sports these generally take players across the notability threshhold. NealeFamily (talk) 01:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
The guideline was reviewed quite recently (see here), as if anything the notability bar was too low. Rugby league is a very minor sport in all but a handful of countries – even at international level, it receives minimal coverage aside from the major tournaments. J Mo 101 (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete as per guidelines NealeFamily (talk) 04:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Binka: To Tell a Story About Silence[edit]

Binka: To Tell a Story About Silence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Binka: To Tell a Story About Silence" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A film I'm trying to find any notability for-all I can find though are just stuff about the director Binka Zhelyazkova-which I guess at best this should be merged or redirected to if not deleted. Wgolf (talk) 21:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Bulgarian title:(Find sources: "Бинка. Да разкажеш приказка за мълчанието" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
  • Keep as Bulgarian language Bulgarian films are difficult to source, but it seems some are available if one searches under its native language (NOT English).[58][59] and others needing translation... so keep per WP:NONENG and just meeting WP:NF. Suitable stub. We can hope readers of that language can help out. Face-smile.svg Schmidt, Michael Q. 05:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

JabberMixClient[edit]

JabberMixClient (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "JabberMixClient" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A instant messaging client that I'm not sure if it meets wiki guidelines or not. I'm finding a few sources but not enough it seems though. Wgolf (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up download sites, but no significant RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 14:19, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Kickin Records[edit]

Kickin Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kickin Records" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

NN record company. The only in-depth coverage found was about the death of its founder (i.e. WP:BLP1E). This company worked with some notable acts, but notability of companies isn't inherited from their suppliers. The Dissident Aggressor 19:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:54, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Kickin Records was a fundamental recording label as well as an instrumental force behind dance music in the United Kingdom in the late 1980's and early 1990's The Dissident Aggressor clearly has some personal issues with record label and it's activities! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.50.30.80 (talk) 23:40, 2 May 2015 (UTC) This company worked with some notable acts but notability of companies isn't inherited from their suppliers??? Then if this the case you must delete EMI Records & Virgin Records plus Warner, Creation records etc etc delete all of the record companies on wikipedia too! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.50.30.80 (talk) 23:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

The Kickin Records label, which pioneered early rave music, in 1988. source http://www.musicweek.com/news/read/kickin-records-founder-dies/036768

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Flower of Life (fiction)[edit]

Flower of Life (fiction) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Flower of Life (fiction)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I see no notability regarding this term. The short examples provided can easily be summed up in a sentence in their respectable plot summaries, and feel this does not need to be a stand alone article. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Merge or redirect this subject does not appears to have been covered significantly in secondary sources unlike the Robotech Wars. I was able to find a few in universe sources, a merge or redirect to an existing article may be optimal. Valoem talk contrib 10:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:54, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:43, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Madani Channel[edit]

Madani Channel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Madani Channel" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Based on the provided sources, this TV channel does not seem independently notable of Dawat-e-Islami Dolescum (talk) 10:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

  • CommentMadani Channel is a first and only one Pakistani television channel who free of advertising and television commercials.

What is the law for them? ARY Qtv, Labbaik TV what is this?--Obaid Raza (talk) 18:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Other stuff exists is a poor argument. Please suggest reasons why this channel is independently notable of it's parent company Dolescum (talk) 20:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Waywords and Meansigns[edit]

Waywords and Meansigns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Waywords and Meansigns" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No evidence of notability; only one clear WP:RS (the Guardian), which has only a paragraph about it. Involvement of Mike Watt, etc. not confirmed by a reliable source. Created by a WP:SPA; prod was disputed.. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:03, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Article clearly has a number of notable musicians involved. Additional sources added since entry was originally flagged for deletion. Finnegans Wake is known for it's obscurity in the mainstream but dedicated cult following. Both Guardian article and http://theconversation.com/the-amateurs-age-of-unriddling-finnegans-wake-on-stage-38498 speak to the massive history of 'amateur' contributions to Finnegans Wake scholarship.The references given -- Punk News, Jambands.com, Grateful Web, James Joyce Centre -- are all websites that speak to considerable subculture audiences. There are numerous musicians involved in the project who are considered notable by Wikipedia: Mike Watt, David Kahne, Hayden Chisholm, Simon Underwood, Mary Lorson. Psychoanalymass (talk) 03:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, we know that grad students everywhere are excited about Finngan's Wake. This may become notable, but the notability isn't here yet. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28music%29#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, instrumentalist, etc.) may be notable if it meets at least one of the following criteria: 6. Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles. This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses. For composers and performers outside mass media traditions: 5. Is frequently covered in publications devoted to a notable sub-culture. Of the musicians involved, they are each notable because of their involvement in particular subculture genres (punk, avant jazz, jambands, James Joyce/Irish lit). Each has been noted for their involvement in this project by sources that are notable within those subcultures (Grateful Web, Punk News, etc) Psychoanalymass (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

