Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
Purge

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Purge server cache

Contents

Vergi Rodriguez[edit]

Vergi Rodriguez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Vergi Rodriguez" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Article is about a singer, dancer, choreographer, actress that lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to establish notability. The article appears to be created by an agency related to the subject, and the accomplishments have been puffed up along with reference bombing. For example, the lead paragraph makes the claim for acting in the movie The Hot Chick which is technically true but the role is minor as one of four actors credited with being a "Palace Girl" according to IMDB. The references are numerous but consist of unreliable sources. My own searches turned up this, but that is not substantial, and is only one source. Whpq (talk) 20:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1424 Sundmania[edit]

1424 Sundmania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1424 Sundmania" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Keasel Broome[edit]

Keasel Broome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Keasel Broome" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Concern was that the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD contested based on speculation as to future international appearances, which is never grounds for notability. – Michael (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or for a senior national team, and has not received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Brandon Parker[edit]

Brandon Parker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Brandon Parker" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nikki311 19:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki311 19:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can't find a thing about this guy, unless he also wrestles for a high school in Pennsylvania [1]. МандичкаYO 😜 19:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Amy Stiller[edit]

Amy Stiller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Amy Stiller" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Article has been re-created in the wake of the death of Anne Meara. Was just deleted in April 2015 for not meeting general notability guidelines See previous deletion discussion here [2]. Result was delete. -- WV 18:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep and restore original version - I supported keeping it the first time and still do. IMO it doesn't matter if she gets more coverage and press because of her family; she still gets the coverage. МандичкаYO 😜 19:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. She fails the GNG because there is no coverage in reliable sources about her. None of her film or TV appearances is particularly important; in fact they're mostly bit roles in her brother's or father's projects. Notability isn't inherited either. Calidum T|C 19:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete as fails GNG, It's sad her mother's died but it doesn't mean she gets a free pass to an article because of that, Failed GNG the first time and unfortunately does now. –Davey2010Talk 19:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Warren Christopher (politician Maryland)[edit]

Warren Christopher (politician Maryland) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Warren Christopher (politician Maryland)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unelected politician failing WP:POLITICIAN Winner 42 Talk to me! 18:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Delete since the subject is a candidate and the article doesn't establish any other notability. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 19:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG as an unelected politician. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - really unfortunate that he has that name, which makes sources harder to find, but it seems is currently running again, and also I am thinking he may qualify based on his military awards. I know the United Nations Medal is fairly common but unsure about how often some of the others are given. He has a pretty impressive resume - obviously that bio there is very promotional but I am assuming the basic facts are true. МандичкаYO 😜 19:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Linda Harrison (singer)[edit]

Linda Harrison (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Linda Harrison (singer)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Is she really notable? I think no; fails WP:MUSBIO. A singer with only 2-3 years of activity, who ”found success covering numerous songs on YouTube” it's not very impressive. There are thousands of such a ”singers” around the world. She has only 4 singles (two in 2015 and two in 2012) and one album, no one of them entered in charts. She's a promising singer, but at this moment most probbaly she is not enough notable for an article. XXN, 18:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Comlife Investments[edit]

Comlife Investments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Comlife Investments" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Does not appear to be a particularly notable company. The only references are this company's inclusion on several very long lists of possibly shady investment firms. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. 17:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Beeblebrox (talk) 17:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Comment Most sources appear to be statements from regulators AusLondonder (talk) 18:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Michael David Krueger[edit]

Michael David Krueger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Michael David Krueger" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Poorly referenced BLP. I dream of horses (T) @ 17:39, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

David Bodanis[edit]

David Bodanis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "David Bodanis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article has been tagged as problematic for a long time and never fixed. It appears to be largely autobiographical, and the sole cited source is a PR biography, which is not independent. Guy (Help!) 16:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Anandu Das (dancer)[edit]

Anandu Das (dancer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Anandu Das (dancer)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

The contents is the same as Lillian Covillo except for the very beginning. Other versions of the page appear to be similarly copied from various pages. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 15:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete - I think you should tag as speedy delete. I can't find a single thing about Anandu Das and outside of the lede, the text of this article is wholly about other people. (And strange title considering there is no Anandu Das.) МандичкаYO 😜 16:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Samieh Rizk[edit]

Samieh Rizk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Samieh Rizk" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Still fails WP:BIO and three years on from two other AFDs there are no new sources providing in-depth and independent coverage. SmartSE (talk) 15:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

United States and state-sponsored terrorism[edit]

United States and state-sponsored terrorism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "United States and state-sponsored terrorism" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

WP:REDUNDANT and WP:POVFORK already fully covered in United States and state terrorism and also in even minor points are covered inCovert United States foreign regime change actions Praguegirl (talk) 14:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete I agree it's just a POV content fork from United States and state terrorism. If there's anything useful then I guess a merge would be okay. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep The pages are distinct. United States and State terrorism refers to US involvement with so-called state-terrorism; the use of torture, murder, and so forth by national governments. The page being nominated here is about US support to paramilitary groups that have committed terrorist activities, as labelled by reliable sources. There are plenty of RS covering this topic; take these, for example; [1][2] Also, please note that the nominator is an SPA with exactly four edits, who for reasons best known to themselves changed the urls in the article such that they stopped working. I think this is ready for a speedy close. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - I see how these are separate. I would be against merging because this would cause confusion, and there is sufficient content for both articles to stand alone. МандичкаYO 😜 16:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - State terrorism and Terrorism are two different subjects. Like said above the article has enough content and I don't see that is written in a POV manner or has POV sources so I opposed to the deletion. Rupert loup (talk) 17:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete or merge. This is POV fork of United States and state terrorism. I do not know, maybe the latter article should be deleted (and this one kept) or they should be merged, however having them both is definitely too much. Speaking on the essence of this, yes, the US have supported a number of rebel groups (including right now), some of which can be arguably called "terrorist groups", however I do not see them on this page. For example, the operations in the Latin America were very much support of ordinary rebels and other political forces, which were not described as "terrorist groups" by majority of sources. My very best wishes (talk) 17:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
@My very best wishes: I'm pretty sure it's common knowledge that the U.S. has supported terrorists. This quote is on United States and State terrorism article but should also be on state-sponsored terrorism: William Odom, President Reagan's National Security Agency Director: "As many critics have pointed out, terrorism is not an enemy. It is a tactic. Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics, the slogans of today's war on terrorism merely makes the United States look hypocritical to the rest of the world." МандичкаYO 😜 18:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
@My very best wishes:@Wikimandia:The very CIA admitted that they supported terrorists and made violations of human rights and there are declassified documents[3][4][5] that prove this. It cannot be a POV fork because it's not have other point of view of the same subject, they have totally different subjects. As I said before terrorism and state terrorism are not the same thing, nor the international community nor wikipedia consider that are the same, that's why they are separate in two differents articles. Rupert loup (talk) 19:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, and because the terms are nearly identical, people not familiar with them may find them confusing if they are merged. But those are the terms they use so we're stuck with them. МандичкаYO 😜 20:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Beaufort railway station, New Jersey[edit]

Beaufort railway station, New Jersey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Beaufort railway station, New Jersey" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A possible hoax, this article has been tagged for notability since 2008. I was unable to find any evidence of this railway station's existence even after extensive searches in both google books and newspapers.com. The closest I could find was a mention on the Whippany Railway Museum website that a station may have existed on Beaufort Avenue Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Søren Gosvig Olesen[edit]

Søren Gosvig Olesen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Søren Gosvig Olesen" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Appears to be a non-notable academic. Sources are simply a link to his profile on university website, and a link to his book on publisher's website. The book is published by an academic press but I can't find much evidence of it being widely read/noticed.

