Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
Purge page cache if page isn't updating.
Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Purge server cache

Life Is Beautiful (Lana Del Rey song)[edit]

Life Is Beautiful (Lana Del Rey song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Life Is Beautiful (Lana Del Rey song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Both Lana and Interscope didn't share any details about the song. It's not heard in the film itself. We have no details about the album except the title. The info about the video is a complete bogus. So nothing here is actually confirmed, maybe the song will never be released. Wikipedia is about the confirmed facts, not (even beautiful) fantasies. You can create the article again, if we have any trustworthy news Mavoy (talk) 22:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

White Bus Services[edit]

White Bus Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "White Bus Services" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable bus company fails WP:CORP & WP:GNG I've only found this [1] and everything on GBooks is to do with a South African company. –Davey2010Talk 22:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Brainhell[edit]

Brainhell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Brainhell" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unfortunately, neither "Brian Hill" nor "Brainhell" appears to have received the sort of coverage required for an article. One article about one, one article about the other, but I found no reliable, independent sources besides those. In addition, no reliable source has publicly connected "Brian Hill" and "Brainhell". It is not the job of Wikipedia to connect the two. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Ambronite[edit]

Ambronite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ambronite" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Reason FloCambs (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Fails WP:PROMOTION: Appears to be product advertising at the moment, and can't find sources from reputable news sources, let alone substantial coverage.

Helping Brainz[edit]

Helping Brainz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Helping Brainz" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article is written by a COI editor, and there is no notability to their organisation. The sources are weak, when I actually wrote what the sources say I managed about 3 lines of text, although this editor then removed the only well-written part of the article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 21:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Looks like everything out there that could serve as a source is social media or self-generated. Thoroughly fails WP:ORG. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

--Yedhukrishna Menon 21:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Hi My name is Yedhukrishna Menon, fortunately the founder of Helping Brainz, which have been nominated for deletion. Helping Brainz is a non profit making organization based in Delhi which works for the underpriviledged on the weekends, since the members of the organization are working professionals. we never work/worked to bear fruits, so nothing fancy to boast about as well. Helping Brainz is all about a passion which young Indians wants to spread (spreading here doesn't mean publicity) throughout the world so that the world one day can become a store house of self-less workers. Few days back to invite more human beings to this ideology, I thought of creating a Wikipedia page, where I plan to include some short and crisp information, just to motivate the youth to work for the community. Now it's Wikipedia's decision to delete it or not. I will continue my community service even without the Wikipedia Page. Everything happens for good. Thank you--Yedhukrishna Menon 21:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

And nothing is SOCIAL MEDIA SELF GENERATED--Yedhukrishna Menon 21:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yedhukrishnamenon (talkcontribs)

Also to add on : as mentioned by @Joseph2302: he helped me editing the same however, for instance what he cited in the page is "Delhi University conducted "Udaan", and which is wrong, so re-entered the information as "Helping Brainz in association with AIESEC in Delhi University conducted "Udaan", and because of which he mentioned that the 'COI' user deleted the information entered by the administrator.

My complaint is that the information I added was correct, because I used the sources. Instead of using the sources, you were just saying whatever. But apparently your whatever is better. But this definitely fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO - I was trying to see it's notability, was never convinced it was very notable. Also, stop pinging me everytime you write something, and stop posting on my talkpage, it won't change my opinion. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I dont agree with you Joseph. The sentence framed by you had different meanings, don't know what you read in the sources. I conducted the event so I know it better, so thank you. Please go ahead and do whatever you want with my page. Won't disturb you!--Yedhukrishna Menon 21:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yedhukrishnamenon (talkcontribs)

  • Delete I would already have speedy deleted it except that a speedy was previously declined, by in order to let the contributor have a chance to improve it. That decline was not wrong, but it prevents a speedy now. I think this is absolutely hopeless promotionalism, and a SNOW delete would be in order. DGG ( talk ) 00:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I agree, it would be speedy deletable if I hadn't previously removed it. My reason for removing it was that it seemed like the editor was heading in the right direction, removing some of the promotional stuff. But I was never convinced by the notability, and this still reads super-promotional. At least by doing this AfD it can never be created again, as it will fail WP:CSD#G4. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Laurel Williams Academy[edit]

Laurel Williams Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Laurel Williams Academy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Notability tag was removed because "schools offering secondary education generally accepted as notable". However, this school does not offer secondary education, considering it only teaches to 12 years of age. Still unsourced and orphaned after 6 years, I can't see anything whatsoever online that could be used as a reliable source. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 20:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Sarah Oliver[edit]

Sarah Oliver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Sarah Oliver" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable cast member of the Bad Girls Club with no to questionable sources. jona(talk) 20:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are also non-notable cast members of the Bad Girls Club with little to questionable sources and are only known for being a cast member fails WP:1E:

Elease Donovan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Victor Twins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Erica Figueroa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Judi Jai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Delete unless there are WP:RSes (other than the network that produces/distributes the show) that discuss biographical details of their lives (apart from the shows).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

CLSM (band)[edit]

CLSM (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "CLSM (band)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I've been unable to drag up any WP:RS about this band or decent mentions to pass WP:GNG - surprising given the claims of grandeur and BBC petitions breaking records. I can't even find a decent website for the band - the one in the article points to a T-shirt shop.