ARK (wireless charger)[edit]

ARK (wireless charger) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "ARK (wireless charger)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This item has no individual notability as a product. If anything, it should be included in the article, Inductive charging. On its own, separate from all other inductive charging devices, this has no notability. Shibbolethink ( ) 06:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Question. What about Ark was ranked among "the top 3 Kickstarter projects" in the Technology category for the entirety of the campaign period and was featured by TechCrunch,[8] Buzzfeed[9] during the campaign. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:48, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to inductive charging where it is already adequately covered. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 02:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ― Padenton|   03:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Emergency USA[edit]

Emergency USA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Emergency USA" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This is merely a US fundraising group for an international organization, with no separate notability of its own. The references are essentialy about the organization in general, or amount DGG ( talk ) 03:19, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Emergency (NGO). While I agree that a standalone article is not necessary here, "Emergency USA" is certainly a plausible search term for someone looking for info on the charity. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Nicola Mar[edit]

Nicola Mar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nicola Mar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable and promotional--I removed a good deal else, including her self-published books, in an attempt to rescue the article, but there is not enough left. The fox " article" is PR DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • delete As a fashion model, it is WP:TOOSOON, and as an author she has pretty much nothing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • "'Keep"' This article is a true and balanced account of a well known and notable fashion model and author.50.75.215.90 (talk) 18:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

McDonald's Falaffa[edit]

McDonald's Falaffa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "McDonald's Falaffa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

The rest of the web has not heard about this upcoming album so this might be a hoax. Even if it's real, an article is way premature since it's only due out in 2016. Pichpich (talk) 03:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. I can't tell if it's a hoax, but if it is accurate it certainly isn't notable and violates WP:CRYSTAL. 12:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Nicotine (song)[edit]

Nicotine (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nicotine (song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Contested PROD. The article has one reference that is a primary source and no references that I can find. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete I agree with you here. And it doesn't appears to have charted, not sourced, except for one primary, you are correct. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 06:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Gather Williams II[edit]

Dr. Gather Williams II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Dr. Gather Williams II" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Does not appear to be notable. Google does not turn up secondary source references suggesting notability. Agtx (talk) 06:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Blooming Lotus Yoga[edit]

Blooming Lotus Yoga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Blooming Lotus Yoga" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This doesn't quite meet the qualifications for speedy, but it should be deleted. The citations are all promotional/press release in nature, and the company does not appear notable. Agtx (talk) 06:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

List of eponymous albums[edit]

List of eponymous albums (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of eponymous albums" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Normally, I'm more an inclusionist than a deletionist, but this is an indiscriminate list which is potentially endless. There is nothing that connects these albums other than their naming, which an exceedingly common way of naming albums. I could have speedied this, as it has beed deleted in the past, but that was eight years ago, so i though it worth bringing here in case anyone here can see any merit in this that (a) I can't and (b) the previous page didn't have. Grutness...wha? 06:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Chen Lin (martyr)[edit]

Chen Lin (martyr) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chen Lin (martyr)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Essentially a rescuer who died while transporting earthquake victims. Certainly admirable, but notable? Page is orphaned. I personally believe there is a conflict of interest, as the contributor has only worked on this 1 article, and that none of the other 4 martyrs who died in the same crash has gotten a page. Timmyshin (talk) 06:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Charonne Mose[edit]

Charonne Mose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Charonne Mose" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable dancer with only lead of notability being a 1995 Emmy winning for Miss America with several Books results showing. However, there is nothing else to suggest notability, a lot of this information is unconfirmed but was actually added by the subject herself as what seems to be a self-bio. News found one result from a website I'm not going to click but it seems passing and minor. IMDb shows she has only had two roles both as a dancer. Multiple searches found nothing else and it is clear that Emmy winning is her only lead of notability because browser searches provide the Books links (note: It appears she now works as a interactive art designer so that explains the dancing absence). The article was actually tagged for speedy but declined due to "Winning an Emmy is a marginal source of notability is a marginal notability" but the article was never improved or nominated for possible deletion. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Baron Von Porkchop[edit]