Note: he has one citation in google scholar that has been cited a number of times, but while I don't read his Danish, I don't think it's his work. It appears to be his translation of Foucault's History of Sexuality, Vol 1 Fyddlestix (talk) 14:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Google Scholar returns about 380 results for him, the translation of Foucault, with by the way an introduction by Olesen (i.e. not just a translation but scholarship) among them, has been cited 363 times, and another translation of Foucault gets 59 citations. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep: He has however been granted a page in Den Store Danske (Great Danes, roughly), which suggests he's pretty famous in Denmark. He is reviewed in Politiken, a major newspaper. He is interviewed on various websites and has given talk on philosophy on d2r (a serious Danish radio channel) among other radio appearances. An academic article of his has been published in French. There seems to be much more. I'd have thought this more than enough to clear the WP:GNG.Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - passes WP:ACADEMIC. I don't know how to calculate the H index but it looks significant, and he's in every single library index. I linked to his article on the Danish Wiki (made 2007) - it appears this was written off that one and so had all the "ibid" citation that I think used to be allowed, and it doesn't appear they added any recent stuff. МандичкаYO 😜 19:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Khilafah.is[edit]

Khilafah.is (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Khilafah.is" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

We wouldn't publish a page on an official ISIL website so I don't know why we have a page on a short lived amateur website that sounds like it was constructed or just knocked together by an individual who may have had little direct connection to the group. Wikipedia is not a directory even for defunct contents. GregKaye 14:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 11. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:44, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral - The shutting down of this website seemed to receive some coverage in New Zealand and Iceland. Not sure I understand the noms assertion that "We wouldn't publish a page on an official ISIL website". If it was notable, why wouldn't we? NickCT (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Merge to article about ISIL under "Propaganda and social media" section. Like NickCT I don't agree with the nominator's rationale, but the website doesn't meet the WP:GNG for its own article. МандичкаYO 😜 15:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Knee hockey[edit]

Knee hockey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Knee hockey" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable version of hockey; perhaps a merge with Hockey would be best, though I could not find any reliable sources to establish notability. The ones I located were brief mentions of the subject. Tinton5 (talk) 19:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Chakradhar Swami[edit]

Chakradhar Swami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chakradhar Swami" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

First of all, this article is not very easy to understand and searches to the best of my ability found nothing good. It appears both Marathi and Polish Wikis have what appear to be references but I'm not a speaker of either language so I'm not sure how good those sources are or if they're relevant at all. My concerns are the understandability and no apparent sources to support this, at least at English Wikipedia. SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 13:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Reece McNaughten[edit]

Reece McNaughten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Reece McNaughten" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No evidence of notability, only sources are bandcamp & bands' own websites. Fyddlestix (talk) 13:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 13:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 13:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Aichi Kinro Kaikan[edit]

Aichi Kinro Kaikan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Aichi Kinro Kaikan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Dubious notability of a community centre/library that no longer even exists. One entry in a directory of libraries would not appear to constitute a level of in-depth coverage sufficient to demonstrate that this passes the basic notability guidelines at WP:GNG. DAJF (talk) 12:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. DAJF (talk) 14:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • KEEP - I just helped assert notability by presenting a few of the notable performers. Lets not forget just because something no longer exists doesn't make it not notable Evangp (talk) 15:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Miss Grand Cambodia[edit]

Miss Grand Cambodia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Miss Grand Cambodia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

fails WP:GNG, not backed up by sources conform WP:RS The Banner talk 12:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

List of people who have walked across Tasmania, Australia[edit]

List of people who have walked across Tasmania, Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of people who have walked across Tasmania, Australia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:COATRACK same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have walked the perimeter of Tasmania, Australia - of local interest only. As Tasmania is 320 kilometres (200 mi) across, walking across it (while admirable and certainly impressive) does not have the same significance as walking across a continent or large country IMO. - МандичкаYO 😜 11:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Rocketmen (film)[edit]

Rocketmen (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rocketmen (film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unfortunately, I can't find a single review or substantial article on this interesting 2009 space program doc to indicate that it meets WP:NFILM. Nothing. Am I missing something? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:27, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello - I wasn't aware of the notability requirement, and see your point. The film recently became available as streaming on Netflix, and is featured under their "recent additions" section. Netflix shows a re-release date of 2013, though I couldn't find information about how/where it was re-released.

To defend the reliability a bit, IMDB has a page devoted to the film, and the information therein (director and such) matches the Netflix version that's streaming. While I agree there's a paucity of information with respect to reviews and suchlike, I think that may change shortly with this re-release. I'd argue (perhaps a bit of a stretch) that it's received a "commercial re-release" (Item 2, bullet 3) given a release on Netflix streaming, to a large potential audience. Full disclosure - I have no vested interest in this film - I just watched it, and noticed there wasn't a Wikipedia page. I thought it was rather well done. Victorygin1138 (talk) 21:06, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Well, yes, and your article makes me want to see the film. But unfortunately IMDb really isn't considered a reliable source establishing notability, either, per WP:IMDB/RS. If it is deleted, perhaps you'd like to WP:Userfy until such time as we can find multiple reliable sources? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
    • And yes I doubt "commercial re-release" five years on means simply appearing on Netflix. But who knows? Could be. Seems geared more for theatrical films rather than television films, which is really what this is. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:45, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Year specific:(Find sources: "Rocketmen (2009 film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Type specific:(Find sources: "Rocketmen (documentary film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Director:(Find sources: "Richard Dale, Rocketmen" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Production:Find sources: "Dangerous Films, Rocketmen" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Distributor:(Find sources: "Sony Pictures Japan, Rocketmen" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
  • Delete This UK film released in Japan simply has no English received coverage. If Japanese reviews of commentary come forward, I could change to a keep. Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:54, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Well, hey now, it's streaming on Netflix, so it's obviously available in an English format. (Edit: I see...you mean coverage insofar as press about the film. Gotcha). I think the rule that there needs to be some sort of major review is a little silly...I completely understand it's there so your average home movie uploaded to YouTube can't be labeled as a "documentary," but this is obviously a professional production. I could ask the folks at Netflix how they came across it. This link (http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=https://www.historychannel.co.jp/detail.php%3Fp_id%3D00420&prev=search) (translated) looks like the Japanese version of the History channel picked it up. But, this is not my Alamo - g'ahead and delete. If someone knows Japanese, maybe they can find a review...Google is getting confused with a book of the same name, released around the same time. Victorygin1138 (talk) 10:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

((Edit: I did find that it grossed 1.2 million from BoxOfficeMojo - http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?page=&country=JP&wk=2009W37&id=_fROCKETMEN01 - looks like it was also released on PBS America, which looks, ironically, like the British version of PBS: http://www.tvguide.co.uk/detail/233940/106786401/rocket-men#.VVcZOvlViko). If you google "Rocketmen PBS documentary" (without quotes), you'll see that various PBS channels across the states are picking it up, too.)