I have been able to find blogs saying their appearance at this rave was good, etc. but that's not enough to pass GNG. The Dissident Aggressor 20:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete notability search falls short of WP:BAND so i think the group may lack encyclopedic importance, but per WP:ALTERNATIVE I think they could have a good article on WikiBands or another such wiki. Bryce Carmony (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Catherine Ajike[edit]

Catherine Ajike (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Catherine Ajike" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Subject doesn't meet the requirements of WP:BIO. A search for sources turned up no coverage in reliable sources and the references cited are press releases, self published sources and her personal website. SmartSE (talk) 20:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Jeff Murphy[edit]

Jeff Murphy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jeff Murphy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Consensus is that bullpen catchers must pass GNG. Murphy does not appear to do so and his previous playing career also does not make him notable. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Mark Merila[edit]

Mark Merila (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mark Merila" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Consensus is that bullpen catchers must pass GNG. Merila does not appear to do so and his work as a scout and a minor league player also doesn't make him notable. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 19:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep There's more and I'll flesh it out later, but he played for Team USA in the 1993 Intercontinental Cup, which in my view satisfies WP:BASE/N. "Baseball figures are presumed notable if they...have participated in a major international competition."[2] The Intercontinental Cup isn't a no-name tournament, it is run by the International Baseball Federation every two or four years since 1973. He was a First-Team All-American while with the Gophers of Minnesota[3]. It looks like he has a hybrid case. All his accomplishments combined make a pretty notable guy. Like I said, though, I'll try to flesh this out more later. Alex (talk) 03:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Ayo Mary Laurent[edit]

Ayo Mary Laurent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ayo Mary Laurent" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Subject doesn't meet the requirements of WP:BIO. A search for sources turned up no coverage in reliable sources and the references cited in the article are self-published/press releases. SmartSE (talk) 19:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Charly Musonda Jr.[edit]

Charly Musonda Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Charly Musonda Jr." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Eileen Wagstaff[edit]

Eileen Wagstaff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Eileen Wagstaff" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I am unable to find significant coverage (or indeed any coverage) of the subject in reliable sources so the topic fails the general criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. The problem might be that the coverage is under her maiden name but that name is not currently given in the article. Pichpich (talk) 17:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Blame Twinkle's resolution of the edit conflict. But now that the AfD page has been created, we might as well go down the slow-deletion route. Pichpich (talk) 17:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

WatsUp TV Africa Music Video Awards[edit]

WatsUp TV Africa Music Video Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "WatsUp TV Africa Music Video Awards" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

WP:Future event with virtually no current coverage. Unknown whether it will be notable even once it occurs; we don't know now that it will even ever occur a second time, despite the representation in the article. Google search: "watsup * music video awards". —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete According to the WatsUp TV article, this isn't a cable channel at all, but merely a show airing on a few TV stations throughout Africa. Basically this can be summed up as 'This show presents a special edition where we'll award whichever acts you stuffed the ballot with the most', but we don't even know the methodology of the voting or how long the awards ceremony is, and the claimed "#WAMVA" hastag on Twitter pretty much has been only pushed by the show themselves, so without popularity or any voting metrics, there's no way to determine this show's true notability. Nate (chatter) 05:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hristina Ivanoska[edit]

Hristina Ivanoska (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hristina Ivanoska" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No independent sources which discuss the person in length to establish notability of the artist. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Weak delete. A resume without references. I didn't find any sources discussing her in detail on Google News or Google (20 first results). Mentions in passing, yes, but that's nothing special. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Lauren Bruton[edit]

Lauren Bruton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lauren Bruton" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Second division team captain, but does not meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG. League is not fully professional and has only played for international youth teams. References are routine mentions. Decided against a PROD in case it gets deleted before someone can find additional info out there. Fuebaey (talk) 16:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Heartstrings Tour[edit]

Heartstrings Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Heartstrings Tour" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable concert tour, fails WP:NCONCERT ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 00:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Support: Fails WP:NCONCERT. Plain and simple. PrairieKid (talk) 03:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • delete. fails WP:GNG and no other indications of notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Docurated[edit]

Docurated (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Docurated" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This subject seems to fail WP:NCORP. A number of trivial news mentions and PR sources online, but nothing that meets the "depth of coverage" section of the relevant notability guideline. VQuakr (talk) 03:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. The only source on the page is not Reliable. When you click on the flag of the source referenced, you are taken to some kind of phony sales page. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Zero notability.Staszek Lem (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete: A Highbeam search turns up various press release based items, plus an indication that the firm was one of 28 finalists in TechCrunch Disrupt NY 2013 Reports Startup Battlefield but nothing indicating WP:CORPDEPTH notability. AllyD (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Alfred Webre[edit]

Alfred Webre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Alfred Webre" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I was originally going to strip away the dubious sourcing, but it seems pointless. Really nothing in this traces back to any place but Alfred Webre, and I cannot find any evidence that he has any traction outside the world of omnium gatherum fringiness. Note that in reading the article I would not assume that anything it says is actually true. Mangoe (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete This WP:FRINGEBLP needs to be sourced to reliable independent sources for us to establish notability. I don't see any that we can use. jps (talk) 16:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - the previous closure was "no consensus", and the issues raised were not remedied since then. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - no RSes. (PressTV completely fails to be one here.) No improvements in sourcing since previous AFD - David Gerard (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallyu World[edit]

Hallyu World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hallyu World" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Show fails WP:GNG and the page creator states she works for the show. The article's current form is after a TON of promotional language and blatant advertising was removed. All that's left is a list of episode summaries and self-claimed info about the host. There are no secondary references at all and none independent of the subject itself. I couldn't find a thing through Google, though the general nature of the title makes this difficult. Shinyang-i (talk) 08:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shinyang-i (talk) 08:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 07:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Micro Encryption[edit]

Micro Encryption (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Micro Encryption" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

MicroEncryptyion (and the related MicroTokenization) are terms created to describe a proprietary encryption process, and aren't in standard usage. They appear to be a Neologism - the sources included only mention the terms in passing in relation to the company's products. There is no apparent in-depth independent coverage to establish the notability of the terms as standalone articles, and the best I'm finding online are press releases and brief mentions in regard to the company.