Baron Von Porkchop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Baron Von Porkchop" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

local tv personality, no indication of any attention outside Dayton tv market John from Idegon (talk) 05:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - Not notable, not even notable locally as it seems News, Books (one link as a list) and browser found anything to suggest he is notable and has received significant or notable coverage. An alternative to deletion could be to move to Horror_host#2010s where he is listed. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Atlantic Superstore Festival of Lights[edit]

Atlantic Superstore Festival of Lights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Atlantic Superstore Festival of Lights" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

It appears this festival has never received significant and in-depth coverage as News searches found nothing (before and after enhanced with additional words) and Books found guides. Multiple browser searches found a few links such as the Nickelback tour from 2007 and a few others but it seems maybe the festival was fading and maybe now defunct (no recent results and appears the website links are now broken). A search for the "largest Canada Day celebration outside of Ottawa" found a few results but are mostly press releases or primary/local and not significant and in-depth. I would suggest moving elsewhere but I don't see a target unless a small merge to Charlottetown. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Peter Buhr[edit]

Peter Buhr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Peter Buhr" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Reason Le petit fromage (talk) 05:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

BLP of an unnotable US associate professor. I cannot see how writing an obscure programming language makes someone notable in the absence of independent 3rd party sources, etc, etc. Le petit fromage (talk) 05:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Annuity Shopper Buyer's Guide[edit]

Annuity Shopper Buyer's Guide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Annuity Shopper Buyer's Guide" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No real evidence of notability--just that it's been referred to. DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. MusikAnimal talk 04:16, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

COUGAR SOLAR[edit]

COUGAR SOLAR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "COUGAR SOLAR" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable company lacking references. Advertisement. Was CSD, but removed, nit sure why. reddogsix (talk) 04:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Techdog[edit]

Techdog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Techdog" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I can't find any evidence that the term "Techdog" is used to refer to robotic dogs, which is what this article appears to be about. In addition, it is unsourced, and what is here appears to be already covered at List of robotic dogs or the various articles on that list. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:54, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Go ahead and delete - The word makes it challenging to search but from what I can see, there's no solid sources supporting this and the article reads more like an essay. SwisterTwister talk 05:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Definitely finding nothing that lends this term to being at all popularized or actually used anywhere. Need sources or delete ASAP. Kemosakeyouknow (talk) 01:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Unseen (website)[edit]

Unseen (website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Unseen (website)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

The site is now offline, and I can't find any reliable, independent sources beyond the one cited here. (This reference is a press release). Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - First of all, this isn't something that would've attracted wide attention so the East Bay Express source is the best there is. My searches found nothing and that was across News and Books, non-notable website. SwisterTwister talk 04:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Bog Stop[edit]

Bog Stop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bog Stop" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Sourced only to the network and production company, and poorly at that. Tagged for more than 4 years. No evident significant reliable coverage that is independent of the subject. Greykit (talk) 01:05, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Street Names of Los Santos in Grand Theft Auto V[edit]

Street Names of Los Santos in Grand Theft Auto V (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Street Names of Los Santos in Grand Theft Auto V" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Pure listcruft and indiscriminate info, but I can't find a speedy deletion criteria that fits, so let's discuss. --Animalparty-- (talk) 03:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Love, love, love this game, but yeah, this is the stuff for the Grand Theft Auto Wiki, not Wikipedia. Inappropriate as a standalone article, and while easily verifiable, may be overly detailed to merge into Grand Theft Auto V.-War wizard90 (talk) 03:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Ryan Alexander Dewar[edit]