I know it looks like I'm making a hard sell here, but really, I'm just awake before the kids, and just have some time to hunt around on this random documentary. :-) Victorygin1138 (talk) 10:20, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

  • I've added a WP:PRIMARY for some WP:V. BTW When We Left Earth: The NASA Missions, which Dale also worked on, is a good example of something that does meet NFILM. Even though there isn't a single non-primary ref on the article, when you do a Gnews search you come up with some very good results, including an Entertainment Weekly review. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 11:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Westbury Nernewtes[edit]

Westbury Nernewtes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Westbury Nernewtes" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A manorial title that, according to the listed sources (this one in particular) no longer has any actual manorial property attached. No indications that this particular title is in any way notable. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Notable please look at [[13]] The National Manorial Register for England and Wales. It is the wish of ‘The Manorial Guild’ to list all Lordship Titles held in Private Ownership.In order to inform everybody, Who is the Current Legal Owner of these Lordship Titles.Westbury Nernewtes (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Westbury Nernewtes (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • "Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act, 1925" please also look at LANDED GENTRY REGISTER as all registered with them too, it is notableWestbury Nernewtes (talk) 15:47, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment Westbury Nernewtes, please read WP:GNG for the notability criteria required for any Wikipedia article to exist. You should also read WP:NOTDIRECTORY to realise that Wikipedia is not an advertising medium for organisations. So if The Manorial Guild want to publicise, Wikipedia isn't the place to do it. Nthep (talk) 15:52, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
I agree with nominator, a title that existed in the 14th century, but no longer has land is obscure, and not notable enough for Wikipedia. Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment There is an active discussion here that may interest you. I do share the concerns about notability. --Drm310 (talk) 15:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Please note I have deleted information, just about Westbury Nernewtes Manor, so no rules broken about nobility, hope this will help.Westbury Nernewtes (talk) 16:18, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. As far as I can see, the "National Manorial Register for England and Wales" is not a reliable source. And they can wish to include as much as they want, as long as they follow our guidelines, such as WP:GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 16:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Comment @Randykitty: I believe you have misinterpreted the statement about the "Manorial Guild's wish to list all titles..." The editor was not stating a plan that this organization wishes to list all titles here at Wikipedia, but rather that they have stated on their own website that they wish to list all titles (presumably, on their own website). WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 02:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Comment. I understand your comments I hope we can resolve this problem, many thanks for all your input.Westbury Nernewtes (talk) 10:13, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep I believe there is enough sourcing to sustain a stub article about this ancient (and no longer existent) manor. Failing that, maybe a redirect to Ashwell, Hertfordshire. As for the Manorial Registry, it is irrelevant IMO; all it lists is the names of people who have purchased the right to use a particular title. That appears to be of great interest to User:Westbury Newnewtes (see their userpage) but is of no interest to Wikipedia. --MelanieN (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep There is significant coverage of Westbury Nerneswtes in http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/herts/vol3/pp199-209 (A History of the County of Hertford: Volume 3. Originally published by Victoria County History, London, 1912.).

    Here is a quote from the book (with the mentions of "Westbury Nernewtes" bolded):

    The subsequent descent of this manor is very difficult to trace. Setting aside the references to the manor of Westbury Nernewtes (of which the descent is given below) there is no record of it until 1606, when James I granted 'a messuage called le Westbury' to Thomas Norwood, (fn. 58) who was already possessed of the manor of Westbury Nernewtes. In 1664 a conveyance of Westbury was made to Elizabeth Sone, widow, by Thomas Bromfield, Laurence Marsh and a number of persons who were evidently co-heirs. (fn. 59) In 1678 a settlement was made by Richard Hutchinson, (fn. 60) in whose family it remained (fn. 61) until at least 1728, when Salmon writes that 'the western part of this manor (Westbury) is a farm of Sir Richard Hutchinson's, which holds of Sir George Humble,' (fn. 62) the Humbles, as hereafter shown, being at this date owners of Westbury Nernewtes. Subsequently it passed to the Leheups. William Leheup was holding in 1779 (fn. 63) and Michael Peter Leheup in 1809. (fn. 64) Westbury Farm still remains a property quite separate from the manor of Westbury Nernewtes (see below). It is situated on the west of the village. Westbury Farm has a homestead moat.

    The Buckinghamshire family of Nernewt (Nernuyt) held land in Ashwell in the 14th century which was probably originally part of the Abbot of Westminster's manor. (fn. 65) This land became the manor of WESTBURY NERNEWTES. In 1340 Sir John Nernewt of Burnham and Fleet Marston, Bucks., settled 'two thirds of one messuage, two mills, 40 acres of land, 10 acres of meadow and 18 marks' rent in Ashwell and Hinxworth' upon his son and heir John, (fn. 67) whose daughter Elizabeth, wife of John Hertishorne, inherited the property. (fn. 67) John Hertishorne (together with two others, presumably his feoffees) was holding 'half a fee in Ashwell which John Nernewt lately held there' in 1428. (fn. 68) The Nernewt property is said to have passed by female line to the Harveys, and on the death of Sir George Harvey (before 1520) to have been purchased by the Lees. (fn. 69) This descent is doubtful, but the Lees did acquire possession of Westbury Nernewtes. In 1540–1 a conveyance by Richard Heigham and his wife Mary, Thomas Colt and Thomas Lysley was made to Anthony Lee, kt., of a moiety of the Buckinghamshire manors and of the manor of Westbury in Ashwell. (fn. 70) After this the connexion with Buckinghamshire ceases. In 1557 this manor (henceforward invariably called Westbury Nernewtes) was conveyed by William Hawtrey and Agnes his wife to Thomas Norwood, (fn. 71) son and heir of William Norwood of Ashwell. Thomas was succeeded at Westbury Nernewtes by his son Nicholas, and Nicholas by his nephew Tirringham Norwood, who in 1611 sold this manor to Edward Waller alias Warren. (fn. 72) Chauncy says that Edward Waller conveyed it to Andrew Laut, citizen of London, whose son Andrew Laut (of Thorpe Underwood, Northamptonshire) was lord of the manor at the date of writing (1700). (fn. 73) The marriage of Sarah daughter and co-heir of Andrew Laut to Sir John Humble brought Westbury Nernewtes to the Humbles. (fn. 74) Elizabeth Humble, daughter-in-law of Sir John, who survived both her husband and her only son, bequeathed this property by her will of 1758 (proved in March 1770–1) to her brother the Hon. Charles Vane, (fn. 75) from whom it passed in 1789 to John Pennell, and on the latter's death in 1813 to his daughter Margaret, the wife of Bernard Geary Snow of Highgate. On the latter's death the manor went to his widow for life, and after her death was divided among his children by Margaret Pennell and by a former wife. Henrietta, a daughter of the former marriage, died unmarried, leaving her share of the property to her betrothed, the Rev. J. B. Smith. Anna Maria, a daughter of the Pennell marriage, married Mr. Edward King Fordham of Ashwell Bury, who bought up all the shares of the manor (including Smith's) excepting that of the Rev. John Pennell Snow, an elder brother of Anna Maria. This latter share (one-sixth) was bequeathed by Mr. Snow to Rupert Donald Fordham, who sold it to Mr. Edward Snow Fordham, who had already (in 1889) inherited the remaining five-sixths of the manor from his father and is the present lord of the manor. The tenants are, however, nearly all enfranchised and the manorial rights have lapsed. (fn. 76)

