Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:CNSV)
Jump to: navigation, search
  Main   Talk   Portal   Showcase   Assessment   Collaboration   Incubator   Guide   Newsroom   About Us   Commons  


Shortcuts:

WikiProject Conservatism is a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to conservatism. You can learn more about us here. If you would like to help, please join the project, inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list below. Guidelines and other useful information can be found here.


Tasks

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
vieweditdiscusshistorywatch

Conservatism articles

Conservatism article rating and assessment scheme
(NB: Listing, Log & Stats are updated on a daily basis by a bot)
Daily log of status changes
Current Statistics
Index · Statistics · Log · Update


See also


Reports


Dashboard

Alerts

Good article nominees
Requests for comments
Requested moves

Assessment log

November 27, 2014

Reassessed

  • The Washington Times (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

November 25, 2014

Assessed

November 20, 2014

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

November 17, 2014

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

November 15, 2014

Reassessed

November 15, 2014

Reassessed

November 13, 2014

Renamed

Reassessed

  • Shine TV (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

November 11, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

November 6, 2014

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

November 5, 2014

Assessed

November 4, 2014

Assessed

November 1, 2014

Reassessed

October 31, 2014

Reassessed

October 30, 2014

Assessed

October 29, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

October 27, 2014

Reassessed

Assessed

October 26, 2014

Assessed

October 25, 2014

Assessed

October 24, 2014

Assessed

October 27, 2014

Reassessed

Assessed

October 26, 2014

Assessed

October 25, 2014

Assessed

October 24, 2014

Assessed

October 23, 2014

Reassessed

  • Alan Sears (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • McCarthyism (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to High-Class (rev · t).

October 21, 2014

Assessed

October 20, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

Removed

October 19, 2014

Reassessed

Removed

October 18, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

October 17, 2014

Reassessed

Assessed

October 16, 2014

Assessed

October 14, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

October 13, 2014

Assessed

October 12, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

Removed

October 10, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

October 9, 2014

Reassessed

  • Philip Anschutz (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

October 5, 2014

Reassessed

Assessed

October 4, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

October 1, 2014

Assessed

September 30, 2014

Reassessed

September 28, 2014

Assessed

  • Mark Reckless (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 27, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

  • Kōmeito (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

September 26, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

September 25, 2014

Reassessed

September 22, 2014

Assessed

Removed

September 21, 2014

Removed

September 17, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

Removed

September 16, 2014

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

September 14, 2014

Assessed

September 11, 2014

Reassessed

  • God and Man at Yale (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to High-Class (rev · t).

September 10, 2014

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

September 7, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

September 5, 2014

Reassessed

  • Richard S. Williamson (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

September 4, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

  • Richard Fink (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

September 3, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

September 2, 2014

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

September 1, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

August 31, 2014

Assessed

  • Afzal Amin (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 30, 2014

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

August 29, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

August 28, 2014

Reassessed

Assessed

August 27, 2014

Reassessed

August 25, 2014

Assessed

August 21, 2014

Removed

August 18, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

August 17, 2014

Renamed

Assessed

August 13, 2014

Reassessed

August 12, 2014

Assessed

  • HouseQuake (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

August 11, 2014

Renamed

Reassessed

Assessed

August 10, 2014

Assessed

August 6, 2014

Reassessed

August 5, 2014

Reassessed

August 4, 2014

Reassessed

August 2, 2014

Assessed

July 31, 2014

Reassessed

  • Tennessee Tax Revolt (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed

  • Meghan McCain (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Pat Fallon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

July 30, 2014

Reassessed

  • Lynn Jenkins (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

July 29, 2014

Removed

July 28, 2014

Assessed

July 27, 2014

Assessed

Requests for Comment


Talk:List of wars involving the United States

Should the outcomes stated in the main articles be listed?

SantiLak agrees and so does Mikrobølgeovn: And they were also the ones who suggested it.