Ryan Alexander Dewar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ryan Alexander Dewar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable director lacking non-trivial support. The article has a lot of references, but they are trivial in nature. Most are either one line comments about the individual or do not even mention the article subject. reddogsix (talk) 01:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 01:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 01:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 01:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak delete Lots of references, but mainly passing mentions. Seems to fail WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG as a result. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - Following Guidlines, May Require Editing Opossed to Deletion - Following the links to notability and inclusion guidelines, the source uses secondary sources and multiple newspaper articles and websites, as well as film sites. The article is notable but may require structural help from other editors to provide fuller use of the links included.Editorincrime (talk)
    Editorincrime's interpretation is not correct. The article has been nominated for deletion. This does allow a small amount of time for any problems to be rectified before a decision is made. The nomination for deletion is around notability. As a filmmaker there will need to be enough evidence within the article, that the subject can demonstrably meet the criteria set out in WP:CREATIVE. There are many links that have been put in the article but this will not be enough to stop a decision to delete. Good quality sources are considered to be those written by journalists and published in national newspapers. Appearing in IMDB does not demonstrate notability. Also anyone can put some unchecked promotional material on a blog, so the inclusion of pages from someone's blog generally isn't viewed as helping establish notability on Wikipedia. So, my advice to anyone who thinks that this article is with keeping, I would suggest you register a "keep" vote on this page but more importantly that you make good use of the few days remaining before any decision on notability. Drchriswilliams (talk) 11:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Improve References are significant but needs structural improvement Kemosakeyouknow (talk) 01:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hai Sheng Wang[edit]

Hai Sheng Wang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hai Sheng Wang" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Extreme form of self-aggrandizing writing (by a single-article editor, Dragonspiritart (talk · contribs)) makes it impossible to tell whether this person actually has any notability. In any case, the article is a huge mess and is unsalvageable in present form, in my opinion. Delete. (If we still permitted it and still maintained it, I would have been tempted to send it to WP:BJAODN.) --Nlu (talk) 22:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete "World's Culture Art Giant" Hilarious. Timmyshin (talk) 06:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

JIVE Magazine[edit]

JIVE Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "JIVE Magazine" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Multiple searches failed to find anything close to relevant or helpful, equal searches with Books and browser showed nothing. I actually found this article while searching for articles that needed cleaning, I searched and found nothing so here we are. This article has not significantly changed at all since its inception and I can't see any improvement as the "magazine" looked more like a forum/messageboard. If at all, the fact that there are three magazines with this name, the page can be remade as a disambiguation. SwisterTwister talk 19:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

1394 Algoa[edit]

1394 Algoa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1394 Algoa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted and redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: this object has been the subject of three independent photometric studies between 2012 and 2014. Praemonitus (talk) 16:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. It's unclear to me why this object has been the subject of as much attention as it has, but I think the studies mentioned by Praemonitus are sufficient. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

1904 Massevitch[edit]

1904 Massevitch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1904 Massevitch" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG; delete and redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect per WP:DWMP: it does receive brief mention in a few scholarly articles, but the content is insufficient to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep as having an unusual combination of characteristics (V-type but located in the outer main belt) [61]David Eppstein (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Atlantic Association of Broadcasters[edit]

Atlantic Association of Broadcasters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Atlantic Association of Broadcasters" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A origination that I'm not sure if it meets wiki guidelines or not. I have gotten a couple results while most of them I'm just getting words that go with each other (like one going to Atlantic city) Wgolf (talk) 19:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak delete According to this the organization formerly existed, but now with all stations amaglamated into ownership by Global, CBC or the CTVs it seems to have dissolved naturally since the corporations usually do what they used to do now. A redirect to the Canadian Association of Broadcasters might be appropriate if we can find what exactly happened to AAB. Nate (chatter) 03:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Utopia (Sirius XM)[edit]