    There is also significant coverage of the subject in http://stalbanshistory.org/documents/1885.04.pdf.

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Westbury Nernewtes to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 03:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 11:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

List of Shimoga Telecom Companies[edit]

List of Shimoga Telecom Companies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of Shimoga Telecom Companies" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This list has a set of telecom companies which are not based in Shimoga. If needed to be kept, the list should be more apt if it would have been List of telecom companies operating in Karnataka. Because telecom companies operate in a circle (Here Karnataka Circle to be precise) rather than in a particular city/town. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:46, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Left-wing conspiracy[edit]

Left-wing conspiracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Left-wing conspiracy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

According to the first edit summary, this article was created as WP:POINTy response to vast right-wing conspiracy (which is a specific phrase unlike this). Pretty clear the article fails to deliver because there are no sources for this broad use of "left-wing conspiracy" and the only sourced chapters is OR websites and blogs. Pudeo' 09:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - fails WP:FRINGE; appears to be set up to defame Democracy Alliance, only sources are blogs. "Vast right-wing conspiracy" seems to have specific notability as a unique phrase thanks to the "vast." МандичкаYO 😜 10:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - article was clearly created to make a point, cited sources don't really demonstrate the need for an article on this (ie, the notability or widespread use of the phrase). Fyddlestix (talk) 14:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Uphill Castle F.C.[edit]

Uphill Castle F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Uphill Castle F.C." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL JMHamo (talk) 08:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 08:32, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 16:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Rory Gaffney[edit]

Rory Gaffney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rory Gaffney" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL JMHamo (talk) 08:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 08:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Kaw (character)[edit]

Kaw (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kaw (character)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Does not meet WP:FICTION minor non notable character Coolabahapple (talk) 06:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Harvey Tolibao[edit]

Harvey Tolibao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Harvey Tolibao" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable and hardly referenced. Fiddle Faddle 10:31, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Does that explain why the AFD notice on the article is removed so often, but that the student(s) do not come here to offer opinions? Fiddle Faddle 14:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I would guess so - likely inexperienced editors who don't understand the AfD process. МандичкаYO 😜 10:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Omar Bin Sulaiman[edit]

Omar Bin Sulaiman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Omar Bin Sulaiman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Pure promotion. Jacona (talk) 11:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep but rewrite – this article fails to mention his main claim to fame - going to prison and being forced to return $14M he apparently wrongfully obtained. Significant international coverage over the years -[14], [15], [16], [17]. He's out of prison and back in a prestigious position - [18]. МандичкаYO 😜 13:02, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Travis Yates[edit]

Travis Yates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Travis Yates" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Mr Yates had a long run as the title character in the West End musical Billy Elliot the Musical. Other than references to the musical, there are scant references in reliable sources for this actor. Shirt58 (talk) 12:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Weak delete - as far as I can tell he was an understudy for this production, as he was not one of the three "main" boys who received the Olivier Awards during this period (if I am reading it correctly). He has been on some notable TV shows, but there's just insufficient coverage of him outside of the 2005 articles when he got the role. МандичкаYO 😜 12:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Know-net consortium[edit]

Know-net consortium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Know-net consortium" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Article about a consortium for a research project about "knowledge management", what succeeded to that consortium and the theory they invented. There is tons of consortiums creating theories in universities, I don't see why that one would be notable. Even if said thoery is notable (which I doubt), it doesn't mean than the consortium who created it is Maximini1010 (talk) 08:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete per nominator ----Snowded TALK 08:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Aleratec[edit]

Aleratec (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Aleratec" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:CORP and hopelessly promotional. SmartSE (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - all the coverage I'm seeing is press release after press release... there are a couple article and review but just not enough articles about the company itself. МандичкаYO 😜 15:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment:- I found The Journal, The Free Library, This Review in addition to the ones already present in the article. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 18:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Question Are any of those reliable sources? Even the WP disambiguation page The Journal doesn't list anything that sounds like that source. The source listed as The Free Library looks like a press release and was published in CD Computing News, which seems like an insignificant computing publication. Newtechreview.com seems to be one guy reviewing some products on a website without editorial control. EricEnfermero (Talk) 22:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep for now, the sources above aren't great, but they're something. SilverSurfingSerpent (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Jeff Isom[edit]

Jeff Isom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jeff Isom" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable minor league baseball manager. Guidelines have evolved since previous afds and most of his career as a minor league player/manager has been in the independent leagues. Spanneraol (talk) 18:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Spanneraol (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete didn't find much of anything that would demonstrate notability. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 02:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep I'd say he passes GNG. This is an in-depth piece on him, while this and this, though they are articles announcing his signing as manager and would generally be considered routine, go into pretty good detail and are more than just blurbs. There is also this and this. Alex (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep – I'm satisfied that the notability of him has been established. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 02:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The sources that Alex found are all articles announcing his hiring at various teams... if those are acceptable than every modern minor league manager would be able to have an article as they all have sources like that. Spanneraol (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Fugenx[edit]

Fugenx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Fugenx" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable company. Kavdiamanju (talk) 18:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Yes, it's in those few listings, but among hundreds of companies, I'd only consider that significant if a secondary source felt it appropriate to report the accolades. I did a ProQuest firehose search of 50+ databases and only got minor and press release hits. The app company had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. None of its apps have received enough reliable coverage to warrant so much as a sentence... so the article can't even act as a holding area for barely notable apps. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 02:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Here are the citations which I found out about the company: [19], [20]. Mr RD (talk) 14:27, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
The second one is okay, but the first one isn't even an article... – czar 16:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
The source is very reliable and trusted. Mr RD (talk) 16:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
If we're talking about the same source, then yeah, it looks like less an article, and more like a headline with no real content.. Sergecross73 msg me 00:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Lerwick Energy Recovery Plant and District Heating[edit]

Lerwick Energy Recovery Plant and District Heating (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lerwick Energy Recovery Plant and District Heating" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable utility; does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGSIG. Info can conceivably go on Lerwick Power Station article. МандичкаYO 😜 16:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   19:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   19:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

The energy recovery plant, and the district heating scheme are nothing to do whatsoever with the Lerwick power stations, so there is no reason to put the information there. The DH is notabnle because it a rare, in the UK example of a district heating scheme being added to an existing town.

