Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut:
Purge page cache if page isn't updating.
Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Purge server cache

Contents

Montana of 300[edit]

Montana of 300 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Montana of 300" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable rapper lacking non-trivial support. Article makes claim of high YouTube hits and downloads, but this is probably not enough to support inclusion into Wikipedia. reddogsix (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete by JamesBWatson. (NAC) lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:08, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Yotta Solutions[edit]

Yotta Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Yotta Solutions" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Lack of notability. I see no evidence that this company meets WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Providing services to notable companies doesn't confer notability. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Impatiens (EP)[edit]

Impatiens (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Impatiens (EP)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I created this article about a year ago thinking the release would be moderately popular and notable, but that didn't end up being the case and it didn't even get a single review. I don't think the subject of this article is notable enough for a Wikipedia entry, so I think it should be deleted. Littlecarmen (talk) 22:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Aromadon[edit]

Aromadon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Aromadon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A corp I am having trouble finding refs for as well as notability. The google search results I am getting names for the most part-though I did get a Russian page but no clue if it is about this or not. Wgolf (talk) 21:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Paola Nuñez[edit]

Paola Nuñez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Paola Nuñez" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG, unsourced BLP The Banner talk 21:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Yasmine Adhimene[edit]

Yasmine Adhimene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Yasmine Adhimene" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG, effectively unsourced BLP The Banner talk 21:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

2015 Washington, D.C., quadruple murder[edit]

2015 Washington, D.C., quadruple murder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "2015 Washington, D.C., quadruple murder" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

WP:NOTNEWSPAPER - Neither the perpetrator nor any of the victims appear to be notable. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 21:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep: Obviously, you and I have different ideas of what constitutes notaable, but the entire family looks notable to me. The father was the CEO and President of the company American Iron Works, a construction company that helped build major D.C. buildings, such as the Verizon Center and the CityCenterDC. That in an of itself establishes notability for the victim and his entire family. Not to mention the fact that many reputable news organizations have covered the homicides. One of the notability guidelines is "significant coverage", and, well, this has gotten significant coverage in reputable news media. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 21:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Oh, and as for the "WP:NOTNEWSPAPER" thing you linked to, one of the things it specifically says is this: "For example, routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia." Well, reporting on a quadruple homicide is not "routine news reporting". Quadruple homicides don't happen every single day, and certainly aren't routine. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I know you created this article [1] but you need to demonstrate what makes these killings notable; was there significant coverage of any of the family members prior to this event? If so, please provide sources. In 2013 there were an estimated 14,196 murders in the US. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 22:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
There wasn't any significant coverage of Walter Scott before his death, yet when he was shot at nine times in the back by a police officer and died, a Wikipedia article was created about him, and rightly so. Therefore, just because there isn't any significant coverage before death does not warrant deletion. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 22:21, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Then I will assume you have no sources for prior notability. Regarding Walter Scott, are you saying you don't see the difference between this event and that one? -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 22:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
You can't start claiming exceptions now. You said this warrants deletion because there wasn't any "significant coverage of any of the family members prior to this event". By that logic, we'd have to delete the articles on the shootings of Walter Scott, and Trayvon Martin, as well as the article on the murder of Jon Benet Ramsey. That's why your logic doesn't make sense to me. I see the difference between this event and the Walter Scott one, but that doesn't make it automatically okay to subvert your "rule" that someone must have significant coverage before a person's death. Therefore, your argument is invalid. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 22:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
If you look at the top of this page you'll see my reason for deletion: Neither the perpetrator nor any of the victims appear to be notable. - This is a news story about a murdered family that will shortly be out of the news cycle. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 23:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
"This is a news story about a murdered family that will shortly be out of the news cycle." And with that comment, Somedifferentstuff, I direct you to WP:NOTABILITY – where it specifically states the following:"Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." Therefore, even if you're right that the story will soon be out of the news cycle, it has already received significant coverage by multiple media outlets, and as such ongoing coverage is not required. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
You need to read WP:CRIME. I won't comment here further. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 23:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Since you've made it clear you won't address my actual arguments that are completely in policy in Wikipedia notability guideline, I won't comment here further. However, reading that, it's obvious that this article does comport with those guidelines. Mr. Savopoulos did have a role in a well-documented historical event: The building of the Verizon Center, through his construction company American Iron Works. That is all. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 22:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep:, Speedily so. The incident has been covered on national and international media. It passes GNG and should be kept as an article. I think the nominator got confused between notability of "perpetrators" and "events". For example, we do not have an article on every single person who was killed during 9/11 but we do have an article about 9/11, same analogy here, the event is notable and should be given a mainspace article. However, I would like to advise that the article is 'renamed' to a more encyclopedic name which gives information, such as Savopoulos family murders or The 2015 Mansion murders. both of the renames I have proposed give out more information than the current title. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Comment The article does need some cleanup which I will be very happy to do as soon as a decision is made to keep the article as per GNG.FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 03:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the support, FreeatlastChitchat, and thank you for recognizing that my arguments are valid. As for your proposed name changes, I don't have a problem with them, I do like Savopoulos family murders more than 2015 Mansion murders though. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 03:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep:, this is not routine news, when it gets international coverage, and involves violence and evil more characteristic of a scripted terrorist attack than a random crime or disgruntled worker incident, WP:NOTNEWSPAPER needs to be clarified that significantly notable crimes like this don't get deleted just because there was no prior news coverage of suspect or victim. Bachcell (talk) 03:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Clare Richards[edit]

Clare Richards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Clare Richards" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A non notable pseudonym of two different people that can't be used as a redirect either due to it being 2 people with no references to be found as well. See also the article of Clare Richmond, there was another one like this that was AFD last month I believe. Wgolf (talk) 21:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Disambiguation page: Simply turn Clare Richards into a page that directs readers to either of the other articles. π♂101 (talk) 21:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Adam Taylor Young[edit]

Adam Taylor Young (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Adam Taylor Young" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Subject of the article fails WP:NMUSIC perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 21:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Azoteq[edit]

Azoteq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Azoteq" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails to meet the requirements of WP:CORP. Nothing appears to have changed since the previous AFD in 2012. SmartSE (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Ramakant Jha[edit]

Ramakant Jha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ramakant Jha" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Article that comes across as a huge resume it seems. Wgolf (talk) 21:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Klaus Solberg Søilen[edit]

Klaus Solberg Søilen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Klaus Solberg Søilen" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:PROF or WP:BASIC. All but one of the sources cited are written by the subject and a search for other sources produced nothing. Google scholar suggests that the subject has not been widely cited. The only potential notability would be due to PROF #8 as he is the editor-in-chief of the Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business but again, based on a search the journal doesn't appear to be particularly important. (The editor has declared a COI). SmartSE (talk) 20:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Musthafa Rayes[edit]

Musthafa Rayes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Musthafa Rayes" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial references. reddogsix (talk) 19:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: He is a chairman of a local and non-notable arabic institute. I can't see enough evidence of notability. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 19:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - I can only find mentions of him speaking at events and conferences, but unfortunately no coverage, and nothing in Google Scholar. His name is not there in Tamil, which would be the last hope for sources, and Google Translate only translates his first name but not his last. МандичкаYO 😜 19:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete: Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 20:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Narendra Firodia[edit]

Narendra Firodia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Narendra Firodia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't enough evidence of notability. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 19:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

United States Senate election in Wyoming, 1988[edit]

United States Senate election in Wyoming, 1988 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "United States Senate election in Wyoming, 1988" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This user seems to be mass-creating articles for each election and each state. So far:

United States presidential election in Delaware, 1980
United States presidential election in Ohio, 1980
United States presidential election in Hawaii, 1980
United States presidential election in Arizona, 1980
United States presidential election in Illinois, 1980
United States presidential election in Wisconsin, 1980
United States presidential election in Indiana, 1980
United States presidential election in Louisiana, 1980
United States presidential election in West Virginia, 1980
United States presidential election in Nebraska, 1980
United States presidential election in Michigan, 1980
United States presidential election in Arkansas, 1980
United States presidential election in South Dakota, 1980
United States presidential election in North Dakota, 1980
United States presidential election in South Carolina, 1980
United States presidential election in Kentucky, 1980
United States presidential election in Washington (state), 1980
United States presidential election in Rhode Island, 1980
United States presidential election in Georgia, 1980
United States presidential election in Wyoming, 1980
United States presidential election in Tennessee, 1980
United States presidential election in Oregon, 1980
United States presidential election in Oklahoma, 1980
United States presidential election in Mississippi, 1980
United States presidential election in Colorado, 1980

This seems unnecessary and of questionable encyclopedic value. Most of the articles contain little more than a vote count and candidate names, and they're all sourced to the same (very basic) sources. The info in these articles is already in the article for the election as a whole anyway, I see no need for a separate article on each state. Fyddlestix (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator - Apparently these pages are much more common than I thought, see [2] [3] [4] for example. Sincere apologies for the error/waste of time. Fyddlestix (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Comment - It actually appears that articles of this type are much more common than I thought they were - see [[5]] [[6]] [[7]], for example. Looking into how to withdraw these nominations, mea culpa! Fyddlestix (talk) 20:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the withdrawal on the part of the nominator. Yeah, these articles are very common, just look at the 2008 presidential election. Every state has its own separate article for the results. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 20:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Banchbo Sharad Samman[edit]

Banchbo Sharad Samman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Banchbo Sharad Samman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG: non-notable award, no coverage from reliable sources. Esquivalience t 17:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

SeamlessR[edit]

SeamlessR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "SeamlessR" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:BASIC: only has one interview. Esquivalience t 17:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

BUNK'D[edit]

BUNK'D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "BUNK'D" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I hurried to create this article, Disney still not released through the internet any demo or promo on the series and there is no release date. I think that the best would be to wait a little longer. Philip J Fry (talk) 06:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - I recently de-orphaned the article. The current source seems reasonable enough at a glance. I think it would be better to keep the article, and expand it when more information becomes available.
    Godsy(TALKCONT) 06:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - according to this article, shooting has begun, which I think is required for upcoming TV/film projects. МандичкаYO 😜 06:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 17:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

List of people who have walked the perimeter of Tasmania, Australia[edit]

List of people who have walked the perimeter of Tasmania, Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of people who have walked the perimeter of Tasmania, Australia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

WP:COATRACK, WP:SOAPBOX. Single-person list of people who have accomplished a non-notable single event, the event being "walking the perimeter of Tasmania":

  • WP:LASTING Event has not had a lasting effect as it only finished a week ago. The article (in its author's version) makes no claim of any effects of the walk.
  • WP:GEOSCOPE No effects claimed, certainly not outside of Tasmania.