I am also nominating the following related page, as covered above:

Micro Tokenization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Bilby (talk) 08:51, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Blauk[edit]

Blauk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Blauk" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unreferenced article about an unnotable social network. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete nn Staszek Lem (talk) 18:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment There's some coverage in Indian media[4][5] and in an ebook that looks self-published[6]. I don't think that's enough to be notable (List of social networking websites is very long and limited only to notable sites so I don't think there's a sensible merge/redirect target). Colapeninsula (talk) 15:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep: there is a clear consensus here, especially regarding Esquivalience's statistics. (non-admin closure) EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 00:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Damodaran M. Vasudevan[edit]

Damodaran M. Vasudevan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Damodaran M. Vasudevan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not a notable figure. Article not sourced with reliable citations. Google search revel no contribution to Indian Science and Technology, whatsoever Educationtemple (talk) 14:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. I think an award presented by the president of India (the Dr. B. C. Roy Award) is significant enough to cover notability by itself, but he also has well-cited publications (WP:PROF#C1) and is mentioned as a keynote speaker in this newspaper article. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. Given the number of colleges he's been principal or dean of. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. Reasonably notable. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep as per WP:PROF#C1: Nearly 6000 citations, a h-index of 28, and a g-index of 73 shows that the subject has made significant impact to his field. Esquivalience t 23:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Intolerant (Ylvis song)[edit]

Intolerant (Ylvis song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Intolerant (Ylvis song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Two-line stub about a song, making no substantive claim of notability under WP:NMUSIC, and citing no reliable source coverage. The mere fact that a song exists is not, in and of itself, enough to qualify it for a standalone Wikipedia article — that takes winning or being nominated for a major "Song of the Year" award, attaining noteworthy success on record charts, or other criteria that elevate the song well above the notability level of most other songs. Normal wikipractice is to redirect a non-notable song to the album from whence it came, but this isn't from an album — while redirecting this to the artist instead could be an option, I'm not sure how valuable that would be and I don't imagine it being all that likely a search term in its own right since anybody who actually was looking for it would have to already know who the artist was anyway. So all in all, my view is that we should just delete it. Bearcat (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Washington D.C. Temple Orchestra[edit]

Washington D.C. Temple Orchestra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Washington D.C. Temple Orchestra" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Sounds like the sort of thing that should be getting coverage. Unfortunately I could only find a few passing mentions such as this one: http://ww2.somdnews.com/stories/11252009/indytop102030_32181.shtml Mark Schierbecker (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, DC-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:51, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:53, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • delete nn without prejudice to recreation when notability increases. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Silas Masinde Simiyu[edit]

Silas Masinde Simiyu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Silas Masinde Simiyu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

The article appears to be an autobiography. It reads more like a CV than an encyclopedia article. The tone is promotional. It was previously BLPProdded. It was removed after adding some sources. The sources all seem to be to generic pages that do not mention him. I have not been able to find any significant coverage of him in reliable sources in the searches I have done. There is some coverage, but I do not believe it rises to the level of our notability standards. -- GB fan 14:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • keep - a reasonably visible figure in Kenya. Unfortunately, online information about African things is limited. I will delete all unreferenced autobio and add a ref or two. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Blatant autobiography. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Lord Livingstone 7000 Kandi[edit]

Lord Livingstone 7000 Kandi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lord Livingstone 7000 Kandi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable unreleased film that has been deleted a couple times via prod already-so I guess it just time to do afd it seems. Wgolf (talk) 14:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
The article is already cited with more than enough reliable sources, and the film is under pre-production.VagaboundWind (talk) 17:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Director:(Find sources: "Anil Radhakrishnan Menon, Lord Livingstone 7000 Kandi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Studio:(Find sources: "Global United Media, Lord Livingstone 7000 Kandi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
WP:INDAFD: "Lord Livingstone 7000 Kandi" "Anil Radhakrishnan Menon"

Springer Public School[edit]

Springer Public School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Springer Public School" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

An unreferenced, non notable Primary school in India. Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:13, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

ViewPoint 3D[edit]

ViewPoint 3D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "ViewPoint 3D" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Delete: Non-notable software. Comment: Main contributor appears to have COI https://www.linkedin.com/pub/robin-colclough/38/b8/304 SageGreenRider (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Although I am involved in the ViewPoint-3D project, that does not mean that the page is not useful to people searching for information on 3D content software, especially as it is the only software currently driving glasses-free 3D screen instantly, in real-time, and with live data and video feed. Clearly the software is notable, there is no "PowerPoint-3D" or "Photoshop-3D", there is no software that allows users to create data-rich 3D animations and presentations with live streaming HD and 4K video, or 3D that is updated by RSS or data feeds, none. If anyone disagrees please post the name of such software, because not Aurora, HTML5 (which is an API and not a product), nor Google Sketchup, or Maya, 3D Studio Max, 3D Afterworks, etc., are able to do what ViewPoint-3D is designed to to: instant HD 3D rendering with live-data updated content.