Utopia (Sirius XM) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Utopia (Sirius XM)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This, along with other Sirius XM radio channels; are these notable? ViperSnake151  Talk  23:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep With more than 25-million subscribers to SiriusXM [1], I have to assume that EVERY channel on SiriusXM is notable, obviously the audience is plenty large, and given that every station must produce content for listeners it would be hard to imagine that notability cannot be established for any SiriusXM channel. Haphazard nomination in my opinion as the nominator states, "along with other Sirius XM radio channels"....really? Are we going to start debating the Howard Stern Channels? How about Hits 1, the most listened to station on SiriusXM? -War wizard90 (talk) 02:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • 25 million subscribers means Sirius XM is notable and almost certainly has some individually notable stations. But notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. That seems to assume listeners are divided evenly rather than having a small number of extremely popular stations and a bunch of others, many of which are just rebroadcasts of terrestrial radio, playlists, etc. You just named a couple of the behemoths, but Stern's notability doesn't transfer to the traffic report stations. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • @Rhododendrites: That's true, I probably got hung up a bit too much on the "along with other channels" comment than I should have. That being said, even if only 1% of subscribers listened to this channel, that's still 250,000 listeners (and that's assuming only 1 person listens per subscription, which I don't think anyone believes is the case). So I still have a hard time imagining anything on SiriusXM isn't notable (I suspect where the real issue may come in is finding reliable sources to prove the notability, more than the actual notability itself). I'll see if I can't dredge up a few sources to help establish notability. -War wizard90 (talk) 04:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Question - @ViperSnake151: what does "This, along with other Sirius XM radio channels" mean? That sounds like you're nominating more than just Utopia, but there are none others listed here. AfD also needs to include an assertion regarding reason for deletion rather than a broad inquiry. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • This is mainly intended as a test case. Our presumption of notability for radio stations only applies to terrestrial stations. Most of their "channels" are no different than the endless automated music channels offered on cable providers through services such as Stingray Music and Music Choice. In the case of Sirius, there may be a few notable stations with a history and enough coverage to justify inclusion. This, however, is not one of them. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Lori Ann LaRocco[edit]

Lori Ann LaRocco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lori Ann LaRocco" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

It appears to possibly be a non-notable journalist, the Squawk Box article doesn't list her and Google News searches along with Google Books don't provide anything. What troubles this article is that it was created and heavily edited by the subjects themselves, I don't see any improvement. Any comments? SwisterTwister talk 06:13, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. "Senior Talent Producer" apparently means "booker"[62] (i.e. lining up guests), and being one for an early morning CNBC show isn't going to satisfy WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:41, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • keep this self-promoting article. It's a common problem, Been tagged for years but attracts no editors. And yet her books have generated articles, even a profile in a local paper. [63] enough stuff out there to pass GNG. I went to make sure she was linked to her hometown, her sorority, her college - sometimes editors improve articles on home town girls. This one grew up in a suburb so faceless that the high school doesn't even have a WP page. I have sourced on AFDs of scoundrels; interesting scoundrels like Richard K. Diran and even horror novelists Tamara Thorne - it can be fun. But LaRocca sounds so dull I don't wanna read about her. I'm not sure the article is even interesting enough to blow up. I guess we just have to live with it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Her role in a nationally broadcast television program, her authorship of multiple published books and her coverage in reliable media establish notability. I have edited the article, which still needs work, but that's not a justification for deletion. Alansohn (talk) 14:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:45, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
@DGG: Would you care to comment? SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Due to lack of significant sources and notability. May be a broadcaster but seems to fall somewhere outside of encyclopedic unless more information can be provided. Kemosakeyouknow (talk) 01:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Don't Look Back into the Sun/Death on the Stairs[edit]

Don't Look Back into the Sun/Death on the Stairs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Don't Look Back into the Sun/Death on the Stairs" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article should be deleted because it only covers a single version of the Don't Look Back into the Sun EP. The complete information about the song and it's releases (as well as other EPs) are featured on the song's page, including information from this acticle. Therefore it's not worth existing. Twistandshout28 (talk) 19:24, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment This discussion was created without the afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--no comment on the nomination itself. --Finngall talk 14:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Shawn King (singer)[edit]

Shawn King (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Shawn King (singer)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Notability is not inherited. Ms. King seems to only have a biography because she was one of Larry King's wives. One of the few sources to discuss her refers to her as "King's wife", showing the lack of notability. Coverage isn't sufficient for WP:GNG, and she doesn't meet WP:NSINGER either. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete I searched under her previous name "Shawn Southwick" and was unable to find significant coverage except as Larry King's 7th wife. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 19:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Petyr Baelish[edit]

Petyr Baelish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Petyr Baelish" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Prominent fictional character who feels as though he ought to be notable, but that's not evident from the article. It cites not a single source, since November 2013, and moreover almost entirely consists of plot summary, in a perfect unholy union of failing WP:V, WP:N and WP:NOTPLOT.

