Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron - Rescue list

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  Main page   Rescue list   Content menus   Article Rescue guide   Newsletter   Members   Awards   Talk page  

Project Code of conduct
Rescuesquad - No text.png
  • Please note that WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron is a Wikiproject intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting !votes, nor about vote-stacking.
  • Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
  • Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.

For more information about article rescue, please refer to ARS Tips to help rescue articles and ARS Rescue guide
For additional article improvement listings, check out this project's archives and listings at WikiProject Cleanup

This is a list and discussion of Wikipedia content for rescue consideration. When posting here, please be sure to:

  • First familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines for topic notability and identifying reliable sources.
  • Include specific rationale why the article/content should be retained on Wikipedia, and any ideas to improve the content.
  • Sign posts with four tildes ~~~~.
  • Place the {{subst:rescue list|~~~~}} template in Articles for deletion discussions, to notify editors about the listing here. The tag can be placed below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

The following templates can be used for articles listed here:

  • *{{Find sources 3|Article name}} - Adds source search options
  • *{{lagafd|Article name}} - Adds relevant links
  • *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (Nth nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated N ≥ 4 times

— Please post new entries at the top of the list —

Big red button[edit]

Big red button (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google)| AfD discussion

What happens when you push it...? Andrew D. (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Town drunk[edit]

Town drunk (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google)| AfD discussion

All things considered, I'd rather be in Philadelphia. Andrew D. (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Romanian Secular-Humanist Association[edit]

Romanian Secular-Humanist Association (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google)| AfD discussion

This is a stub about one of the main Humanist organizations in Romania. The organization is not super famous internationally, but then neither is the country. Still there are plenty of external sources and it's clearly a "minimum viable stub". I would actually it's more than "minimum", for it's better than the average NGO stub. If it is not good enough, we might as well remove all stub templates and stub category pages from Wikipedia and ban the creation of stubs altogether. If only this page is removed, it is clearly some kind of persecution happening for reasons that I fail to understand. There is a more detailed discussion in the article's AfD page. Ariel Pontes (talk) 09:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)