Why would anyone want to remove the page, its not offensive, the information is factual, the company even offers completely free software to educational users of any size as long as they are non-profit. Educators can use the software to develop interactive content with simple or very complex models, as large as software from companies such as Virtualia that costs thousands of dollars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobinColclough (talkcontribs) 06:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment. The article creator having a COI isn't necessarily grounds for the article's deletion (the article does appear to have a promotional tone, but that isn't grounds for deletion either). Erpert blah, blah, blah... 06:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Agreed. However, COI editors are generally poor judges of notability, and indeed I believe this is the case here, so I mentioned it. SageGreenRider (talk) 11:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I added "Delete" and "Comment" to my initial line to clarify which part was the reason for deletion, and which part was an observation. hth SageGreenRider (talk) 12:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. This article is unsourced, except to its own website; even the review cited is on its own website. The tone is heavily promotional, and without any external references it is nothing more than an advertisement. ScrapIronIV (talk) 20:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment As a compromise, I'm happy for the article to be moved into draft space or the primary contributor's sandbox until such time (if any) that the company/product achieves notability per policy. At such time, submission via WP:AFC would help overcome the COI issue. hth SageGreenRider (talk) 16:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment Actually, this should probably be Speedy Deleted per WP:G11 due to its obviously promotional slant. There is no reason why it can't be rebuilt with good sources if they exist. Anyone could put it in their own sandbox if they wanted. But, even with a change in tone and direct links solely to the publisher's page removed, it still would not meet notability guidelines. ScrapIronIV (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment I'd like to try to defend the page, if that's okay, and I apologise up-front for any over enthusiasm. Can I ask, is it important that users of Wikipedia have a detailed source of reference of new technologies, even if they are not in widespread use? Because if it is then the page should not be deleted or relegated to the soap box, as it is the only computer graphics software that provides 3D content generation with live-data, where external data can change the 3D scene display in real-time without human re-editing. This is very useful for information display purposes, because users can make, amongst many things, a 3D weather fly-through that auto-updates as new RSS weather data arrives, or a flooding mimic diagram in 3D showing river levels as they rise and fall.

If anyone can provide any proof that there is another 3D software that can provide those facilities, without any scripting or programming, I'd understand there being such interest to delete the page. In addition, this is currently the only software that can render HD (up to 4K) video in real-time within the 3D scene. This is useful because it allows, for example, a youtuber to create a live video cast of themselves green-screened into an HD video and broadcast it immediately, or simply allow an information or digital signage screen to show content with current TV and live video camera feed.

On top of these unique features, the software, which is an ongoing development project, is currently, the only that can render directly live 3D animated content to glasses-free monitors, and on low-cost computers.

Current approaches use post processing of existing canned 3D content to produce 2D+Depth or Autostereoscopic interleaved output.

To the best of my knowledge, this software is unique, neither Intel, Microsoft or specialists like Scala or Broadcom have this capability, and some of the 3D glasses-free manufacturers have even threatened legal action as it threatens their control of the content market.

ViewPoint3D is a small project that has been reported by the industry press (links available on the viewpoint-3d.com site under News), however it doesn't have the economic power to compete in what has become a very controlled advertising market, even press releases don't get published without paying for month of advertising up-front, and if all channels are blocked the public won't be able to find out that 3D content doesn't have to cost them $30/second, which is the average rate.

Intel was recently fined heavily for illegal practices, including paying PC manufacturers not to use competitors chips Intel loses appeal of 14B USD European Union Fine, and so any new technology faces the risk of being squashed if not bought out.

People looking for 3D solutions have found us because of the Wiki page, some have been educational users, to which the software is available completely free, others commercial.

I can't say if this project will become globally notable, but deleting the page or dumping it in the sand box will only be useful to commercial companies selling more costly solutions; I mean its not like so many complex software projects are swapping wikipedia's database. Apologies if I've gone on a bit, but I believe in this project beyond pure commercial interest, and hope that the project is given a chance. Thanks RobinColclough (talk) 19:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a vehicle to right the world's wrongs. We are tertiary followers. We write about what secondary sources (e.g. journalists in newspapers) have written about primary topics (e.g. events, ideas, companies, products,...). This debate is about a single issue: notability. It's a waste of everyone's time to for you to talk about other topics like the commercial practices of Intel et al. Sorry to be terse. On the positive side, I see you have added some independent sources in the past few days. That is helpful. I'm pinging people who looked at it before to look at it again: @ScrapIronIV, @Erpert, what do you think? Keep and multi-tag for COI, questionable notability, promotional language? Re-list for more inputs? I'm not sure. SageGreenRider (talk) 12:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
As mentioned previously, this qualifies for a Speedy Delete per WP:G11 promotional content. The sooner it is gone, the better. We are not an advertising platform, nor are we a place to campaign for "new ideas" in the marketplace. We are supposed to be an encyclopedia... Would you find this sort of advertisement in Britannica? ScrapIronIV (talk) 13:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I tend to agree but I'm torn between avoiding biting the newcomers with a speedy and a fear that @RobinColclough, while acting in good faith, is not here to build an encyclopaedia. SageGreenRider (talk) 13:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe that adhering to policy is a case of biting a newcomer, so long as appropriate explanations are made. Besides, they have been here since 2011. As our policy has been explained, it should not be an issue for an uninvolved editor. Unfortunately, it appears that the article creator is not an uninvolved Wikipedia editor, but an outsider promoting multiple properties for personal benefit. I appreciate your patience, but some things just need to be deleted. ScrapIronIV (talk) 14:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: Kindly help! SageGreenRider (talk) 14:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SageGreenRider (talk) 14:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. I was neutral at first, but thanks to the independent sources added, it sounds like this subject deserves a chance. And although it's true that the tone is still rather promotional, it isn't blatantly promotional (imo), so a speedy wouldn't apply (a rewrite would, however—and remember, AfD is not cleanup). Erpert blah, blah, blah... 22:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete References added after AfD are 2012 press-releases, which means that the software didn't generate enogh buzz yet, and it is not wikipedia's job to do it for them. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
The software is still in development, with press releases in the pipeline. The release due next month will offer Google Sketchup users instant rendering of models that currently take hours to render. Its a lot of work, its taken 5-years so far, but if you really all think its just rubbish, just delete it and get it over with, as it does the project more harm than good sticking the "Questional content" banner on the top of it. RobinColclough (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
You will also find references and images produced by ViewPoint-3D on Autostereoscopy and 2D-plus-depth, so you can delete all that too if you wish. RobinColclough (talk) 08:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Robin, no-one said it's "just rubbish." The criterion for inclusion is that multiple, independent reliable sources have written substantially on the topic. It so happens that this is not the case (yet) for your project. That's all. If you think your project has become notable in future, you can re-submit to Articles for Creation at such time. SageGreenRider (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Ervin Malicdem[edit]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Philippine Adventurer (talk) 13:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kolbasz (talk) 14:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Philippine Adventurer (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Philippine Adventurer (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Ervin Malicdem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ervin Malicdem" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