Now I follow media coverage of Game of Thrones somewhat closely, having contributed most of the text of the series's main article, and I can't remember reading anything in reliable sources about the character that went much beyond passing mentions in reviews in the vein of "and meanwhile Littlefinger is busy scheming, and whoring". I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, of course, but only if whoever finds relevant sources also uses them to reference the article and add something to it that goes beyond plot summary. Otherwise we're only duplicating fan wikis, which is not what we're here for.  Sandstein  19:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment - {{spoiler alert!}} Usually, I'm not a proponent of having "in-universe" fiction topics for WP. But anybody who's been here since the early days will remember the giant brouhaha about Lord of the Rings characters, etc., so on that issue I bow the consensus of the community. That having been said, Baelish is the main mover and shaker of the books/show. Without Baelish, there would be no "game of thrones". He has been the gamemaster from the beginning. Without the death of Jon Arryn, Ned would never have gone to the capital, the truth of Joffrey's (whom Baelish later murders!) parentage would never have been revealed, there would be no War of the Five Kinds, etc., etc. I realize sourcing could be a major issue, but having an article on the Game of Thrones without an article on Baelish is akin to having an article on The Lord of the Rings without an article on the One Ring or having an article on Star Wars without having an article on Palpatine.--William Thweatt TalkContribs 21:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • We don't need to have an article about him to cover him as part of the plot of the novels. He can be (and is) described in the List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters and in the plot summaries of the books he appears in. But Wikipedia articles must be more than just plot summary, which means that if there's nothing more to the character than his in-universe significance, there's no basis for a dedicated article.  Sandstein  06:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Littlefinger is definitely notable! He betrayed Ned, killed Jon Arryn, killed Lysa Arryn (alright, that one was warranted). He also killed Joffrey indirectly, a redeeming quality. I'm just kidding. Definitely agree "fictional character who feels as though he ought to be notable". Redirect to list of characters. Fails WP:BKD. While I absolutely love Game of Thrones and the books, they are not yet significant to the level of Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol, and even if they were, Littlefinger is nowhere near a significant enough character. Maybe once GoT/ASoIaF is studied academically and if Littlefinger is somehow a major character in books 6/7. ― Padenton|   03:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment This, at least, is an at least quasi-academic paper that is concentrating on the subject's character; and these two also deal with the subject in some detail and go rather beyond simply recounting the plot. Though I think that while at least the first of the three is probably usable towards notability, these don't quite achieve notability for the subject by themselves. But if anyone wants to try,... PWilkinson (talk) 14:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Northern Mariana Islands Department of Public Safety[edit]

Northern Mariana Islands Department of Public Safety (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Northern Mariana Islands Department of Public Safety" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No real context, a single source and non-notable department Zackmann08 (talk) 02:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep - From my understanding, single departments of an entire territory (for example, Northern Mariana Islands) are automatically notable. This isn't the police department of a single municipality or even county. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Rickon Stark[edit]

Rickon Stark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rickon Stark" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A minor fictional character somewhat notorious for being forgotten about by both the authors of the novels he appears in and their TV adaptation. I think we should follow the sources in this regard, because I can't imagine this poor little Stark meeting WP:N on his own. The only secondary source cited, Publishers Weekly, doesn't even mention him. There's really so little to say about the character, both in and out of universe, that all he can really aspire to is an entry in List of A Song of Ice and Fire characters.  Sandstein  19:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to list mentioned above. Fails WP:BKD. Completely minor character, only 3 at the start of the books and therefore unlikely to ever become a major character. Had maybe 4-5 lines in the TV series. Not sure why we need to be a mirror for A Wiki of Ice and Fire. ― Padenton|   03:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The Pink Tail Fly[edit]

The Pink Tail Fly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Pink Tail Fly" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

non notable individual episode. Was previously redirected based on the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Le_Cop_on_Le_Rocks and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Pest Control but apparently Padenton thinks this one is a special snowflake. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment I came across nom's attempts to force a redirect of this article based on the 2 above AfDs with no apparent discussion regarding the article. This article is not mentioned at any of the above AfDs and there does not seem to have been any attempt to involve the article in the discussion. So, I reverted it. I have no particular vote on the matter, but I feel claiming an AfD applies to an article that isn't even mentioned in the AfD is inappropriate. ― Padenton|   20:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   20:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
The entire category was discussed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Pest Control per my comment "Basically every article in this category : Category:Pink_Panther_animated_film_series Gaijin42 (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

nominator delete/redirect all such episodes (minus 1) See also recently un-redirected Sherlock Pink and The Pink Pill. delete/redirect all per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes based on the two previous mass AFDs. The notable exception is The_Pink_Phink which is individually notable as being nominated for an oscar. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Support Deletion / RedirectSeems to just be a case of a specific episode that is not notable like some others that deserve their own articles. Suggesting the same as all above. WHOISFANDOM (talk) 01:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Kenji Sonishi[edit]

