|This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Use common sense in applying it; it will have occasional exceptions. Please ensure that any edits to this page reflect consensus.|
This page is a guide to providing heraldic blazons in a style that is clear and consistent throughout Wikipedia. As with any style guide, there will be exceptions, and this guide does not carry the same weight as policy. This is a guide to the agreed-upon preferences on how to best represent blazons in Wikipedia's articles. Before making changes to it, please make sure they reflect consensus.
English (Anglo-Norman) blazons
Anglo-Norman blazons should be put in italics.
This defines blazons as non-standard English and treats them like quotations or foreign or technical terms. Single words and phrases of Anglo-Norman blazonry should also be italicized, as a foreign or technical term would be. Double quote marks may also be suitable instead of italics, as explained at WP:MOS#Words as words.
Inline quotes or indented block quotes
Short extracts may be put in-line but longer ones should be indented on a new line (similar to quotations).
This is another convention that treats blazons like quotations and makes them more manageable. In particular, extracts longer than two lines should be indented using <blockquote></blockquote>.
While the College of Arms nowadays tends to capitalize tinctures, this is a recent trend. Historically, heralds have shown very little consistency in capitalizing tinctures and charges. Fox-Davies advocated leaving all tinctures uncapitalized. The convention of capitalizing Or to distinguish it from the conjunction or, however, is a very useful convention as the placement Or as a secondary tincture can yield a very confusing blazon. This sort of convention also has a linguistic basis in English. The personal pronoun I similarly became capitalized for ease of reading during the Middle Ages.
Exceptions may exist, such as German heraldry, where charges have been consistently capitalized throughout history. Exceptions may also be made for blazons which feature capitalization in the original text.
Tinctures may be repeated (e.g. "Or, on a bend gules a sword Or") or truncated (e.g. "Or, on a bend gules a sword of the first"), as it appears in the source.
Brevity and clarity may indicate changing a truncated blazon to repeat its tinctures. Clarity should always be the final guide.
Exceptions may be made to any or all of these guidelines if doing so is more appropriate to a blazon than following the guideline.
- This guide should be used in a manner consistent with other guides and policies, particularly, with respect to the Non-English sources (WP:NONENG) policy:
English-language sources are preferable to sources in other languages so that readers can easily verify the content of the article. However, sources in other languages are acceptable where an English equivalent is not available. Where editors translate a direct quote, they should quote the relevant portion of the original text in a footnote or in the article. Translations published by reliable sources are preferred over translations made by Wikipedia editors.
- If your source contains a non-English blazon in a formal style or technical register reserved to heraldry:
- You may translate it into an Anglo-Norman blazon. This may be particularly appropriate when dealing with a blazon within Gallo-British heraldic tradition (such as Irish or French).
- An English blazon appearing in a reliable source is preferred over a blazon translated by a Wikipedia editor, per WP:NONENG.
- Alternatively, you may translate a non-English blazon into plain English. This may be appropriate for blazons outside the Gallo-British heraldic tradition (such as Scandinavian blazons).
- If your source contains a non-English description of a coat of arms in layman's terms:
- You may translate the description into plain English.
- Alternatively, a complete and reliable blazon written in an informal style may be translated into an Anglo-Norman blazon.
- Provide the original (non-English) text and its source in a footnote for optimal verifiability.
- Non-English blazons and passages longer than a word or phrase should not appear in the main text of the article.
- When a non-English term is provided in the main text of the article, it should be clarified as necessary in plain English.
- Formal blazons should not be constructed from loose descriptions or incomplete blazons, as this may violate the No original research policy and may result in an inaccurate blazon.
- Only a complete and reliable blazon should be translated into an Anglo-Norman blazon. Translating into Anglo-Norman should never be used to achieve an affectation of authority not supported by reliable sources.