And so forth... ― Padenton|   16:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom - I don't think it would even qualify for a stand-alone article about the trek, much less one disguised as a list МандичкаYO 😜 19:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. I'm not convinced that this satisfies our inclusion criteria, and I don't think a list that consists of a single element is really helping anything. With only one element and autobiography, it does come off as looking like a coatrack. Once this becomes a thing and people outside of Tasmania report on it, we can recreate the list (minus the autobiography). Another option would be to redirect to List of people who have walked across Tasmania, Australia, which seems to be more of an established event (though I have my doubts about that, too). Not everything that's reported in the news is fodder for an encyclopedia article. WikiNews is probably more appropriate for this sort of thing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete I had not read Geoscope and Lasting at the time. I realise now this list should not have been created. Sorry everyone. Happy Squirrel (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   20:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   20:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   20:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   20:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   20:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Christopher Hogan[edit]

Christopher Hogan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Christopher Hogan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable artist. A lot of minor appearances and presentations, but no work in major museum collections and no substantial critical work about him DGG ( talk ) 20:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep I am the author of this article. Christopher Hogan is regarded as one of the foremost artists in the Australian North East. He is on permanent exhibition at the Gold Coast City Gallery and also at the Gold Coast Sculpture Walk. His unique form of art is known as Marine Abstract.Nmwalsh (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 16:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Molly Whittington-Egan[edit]

Molly Whittington-Egan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Molly Whittington-Egan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This is poorly sourced for a BLP. The one sourced provided does not have much substance. Further I would question the notability of the subject. A google search only turned up her books. Trout 71 16:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Charles Allen Moser[edit]

Charles Allen Moser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Charles Allen Moser" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No evidence of meeting PROF or other relevant guideline. Vanity puff page. Barcaboy2 (talk) 15:51, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 21:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - well it's clearly not a "vanity puff page" - I do not believe that Moser is user:Jokestress. As for meeting WP:PROF, it certainly seems possible to likely that he does. Le petit fromage (talk) 03:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Solar cycle (calendar)[edit]

Solar cycle (calendar) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Solar cycle (calendar)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not notable. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Keir Millar[edit]

Keir Millar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Keir Millar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Classic case of WP:NOTNEWS, WP:ONEEVENT and WP:MEMORIAL. Won a non-notable race and died very young. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - all articles are referring to him as a world champion. Are they incorrect? Even if it's only world champion in his age group, it indicates notability that goes beyond one event. Additionally, deaths in athletics (even motorsports) tend to be notable and are not considered WP:MILL. МандичкаYO 😜 08:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
A world champ in an essentially non-notable competition. I wonder if any world champs in the egg-and-spoon race died before they hit their teen years? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 15:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Ninja Kart racing is pretty much limited to the UK, so it is hard to call him a "world champion". There is no Wikipedia article about the Ninja Kart or its racing and negligible coverage of its races in reliable sources. He was killed driving Ministox, another non-notable small race car for kids. It's a memorial page based on memorial newspaper articles. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 18:21, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Chuck Hadley[edit]

Chuck Hadley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chuck Hadley" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable businessman (little/no coverage in RS that I can find), unsuccessful candidate for political office. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Delete: Also the fact that there are zero references. Delete it, delete it. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 22:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Transtator[edit]

Transtator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Transtator" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
  • Delete as original PROD-er—the article appears to fail WP:N, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". —Granger (talk · contribs) 15:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Professor Dr Abdul Rob[edit]

Professor Dr Abdul Rob (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Professor Dr Abdul Rob" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No evidence of notability - holds some important-sounding posts but on closer inspection these are with small, local organizations. For example, the NHS "Governor" position is a volunteer post. Fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in third-party, reliable RS, definitely fails WP:SCHOLAR. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. Nothing in the article itself adds up to notability but his Google scholar citation record is close to the threshold (though I think a bit under) for WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Lerwick District Heating Scheme[edit]

Lerwick District Heating Scheme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lerwick District Heating Scheme" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. There is nothing to suggest this district scheme is particularly notable; anything possibly significant can be mentioned at Lerwick Power Station or District heating. МандичкаYO 😜 15:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   19:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:29, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 14:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Marc van Roon[edit]

Marc van Roon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Marc van Roon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Reason Yasima burundi (talk) 13:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC) this article does NOT meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines ,

 There is NO Wikipedia independent reliable sources on this article , 
THERE IS NO Evidence of Notability on this article -- --Yasima burundi (talk) 13:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Susanne Abbuehl[edit]

Susanne abbuehl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "susanne abbuehl" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Reason Yasima burundi (talk) 13:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC) this article Does not meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines Yasima burundi (talk) 13:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Winner 42 Talk to me! 22:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Winner 42 Talk to me! 22:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Frans van der Hoeven[edit]

Frans van der Hoeven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Frans van der Hoeven" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Reason Yasima burundi (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC) this article does not meet Wikipedia notability Guidelines ,

NO third party Wikipedia reliable sources Yasima burundi (talk) 13:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

PREDICT trial – Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Renal Damage in Congenital Abnormalities of the Kidney and Urinary Tract[edit]

PREDICT trial – Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Renal Damage in Congenital Abnormalities of the Kidney and Urinary Tract (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "PREDICT trial – Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Renal Damage in Congenital Abnormalities of the Kidney and Urinary Tract" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable study (studies shouldn't even have a standalone article in most cases). Esquivalience t 13:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom, WP:GNG. On the rare chance this becomes a notable study (after the fact), its notability can be discussed again. ― Padenton|   17:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

The Pod Delusion[edit]

The Pod Delusion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Pod Delusion" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Seems time for this one to go, a PROD template was previously removed but the article relies entirely on a 1 minute appearance on the BBC's "Click" and a couple of awards from Skeptic magazine. The awards seem to be minor and I can find no other evidence the podcast has received significant coverage from any news sources. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 14:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 12:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Disinfect (band)[edit]

Disinfect (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Disinfect (band)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Band does not meet notability per WP:BAND. --Non-Dropframe talk 05:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - found only basic listings. The corresponding article in the German Wikipedia was created in March (though they've been around since 1999) and has no real sources. МандичкаYO 😜 09:16, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - Not enough reliable sources to establish band as notable. Saw some listings here and there on MTV, but that's it. Delete. CookieMonster755 (talk) 06:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Regarding the notability of the sources, they are real sources, not notable as it seems (because they don't seem to mete mainstream criteria, maybe?). So shouldn't magazines (both print and online) not be used at all? Or is there a certain subscriber base required? One more question, for future articles: Why/how was it accepted as article in the first place? Looking forward to any help and thanks in advance.• Chrisnb

  • To answer Chrisnb's question. Whether a source conveys notability is not related to its popularity or its specificity, but rather its reliability. In short, if a source has editorial control it is usually reliable and conveys notability. Looking at the sources in the article (which none of the above comments seem to have done):
Metal.de is an extensive review and the site appears to be a reliable source - conveys notability
Perun.hr is a modest length review and the site's reliability is possible, but unclear - doesn't add much
Eternity Magazine is an interview (semi-primary source) by a publication with unclear reliability - adds nothing
Voices from the Darkside (Chris Infect) appears to be a reliable source - adds a little, but not as much as a review or other non-interview would
Blabbermouth does not appear to be a reliable source
The-pit.de does not appear to be a reliable source
The rest of the sources are trivial mentions (tour dates, track listings, etc)
Overall, I would say that adds up to some minor notability: weak keep --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:51, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Prasant Palakkappilly[edit]

Prasant Palakkappilly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Prasant Palakkappilly" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No notability. VagaboundWind (talk) 11:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Procedural comments:- I think is odd and bizarre for the nominator to simultaneously nominates article for deletion per WP:CSD#A7 and through WP:AfD. I remind the nominator that A7 does not applies to articles with claim of significance even if the claim is unsupported by reliable sources. Thanks! Wikigyt@lk to M£ 20:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

PreerP[edit]