Also unique, the energy recovery plant was built specifically to heat the DH - can you show any other scheme in the UK where this is done?

Engineman, can you please sign your posts? You enter four tildes: ~~~~ Thank you. As for your claims of notability above... first, I think that info is dubious to establish enough notability for its own article. Not every factoid about first or thing built for a difference purpose makes something inherently notable enough for its own article. You could mention that bit of trivia in the article about Lerwick. Second, not only have you not included any reliable sources to support your claims of notability.... none of these claims of notability are even mentioned in the article. You created an article with five brief sentences and no sources, did not include any of the information that you think makes it notable, and this was three months ago; you have not gone back to improve the article since so it seems the article is to your satisfaction. You've been on Wikipedia so long that I'm really mystified; as you also created the Three legged chair or table article in all seriousness, I don't know how I can be of assistance except to politely suggest you should review Wikipedia:Tutorial thoroughly and consider using the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process to get help in creating articles. МандичкаYO 😜 05:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Chris Billington[edit]

Chris Billington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chris Billington" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:ARTIST as they have only received low quality coverage in local newspapers. SmartSE (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

What part of WP:ARTIST#4? The Jülich Museum may or may not count as a notable museum, but it's clearly not "several notable galleries or museums". Colapeninsula (talk) 09:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Shocking comments! How on earth will you consider the "Jülich Museum" non-notable simply because it has no article on the English Wikipedia when it does has an article in the dutch Wikipedia (de.m.wikipedia.org/.)? The truth is that there are multiple reliable sources that establish his notability only that they are not in english. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 11:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
http://www.rambulation.com/ is just a random blog and the analysis there is ridiculous. I don't think that world-arts meets RS either - it's clearly autobiographical. His work is in 'a museum' but it's not an art collection that is at all noteworthy. SmartSE (talk) 09:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
How on earth will you consider "World Art" unreliable source? Will you also consider the The Art House Gallery, Gallery Liverpool Achieve, Daylight Project unreliable? Perhaps we may need to take the sources to the RS Notice board. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 11:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Because: World Arts gives you the artist the opportunity to advertise, promote, display and sell your work with no commission fees. The first two aren't unreliable, but they're of little use to demonstrate notability as they are just routine exhibition listings or selling his work. The daylightproject is a site run by Velux as PR. SmartSE (talk) 12:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1383 Limburgia[edit]

1383 Limburgia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1383 Limburgia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. This was one of the 34 bodies in the Texas Minor Planet Project [22] which analyzed their orbits carefully "to map irregularities of the fundamental system of equatorial coordinates" [23]. Additionally it is part of two photometric studies [24] [25] and is used as an example in a paper about orbit determination [26]. I think that's enough attention to pass WP:NASTRO. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1886 Lowell[edit]

1886 Lowell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1886 Lowell" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect. All I could find was a study of potential asteroid flyby missions that included its name as one line in a table [27]. It's not enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1892 Lucienne[edit]

1892 Lucienne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1892 Lucienne" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect. Part of an unselective 100-object lightcurve study [28] and name-dropped very briefly in an article theorizing that some meteorites have their origin in fragments from near-resonant asteroids [29]. I don't think that's enough in-depth and specific attention to this body to count for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Asadulla pasha[edit]

Asadulla pasha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Asadulla pasha" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article looks heavy promotional and though some notability exists, no independent sources can support the claim. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment - I agree with your assessment and it's good you contacted Fasiullah - it appears his native name ("اسد اللہ پاشا") is not spelled correctly as it brings 0 results. It seems he should have notability by the references, but I can't find enough sources. МандичкаYO 😜 09:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. Before I check in, some changes have been made to the profile to remove "promotional" content and additional sources were added. As I find myself still naive to wiki editing, surely need your help in making the profile reasonably useful for Wikipedians/general users. Please consider improving it, instead of simply deletingg. User:Fasiullah 14:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Valiant Language School[edit]

Valiant Language School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Valiant Language School" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No indication of the school meeting notability, contains no reliable sources to allow verification. While schools are often considered inherently notable, this is a tiny private language school in Tokyo, and therefore should not be afforded that consideration. Creator of the page asked for more time to work on the article on April 7, and has not touched it since then. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 07:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete as original prodder; I could find no evidence it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:39, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Lis Anna[edit]

Lis Anna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lis Anna" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This page concerns an unknown short filmmaker who won a number of awards at small and obscure film and literary competitions. This page does not validate the subject matter's notability, but serves as a list of awards she has won at non-competitive events. The external links attempts to serve as a substitute for references, which it fails to do, as all of them fall under at least one category of being: non-notable, unreliable or first-party.

This article was created in 2008, which makes me wonder how it has gone unnoticed this long. However, provided that its author has only made one contribution and the page reads like an advertisement, I would assume it was made by either the subject matter or a friend. DARTHBOTTO talkcont 05:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Nothing that comes close to being a reliable source establishing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:32, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Captain's Ball[edit]

Captain's Ball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Captain's Ball" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not notable variant of netball. Apparently limited to one court in Singapore. DGG ( talk ) 05:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

A Night in NYC[edit]

A Night in NYC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "A Night in NYC" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have been unsuccessful in trying to establish the notability of this release. Lachlan Foley (talk) 04:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Dodgerfilms[edit]