Kenji Sonishi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kenji Sonishi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This author has one notable work but there is no indication that Kenji is notable on his own. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

  • If there is only one notable work a redirect to that particular work may be an option.--67.68.161.47 (talk) 02:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • That doesn't make the author notable though. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Support Deletion Since there are not any sources that detail WHY this topic is notable in any way, and the only source provided is a link to a book with no information, I would say this should be deleted. WHOISFANDOM (talk) 01:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Nova fractal[edit]

Nova fractal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nova fractal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable fractal. There are a couple dozen sources on this in Google scholar and Google books, but as far as I can tell all of these sources were published subsequently to the 2008 addition of this material to Wikipedia, all give little or no detail (maybe a figure but not even the formula), and all are plagiarized from the 2008 version of the Wikipedia article Fractal, in particular copying the sentence "Examples of this type are the Mandelbrot set, Julia set, the Burning Ship fractal, the Nova fractal and the Lyapunov fractal." from that version. I can find no reliable in-depth sources that are independent of Wikipedia, so I believe the topic fails WP:GNG. The previous AfD, in 2008, did not seriously address the lack of sources, instead defaulting to a keep based on weak arguments such as claims that all mathematical formulae are inherently notable (which I don't believe). —David Eppstein (talk) 20:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak delete/Redirect: I think I've found one example of its being implemented in a fractal software package (here), but I certainly haven't seen anything to suggest that it's a part of "most" fractal art software, as the article currently claims. There are other mentions, but no definitive, specific coverage from a major, credible source that I could spot. I'd feel comfortable keeping it if we could find even just one clear definition of the term in a reliable source, but without that I'm leaning toward redirecting it until something more solid emerges. And, given the current state of the article, it's not as though the encyclopedia would be losing much. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • merge to Newton fractal. Not independently notable, not enough content for a standalone article. The previous AfD does seem to be more of a merge/delete than a keep, and probably should have been closed no consensus, but even if it were a solid keep seven years is more than enough time for consensus to change.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 02:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Averis[edit]

Averis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Averis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

They don't meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. No suitable redirect target. Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 21:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Macadoshis[edit]

Macadoshis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Macadoshis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Rapper who seems to have little notability. Maybe a redirect to one of his associated acts be the best if not deleted. Wgolf (talk) 18:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 21:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

ShowMan[edit]

ShowMan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "ShowMan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not sure if this passes Wiki guidelines or not. When I look up show man I get the expected stuff about people in show business. Wgolf (talk) 16:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

BTW if this does get AFD might want to just do a redirect of Showman to here given that most of the terms seem to be about this not the processing chip outside of the Amiga article. Wgolf (talk) 16:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 21:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect - to Richmond Sound Design the company that made the software. Article is an unreferenced stub of unclear notability, but redirects to the parent company article are a common solution for software which is not independently notable.Dialectric (talk) 02:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Cherise Donovan[edit]

Cherise Donovan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Cherise Donovan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Delete: insufficiently notable actress Quis separabit? 16:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 21:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • delete insufficient evidence of major roles to meet WP:NACTOR. LibStar (talk) 13:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Urban Haze[edit]

Urban Haze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Urban Haze" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - All the standards of notability in media, big 3 for direct sales, host of bigname stream services for the album. Also, book noting it's notability[64] — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamM1rv (talkcontribs) 16:55, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 21:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Span Thang[edit]

Span Thang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Span Thang" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this subject. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
  • weak keep - This one has so many references in paid libraries like rhapsody / napster - which means it's being sought out and added by major companies for people to stream. The standard bigger direct sales amazon etc have it too. -- IamM1rv (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 21:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Malcolm Goodman[edit]

Malcolm Goodman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Malcolm Goodman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Well trying to find Malcolm Goodman is hard enough given how common of a name it is-looking up shapeshifter I'm getting bands with the names but not sure if any are him or not! Wgolf (talk) 03:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Pishcal 03:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Pishcal 03:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 21:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

24/6: A Jewish Theater Company[edit]

24/6: A Jewish Theater Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "24/6: A Jewish Theater Company" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Contested PROD. Concern was "Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage." Eeekster (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