PreerP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "PreerP" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No indication whatsoever of notability or indeed existence; there was a website, mostly non-functioning, apparently copied with minimal changes from that of Odoo, but that seems to have disappeared. The article was created by copying the Odoo page and replacing "odoo" with "preerp", even in the weblinks (that content now removed). This seems to be a hoax or scam, but speedy as G3 was declined. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete. A short one-line article stub that's hardly worth keeping. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 10:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Stop That Ball![edit]

Stop That Ball! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Stop That Ball!" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Does not meet WP:NBOOK Coolabahapple (talk) 04:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Weak delete, the announcements from the sellers suggest that the book might be notable, but I was unable to find any independent sources beyond trivial mentions.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. I think it's going to be difficult to come up with online sources to establish notability for this early entrant in the Beginner Books series. Perhaps worthy of note, for someone's future attention, is that the author, Marshall "Mike" McClintock, played a significant role in the career of Dr. Seuss: a Dartmouth friend, McClintock was a brand-new juvenile book editor at Vanguard Press when he was responsible for the publication of Seuss's first kids' book, And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street: Seuss dedicated the book to McClintock's wife and renamed the protagonist Marco after McClintock's son. Much later, McClintock wrote several books for Seuss's Beginner Books series. [8][9][10]. According to this publisher's bio for McClintock [11] he died in 1967, so it might take some off-line digging to come up with an obituary, but maybe with some effort a reasonable bio article could be written. (Apparently Mike McClintock existed as an unsourced article until it was deleted by prod in 2012. [12]) --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Lord of Stormweather[edit]

Lord of Stormweather (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lord of Stormweather" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This book doesn't meet WP:NBOOKS. Mikeblas (talk) 00:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Anas Rashid[edit]

Anas Rashid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Anas Rashid" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NACTOR Mdann52 (talk) 19:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   18:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   18:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Diya Aur Baati Hum - Multiple searches found nothing aside from the usual gossip and other non-significant links here. Nothing to actually suggest he's notable at this time. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Camp david GCC[edit]

Camp david GCC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Camp david GCC" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Wikipedia is not Wikinews. I dream of horses (T) @ 04:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 04:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 04:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Poorly titled and not sufficiently developed, but fulfills WP:GNG -- significant international news coverage over an extended period. Will surely be cited going into the future on U.S.-GCC relations. Plot Spoiler (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 10:37, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - Summit ended 10 days ago and is still being discussed - [13], [14], [15], [16]. I'm a bit shocked this was listed for deletion before the event even took place, although it had already received significant coverage. МандичкаYO 😜 09:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

1201 Strenua[edit]

1201 Strenua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1201 Strenua" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 08:57, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

1847 Stobbe[edit]

1847 Stobbe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1847 Stobbe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 08:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

1807 Slovakia[edit]

1807 Slovakia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1807 Slovakia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 08:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Shopaholic Abroad[edit]

Shopaholic Abroad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Shopaholic Abroad" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not finding any third-party references about this book; I don't believe it meets WP:NBOOKS. Mikeblas (talk) 08:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

ReGlobe[edit]

ReGlobe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "ReGlobe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Highly promotional article, the sources are essentially press releases/ DGG ( talk ) 22:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is a private start-up launched two years ago which pretty comprehensively fails WP:ORG. Note that while the article claims it was started in 2012, their own website says that it was launched in 2013. [17] Having examined the sources, I agree with the nominator that they are all essentially press-release based. The article is clearly written to drum up business. Even if kept, 80% of it would need to be removed. Although this it is not in itself a reason to delete, I note that this has all the earmarks of a "paid for" article—springing fully formed from a brand new editor as their first edit, complete with perfectly formatted infobox and "references". Voceditenore (talk) 08:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep The article could use more content, but checking the references I find: #1 a substantial article #2 dead link #3 a promotional site (you write your own content) #4 mention #5 mention #6 article about getting significant VC funding #7 substantial article (local biz journal, AFAIK) #8&#9 no longer link to relevant article. I would say that #1, 6 & 7 are enough to establish notability. The article does need to be updated. LaMona (talk) 23:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Obviously promotional/paid for article. #6 is borderline WP:ROUTINE, #7's use of bold blinded me in addition to being a very promotional article from a very small news organization whose website looks like this. #1 is the only reliable significant coverage of this business, but the article cannot rest on the back of that single source and LaMona has already ruled out the remaining sources. This Wikipedia article was clearly written with the intention of promoting the company and needs a good bit of Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over Winner 42 Talk to me! 18:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - Maybe I missed something, but I do not see why a "promotional" article needs deleted if it is notable. Anything can be stripped down to a few basic statements establishing notability. While some of the coverage looks routine, there are references out there such as this [18] that look like they would support notability. Not sure how to vote yet, but wanted to point out that promotion shouldn't be a reason for deletion when we could simply cut out the majority of the article which is promotional.--TTTommy111 (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
@TTTommy111: No, you didn't miss anything. You're 100 percent right. Articles that are promotional should be tagged promo, but some editors ignore that. МандичкаYO 😜 09:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - sufficient coverage including recent deal with Amazon [19], covered here МандичкаYO 😜 09:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete: only sources that I could find are just deals relating to the company, which does not contribute to WP:CORP notability. Esquivalience t 14:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Kelly Hutchison[edit]

Kelly Hutchison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kelly Hutchison" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Delete: as pure copy/paste, promotional OR hagiography. Quis separabit? 11:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: I am the original author of this article and I worked very hard on it under the advice of a seasoned editor on Wiki that also wrote articles on visual artists. I am not affiliated with the artist, and I understand it has been edited by various others since it's creation, but I am familiar with the sources that the pages cites and know it is not a copied/pasted article. It is not of my opinion that it displays information in a biased manner as all information is cited, however if there is something specific that would need to be changed I will volunteer to do so. The page was not created for any promotional purposes. If there's something there now that should be fixed along those lines I will volunteer to do so.Crystalh1982 (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Redirect to Murderabilia, possibly adding some content from these references. The article suffers from cite spam, unfortunately. There are no articles listed that are about the subject, although there are mentions. Some of the links, however, do not mention the person at all (e.g. #16, #21). Other cites are to blogs, individual web sites, etc., and no reliable sources have an article about the artist. In fact, the thrust of the articles is almost exclusively the phenomenon of "murderabilia". LaMona (talk) 01:17, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
    I'd suggest that the full length article in juxtapoz counts as an article about him.©Geni (talk) 02:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
I believe that interviews may be considered primary sources and thus original research. See Wikipedia:No_original_research#cite_note-3 I don't know how to know when they are not OR. LaMona (talk) 14:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: @ Geni, I agree the full length article in juxtapoz counts as an article about him. @ Lamona, I disagree that the interview is considered primary research after reviewing cite note 3 mentioned above. My understanding is that it would only apply to an "oral history interview", such as an interview about an accident that took place and referencing an interview from a witness. I can see your point that perhaps the murderabilia info isn't valid within the artist page, however many articles mention personal information about the subjects, and I can see why someone may have thought to add it because it is a big part of his life/what influences him(#21 does mention the artist by the way). However you claim that the murderabilia section is the main part of the page. It is actually a section only titled "personal collection", the rest is about the artist himself, no? As far as the individual web sites, blogs, etc.: What about Thrillist Media Group? They made upwards of 100 million in 2014 with more than 300 employees according to Wikipedia. Per WP:BLPSPS "Some news organizations host online columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control". Therefore, just because it's a blog, doesn't mean it's not legit. Also, Reference #2 may appear to just be a "personal website" but it's actually a local newspaper that is printed, and the articles just happen to be reposted in blog form online. I also obtained a copy of Inked Magazine (Reference #12) and indeed the article does exist about him as listed - so although it's not available online for free I believe it's still a valid reference. I also have for example, an article about him in print from San Diego City Beat that isn't on this reference list, and I'm not sure why local publications are not valid? I really respect all of your opinions, and am trying to figure this out. As I am sure you can understand, I do not want my hard work going to waste and again volunteer my help if something can be done to prevent deletion.Crystalh1982 (talk) 06:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Christof May[edit]

Christof May (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Christof May" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This Article does not meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines .... sorry there is NO Evidence of Notability on this article , --Samat lib (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment - I fixed the nom. ansh666 09:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Meets several criteria in WP:MUSICBIO. Some of his clarinet playing with Abbuehl is stunning. -- haminoon (talk) 08:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

*Delete please where are the independent reliable sources to prove the Notability , Secondly how can we verify the information on this Article , ( if this problem can not be fixed fast ) *Delete Kokobenin (talk) 15:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

I've added a couple of independent sources. It would be fairly easy to confirm the facts of this article and the clearly notable people he has worked with by googling. Bear in mind this article was created 8 years ago when referencing was done in a slightly laxer fashion. Deleting an article doesn't help it get referenced any faster. -- haminoon (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:38, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Significant coverage in reliable sources does not exist even when looking in German sources. I managed to find both a pastor and an entrepreneur with the same name that had more significant coverage than this person. Winner 42 Talk to me! 21:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment I've struck out vote from sockpuppet of nom. -- haminoon (talk) 05:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - can't find anything. Unfortunately the one review on the page gives me an error, but it's only a review. de:Christof May is unreferenced as well. МандичкаYO 😜 08:38, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete NO reliables sources --Yasima burundi (talk) 14:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I suspect this comment is from a sockpuppet of the nominator. There clearly are reliable sources. -- haminoon (talk) 21:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

One97 Communications[edit]

