Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:BIRD)
Jump to: navigation, search
Main page Members Showcase Taxonomy & resources Tools To do Assessment
WikiProject Birds
General information
Main project page talk
Naming and capitalization
 → Article requests
 → Spoken Article requests talk
 → Photo requests talk
 → Attention needed talk
 → New articles talk
Project portal talk
Project banner talk
Project category talk
Departments
Assessment talk
Collaboration talk
Featured topics talk
Outreach talk
Peer review talk
Country lists talk
Bird articles by size talk
Task forces
Domestic pigeon task force talk
edit · changes
Shortcuts:

The aim of this WikiProject is to set out broad suggestions about how we organize data articles about birds and related topics. In general, these are only suggestions, and you shouldn't feel obliged to follow them.

This WikiProject aims to help organise our rapidly growing collection of articles about birds. Included in its scope are articles for all known species, genera, families, and orders of birds (both extant and extinct), as well as articles relating to bird anatomy, physiology, evolution, behaviours, diseases and parasites. Also included are articles relating to the study (ornithology) and the keeping (aviculture) of birds, articles on ornithological organisations, biographies of notable ornithologists and their works, and lists of birds found in various human-defined areas (i.e. countries, states/provinces, counties, etc.).

Related projects

This WikiProject is an offshoot of WikiProject Tree of Life.

WikiProject Biology
WikiProject Tree of Life
WikiProject Animals
(WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, and then
WikiProject Dinosaurs, if you're a cladist)
WikiProject Birds
Domestic pigeon task force

Related projects include:

Our best content

We currently have five featured topics, 257 featured pictures, 131 featured articles, 23 featured lists, two featured sounds and 89 good articles. Here's the list.

Feel free to request assistance with references at the reference request desk and any bird-related assistance on the talk page.

These articles are currently under consideration for upgrading

Former FA or GA content includes

Featured articles

Good articles

Spoken articles

The list of spoken articles concerning WikiProject Birds is found here.

Guidelines for layout of bird articles

Bird names and article titles

In general, use the formal common name for article titles.

Sometimes exceptions need to be made; some individual creatures (usually newly discovered ones) do not yet have a formal common name and some groups are known only by their scientific name.

The common name of a species used to be capitalised to differentiate it from more general terms[1] but following discussions, it has been decided that capitals will be used only for parts of the name that are proper nouns[2].

The phrase "in Australia there are many Common Starlings" used to indicate a large number of Sturnus vulgaris. In contrast, the phrase "in Australia there are many common starlings" could indicate several different types of starling being common. Use a clear formulation. Add binomial names in brackets to reduce any ambiguity if necessary.

The topic of capitals has been discussed numerous times and discussions may be found in the archives. (Examples: 10-1, 7-1, 7-2, 2-1, 2-2, 2–3). And in 2014, a request for comments settled that lower case will be used, as consistent with other taxa.[2]

The International Ornithological Congress (IOC) which has tried to standardize the English names of birds uses capitalized names. In the vast majority of Wikipedia articles, the IOC names are used in lower case except where parts of the name refer to a proper noun (e.g. New Zealand scaup).

Article title make a redirect from
White-necked raven White-necked Raven
Black-faced cuckoo-shrike Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike
Prairie warbler Prairie Warbler

When creating a new article for a species, make sure the title is correctly capitalised and create a redirect from the capitalised IOC name. For example, name the article Bald eagle (and write "bald eagle" in the text) but create a redirect to it from Bald Eagle. See the table at right for more examples.

Per this discussion, the consensus style to write the combination of common name plus scientific name in the lead is bolded common name followed by unbolded italicised scientific name in parentheses:

The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) is a passerine bird...

Summary of naming guidelines – common names

  • The common name of a particular species is not capitalised, except where proper names appear (e.g. common blackbird, metallic starling, emu, ostrich, New Zealand scaup).
  • The name of a group of species is not capitalised (e.g. birds, thrush family, kingfishers, turtle doves, marsh harriers).
  • Alternative common names should be mentioned where appropriate; with bold type in the opening line of the article if they are in wide use, elsewhere in the article (with or without the bold type) if they are less-used. This is usually a matter for individual judgement.