The subject is not mentioned significantly in any reliable sources. References provide in the article: 1 is a trivial link to his website, 2, 3 and 4 don't mention him at all, 5 is a list of 1,679 contributors, 6 isn't independent, 7 is a (seemingly) non notable animation contest, 8 is a web forum, 9 is non independent technical information, 10 is a wiki site, and 11-17 aren't independent. Delete per WP:BIO Winner 42 Talk to me! 13:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete: I was just about to nominate the page myself, in fact. Fails WP:GNG. A single passing mention in an independent source, the rest of the references either don't mention the subject at all or are low quality self-published sources (personal website on a free web host, Github page, forum post (!), etc). Google doesn't turn up anything useful either. Kolbasz (talk) 13:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Pass WP:1E, specifies that one must be able to weigh if the subject can be specified on a larger article so that it can be merged, but there are cases that one can stand on 1 article such as this BLP if it is large or notable enough to expound on one article. (1) This BLP with its contribution during Haiyan as the source of the compiled OpenStreetMap data (the GPS map end-product of the 4 million data changes that 1670+ crisis mappers mapped for the Haiyan crisis) that has been used by multiple international organizations during its rescue operations and relief efforts on contribution is valid enough to be placed into a separate BLP article. This is so far the largest collaboration of mapping advocates to which the second is the earthquake in Haiti. However, if evaluators seem not to perceive it as big as it is, there is also another event (2) where the subject has been a part of the team that won the 1st Philippine animation festival which makes 2 separate notabilities that must be included to one article pertaining to the subject.
    (3) As the third notability is being the first person to lead a mapping expedition in the Palay-Palay Mataas na Gulod jungle in the Philippines to which the mapping trail produced and shared via the same GPS map is now being trekked by Filipino mountaineers.
    All in all this satisfies WP:BIO due to strike 3 of the subject's notability.
    The issue that may have so far is the limited amount of secondary sources where Wikipedia suggests in WP:GNG. Unfortunately most of the secondary sources do give it a passing mention (PBS, Guardian, UNOCHA PH Humanitarian Response, etc) as it only either links to the subject's mapping resource site or to his alias or a to an explanation of an end-product... but do take note that the end-product is still the GPS map provided by the subject and paper maps printed by other sources. The details are then explained by the OpenStreetMap Wiki on Haiyan which was used as one of the sources. However, let us not forget that even most of the sumptuous source are those of primary and tertiary sources, let us not forget WP:PSTS gives importance to these sources too with the use of common sense. In the end, it is still WP:RELIABLE as well as WP:ANYBIO
    Let us not allow the deprivation of a notable subject of an article get deleted due to literal implementation of WP:GNG without considering common sense.
    (4) Manila Times citation is reliable as it is a newspaper in the Philippines. First Philippine Animation Festival is the first ever animation festival held in 2002 with top universities in the Philippines participating. Ended 2006 as its major sponsor (Intel Philippines) has pulled out its operations in the country, then replaced by Animahenasyon on 2007. According to guidelines as of March 2010, BLP at least one reliable source that at least supports 1 statement in the article must suffice. Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people Philippine Adventurer (talk) 13:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note to closing admin: Philippine Adventurer (talkcontribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn.

Intelligence and personality[edit]

Intelligence and personality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Intelligence and personality" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Article seems to fail WP:SYNTH and WP:NOTESSAY. Winner 42 Talk to me! 13:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Nomination Withdrawn, my main concern was that this topic wouldn't have enough coverage to stand on it's own because Intelligence and Personality already exist, but other editors have shown that this is a suitability notable topic in current academic fields. Winner 42 Talk to me! 13:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep I created this article by cutting and pasting content that someone recently added to g factor (psychometrics). While it is true that the article in its current form may fail various policies, there's a considerable research literature on the topic itself, so I think the article should be improved, not deleted.--Victor Chmara (talk) 13:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Strong keep I fully agree that the article in its current condition looks like it has had too little attention from the point of view of making it an encyclopedia article, but this is a recognized encyclopedic topic, there is a lot of literature about this topic available in reliable sources for medical articles, and I would be happy to help improve the article. Indeed, I have already been keeping a source list in user space since 2010 to guide fellow Wikipedians to reliable sources on this article's topic and related topics. So the problem here is just the usual problem most of the 4,858,769 articles on Wikipedia have, that it still needs more work and article content improvement on the basis of reliable sources. I'm happy to help--I have many other articles with more page views to fix on related topics--so the rationale here, that the article currently reads like an essay, is not a sufficient rationale for deleting an article on a topic that can be shown from reliable sources to be a legitimate, encyclopedic topic for which there is an active program of primary research and secondary-source writing. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 15:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep The nomination doesn't give any particular details and does not explain why these supposed problems can't be corrected by ordinary editing. Andrew D. (talk) 07:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