One97 Communications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "One97 Communications" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP Joseph2302 (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep The first reference on the article indicates that Alibaba has purchased 25% of the company. That makes it sufficiently notable for inclusion. Richard Harvey (talk) 06:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Alibaba Group - Article does not seem notable itself, but could be mentioned in its parent's article. CookieMonster755 (talk) 07:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Merge/Redirect to Alibaba Group This company has only received coverage by proxy of Alibaba so a redirect is appropriate. Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Merge/redirect salvageable content to Alibaba Group as suggested. It's probably Paytm that's really going to be notable not so much on One97, note that the article has zero attribution for the history section. — Brianhe (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Sources may be hard to find, since they are an Indian company, but I have a hard time seeing deletion for any company with 1,200 employees. CorporateM (Talk) 16:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - While I believe there are enough sources to support notability, I would say that the more pressing issue is the Paytm article which reads like a press release. I don't want to vote keep for this one as I am unsure if it should be kept and merged into Paytm or Paytm merged into One97. Maybe someone who has looked at it longer has some ideas. Just a thought. --TTTommy111 (talk) 05:00, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep, article looks well written enough to support its notability. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 10:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: about 106 mentions in HighBeam. Although most are passing mentions, some seem to be significant coverage. Esquivalience t 15:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - enough sourcing appears to be available. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

TG Rayong F.C.[edit]

TG Rayong F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "TG Rayong F.C." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG. Prod was removed as editor felt this meets WP:NFOOTY; NFOOTY is for articles on individuals footballers. Additionally, the Khor Royal Cup is national in scope, but only for semi-professional/low-level clubs. Boleyn (talk) 07:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:51, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Abhimana Sthalam[edit]

Abhimana Sthalam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Abhimana Sthalam" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

as per WP:Unreferenced and WP:OR Vin09 (talk) 07:00, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Mary Katharine Duffie, Ph.D.[edit]

Mary Katharine Duffie, Ph.D. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mary Katharine Duffie, Ph.D." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This autobiography is written as a resume. It appears to fail general notability standards. Besides an example of publish or perish in the academic community and its technical literature, it fails to add significance to the encyclopedia. A Prod failed when the autobiographer removed the notice and contributed more details to the article. I like to saw logs! (talk) 06:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Written by the subject, does not establish notability as shown in WP:SCHOLAR. James Cage (talk) 15:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

ANSWER: I can understand how it may appear written as a resume, but I did not intend to sell or persuade anyone on my background - at all. It may have looked like a resume because I was trying to keep it short. I tried to follow the page structure on a number of anthropologists in wiki.

Perhaps you were immediately turned off, because autobiography is discouraged (for obvious reasons.) But, my intentions were actually opposite. Over the years I have been contacted by many people about my work - from defense attorneys, to lay people interested in New Zealand, to other academics needing specific information about the health and culture of American Indians and Maori. As I wrote the article, I was partly thinking of New Zealand and American Indian researchers as these are a very small but increasingly important group of academics. They are merging their research collectively into an indigenous epistemology, with an emphasis on global patterns in neocolonialism. Those who take a fourth world approach, as I did, to solving sociocultural patterns are pioneers in that way. More broadly, my life's work is unique and original as it was impacted by study with Vine DeLoria, jr. who turned anthropology upside down with his disdain for etic (or outsider analysis) interpretations among anthropologoligical ethnographies (i.e, in the 1980s-90s, he was reeling against the grain of truth in the following joke: Q. what composes an Indian family? A. Single mother, two kids and an anthropologist). I was one of the first, if not the first, Indian researcher(s) to incorporate these criticisms into all of my work, drawing on Clifford Geertz and Shostak from the anthro side. There are two books, a major research grant, and at least five journal articles that are mostly all readable by lay and academic alike. In fact, one book was written for a public audience in New Zealand. I also tried very hard to keep it nontechnical, as most of my hyperlinks bring the reader to already established wiki pages. I only included 2-3 external definition links, and these are very easy to read. Also, the autobiography references a research article that contains an original, unique theory about the physiologic, psychologic and cultural relationships that result in cross-cultural psycho-somatic illness. The theory earned a prestigious signal honor from the Society of Medical Anthropology. Perhaps I could redo the article and include some of the above analysis, or that which you may suggest (with consensus permission of course) from the other editors? Please also NOTE: I also did not intentionally remove any prods, so please don't hold that against the article. It must have happened by mistake. Example (talk) 21:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Please identify which notability standards are missing. I should be able to address these with a bit more research and give the needed proof.

In a more general sense, I look forward to adding bits of clarifying information on many of the Maori, New Zealand and American Indian culture pages, separate from my own work of course. And, I hope to make a friendly relationship with many of you.

Thanks for considering ways to improve the article. I am a diligent responder. — Preceding mkduffie comment added by 205.161.250.173 (talk) 21:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Galt F.C.[edit]

Galt F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Galt F.C." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable association football club. Fails WP:GNG and Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep Olympic gold medalists are most definitely notable. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Withdraw nomination. I misread the year as 1981. Clearly notable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - Was this a joke? This is one of the most famous football teams in the nation! I'd suggest User:Walter Görlitz restrict themselves to only trying to delete articles in areas of which they are familiar. One shouldn't have had to have read the article closely to know this! And a clear lack of research, given that any team that has represented the nation internationally got there in a national competition! Nfitz (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Perhaps Nfitz can keep his opinions to himself. I already requested that it be withdrawn. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
    • I disagree. It's such a shocking nomination. Perhaps User:Walter Görlitz should properly research future AFD candidates before proposing deletion of such a massively famous team that anyone with awareness of the history of soccer in this country would instantly recognize. Ignoring the miss of the Olympics in the article, did you even read it? Surely the multiple references of induction into the Canadian Soccer Hall of Fame was a huge giveaway! Nfitz (talk) 03:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
      • I did properly research this AfD. I looked at Google for sources. Found Canadian Soccer History-Great Teams Galt FC 1904 and nothing else. The references were just added now. So WTF dude. Walter Görlitz (talk)
      • I think I see the problem now, I'm not from Southern Ontario. I had never even heard of the team despite being very aware of Canadian association football. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Chork[edit]

Chork (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chork" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No assertion of notability, all sources seem to be paid content and part of the same introductory media blitz, previously deleted 2007 Apr 23 Dalamori (talk) 05:16, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Jeremy Stahl[edit]

Jeremy Stahl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jeremy Stahl" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

While it appears that Stahl has written a lot of articles, it doesn't seem like anyone else has written about him. Writing articles is simply what journalists do, notability requires more. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Magic 2.0[edit]

Magic 2.0 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Magic 2.0" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable books by non notable author. The most widely held of the books, the first, is in only 38 libraries,[20] which is utter non-notability for this sort of fantesy. DGG ( talk ) 04:06, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Aside from inclusion in libraries, the books have some following online (I discovered them via an io9 blog.) The author, Scott Meyer, is a radio personality, publishes a web comic, and has written other books (including a novel that will be released in July 2015.) Where are the policies for what constitutes as notable? Trevor Bolliger (talk) 15:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Leo Zogmayer[edit]

Leo Zogmayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Leo Zogmayer" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No properly independent sources cited. Article cites its own author, via his dissertation. Reads like a fan page. Guy (Help!) 00:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment- We probably need a German speaker to assess this one. The article is unsourced and needs to be rewritten, but there is a fair bit of media coverage about this individual.TheBlueCanoe 13:47, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: I linked the German Wiki article, though it is effectively the same and equally lacking in online verifiable sources. I do notice, however, a brief mention of the subject as "the lesser-known, remarkable Austrian gestural painter" in a Chicago Sun-Times piece ([21], via Highbeam, subscription reqd.). Also a couple of recent German language articles about progress on realising the subject's winning plan for the renovation of St. Hedwig's Cathedral ([22], [23]). AllyD (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:51, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Naked Truth (band)[edit]

Naked Truth (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Naked Truth (band)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This band seem to have no notability. The only search results for naked truth that talk about the band are links to buy their albums. Snood1205 (talk) 00:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment. "The band seem to have no notability" - what about the two albums on Sony and the entry in The Encyclopedia of Popular Music that much of this article very (too) closely resembles? --Michig (talk) 06:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Comment I could not find the entry in the encyclopedia of popular music. Could you link that by chance, because it'd be quite useful to improve the article. Snood1205 (talk) 12:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
      • There are a couple of snippet views in GBooks ([24], [25]) and the whole entry is reproduced at Allmusic ([26]). --Michig (talk) 12:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:51, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Neil Olsson[edit]

Neil Olsson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Neil Olsson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No notability. Google search for name shows only social results. CerealKillerYum (talk) 12:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 12:51, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete for now - Multiple searches instantly found nothing good so it's likely he has not received that much attention. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Escambia County Sheriff's Office (Florida)[edit]