Dodgerfilms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Dodgerfilms" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable individual with a handful of refs regarding a single event/YouTube video. Article is largely promotional in tone. --Non-Dropframe talk 04:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep. With respect to the nominator, neither assessment is correct. First, this is not a single event: this is two events, within the same month. As yet, I can find no evidence that this has ever occurred before. Meantime, the "handful of refs" includes ESPN, MLB.com, and Sports Illustrated. Second, for the article to be promotional, it would have to be designed to send page viewers offsite for someone's financial gain; this article is matter-of-fact in its presentation of a non-profit (as near as I can tell) YouTube channel and the man behind it—and why, suddenly, he is now notable. That said, I would not be averse to a page move to, say, Bobby Crosby (Dodgerfilms)ATinySliver/ATalkPage 04:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - even though it is technically "two" events, it is a similar event and within a very short period of time. Subjects must pass Wikipedia's specific guidelines for notability. That something possibly never occurred before is not one of them. It does not satisfy the requirement for significant coverage. WP:PROMOTION does not have to be specific to financial gain; it can be to promote a person, belief, movement etc. (although many YouTubers financially benefit from increased views). Moving it to "Bobby Crosby" would not make a difference as it would not pass minimum requirements for biographies. МандичкаYO 😜 06:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Wikimandia, your reasoning is backward; it would be akin to arguing that two lightning strikes would be less notable if two otherwise completely unrelated storms, coming in from completely different directions—say, Phoenix and San Diego Face-grin.svg—found your baseball glove in the same spot while you were recording it. A ridiculous analogy, perhaps, but its rarity and, therefore, its notability are compounded, not diluted, by the fact that "it is a similar event and within a very short period of time." That's why ESPN, MLB, Sports Illustrated, et al., found it worthy—and why Wikipedia does, too. —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 07:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Please take some time to familiarize yourself with Notability Guidelines. That the media considers something worthy to write about is not the equivalent of satisfying Wikipedia's criteria for GNG - "Many events receive coverage in the news and yet are not of historic or lasting importance. News organizations have criteria for content, i.e. news values, that differ from the criteria used by Wikipedia." (WP:EVENTCRIT) Any way you look at it, this does not pass the GNG. Dodgerfilms does not pass as an organization WP:ORG, the guy who runs it does not pass WP:BLP, and the two events do not pass WP:EVENT. While it might be interesting (to some) that someone caught two Dodger homeruns while recording it within a short period of time, interesting is only an opinion. We need significant coverage of the event in reliable sources to back up this claim of notability. There is no indication this will have any lasting significance (WP:LASTING) or receive persistent coverage (WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE). As far as I can see, only one source (MLB) even mentioned the second catch. That's strange - if the second event was some kind of stunning shock that defied the odds, wouldn't there be more coverage of the second event? The coverage should be multiplied for something like that ... ie Man gets hit by lightning (news story in a few sources); same man gets hit by lightning twice in one month (WAY more news stories). Even if you combine all the coverage of both events, it is nowhere near in-depth or significant coverage (WP:DEPTH). This is so weak it is almost a speedy delete. МандичкаYO 😜 09:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

APOGEE (festival)[edit]

APOGEE (festival) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "APOGEE (festival)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No actual evidence of notability. WP is not a directory of cultural events at a college. DGG ( talk ) 03:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Most sources are self-published, press releases, or event listings. I found three semi-maybe-independent sources (here, here, and here) that mention APOGEE, but they are far from adequate to use as the base for a Wikipedia page. Fails WP:GNG. And, even if it didn't fail GNG, the information here would probably be better suited on the institution's main article in a condensed form. Gargleafg (talk) 05:42, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

OASIS (culfest)[edit]

OASIS (culfest) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "OASIS (culfest)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

no actual evidence for notability; the basics are already in the article for the university. DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

White House Complex[edit]

White House Complex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "White House Complex" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This page was originally prodded in 2007 for being "Unnecessary - all info already in White House",[30] but that was rejected. In the eight years since, this article remains with no citations, with almost all of its content basically repeating what is on White House#The White House since the Kennedy restoration and other sections of the White House article. Thus, there is no apparent rationale under all the rules of WP:GNG for maintaining a separate stand-alone article. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

I'Anson (musician)[edit]

I'Anson (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "I'Anson (musician)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

WP:BLP of a musician, making no substantive claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and not citing nearly enough reliable source coverage to claim WP:GNG instead. Essentially, this article just serves to demonstrate that he exists, and fails to make a credible case as to why he would belong in an encyclopedia as of yet. Delete, no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he actually makes it over a notability criterion. Bearcat (talk) 19:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. The coverage cited in the article plus a review in the Herald ([31]), BBC Radio coverage ([32]), and this from the Daily Record are sufficient for a pass of WP:GNG. --Michig (talk) 07:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Hiroshi Ashitomi[edit]

Hiroshi Ashitomi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hiroshi Ashitomi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Political activist, his main campaign means that he has been mentioned in articles in newspapers internationally. However, I think this is far more about the protest than him directly, and I don't think it would get beyond WP:1E. I can't see that he meets WP:POLITICIAN, WP:BIO or WP:GNG. I'm aware that part of the problem is the language barrier. Boleyn (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 01:50, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 01:50, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. All of the sources simply mention this person in passing, and do not appear to provide a level of in-depth coverage sufficient to demonstrate general notability. --DAJF (talk) 02:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Route 6 (GRTC)[edit]

Route 6 (GRTC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Route 6 (GRTC)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable bus route. Individual bus routes are generally not encyclopedic and with no independent coverage this fails general notability. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:23, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Dikgobe[edit]

Dikgobe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Dikgobe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Does not seem notable and does not have much content. Rider ranger47 Talk 14:46, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Nayakuralu Nagamma[edit]

Nayakuralu Nagamma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nayakuralu Nagamma" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

The article is not intelligible and has sources but those are not clear. Searches here and here found results but nothing to improve the article. A browser search found this (I'm not sure what it says) and this (which like Books confirms this person has been portrayed in movies). There's simply nothing to improve this article and nothing to significantly support it (at least with English sources). SwisterTwister talk 04:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I originally held off closing in the hope more of a discussion would happen but 17 hours later and still the same, seems consensus is to Keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 19:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Miss Earth 2015[edit]

Miss Earth 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Miss Earth 2015" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

With so much unknowns, just a crystal boll and advertising. The Banner talk 11:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - seems to meet GNG with news coverage, and with contestants are being added as they qualify. Even though it's not till November it has enough sources for information. МандичкаYO 😜 07:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - pageant is an upcoming event, related articles of the same pageant have already met the notability guidelines --- Tito Pao (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
    • No date, no place, no venue, no sources for the event itself (all sources are for the contestants). I tend to call that a crystal boll. The Banner talk 10:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Westward School, Walton[edit]

Westward School, Walton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Westward School, Walton" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable primary school, and not a plausible redirect to Walton-on-Thames. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:30, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:30, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • draft / userspace There's simply nothing here, so my inclination would be to delete it, whether or not it's notable. As it's an independent, there is a slightly greater likelihood of it being able to in some way demonstrate notability per WP:GNG by the usual manner, rather than just being a simple run-of-the-mill local primary. However there's no sign of that as yet. It is however a new article by a new editor and so I'm happy to give them time to work on it.
Redirection seems pointless, as there's little to link it with the suggested target and a redirect to a large topic with no coverage of the redirect subject isn't much use to readers. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - article has been moved to Westward School, of which a cursory google search shows that there are too many to have a primary topic. I don't think that the old title is much more useful either as a redirect, especially since Walton-on-Thames doesn't have an #Education section. ansh666 04:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: All of the participants agree that the school shouldn't have a standalone article, however the course of action (there were suggestions to redirect, merge, userfy, and delete) is unclear. Esquivalience t 01:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