News Town[edit]

News Town (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "News Town" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No evidence of meeting WP:ORGDEPTH notability requirements. - MrX 12:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, no indication of notability per WP:GNG. I had trouble finding their website, which turned out to be a single page reading "under construction" dated 2014, so can't even tell if they've launched the printed version yet. Couldn't find any other mention online in English, WP:RS or otherwise. Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Ethnic organizations of Nigeria[edit]

Ethnic organizations of Nigeria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ethnic organizations of Nigeria" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Well the Title of the article seems not to be in sync of what is written in the article. Still giving a search on "Eket Front" doesn't give me anything worthy. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:46, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! [talk] 12:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Pearl Grammar Public School, Taunsa[edit]

Pearl Grammar Public School, Taunsa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Pearl Grammar Public School, Taunsa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not sure if this school reaches wiki guidelines for schools or not-the only Google hits I could find were wiki mirrors. Wgolf (talk) 21:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep if definite evidence can be found to prove it exists and is a secondary school. I must admit I'm having difficulty finding anything too. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! [talk] 12:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Guide track[edit]

Guide track (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Guide track" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No sources to verify anything mentioned in the article Monni (talk) 20:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! [talk] 12:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

José Manuel Rosano[edit]

José Manuel Rosano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "José Manuel Rosano" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A voice actor who has only one ref where he is briefly mentioned. The Spanish wiki has no refs at all and mentions him dying in 2007 (hence the living dead tag) Tried to find him on the IMDB and found 2 possible names but neither of the dates matched (one said died in 2002 and another one seemed off also) Wgolf (talk) 02:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! [talk] 12:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Bodyguard (Shinee song)[edit]

Bodyguard (Shinee song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bodyguard (Shinee song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Song fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG and goes against WP:SONGS, which says most songs shouldn't have their own articles unless there is something significant to say about them that can fill up a good length article. This was a low-charting digital single released as a commercial for a mobile phone. Several articles about songs similar to this by Girls' Generation, f(x), and Super Junior have been previously deleted. I can't even see what it should be merged to, really, but am open to suggestions, of course. Shinyang-i (talk) 03:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shinyang-i (talk) 03:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 07:03, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! [talk] 12:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

David After Dentist[edit]

David After Dentist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "David After Dentist" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

The fact that a one event internet video is considered notable for wikipedia standards is absurd to me. It might have coverage but WP:ONEEVENT isn't notable. LADY LOTUSTALK 12:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - From WP:1E "When an individual is significant for his or her role in a single event, it may be unclear whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both." Since this article is about the "event", (of sorts) this is perfectly fine. ― Padenton|   16:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   16:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep – Per WP:ONEEVENT, "The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person", which is exactly what this article does. Furthermore, the topic meets WP:N. Source examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. North America1000 02:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Charlie Bit My Finger[edit]

Charlie Bit My Finger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Charlie Bit My Finger" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

While it does meet GNG, it's for WP:ONEEVENT. How is this notable enough for it's own wikipedia page? LADY LOTUSTALK 11:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 11:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep ONEEVENT only applies to biographical articles, which this is not. This video has received coverage in a great deal of reliable sources over an extended period of time and so does appear to be notable per GNG, as the nominator notes. Everymorning talk 12:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - The video has received worldwide coverage which passes GNG, ONEEVENT is irrelevant as that applies to BLPs which this is not, No valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 14:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - From WP:1E "When an individual is significant for his or her role in a single event, it may be unclear whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both." Since this article is about the "event", (of sorts) this is perfectly fine. ― Padenton|   16:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep – As per WP:ONEEVENT, "The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person", which is how this article is formatted. Furthermore, the topic passes WP:N per sources in the article. North America1000 03:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep This now seems to have 818 million views on YouTube and has been acclaimed on shows such as Rude Tube. Such items should be considered as equivalent to hit singles in popular music and this one seems up there with White Christmas. Andrew D. (talk) 07:27, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Laughing Baby[edit]

Laughing Baby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Laughing Baby" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

How is this an article? The references are weak and most aren't even reliable. Past WP:ONEEVENT, I don't see why this needs it's own article. LADY LOTUSTALK 11:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - From WP:1E "When an individual is significant for his or her role in a single event, it may be unclear whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both." Since this article is about the "event", (of sorts) this is perfectly fine.― Padenton|   16:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep per Padenton - The video has received worldwide coverage which passes GNG, ONEEVENT is irrelevant as that applies to BLPs which this is not (I'm seeing this as an event and not an actual BLP although I could be looking at this wrong). –Davey2010Talk 22:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Meets WP:WEBCRIT which is the relevant guideline for web content. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Świat Nieruchomości[edit]

Świat Nieruchomości (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Świat Nieruchomości" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Journal established in 1991. No independent sources. Indexed in some non-notable databases (BezEkon and Central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities), in Index Copernicus (onJeffrey Beall's list of questionable companies producing misleading journal metrics), and a relatively obscure list of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (obviously biased towards locally-produced publications). Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Rising Sun Films[edit]

Rising Sun Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rising Sun Films" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 10:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Getaway Films[edit]

Getaway Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Getaway Films" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 10:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Ad Hominem Enterprises[edit]

Ad Hominem Enterprises (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ad Hominem Enterprises" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 10:46, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. Certainly exists, but not seeing significant, independent, third-party coverage, etc. Neutralitytalk 16:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Totally Buffed[edit]