Escambia County Sheriff's Office (Florida) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Escambia County Sheriff's Office (Florida)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Article subject does not meet WP:GNG per WP:ORGDEPTH: I could not find any references that establish notability. As of now the article is just a directory of information, which Wikipedia is not (WP:NOTDIR) МандичкаYO 😜 18:07, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
(Find sources: "Escambia County Sheriff's Office" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
  • Keep. Satisfies GNG due to extensive coverage in GBooks, GNews (I count about twenty sources in the first and more than 650 results in the second) and elsewhere. This article does not satisfy any of the criteria of NOTDIRECTORY. It isn't a list (criteria 1 and 4), a genealogical entry (2), a collection of contact information (3), a sales catalogue (5) or an un-encyclopedic cross categorisation (6). "Directory of information" is gibberish and I don't see how this article could possibly be characterized as a "directory" in any meaningful sense of that word. We certainly don't delete an article because it is a collection of information, because all encyclopedia articles are collections of information. I'm fairly certain that the nominator has no idea what the word "directory" means. The Compact OED defines it essentially a list of people or bodies with contact details. This article isn't one, and there is no reason why it should be either, in view of the sources available. As a obvious redirect, with mergeable content, to Escambia County and Escambia County Sheriff, this page isn't eligible for deletion under any circumstances, and should not have been nominated (WP:R). AfD isn't for merger proposals. And that is exactly what this is: a merger proposal masquerading as an AfD. If the nominator wants to merge articles on police agencies into the areas they police, he should do so through the normal channels (Wikipedia:Proposed mergers), instead of wasting the time of the AfD volunteers, as there is zero prospect of any of these articles being deleted under existing guidelines, because we don't delete mergeable content or plausible redirects. I hope this recent spate of hopeless nominations will now cease, and that these merger proposals will be sent to the place where they are meant to go. James500 (talk) 20:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
There isn't "zero prospect" of these articles being deleted - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barnstable Police Department. МандичкаYO 😜 12:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Comparing a small town police department with a large county sheriff's department is not comparing like with like. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:38, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
@Wikimandia: The result in that AfD is what is known as an 'outlier' or 'fluke'. Obviously incorrect results do unfortunately happen at AfD. Frankly, that particular AfD should probably be sent to DRV on grounds that consensus is not a 'head count', and, in this respect, during the AfD, it was pointed out, correctly, that the guideline WP:R required redirection, and no valid counter-argument (nor any counter-argument at all, for that matter) was offered by anyone, and thus consensus was for redirection and was not assessed correctly. I'm afraid I don't have the time or patience to send it there myself. James500 (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Escambia County Sheriff and possibly and possibly Merge to the article. If RS shows that it can stand alone, I will have to agree with the idea of keeping the article. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 23:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. Any law enforcement agency with 650 employees is easily notable enough for an article. In fact, Escambia County Sheriff should be merged into this article. We usually have articles about the department, not the chief. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Please familiarize yourself with the guidelines. No group, or company, or agency is automatically notable because of the number of its employees. МандичкаYO 😜 12:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Please try not to patronise a very experienced editor who is completely familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines and is giving his considered opinion as he is perfectly entitled to do in an AfD! I consider large law enforcement agencies to be inherently notable. I also consider this to be common sense. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Grace Kosaka[edit]

Grace Kosaka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Grace Kosaka" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A non notable actress, who is not referenced significantly in any reliable independent sources, fails WP:BIO as well as WP:NACTOR. Winner 42 Talk to me! 20:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Comment - The article creator, Lisamichelle2008 (talk · contribs · count), has self-identified as the article subject on at least two occasions. This may not directly impact the notability of the subject, but may be taken into account in the discussion. --Tgeairn (talk) 00:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 02:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - Not notable with multiple searches finding these results, I would've suggested moving the article elsewhere but I don't see a good target. SwisterTwister talk 05:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment. She gets several hits in newspapers for co-founding the Rebelfest International Film Festival. However, those articles are just using her as a spokesperson for the festival and don't provide anything substantial about her, other than she is also film-maker. maclean (talk) 16:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom - only a handful of roles and no significant coverage МандичкаYO 😜 07:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Magical Idealism[edit]

Magical Idealism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Magical Idealism" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unremarkable movement in literature with no reliable sources established. Tinton5 (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment I don't know about modern conceptions of magical idealism, but the historical conception associated with Novalis is well known and sourcable. So at the very least, a redirect to Novalis#Writing is warranted, where it is mentioned. --Mark viking (talk) 00:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Suggest a merge I support the redirect to Novalis, but think redirecting to German idealism might be a little bit more appropriate: also there seems to be room for merging Novalis's well documented concept into the main German Idealism article- it hasn't been treated in that article yet. Sadads (talk) 16:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
A redirect or merge to German idealism would be fine with me, too. --Mark viking (talk) 01:18, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Hedley C. Taylor[edit]

Hedley C. Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hedley C. Taylor" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not seeing anything that would satisfy WP:BIO as a district judge and unsuccessful local politician. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 02:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 02:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep per User:James500. There are definitely more sources on him to be found and to expand off of. Haven't even checked newspaper sources yet, but he was one of the more notable names in Alberta at the time, going from my research. There's a good chance that there's extensive coverage on him in the Edmonton papers (there were two major ones at the time) as well. I might try and get back to it when I get the time... this was one of my earlier article creations. Connormah (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Start Your Own Scene[edit]

Start Your Own Scene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Start Your Own Scene" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Nothing here supports a notability claim for this album. No references, no indication of significance. KDS4444Talk 00:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete as no evidence of notability, Fials GNG. –Davey2010Talk 01:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 13:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to the band. Wgolf (talk) 16:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Jan Westerbarkey[edit]

Jan Westerbarkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jan Westerbarkey" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable businessman. A search reveals some PR-announcements and brief mentions, but no in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources. The current sources are only interview quotes, blogs and brief announcements. GermanJoe (talk) 00:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - two pages from family business, one deadlink and one interview. No reliable sources. No notability indicated either.--Rpclod (talk) 01:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Robustness Diagram[edit]

Robustness Diagram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Robustness Diagram" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No context, no references, no links to other articles. The first sentence is one of several self-referential definitions. This topic may be notable, but the content of the article is unencyclopedic in tone and would need to be completely re-written. Neither an expert nor a non-expert would be likely to understand the content. Roches (talk) 02:24, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep/merge Context is clear enough to tell that this is a Unified Modeling Language diagram to analyze robustness (computer science) in computer systems. Sources resides mainly with UML tutorial (text)books. You can argue it is not separately significant from the concept of robustness to deserve an article though. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 15:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep per recommendations above: its a problem of someone not writing encyclopedically, not that the topic isn't notable. A quick google books/scholar search shows plenty of fairly significant discussion of the topic on its own. That being said, a well done merge might be useful in the shortterm, until someone takes a real pass at creating a full article, Sadads (talk) 20:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

The Insanity Machine[edit]

The Insanity Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Insanity Machine" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Self-published book without unrelated citation or review. Does not meet WP:NBOOK. Tgeairn (talk) 03:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, nothing found in google, no need to redirect as author doesn't look that notable.Coolabahapple (talk) 16:25, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Alpha Motherfuckers[edit]

Alpha Motherfuckers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Alpha Motherfuckers" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unsourced article on a tribute album by a bunch of mainly redlinked bands to a band of no real importance. Queen they are not. Guy (Help!) 23:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 02:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete I wouldn't dismiss it by saying it's a band of no real importance. I've never heard of them either but this is a Norwegian project and it seems like a very popular band (I looked at the Norwegian article for that band and what linked there, to see if I could find the tribute album article in Norwegian, and the band page was listed among the 1,000 most popular articles for a pretty impressive stretch), but that doesn't mean anything since there are not enough mentions of the tribute album itself that I can find to satisfy GNG. Someone else might have better luck. МандичкаYO 😜 02:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep The QOTSA element of the tribute album should be enough on its own and I turned up these Norwegian/Swedish articles in a few seconds one, two and three. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:12, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Heroes & Zeros[edit]

Heroes & Zeros (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Heroes & Zeros" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This Article does not meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines Sorry there is NO Evidence of Notability Guidelines on this Article --Samat lib (talk) 00:40, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep. Three albums on Universal passes WP:NBAND and pretty much guarantees there will be coverage out there. --Michig (talk) 09:20, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. this Article need a Third party Independent reliable sources , if this problem can not be fix *Delete. Kokobenin (talk) 15:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - I fixed the nom. ansh666 09:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment I've struck out vote from sockpuppet of nom. -- haminoon (talk) 05:24, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:NBAND as stated by others above, but it appears to me that the lengthy "History" section must either be radically curtailed and rewritten or just plain removed. The edit history indicates that this was first added by an editor on 21 January 2008 [27], was deleted as an apparent copyvio on 13 May 2008 [28], was reintroduced by an IP editor on 21 February 2011‎ [29], was cut to a couple of paragraphs by a new editor making xis only edit ever on 20 November 2012, and then immediately restored when a bot reverted the edit due to external link violations.[30] Whether it was a copyvio or not, it appears to me that this long essay about the band's "amazing talent" and "hard work" is simply inappropriate for Wikipedia. --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Hysteria (TV series)[edit]

Hysteria (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hysteria (TV series)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not a TV series; just a pilot that was not picked up. If kept then the article title should be changed. Musdan77 (talk) 03:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Amazon Studios#3rd pilot season (August 28, 2014) Amazon pilots should be subject to the same basic creation standards of regular TV pilot articles, in that they should only be created when they go to series. Failed pilot, which we don't usually have articles about. Nate (chatter) 16:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 11:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Bassam Kurdali[edit]

Bassam Kurdali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bassam Kurdali" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Filmmaker with no real indication of encyclopedic relevance. His films don't appear notable, and there's little coverage of him in reliable sources. Michig (talk) 06:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 11:26, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Rachel Reynolds[edit]