2015 Miss Grand International[edit]

2015 Miss Grand International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "2015 Miss Grand International" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Recreation of the earlier removed Miss Grand International 2015. Non-notable year version built on related or unsuitable sources. The Banner talk 11:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wikipedia articles aren't intended for establishing notability, as in this case, but should be about events etc that already are notable. Thomas.W talk 12:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per CSD G4, Salt as recreated 3 times (including the earlier title) and {{uw-salt}} the page creator. --TL22 (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Miss Grand Romania[edit]

Miss Grand Romania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Miss Grand Romania" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Nearly unknown local version that fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 11:20, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Miss Grand Japan[edit]

Miss Grand Japan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Miss Grand Japan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Nearly unknown local version that fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 11:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Miss Thailand candidates at International pageants[edit]

Miss Thailand candidates at International pageants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Miss Thailand candidates at International pageants" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

fancruft The Banner talk 11:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete as a mass of unreferenced BLP material. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Miss Grand Albania[edit]

Miss Grand Albania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Miss Grand Albania" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Local version of a pageant that fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 11:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Mandaue Gay Pageant[edit]

Mandaue Gay Pageant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mandaue Gay Pageant" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Does not appear to be a notable pageant. The article does not cite any references, and the only sources I can find about the event are insignificant. Apparently, the event is part of Mandaue's yearly fiesta, but either way this doesn't appear to have independent notability. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:28, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete For a Wikipedia article to exist that article needs to note multiple reliable sources which discuss the subject of the article. This concept fails WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete The pageant is too local in scope even in the Philippines, and wouldn't probably meet notability guidelines for Philippine-related articles. --- Tito Pao (talk) 15:09, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep There are reliable sources and these are news articles cited and a government website. This is in tangent with WP:GNG. There is evidence that Ms Gay Mandaue pioneered in trans pageantry and local as it may be in Cebu it is widely known in Pageant circles in the Region. Regionalism is at play here to cite that a local pageant shouldn't be promoted for education and recognition. Dmitri cortes (talk) 23:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
The only sources I could find were about the Mandaue fiesta as a whole rather than just the pageant. Even those that were, at first glance, about the pageant, were actually about the pageant as part of the fiesta. This could mean that Mandaue's fiesta is a notable event which warrants its own article, and I wouldn't have prejudice against this article being merged to such an article, if it existed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Access intelligence[edit]

Access intelligence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Access intelligence" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I'm nominating Access intelligence for deletion due to lack of notability. This article does have an {advert} note on it already, but after checking the provided links and doing further searches, I doubt that it can be brought to an acceptable level of referencing. References all seem to be either primary sources (quarterly reports, press releases), advertisments, or incidental listings (stock exchange records). - Article author notified.

  • Delete as non-notable (as nominator).-- Elmidae (talk) 16:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Struck duplicate !vote, your nomination is your recommended course of action. Feel free to comment, though. Esquivalience t 01:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:04, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1940 Whipple[edit]

1940 Whipple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1940 Whipple" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. As it is a low-numbered asteroid, I have taken it to a full discussion rather than a unilateral redirect or a prod. I think it should be deleted; or (as NASTRO recommends) redirected to List of minor planets 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Procedural Keep: Boleyn appears to be on a deletion spree without allowing consensus to develop on the asteroid articles they have previously nominated. AfD is overhead and this is an abuse of the system.--Milowenthasspoken 13:37, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect per WP:DWMP: it's difficult to investigate this one because 1940 Whipple appears in a different context. I just found one photometry study[33] and a few mentions of the asteroid in the context of a discussion about Whipple. Praemonitus (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak redirect. One lightcurve study [34] and brief mentions in some other papers, but I don't think it's quite enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep:So an object is more notable if a lazy bastard only studies 2 objects, but if someone studies 20 such objects in a single paper, then none of them are notable? Wikipedia is a strange place. -- Kheider (talk) 12:28, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:43, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1371 Resi[edit]

1371 Resi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1371 Resi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 19:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect. Carrasco published a couple of studies of its orbit in the early 1950s but I can't find much about it that's more recent, and I don't think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1653 Yakhontovia[edit]

1653 Yakhontovia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1653 Yakhontovia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG, but as a low-numbered asteroid, needs a thorough discussion rather than a unilateral redirect. My personal opinion is that is should be deleted or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets 1001-2000 in line with WP:NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 08:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:14, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Procedural Keep: Boleyn appears to be on a deletion spree without allowing consensus to develop on the asteroid articles they have previously nominated. AfD is overhead and this is an abuse of the system.--Milowenthasspoken 13:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect per WP:DWMP: One photometric study with a paragraph of text found. Not much else. Praemonitus (talk) 17:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1438 Wendeline[edit]

1438 Wendeline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1438 Wendeline" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. As it is a low-numbered asteroid, I have taken it to a full discussion rather than a unilateral redirect or a prod. I think it should be deleted; or (as NASTRO recommends) redirected to List of minor planets 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Procedural Keep: Boleyn appears to be on a deletion spree without allowing consensus to develop on the asteroid articles they have previously nominated. AfD is overhead and this is an abuse of the system.--Milowenthasspoken 13:37, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect per WP:DWMP: All I could find were position reports and photometric opportunities; nothing substantial. Praemonitus (talk) 17:31, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was There is No Consensus to delete the article. -- GB fan 11:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Lake Placid (film series)[edit]

Lake Placid (film series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Placid (film series) Stats)
(Find sources: "Lake Placid (film series)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article is redundant, unnecessary, and messy, and contains no new and little contents which are merely copies of contents from another article. TurokSwe (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - There's a template directly below with the films in thus making this entire article redundant ?....., So I'm not really understanding why this "article" was ever created.... –Davey2010Talk 00:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:59, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:59, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep as creator. Clearly notable. I created this stub to provide an overview/umbrella of the series. It can always be improved on. The fact that there is a navbox is irrelevant, in actual fact there should be an article to justify the navbox. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: If kept, this could merit a rename to Lake Placid franchise, as the series spans several films and some games as well. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:NCF, the correct disambiguator would be "(franchise)", however, a couple of promotional tie in web games do not satisfy the definition of a franchise. There is already a move discussion in place. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
I think the real issue here is that it doesn't please YOU. TurokSwe (talk) 09:16, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
The real issue is that you don't understand what qualifies as a franchise by our definition, and you have no respect for our guidelines or MOS and you have made a rather WP:POINTY AFD. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. What other article does this duplicate? Of course it will have some overlap with the component parts of the franchise, but deleting it on those grounds would be like deleting Car because we have articles on every individual part of the car. bd2412 T 14:53, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - nothing notable about this series. Furthermore this article is somewhat pointless; for example, the table listing all the characters as they appear in the series reveals that only two appeared in more than one film (and those two only appeared in two). So basically each movie gets a whole new cast and there is no crossover. МандичкаYO 😜 01:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep No valid deletion arguement presented by the nominator. AfD is not for cleanup. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