Totally Buffed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Totally Buffed" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Pro wrestling tag team not very notable (just the feud with O'Haire and Palumbo during the end of WCW). I think that this feud can be resume in Lex Luger and Buff Bagwell. Sismarinho (talk) 10:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Keep: I see a lot of article about WWE tag team created just because they existed in the 2005-2015 (ShoMiz, Air Boom, London and Kendrick, John Morrison and The Miz, The New Day, Team Hell No, Jeri-Show). Some doesn't even have an actual tag team name, and others are just occasional teams (Big Show and Kane). I don't see why this article must be deleted just because it's an old team while we have plenty of article about recent teams which are created the day the team makes its debut on TV. Jeangabin (talk) 11:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not a valid argument. An article is kept if its subject matter has significant coverage in reliable third party sources (WP:GNG). Nikki311 17:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Nadia Alexander-Dhean[edit]

Nadia Alexander-Dhean (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nadia Alexander-Dhean" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Poorly referenced BLP. I dream of horses (T) @ 08:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete per TOOSOON - I'm also getting the feeling judging by the image this was an attempt to promote, Anyway according to IMDb they've only been in one film and even that's not out till gone 2016, So will have to say delete. –Davey2010Talk 22:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Amita Birla[edit]

Amita Birla (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Amita Birla" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Sources consist of public company records and one small mention on Business Standard that looks rather like a press release. Look like this might fail WP:BASIC Dolescum (talk) 07:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)


Hi Dolescum, This article is created from the current available resources on the internet. Please help me to build this article as per the Wikipedia norms. I am giving my time to this article because she is one of the from very few business women from India. Please remove the it from Articles for deletion and add a tag to get help from other Wikipedians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avtarnanrey (talkcontribs) 10:28, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@Avtarnanrey:, if Birla is notable, you should be able to provide better sources. Could you also explain why you made this edit to your user page after I opened this AfD? Dolescum (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
@Dolescum:, I have found few more references from Google Books as Birla family is one of the four richest family from the legecy of Indian industries and businesses. And I deleted that because that was against my employment policies. I cannot reveal the client's name in public place. Avtarnanrey (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2015 (IST)
@Avtarnanrey:, I looked at those links, they look like incidental mentions to me. You understand that fact you're employed by Ms Birla's husband raises conflict of interest questions, don't you? Dolescum (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Digital perpetuation[edit]

Digital perpetuation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Digital perpetuation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Contested PROD; non-notable neologism that the creator admitted to coining in a previously deleted version. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 07:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete, possibly Speedy Delete as A11. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Charles Haigh-Wood[edit]

Charles Haigh-Wood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Charles Haigh-Wood" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. The guy mostly appears in books etc because of being father-in-law to T. S. Eliot. A local historian - Ken Craven - has effectively self-published this family biography but otherwise there is little other than primary sources of the type already used in the article and passing mentions such as this. There are also some passing mentions in art sale catalogues, basically repeating his d.o.b./d.o.d. and a brief description of the artwork. The BBC says even less.

Unless exhibiting at the Royal Academy automatically confers notability, the subject matter does not reach our bar. The article appears to reflect the niche interest of its creator but little interest from others. Sitush (talk) 05:57, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep: There is discussion of Haigh-Wood's paintings. E.g. http://www.americanreadingforum.org/yearbook/yearbooks/02_yearbook/pdf/06_Dowhower_final.pdf For the Royal Academy exhibitions, from WP:ARTIST "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." I've not been able to find out whether these exhibitions featured Haigh-Wood's works as a significant part, or whether his pictures were one out of many. I've also been unable to find if significant art galleries hold works by Haigh-Wood. It appears that the UK national gallery and portrait gallery do not, unless my search-fu has failed. However, as this appears to be a case where more in-depth research is necessary to characterise his notability, I suggest that the article remains until someone can put in the necessary work. Ross-c (talk) 07:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I think you may find that VictorianPainter is the person who can "put in the necessary work" ... the problem being that there is nothing further to say and WP:BURDEN applies. I'm afraid that I can say no more about that here because of the potential for outing. I have an inherently low opinion of topic notability guidelines, so it is probably best that I do not comment on trash like that.

    As far as the RA exhibitions go, Haigh-Wood was a mere Associate of the Royal Academy and literally tens of thousands of paintings have been exhibited there. FWIW, I am resident close to Haigh-Wood's home ground, I know a lot of the local history and even round here, he is known mainly for the Eliot connection (and not known at all by most people). He really is a minor figure. - Sitush (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Bill Duplissea (baseball)[edit]

Bill Duplissea (baseball) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bill Duplissea (baseball)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Consensus is that bullpen catchers must pass GNG. Duplissea does not appear to do so and his minor league playing experience and college coaching also do not qualify him for notability. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 03:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

ATelecine[edit]

ATelecine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "ATelecine" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Band has zero notability for it's music and is only known for having former pornstar Sasha Grey as a member. Ridernyc (talk) 03:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep seems to be appropriately sourced. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 07:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   16:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   16:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep, just - skimpy but seems reasonably sourced - David Gerard (talk) 10:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

RevLeft[edit]

RevLeft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "RevLeft" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Nonnotable political forum. No reliable secondary sources exist. Xcuref1endx (talk) 03:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted under A7.