Summary of naming guidelines – scientific names

  • Orders, families and other taxa above genus level are written with an initial capital and in roman (not italic) text: birds belong to the class Aves; ducks are members of the family Anatidae and the order Anseriformes.
  • The names of genera are always italicised and capitalised: Turdus, Falco, Anas.
  • Species epithets are never capitalised, always italicised, and always preceded by either the genus name or a one-letter abbreviation of it: Alcedo pusilla or A. pusilla, Cisticola juncidis or C. juncidis. The abbreviation is used only when it is unambiguous in the context of the article.
  • The placements in families and genera as well as the boundaries of the species are themselves not always unambiguous or without debate. Although the IOC list is usually up-to-date, new species, and large scale phylogenetic studies may sometimes suggest alternate placements (both binomial combinations as well as higher level classification). These alternate positions are best included with citations with the taxonomic history, older combinations and rationale explained with citations in the article.

Regional lists

It is recommended for the sake of consistency that regional lists are named as List of birds of _REGION_ rather than List of _REGION_ADJECTIVE_ birds.

Article sections

Most of the bird species articles have a common structure which include various combinations of the following:

  • Taxonomy and systematics (including subspecies, relation to related species, history of naming, alternate names, and evolution)
  • Description (often including details on immature plumage, moult, vocalisations, identification, and similar species)
  • Distribution and habitat
  • Behaviour and ecology
    • Breeding
    • Food and feeding
    • Threats or Survival
  • In culture or Relationship to humans
  • Status

Additional sections may be included to cover aspects that are particularly interesting or well studied in that species.

Taxoboxes

Torresian crow
Torresian crow.jpg
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Passeriformes
Family: Corvidae
Genus: Corvus
Species: C. orru
Binomial name
Corvus orru
Bonaparte, 1850
Corvus orru map.jpg
Distribution of the Torresian crow.

In general, bird articles should have taxoboxes. This is something we have inherited from the Tree of Life WikiProject. There are many examples there to look at.

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life/taxobox usage for the full details on constructing a taxobox.

Taxoboxes on the bird pages vary quite a bit from one another and could perhaps be standardised more than they are right now. This may or may not be a good thing. Discussion of this is welcome.

There are several example bird taxoboxes, suitable for cut and paste insertion into entries:

Distribution maps

A good way to show a bird's area of occurrence is to add a distribution map; see the above example on how. Species with tiny areas of occurrence should get larger maps which are displayed thumbnailed.

As for colors, the following are generally accepted as literature standard, for example by the Handbook of Birds of the World:

  •        Breeding visitor
  •        Non-breeding visitor
  •        Resident
  •        Introduced range

For species that do not migrate, a single color can be used as in the example. At-sea range of birds like albatrosses is usually marked in darker or lighter blue. Small islands can be marked with a larger dot and/or shown magnified in inserts. Migration flyways are often indicated with arrows. Areas of irruptive occurrence- more regular and plentiful than casual vagrancy, such as in crossbill species – can be indicated by colored stippling.

It is good to use basic, web-safe colors. If using nonstandard coloration (e.g. Arctic tern or silvery pigeon), it is important to annotate them. Former ranges of extinct birds can be indicated in dark grey (HBW standard) or red (many other), the former is probably preferable due to unambiguity.

The "HBW standard" colors have one major advantage: they can also, due to differences in brightness, be distinguished by almost all people with some sort of color blindness.

Other infoboxes

See also

References

  1. ^ Josep del Hoyo, Andrew Elliott & Jordi Sargatal, ed. (1998). Handbook of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Ostrich to Ducks. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. p. 25. 
  2. ^ a b Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Bird common name decapitalisation and Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Animals, plants, and other organisms.

Directory Directory of WikiProjects

 

Council WikiProject Council

 

Guide Guide to WikiProjects