AvoDerm[edit]

AvoDerm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "AvoDerm" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable company. Article reads like an ad. No references, other than two external links to the company's own website. A google search comes up with no reliable sources. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   18:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   18:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Technically, Padenton, WP:NCORP doesn't apply to AvoDerm, because it's not a company. Breeder's Choice Pet Foods is the company that offers the AvoDerm line of pet food, and Central Garden & Pet Co. is that company's parent. That's neither here nor there. A basic Google News search revealed a 2012 recall of AvoDerm pet food (1 2 3). It's also received a few passing (or slightly more than passing) mentions in other articles from prominent and reliable sources (1 2). Some reviews are pretty thorough (1 2). And, from the first deletion attempt this article went through, we can see that AvoDerm is mentioned in a number of book sources ([35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40]). I think these are all enough to pass WP:GNG. The article in its current form is certainly bad. I think it just needs to be properly-sourced and rewritten. Gargleafg (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Per argument made above. Also, after reading this, I'm convinced it passes notability guidelines. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 11:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Amelia Adams[edit]

Amelia Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Amelia Adams" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Delete: as insufficiently notable television personality. Quis separabit? 12:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - passes GNG. 2008 profile and this one, along with the usual articles mentioning things related to her reporting, are sufficient for notability МандичкаYO 😜 01:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • keep 3 articles focused on her, plus "the usual articles mentioning things related to her reporting" to quote Wikimandis. It's enough to push her past GNG. (I do wonder whether developing standards for journalists might be useful) E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

My 31st Demerit[edit]

My 31st Demerit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "My 31st Demerit" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Only a single feature article in Daily star. I failed to find any other source for this band in Google search. Fails WP:GNG Arr4 (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   19:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete 2012 article with one source. They played one event, and nothing comes up in searches. AlbinoFerret 03:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - it would be nice to find out their name in Bengali to see if sufficient coverage is available. МандичкаYO 😜 01:32, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 00:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - Bar the source in the article I can't find anything at all, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG/ –Davey2010Talk 02:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Beaumont Arms[edit]

Beaumont Arms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Beaumont Arms" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not an obviously notable pub. I declined a CSD A7 as there are a few news pieces in the Bolton News about change of ownership, and the "community pub" concept suggested there could be enough to write about a piece of minor local history. Having dug around for sources, it seems this is one of many, many estate pubs all over Britain, though I have to give it credit for still being open and serving customers, as many are not. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - Non-notable pub and my searches found nothing aside from listings and I would've suggested moving elsewhere but there's no target. SwisterTwister talk 23:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 00:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Joy Onaolapo[edit]

Joy Onaolapo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Joy Onaolapo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

WP:NN person. Article features a minimal two sentences holding onto one source and has not been edited in over 9 months. This shows there's nothing of note to add and thus Miss Onalapo does not meet Wikipedia standards. Rusted AutoParts 00:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep Onaolapo was a gold medalist in 2012 at the Summer Paralympics. Her death even drew comment from Nigeria's President, Goodluck Ebele Jonathan who described "the death of the Nigerian Paralympian gold medallist, Mrs. Joy Onaolapo as a big loss to the nation." found at this source here: [41]. Whether an article has or has not been edited in nine months is not criteria for deletion of an article. I expanded the article with some new references including President Jonathan's statements, and the words of one of her coaches. The article subject crosses the threshold of notability.WP:N Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 11:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1704 Wachmann[edit]

1704 Wachmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1704 Wachmann" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG, but as a low-numbered asteroid, needs a thorough discussion rather than a unilateral redirect. My personal opinion is that is should be deleted or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets 1001-2000 in line with WP:NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 08:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:15, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect. I only found one study of this object [42]; I think we need more for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Procedural Keep: Boleyn appears to be on a deletion spree without allowing consensus to develop on the asteroid articles they have previously nominated. AfD is overhead and this is an abuse of the system.--Milowenthasspoken 13:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: The article has a light-curve image. -- Kheider (talk) 16:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect per WP:DWMP: it only has one photometry study, and that provides little useful detail. Most of the article was about the observation techniques and the fact that this object had previously had its period determined. Non-notable per WP criteria. Praemonitus (talk) 19:14, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 00:54, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

1777 Gehrels[edit]

1777 Gehrels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1777 Gehrels" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Delete / redirect per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 07:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 07:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: Two light curve studies. Praemonitus (talk) 15:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect. I only see one study [43] repeated several times on Google scholar in part because it overlaps in pages with a different unrelated paper. Anyway, I don't think that's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ― Padenton|   17:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect per WP:NASTRO (WP:NASTCRIT) No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is a paper listing several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTCRIT #3 as not meeting notability) ― Padenton|   21:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs a slightly clearer consensus. Esquivalience t 00:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 00:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Afterlife Empire[edit]

Afterlife Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Afterlife Empire" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unsourced and non-notable PeterTheFourth (talk) 00:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

I didn't even know about incubate. Sounds perfect to me. — Strongjam (talk) 02:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment if this does get deleted I'd like to request the admin relocate it to my userspace so that I can compile any future references that might appear for it. If the game moves from Greenlit to actual release, then more coverage may result and allow me to build the page to a size where, if anyone seems appropriate, they could see it as adequate justification to re-create at that future time. Ranze (talk) 01:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • incubate right now there is nothing notable about the subject itself, merely the controversy surrounding the players involved and the controversy is covered in the articles about thosee players. It seems possible that there will be coverage of the game itself after its release in which case the controversy about its funding etc would be a notable feature. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    sounds like a good idea actually. I forgot all about WP:AI aka WP:LIMBO. I think I ran across it a while ago but it's hard to remember the terms. Plus the process is a bit hard to get familiar with. I am agreeable to an administrator moving to an incubator... I think I might have even done this before for some other page. Can't recall which. This may be preferable to leaving it on userspace. Ranze (talk) 03:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Incubate per TRPoD. Seems like a perfect use of Limbo. Grayfell (talk) 05:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - the WP:Article Incubator is now closed down. The suggestion there is to consider WP:DRAFTS instead. Hope this helps. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 15:17, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

BC logging road etiquette[edit]

BC logging road etiquette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "BC logging road etiquette" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable info to warrant its own page. Perhaps a merge to Driving etiquette would suffice. Tinton5 (talk) 00:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:46, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:46, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete—we're not a textbook. A few of the specialized concepts might warrant mention in driving etiquette, but only as examples of variations. Imzadi 1979  03:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Might be useful on Wikibooks or Wikivoyage, but not here. --Rschen7754 05:23, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    • ^ Grandin & Joseph, Greg & Gilbert (2010). A Century of Revolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. pp. 397–414. 
    • ^ Feldmann, Andreas E.; Maiju Perälä (July 2004). "Reassessing the Causes of Nongovernmental Terrorism in Latin America". Latin American Politics and Society 46 (2): 101–132. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2004.tb00277.x.