Rakesh majaran[edit]

Rakesh majaran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rakesh majaran" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Despite being "hailed", Google finds no matches for his name, though "yoni massage" is found in abundance. I'm a bit skeptical (a) because female genital massage seems a strange thing to have "disciples" for and (b) because the article identifies the author as one of the two "disciples". —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete (and so tagged) as obvious hoax (Yoni massage??? "...officially accepted 2 disciples, Kenny Chan and Benny Tan..."???). Sole edit by User:Bennytan1120. Pax 04:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete - either a hoax or so non-notable he's not mentioned anywhere. I was tempted to speedy this but will let this AFD run its course. No references and this only web link for him is an advertisement for one of his "disciples". Convinced this is just a promo for their, ahem, *cough* 'services'. Glen 05:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Island Heat[edit]

Island Heat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Island Heat" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This event is not notable. The only coverage of the festival is limited and talks about it upcoming and there is no coverage of it actually happening. Rimmel.Edits Talk 01:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! [talk] 02:37, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Keris Verginix[edit]

Keris Verginix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Keris Verginix" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fictional character with no notability to be mentioned at all. Wgolf (talk) 00:47, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! [talk] 02:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Paul Antony-Barber[edit]

Paul Antony-Barber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Paul Antony-Barber" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails NACTOR + GNG –Davey2010Talk 02:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Weak Keep as borderline. While he has only had one major role in a notable TV production (Anubis), he has made numerous appearances in Television, and in a number of films. I think this might meet the 'prolific' requirement in WP:NACTOR "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." Ross-c (talk) 07:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Sorry, you have to check sources before making statements. It was nowhere near a "major role". As for NACTOR, please pay attention to the word "significant", which is none of him. Anyway, sources, please. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I think we need to keep this article, such as Ross-c said, he had a role in many movies, television series...---Christaya1002 (talk) 10:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia has clear notability guidelines. If you feel that those guidelines should be different from what they are, then that is a discussion for another place than an AfD discussion on an individual article. Ross-c (talk) 15:17, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Actually Wikipedia has quite debatable and contested standards regarding notability, hence the thousands of articles which have been in AFDs, CFDs, etc. "If you feel that those guidelines should be different from what they are, then that is a discussion for another place than an AfD discussion on an individual article." I don't know what this means. I simply pointed out that many "editors" misuse Wikipedia to create vanity, promotional, etc. articles or articles about personal friends, relatives, etc. and some treat Wikipedia as thought it were a fansite or blogsite, or for blatant attempts to promote things or people. That is without prejudice to this article as I am speaking in general. Quis separabit? 15:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Ross: re:Wikipedia has clear notability guidelines. Please pay attention to the word "guidelines" and read about differences between guidelines and policies. And after you've done that, please explain how your opponent violated the guidelines or policies. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • delete No evidence that this actor did something more than 3-rd row roles. He is said to be "best known" for a role in a supporting cast, unknown how much support was there by him. No detailed discussion of the person. Wikipedia is not yellow pages for starving actors. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
On this Wikipedia, we have many articles about non-notable people (not only about actors). Wikipedia has articles of all kinds of people. Some people have article about them on Wikipedia though they do not deserve article. I think that actor who had role in numerous TV shows, movies ... deserves to have an article on Wikipedia. I can and give examples of the significant roles who this man had.---Christaya1002 (talk) 09:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Glynis Barber, his rather more notable ex-wife. He's a jobbing actor who's been in a few shows but isn't notable. His biggest part is a supporting role in House of Anubis (a satellite/cable kids show). He's not starring on prime-time network TV, he's not being nominated for Emmys or Baftas, he fails to meet any criterion of the relevant notability guideline. Is there material to write an article that's more than just a list of roles copied from IMDb? I can't see anything. Colapeninsula (talk) 15:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Roger Barclay[edit]

Roger Barclay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Roger Barclay" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails NACTOR + GNG –Davey2010Talk 02:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep. Not the most notable, but has billed appearance in notable movie Diana & Me being moderately billed for that., as well as long-running supporting roles in House of Anubis and Holby City. His four episode (out of six) appearance in Pride and Prejudice is also a non-trivial (though not main) role. Overall, I feel that these appearances plus his prolific other appearances justify an article. Ross-c (talk) 07:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure if I have the right to comment but still... As for the amount of informations about this man, I was not able to find much about him, but over time will appear more and more information about this actor. So I think we need to keep this article.---Christaya1002 (talk) 10:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete: as non-notable. Quis separabit? 13:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Is the newest and most complete model of carcinogenesis[edit]

Is the newest and most complete model of carcinogenesis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Is the newest and most complete model of carcinogenesis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
(Find sources: "D-DINOMIT" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article is mistitled -- probably the intent was to title it D-DINOMIT. I am not going to rename it, because even under that name it is not a proper Wikipedia article, being OR. The article was previously prodded, but the prod was removed, or rather mangled in a way that broke the template. Looie496 (talk) 01:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 02:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Chris Nelson (director)[edit]

Chris Nelson (director) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chris Nelson (director)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Delete: non-notable dilettante in the entertainment business. Quis separabit? 01:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Keep: Passes WP:DIRECTOR as his works have had multiple reviews in independent periodicals. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/ass-backwards-sundance-review-417505 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/08/movies/ass-backwards-a-comedy-by-chris-nelson.html?_r=0 http://variety.com/2013/film/markets-festivals/ass-backwards-1117949080/ as well as the three references in the article proper. Ross-c (talk) 07:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Eran Thomson[edit]

Eran Thomson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Eran Thomson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I've not found the single thing that makes them pass Wikipedia's notability criteria that I am aware of. I cant find independent coverage of Laugh-Masters Academy, Koobar or Friendlet; the films are mostly shorts; the 'Greens ad' did get a bit of attention at the time, but the creators sadly didnt get a lot of focus as a result. John Vandenberg (chat) 00:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Dil howlter[edit]

Dil howlter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Dil howlter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unremarkable fictional character, no reliable source coverage. reddogsix (talk) 00:27, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 01:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete – wish there was a speedy for this. Fictional character where the basis/origin does not have an article itself.--☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 02:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete- as much as I would like there to be a wiki article dedicated to a sims character. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 03:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)