JJ Longstaff and Sons[edit]

JJ Longstaff and Sons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "JJ Longstaff and Sons" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable bus company Fails NCORP + GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transport-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010Talk 22:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010Talk 22:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010Talk 22:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Weak delete The only reliable source I could find was from a local newspaper, however, I do not think its enough to prove the subject's notability. If someone can find sufficient evidence to prove me wrong, go ahead. :) BenLinus1214talk 02:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Anne Plunkett[edit]

Anne Plunkett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Anne Plunkett" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

fails WP:BIO. the only coverage I could find merely confirmed she was ambassador. being from a "major country" does not grant inherent notability either LibStar (talk) 23:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. References are limited to primary sources (Australian government). Notability requires citation in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. WWGB (talk) 00:22, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep, WP:HEY, this may have looked more difficult to source than it is because there are lots of Anne Plunketts in the world. But if you limit searches with words like Ireland: lots of sources on this one. I've added a few of the news sources that come up on search engines. There are many more in which she appears at diplomatic events, shows up on national memorial days in the places she has served, sits on panels discussing stuff, etc. Note particularly the more personal interview in The Catholic Weekly, at least, as personal as an ambassador gets. It's pretty anodyne stuff. Irish papers have run entire long news interviews about things like tourism to Australia from Ireland, and how wonderful Irish/Aussie friendship is. yawn. I put in one or two more interesting tidbits, and sourced specifics. Long article in BBC at time of her appointment to Ireland lists every post she ever held. I didn't copy it all into article. She has done her job right, if that means avoiding controversy, notoriety, even colorful speech. But ambassadorial appointments are notable, and I believe that the extensive coverage (going back to her days at lower ranks) shows that she is.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
"But ambassadorial appointments are notable" no they're not, several ambassador articles have been deleted. "she has done her job right" is irrelevant to her notability. LibStar (talk) 22:59, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Right. What I meant to say was that ambassadorial appointments are viewed as significant by the world at large, and therefore contribute to WP notability which is established by the interviews with her and coverage of her activities in the press, although only if you use powerful search engines like proquest, if you use google news - not so much. E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep EM Gregory makes some very good points. BenLinus1214talk 02:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Bangladeshi cuisine[edit]

Bangladeshi cuisine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bangladeshi cuisine" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article is badly written and only cites one source, and only copy-paste or close paraphrasing. Also the purpose of this article can be served by Bengali Cuisine. Fazbear7891 (talk) 02:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

List of highest chess Tournament Performance Ratings[edit]

List of highest chess Tournament Performance Ratings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of highest chess Tournament Performance Ratings" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I believe that the term "Tournament Performance Rating" and the methodology were invented by the original editor, thus violating wp:OR and/or wp:synth. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 01:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 01:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment The terminology can be fixed by removing the word "Tournament", because "Performance Rating" is a widely used chess term. But there are bigger WP:OR and lack-of-WP:RS issues, as I argue above. Adpete (talk) 05:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment I prefer deleting to redirecting. The title of the page is not intuitive anyway. MaxBrowne (talk) 06:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - unless (a) the community agrees that taking measures along the lines suggested by Adpete here would be sufficient to save the article and (b) someone is actually willing to do that work. MaxBrowne (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete – clear example of OR. I don't know how the author arrived at a TPR for Fischer in 1963 even with his original method of computing TPRs for perfect scores, since FIDE ratings didn't exist yet. Cobblet (talk) 08:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Gareth neighbour[edit]

Gareth neighbour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Gareth neighbour" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A non-notable academician that fails WP:PROF. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 01:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 01:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Inother (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Just spam. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Chris Did Not Go To Prison Because He Is Black In America[edit]

Chris Did Not Go To Prison Because He Is Black In America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chris Did Not Go To Prison Because He Is Black In America" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Rambling and incoherent essay worthy of a WP:CSD but cannot find an appropriate category. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 00:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Plasmanium[edit]

Plasmanium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Plasmanium" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Borderline WP:A11, appears to be a non-notable in-game faction. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 00:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - no references, let alone any reliable sources.--Rpclod (talk) 01:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per above - no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 01:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete no evidence of notability, especially in a real-world context. BenLinus1214talk 02:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Seems to be made up, no evidence whatsoever on this being a real thing. WHOISFANDOMtalk 01:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)