Rachel Reynolds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rachel Reynolds" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Delete: non-notable. Quis separabit? 22:37, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete I can find mentions of her in articles about the show, but nothing specifically about her except the pregnancy and birth notices. Hopefully, we aren't creating a WP article for every woman who gives birth. LaMona (talk) 04:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 12:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Ecorates[edit]

Ecorates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ecorates" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This appears to be a non-notable currency system as Books, News and browser searches found no results, additionally I provided other searches with different words and found nothing as well. This could also be moved to European_Youth_For_Action#Alternative_currency (or delete and then move). SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete, it is not notable, it is one organization's discount scheme. Spumuq (talq) 13:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 12:07, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • 'Move as suggested. It's not a marketing scheme, it seems to have been a sort of notional currency based on a trans-cultural cost-of-living index. a/c its web page, it wasn't continued after 2008. DGG ( talk ) 06:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Alyas Pogi: Ang Pagbabalik[edit]

Alyas Pogi: Ang Pagbabalik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
Filipino:(Find sources: "Alyas Pogi: Ang Pagbabalik" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Contested PROD, Non notable film where no reliable independent sources exist to demonstrate notability. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:15, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:15, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
English equiv.:(Find sources: "Alyas Pogi: The Return)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR
Year:(Find sources: "Alyas Pogi: Ang Pagbabalikm (1999 film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Awards:(Find sources: "Alyas Pogi: Ang Pagbabalik, FAMAS" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Director:(Find sources: "Joey Del Rosario, Ang Pagbabalik" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Producer::(Find sources: "Malou N. Santos, Ang Pagbabalik" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Studio:(Find sources: "Star Cinema, Ang Pagbabalik" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Distributor:(Find sources: "ABS-CBN, Ang Pagbabalik" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
  • Keep and allow this brand new article to be expanded over time and through attention of Philippines editors. Yes, sourcing Philippines films is often difficult... and specially when the topic is pre-internet. But this receiving FAMAS Award recognition allows a reasonable supposition that it did receive press coverage 26 years ago. As "some" sources ARE available, there is no need to toss it because the nominated version did not use them. Schmidt, Michael Q. 02:37, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. There's no online archive of newspapers that exist for the period when this film was shown (August 1999). However, one of the actors in the movie is now a senator, and "Alyas Pogi" has been used to refer to him in a lengthy opinion piece, and by the president himself. This most likely shows that the movie was notable enough for people to refer to the actor more than a decade after the film was shown. –HTD 07:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete as (1) it fails to make a claim to notability under WP:NFILM and (2) it fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Lastly, notability is not inherited, just because the actor is famous does not make all his films famous. Even were this material to be kept, it should be as part of an article about the trilogy, and not as a separate article. --Bejnar (talk) 03:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Sorry Bejnar, but you are mistaken. Sourced as wining FAMAS Award recognition IS an attribute of notability under WP:NF, AND being spoken of many years later,[31][32] IS an indicator that the the film was notable enough 25 years previously. We do not expect that films released in the Philippines before the internet would have continued commentary and analysis decades later. Read WP:NTEMP and WP:UNKNOWNHERE. You are quite welcome to do your pre-internet Phillipines research and write about the other two films, but you would likely have to fly there and hire a local to visit libraries and universities for hard-copy non-English news sources unavailable online. Thanks, Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • It sucks that this article is in the time period where there is no online newspaper archive. If this was from the late 1980s to mid 1990s, and from the early 2000s to 2003-ish, we could find something. The Google Newspaper Archive doesn't have anything for this time period. –HTD 15:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - A FAMAS award in the Philippines is analogous to an American film winning an Oscar. --- Tito Pao (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:38, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

1817 Katanga[edit]

1817 Katanga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "1817 Katanga" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Included in three lightcurve studies of small sets of asteroids [33] [34] [35]. Maybe it's enough? —David Eppstein (talk) 06:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: I only see two photometry studies, but my notability bar isn't very high. Praemonitus (talk) 22:10, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Relisting comment: NASTRO says such mentions in light curve studies may make it notable enough for redirect to a list, why is this asteroid independently notable to warrant its own article? – czar 15:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – czar 15:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - I fail to see how WP:GNG or other notability criteria are met. Given the number of these space object AfD entries, I would think there would be clear guidelines when they are listed separately or in a group or not at all. But I have not seen anything like that.--Rpclod (talk) 16:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect per WP:NASTRO (WP:NASTCRIT) No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is a paper listing several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTCRIT #3 as not meeting notability) ― Padenton|   21:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

A list of artificial intelligence films[edit]

A list of artificial intelligence films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "A list of artificial intelligence films" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

The list would be far to large for Wikipedia to conceivably list them all. Seems like a case of WP:LISTCRUFT and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:46, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

There's already the Artificial intelligence in fiction article and it's not big at all. There aren't that many AI films actually. It would be nice to have a plain list of them and in an easily digestible form. Artem-S-Tashkinov (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment. Yes, we've already got artificial intelligence in fiction, which is a mostly unsourced example farm. I've been meaning to clean up that article for some time now, but it's not work that I really enjoy. Anyway, I'm not quite sure why we need two articles about AI in pop culture. But I guess a case could be made for it, such as [36], [37], [38], [39]. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:36, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I support delete per Listcruft. I simply noted this was already a category, so I'm not crying too much over its deletion. Also the Time magazine article doesn't support this list existing. Churning out lists is common thanks to Buzzfeed and people's short attention span. Here's a fully useless list from Time - Top 10 Things That Broke the Internet.
  • The Time article demonstrates, along with the other lists, that the media does compile lists of these films. I've also added additional info that don't come up in the category (pro-list argument #1). Actually, this is a more-to-the-point Time list. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • 01110100101100010101110011... (translation: It should be retitled List of films involving artificial intelligence). Clarityfiend (talk) 02:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Simply compiling these lists is not indicative of any kind of notability. As I pointed out, it's popular to compile lists aka listicles (easy content with no real effort). МандичкаYO 😜 03:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:35, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. I agree with Clarityfiend, and would go further to say that there are no encyclopedic, (especially open encyclopedic) lists of this variety suitable for cataloguing artificial intelligences in film. As far as list-based articles go, this one goes several steps further by conveniently and clearly listing other relevant film and topic metadata that does not fit into other lists. --MahmoudHashemi (talk) 07:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Passes WP:LISTN as noted above. WP:CLN and WP:NOTPAPER tell us that it's fine to have lists of this sort. WP:LISTCRUFT is an essay, not policy, and that's why we have thousands of lists. Andrew D. (talk) 08:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep This differs from the category in that it is not just a list of the films themselves but it names and categorizes the AI. In fact, it might be more accurate to call this the List of Artificial Intelligences in Films, because that is what distinguishes it from any list of the films themselves. LaMona (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. Eh, I guess there are enough sources listed above to show that it passes WP:LISTN as a notable topic in its own right. I still don't like having two articles that overlap so much, but I guess one is an unsourced article full of original research in prose format, and the other is an unsourced list. So, there are differences. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:32, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Figure skating at the 2012 Winter Youth Olympics – Qualification[edit]

Figure skating at the 2012 Winter Youth Olympics – Qualification (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Figure skating at the 2012 Winter Youth Olympics – Qualification" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unnecessary detail of qualification for Figure skating at the 2012 Winter Youth Olympics. The article as an appropriate section covering this so merging does not sense, nor does redirecting. Whpq (talk) 11:07, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Merge The article is basically just tables of results; so merge the appropriate tables back to their respective articles for this meet (eg men's singles, women's singles, etc). I don't see a need to have a separate article about qualification when it's much better organized by discipline, and there is nothing unique about the qualification to support it being its own article. МандичкаYO 😜 03:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Merging this massive set of tables would be undue weight in the parent article. -- Whpq (talk) 02:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
      • I don't think you know what WP:UNDUE is. Also, these would go in articles (plural) - men's qual goes in men's article, women's qual goes in women's etc. It's really not that massive. МандичкаYO 😜 20:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Blackjack Treasure[edit]

Blackjack Treasure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Blackjack Treasure" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. The1337gamer (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:31, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Non notable game that is not covered in any reliable sources. Additionally, the game is no longer exists as the site that was hosting it just gives a 404. Winner 42 Talk to me! 21:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable game; looks like just another Flash game that hasn't received any significant coverage. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Kumar Nagendra[edit]

Kumar Nagendra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kumar Nagendra" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Previously deleted per blp prod-actor that falls under too soon Wgolf (talk) 05:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 11:25, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - agree with nominator, not enough yet to show WP:ENTERTAINER notability.--Rpclod (talk) 13:54, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Dalmia Group[edit]

Dalmia Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Dalmia Group" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This is an article I believe is better to delete or redirect to Ramkrishna Dalmia (probably better redirect to save it and mention at founder's article) as it seems the company is not notable. I looked through links listed here and the few news links there are barely mention the company (much less significant and in-depth) and almost half of the links are primary with others being simple links. Books found several links but looking through until page 6 I found nothing outstanding aside from confirming some of the companies' subsidiary businesses. A News search and Highbeam found nothing that looked outstanding either. Searches at The Hindu, Hindustan Times, Times of India and India Express all found no results. The article has basically remained the same since April 2007 and has read more like a personal page (not to mention, it seems Dalmia family members including creator have edited the page) and I don't see much possibility for improvement. The only good thing I could find to come closer to confirm the $5 billion turnover was this and it says they are the family holdings. SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 11:25, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Stella (software)[edit]

Stella (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Stella (software)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

There is little evidence of notability per WP:PRODUCT. I think WP:NOT#ADVERT is relevant. The only independent source seems to be the article in PC Plus magazine. The general notability guideline requires multiple independent sources that discuss the subject in detail. This does not seem to be the case here. Sławomir Biały (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm not in a position to judge notability. I have the software and I use it, and generated many of the geometric images for wikipedia with it. I helped write the article, but confess it isn't very useful anyway in its current form. Tom Ruen (talk) 01:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Here's some online references to the correct software, not considering the quality or usefulness in content in adding to the article content. Tom Ruen (talk) 02:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

  • [40] Mindhacker: 60 Tips, Tricks, and Games to Take Your Mind to the Next Level By Ron Hale-Evans, Marty Hale-Evans
  • [41]  Coordinates of polyhedra were calculated using Great Stella [2]. In this program, there are 17 stellations (the icosahedron is not counted). Our notation, for instance SI06, means the sixth stellation in this sequence.
  • [42]  Great Software for Polyhedrons and Polytopes «Stella» and «Great Stella» These are great polyherons programs that the author intended to be the ultimate one, and it truely is a excellent program. This is probably the most comprehensive software for polyhedrons. Author is by Robert Webb.
  • [43] Magnus Wenninger, author of the introduction to Polyhedron Models for the Classroom, now uses a program called Stella to design his projects. This program provides a 3D perspective as well as the 2D view needed for construction and assembly.
  • [44]  10 am – 11 am – Polyhedra Power! – Have you heard of Stella http://www.software3d.com/Stella.php? This is a funky software program which allows you to design, print and assemble your own personal polyhedron. We will be operating Great Stella and a color printer to produce polyhedra only limited by your imagination! Come join us for fun polyhedra creation!
  • [45] The calculation of intersections of extended polyhedron faces is a tedious process to do by hand, but it can be easily done using interactive computer programs such as Stellation Applet [3] or Great Stella [4].
  • [46]  Stella is the name of a computerized polyhedron creator. Designed by Robert Webb of Australia, the program allows you to create a polyhedron on the screen and print out its net, which you can then cut out and assemble into a real-life 3D model of your original creation. The Stella software contains a built-in polyhedron library that includes all the Platonic solids, or regular polyhedrons, as well as many other shapes.
  • [47] Cylinder intersections with the program Stella 4D, Dr. Ulrich Mikloweit

Keep – Though the article could be improved, I think it is keepable in its present form. This page points out the connection to regular polytopes and the work of H. S. M. Coxeter. Our article on Great icosahedron uses diagrams generated by this software. It appears there is some overlap between what Mathematica can do and the Stella software regarding polyhedrons. (Here is a great icosahedron as generated by Mathematica).You would think that the more popular math journals would have articles on generation of polyhedra with software, and if they don't cite Stella, they must cite some of its competitors and we would find out which ones they are. Well-known published pictures of star polyhedra, like the one of the cover of Proofs and Refutations, seem to have been made by photographing models built by hand rather than created by software. EdJohnston (talk) 03:02, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

p.s. EdJohnston, the primary purpose of Stella software was for computing printing nets for hand-built physical models. Some of the nets are also uploaded to wikipedia, like for the harder to see Johnson solids. Tom Ruen (talk) 03:32, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand this vote. Yes, polyhedra are notable things. We have articles about them. The star polyhedron on the cover of the 1976 book Proofs and Refutations was not created using this piece of software. Perhaps it was made using the methods described in the 1951 book Mathematical Models by Cundy and Rollett. Anyway, there are lots of sources, both online and in good old-fashioned books, that will allow you to draw nets that can be cut out to make whatever polyhedra you want. Surely not all of these things are also notable just because polyhedra are. Sławomir Biały (talk) 11:16, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

This is Robert Webb, author of Stella, so I may be biased, but here are my thoughts. Regarding being an advert, I did not write the page or ask for it to be written. Robert Austin created it and Tom Ruen has also done a lot of work on it. It does not appear to have sensational language, just stating what the software does. I have made small changes now and then when something was out of date or incorrect, but tried not to get involved with the content too much. As to notability, PC Plus is not the only independent source:

  • The wiki article already includes a reference to a story about it on television, including a video of the story. Why overlook that?
  • Stella also got a write-up in Edward S. Popko's book "Divided Spheres" on pages 350-355. On Amazon you can preview some pages including 352, 354 and 355 within this range. See [48] and [49]
  • David Darling's "The Universal Book of Mathematics" also includes photos of polyhedra made using Stella software. From the acknowledgements: "Thanks especially go to ...Robert Webb (www.software3d.com) for numerous photos of his wonderful, homemade polyhedra...". See [50]
  • Matt Parker's "Things to Make and Do in the Fourth Dimension" includes images from Stella4D and mentions me in the acknowledgements p454: "Most of the renders of 4D shapes were done using the program Stella4D developed by Robert Webb". You can see some pages in the Amazon preview including images from Stella4D, eg p215, 216. See [51]
  • An image from Stella4D also appears in Giulio Tononi's "Phi" p214 (not in the Amazon preview). See [52]
  • Article in Melbourne newspaper The Age about me and Stella and the models it can be used to produce. See [53] (alas the images in the article seem to have gone for some reason).
  • Wikipedia itself uses dozens of images from Stella in various articles about geometry.

I don't know whether simply using images created in Stella adds to wikipedia's concept of notability. If not, then the off-line references would be limited to the PC Plus article, the TV spot, and Popko's book "Divided Spheres" which reviews Stella over 6 pages. The Age article was online, but had a brief mention in the printed paper which you can see here: [54]. Someone should add these references to the wiki article maybe? Tom has already listed a bunch of online references, many of which I didn't even know about, and there are many more. RobertCWebb (talk) 04:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Bing Crosby's legacy[edit]

Bing Crosby's legacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bing Crosby's legacy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

A hodgepodge of synthesis, and to the extent it is not a miscellaneous assortment of facts, the material is covered adequately already at Bing Crosby. Speedy delete was declined (!) for this third recreation and I recommend that the page be salted to prevent a fourth. JohnInDC (talk) 14:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

I want to create a well-organized page of facts of the awards and nominations received by Bing Crosby and thought I might as well put his other achievements there. Other artists have these pages, such as The Beatles and Frank Sinatra and that material is already covered on their pages, so why delete this one? (Utzdman55 (talk) 15:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC))
  • Delete and I would have agreed with the speedy delete. WP is not a platform for fanzines or essays, which this appears to be. Also the article struggles with a neutral point of view.--Rpclod (talk) 16:37, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment:- The article was inappropriately tagged for speedy deletion here per WP:CSD#A1 by User:Jorm but I declined it with no prejudice against its deletion through this medium (WP:AfD) if notability is in doubt because, A1 does not applies to articles with enough context to identifies the subject. I found no deletion log for the page prior to declining the speedy deletion per A1, I would have tagged it appropriately, although am not aware that Bing Crosby already exist. Having said that, I think the page should be redirected to Bing Crosby since the page already mention the subject of the article according to the nominator. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 19:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment:- I think I should delete the page but put the charts within the Bing Crosby page to compliment the data. Thoughts? (Utzdman55 (talk) 20:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC))
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment:- @Rpclod This article doesn't support Bing Crosby. It is an article of facts. Just facts. If you look at those facts, you would see that they are not opinions. The article doesn't struggle with a neutral point of view because it tells facts. And those facts are backed up by sources that tell me that they are true. Bing Crosby was the most popular entertainer of all time. He could have sold the most records ever and has sold the 3rd most movie tickets of all time. In 1947, he was declared most admired man alive. At the height of his radio show, he had 1/3 of America listening. In 1948, he was half of all radio (more than 40,000 hours). No entertainer (in 2 or more main mediums) has put up those numbers since. These are not opinions, just facts. I'm pretty sure you didn't know all of these facts so you just jumped to conclusions. Next time just please be careful. This is just an article of facts. (Utzdman55 (talk) 20:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC))
    • Comment - I think that tone is a big part of the problem - facts or not, it sounds like fansite material to me. JohnInDC (talk) 21:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Laurette Glasgow[edit]

Laurette Glasgow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Laurette Glasgow" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

fails WP:BIO. those thinking there is inherent notability of ambassadors should point out the actual guideline which says that. LibStar (talk) 14:58, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:25, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - Per WP:DIPLOMAT there is no presumed notability for Ambassadors. They can be redirected to List of Xian Ambassadors to Y but there is no such list for either of the subjects posts. Not enough coverage in reliable sources to verify and sustain an article. Fails general notability and WP:ANYBIO. . Nor are her Church roles sufficiently distinguished to contribute to her notability. JbhTalk 13:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Yves Gagnon[edit]

Yves Gagnon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Yves Gagnon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP BIO. Coverage merely confirms he's an ambassador. those thinking there is inherent notability of ambassadors should point out the actual guideline which says that. LibStar (talk) 15:30, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Cancelled 2009 Reunion Tour[edit]

Cancelled 2009 Reunion Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Cancelled 2009 Reunion Tour" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This is a non-notable, canceled concert tour that fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT. The concert tour was cancelled so the band could record an album. The first non-reliable source provided in the article references the second non-reliable source provided in the article that states the nature of the cancellation. The third non-reliable source just provides the concert dates when they were announced. Aspects (talk) 15:42, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. This looks to be redundant to Mechanize Tour, which was supposed to have begun in August 2009 in the various countries listed in this article. I'd recommend a speedy delete since it's essentially the same thing. The only difference is that this article lists the cancelled tour dates while the other does not. Even if the tour was revamped into the Mechanize Tour or was a completely separate tour, I don't see where this cancelled portion really merits its own article. It's already mentioned in Mechanize Tour and that's all that it really warrants. I'd recommend against redirecting since this title is fairly generic and doesn't seem like it'd be a likely search hit. It could be that someone would use this term to search for the cancelled 2009 shows by Fear Factory... or they could be looking for a cancelled tour by a completely different artist/group. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:23, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per TokyoGirl - It's pretty much a dup of Mechanize Tour, As an aside the title's rather pointless as it doesn't say whos cancelled tour.... Anyway delete1. –Davey2010Talk 07:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete The itsy bitsy spider went up the water stout. Down came the rain, and washed the spider out. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 02:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing early as nominator has a habit of nominating articles under invalid reasons and or not bothering to search for sources. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 07:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Keyti[edit]

Keyti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Keyti" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

The topic of this Article does not meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines, there is No EVIDENCE of Notability on this Article . --Samat lib (talk) 12:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 13:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep It's clear that the subject does meet WP:GNG. Lack of evidence in the article is grounds for marking with templates, not nomination. Nominations required some effort to determine if the subject is or is not notable (see section D of the linked page). In my search I found the following a number of references including one that stated he had worked with Amnesty International within the country. I have added the ones I found. The problem may be that most of the references are in French or Wolof, and Senegal, the nation from which is is based, is not noted for its Internet use. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:38, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 16. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Clearly notable with heaps of reliable sources. -- haminoon (talk) 20:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Gull Terrier[edit]

Gull Terrier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Gull Terrier" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable dog breed. I cannot find any sources to establish notability and the article itself offers no sources and is written in the typical "this dog is good with kids, buy this dog" manner. TKK! bark with me! 17:58, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - does not show any notability; searches using "Gull Terrier" or the alternative name given of "Kohati Gultair" just come up with the usual unreliable sources (dogbreedinfo.com etc) or FaceBook. SagaciousPhil - Chat 08:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:21, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Grupo Vidanta Foundation[edit]

Grupo Vidanta Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Grupo Vidanta Foundation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:ORG. Zero substantial coverage in RS as far as I can tell. SmartSE (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect and mention briefly at Grupo Vidanta as there is no significant and notable coverage and my two searches here and here mostly found press releases and other searches here, here and here but nothing significant. SwisterTwister talk 20:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Forum at Grace Cathedral[edit]

Forum at Grace Cathedral (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Forum at Grace Cathedral" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I can't find any in-depth coverage of this lecture series in reliable sources. The tone of the article (which calls the forum "a series of stimulating conversations about faith and ethics in relation to the issues of our day") also inclines me toward deletion. —Neil P. Quinn (talk) 20:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - No significant and notable coverage and aside passing mentions here or mostly about Grace Cathedral for the talk show. Not notable with no signs of improvement. SwisterTwister talk 17:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Compostela Aberta[edit]

Compostela Aberta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Compostela Aberta" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Article is about a very recently established political party for "the municipal elections of May 2015." WP:NONPROFIT guides that "the scope of their activities is national or international in scale" and meets GNG. Being purely an Anglophone, it's hard for me to gauge the Spanish language third-party coverage here but the very narrow geographic and political scope of the organization makes me question its notability. --Non-Dropframe talk 21:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

It happens to have won the election in Santiago de Compostela (see here), which happens to be the capital of Galicia. No need to delete. --Discasto (talk) 22:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Paulo Maló[edit]

Paulo Maló (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Paulo Maló" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

possibly not notable Matthew Ferguson (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - it seems he invented a technique, All-on-4, and there are articles referring to him as the "world's most famous dentist." This article states his 49 clinics in 19 countries are "currently the world leader in the field of implantology and dental aesthetics." Some coverage and Q&As: [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], plus I think he would pass as WP:ACADEMIC based on his Google Scholar numbers. МандичкаYO 😜 07:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Evergreen document[edit]

Evergreen document (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Evergreen document" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No evidence of notability given, and a web search fails to find any suitable references. Propose deletion as non-notable neologism. Impsswoon (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:49, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Send to Wiktionary - there are many references to this phrase, but I can't find anything that supports it having its own article МандичкаYO 😜 01:04, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Transwiki. Would be more suitable for Wiktionary. APerson (talk!) 18:33, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - I'd prefer sending it to WikiDictionary but it's unlikely it'll happen (I've never used the site in my life so wouldn't have any idea on how to transwiki it over) so it may aswell be deleted. –Davey2010Talk 07:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Bear Mountain (resort)[edit]

Bear Mountain (resort) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bear Mountain (resort)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable resort, fails WP:GNG. Moreover, the entire article is a POV controversy section which is poorly sourced. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep, TNT - it would seem that, based on the ongoing controversies, it meets the burden of the GNG. I agree it's way too much about the controversy and should be rewritten. МандичкаYO 😜 22:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
    • WP:TNT is an essay that would be more in line with deleting, rather than keeping, seems to me. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:42, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:42, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:42, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Stubify: meets WP:GNG; however the article is so full of self-published sources that fixes other than just starting over would not work. Esquivalience t 18:12, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:59, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - Personally I think it's better off Blown up & rewritten from scratch, I get we're an encyclopedia & all that but there's no chance in hell of this being rewritten from what it is now to WP standards so personally think it's better off all redone again and this time should hopefully meet the standards here. –Davey2010Talk 07:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep, on the basis of news coverage such as these [60] [61] covering its 2013 sale and this which describes some sort of bankruptcy scandal. It's a private business at the end of the day, but I think these sort of sources squeak it over the WP:GNG threshold. Now the unsourced material has been removed the article can be rebuilt appropriately. Sionk (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment I think the stubified article is fine, and a massive improvement on the POV page that I nominated for deletion- still could do with being expanded in an encyclopedic way. If I could, I'd withdraw my nomination, but I can't, so Keep. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Empire Bay (city)[edit]

Empire Bay (city) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Empire Bay (city)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Contested PROD. Fictional element of a game that fails WP:GNG and is better off at Wikia or some other fan-centered site. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Delete Fails GNG, and if anyone wants the information about this niche article there is already another article on the Mafia II wikia. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 02:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Mr RD (talk) 10:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

107.5_Switch_Radio[edit]

107.5_Switch_Radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "107.5_Switch_Radio" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Does not pass WP:GNG, there is nothing specifically notable about this radio station. LethalFlowerTalk/Reply 02:33, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Yvette Rachelle[edit]

Yvette Rachelle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Yvette Rachelle" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Actress/model who seems to have not much going for notability as well as TONS of unsourced info on her. It is interesting to note that the creator of the article is named Yvettefan. Wgolf (talk) 02:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

I should add that she does sound noble I will admit, and if someone can start to make this page better maybe I'll withdraw. Wgolf (talk) 02:19, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
AfD is not cleanup. North America1000 02:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes I am aware of that-but I am not putting a AFD for cleanup but rather if it should be deleted or not. Wgolf (talk) 02:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Please avoid using the caveat of considering withdrawal based upon editors here working on the article. The minimum needed herein for article retention in this case is proof of notability; while article improvements are desirable, they're not a requirement of the process here. North America1000 02:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. APerson (talk!) 02:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Delete: There are only two sources, one of which is IMdB, which is not really a reliable source, and the second one is her own website. We don't like to use primary sources. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 22:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented in the nomination. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid deletion rationales. While it's arguable that the nominator could theoretically intend #14 at DEL-REASON as a basis for the nomination, this is not stated, the rationale herein is subjective, and the fact that this article went through and passed a GA review in 2012 serves to negate the notions presented in the nomination. North America1000 02:38, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic fandom[edit]

I believe this article is unnecessary since we don't have any other fandom pages, and besides the brony community was never really relevant. Yeahbsolutely! Wanna talk? LOOK @ ME, DADDY, I'M A FARMER! 01:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep Previous AFD in June 2012 closed the same. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fandom. Nominator as not outlined why it meets AFD criteria for deletion WP:DEL-REASON. WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a valid reason. Sad that it is, this GA rated article does meet GNG as it has had significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. The nominator has made an inappropriate AFD with no AFD tag to the page or notified anyone about this nom, or specified a valid reason. Cowlibob (talk) 01:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep per Cowlibob - clearly notable, and already speedily kept back in 2012. We don't determine to keep an article based on whether or not other fandom pages exist. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Halifax Amateurs FC[edit]

Halifax Amateurs FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Halifax Amateurs FC" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Inadequately sourced article about an amateur football club. I was only able to find one source that makes a passing mention about the club. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - MrX 00:28, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Delete Agreed with nominator, there is a website with information about them but they don't meet WP:GNG LethalFlowerTalk/Reply 00:32, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Mr RD (talk) 09:53, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Mr RD (talk) 09:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Sources have been added, further ones to come once I am given their direct link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rinkydink84 (talkcontribs) 16:31, 24 May 2015 (UTC)