Indicate Support or Oppose, and please give reasons. Kirothereaper (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:2014 Hong Kong protests

Umbrella Revolution and Umbrella Movement are mentioned already in lead prose. Why (re-)adding either in the infobox? The infobox already says 2014 Hong Kong protests, a different take from Chinese Wikipedia. --George Ho (talk) 01:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Wikipedia has Lists of countries and territories and a List of sovereign states with many subsidiary lists including List of sovereign states in the 2010. Someone inserted "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant" right between Ireland and Israel on that one list, and no other I could find so far. Since ISIL is accurately listed at List of active rebel groups can we have consensus that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant is not a sovereign state, country, or sub-national entity and should not be listed as such. This means we will not list ISIL on any of the referenced lists of States and Countries and that we will not refer to ISIL as having characteristics exclusive to real states or subnational entities (a capital, a government, currency, defined borders etc) I believe this is the current state of consensus across Wikipedia but outside this ISIL article can not find any discussion on this matter. If you agree write Support. If you disagree, write Oppose and provide RS evidence against the above statement. I believe if we start recognizing ISIL as a state we have to alter the recognition and borders of Iraq and Syria Thank-you for participating. Legacypac (talk) 21:29, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Watergate scandal

Shall worldwide analyses about media coverage of the Watergate be added? Also, I wonder if worldwide public reactions are worth adding. --George Ho (talk) 05:31, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Hong Kong 1 July marches

Does the current title of the article adhere to WP:article titles and WP:naming conventions (events)? If not, does it adhere to any other applicable policy and/or guideline? If not, shall we ignore all rules that prevent us from improving this article? If rules can't be ignored, what title shall we suggest? --George Ho (talk) 07:04, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa

Remove the misreported birth name "Michael Joseph Hall" completely from the article as it conflicts with all RS after October 22 and 23.

Original Source for "Michael Joseph Hall" reuters article published Oct 22 (the day of the shooting) "Some U.S. government sources said the shooter was born Michael Joseph Hall but changed his name to Zehaf-Bibeau." There are other reports using the Hall name, quoting reuters or US officials, but all I could find were published on Oct 22 or 23 within 48 hours of the shootings.

The next day the original source reuters reported "Court records in Montreal showed Zehaf-Bibeau was born to Susan Bibeau in 1982 after she had a brief relationship with Bulgasem Zehaf. The two had a rocky relationship but were married in 1989, Bulgasem said in an affidavit. After (his) birth, his mother, Susan Bibeau and I renewed our relationship and I also established links with my son," Zehaf said in the affidavit. "I was entitled to ... look after his education, his security, and to give him all my love." The parents petitioned in 1995 to change their son's name from Joseph Paul Michael Bibeau to Joseph Paul Michael Abdallah Bulgasem Zehaf Bibeau. Zehaf was also registered as the child's father at the time."

The following additional indepth articles published after the intial flury of inacurate info passed support this proposal: Huff Post Macleans who says explicetly they obtained the court records Ottawa Citizen the Star Phynox and there are many more.

I am seeking comments and consensus because my efforts to correct this inaccuracy - that was inserted in good faith the day of the shooting - were twice reverted . See previous section for the details. In the mean time I believe that the Hall name can be deleted immediately based on WP:BDP, and WP:BLPSOURCES and WP:BLPREMOVE and WP:NOT3RR Legacypac (talk) 14:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Axis powers

Should this article have a "former country" type infobox? This question equally applies to Allies of World War II. —Srnec (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

File talk:Samesex marriage in USA.svg

A federal judge in Kansas issued a preliminary injunction barring the defendants: court clerks in Douglas and Sedgwick counties, along with the secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment from enforcing Kansas's same-sex marriage ban. The Attorney General insists that the ruling only applies to the defendants. As a result, the state of Kansas is refusing to recognize same-sex marriages and only 19 of 105 counties are issuing licenses to same-sex couples. These 19 counties account for 60% of the population and any same-sex couple that receives a marriage license from one of these counties can get married anywhere in the state of Kansas. In addition, Johnson County began issuing licenses to same-sex couples before the federal court ruling in response to a precedent set by the Tenth Circuit of Appeals. The state supreme court blocked the county from issuing licenses to same-sex couples. In response to the federal court ruling, the hold was eventually lifted. However, the state supreme court decided not to rule on whether or not same-sex marriage is legal. The current consensus for Kansas is deadlocked. Here is what has been suggested for how to color Kansas: solid dark blue, striped dark blue-medium blue, striped dark blue-light blue, striped dark blue-gray, and striped dark blue-medium red.

To the right is the map & key for all the colors:

State laws regarding same-sex marriage in the United States1
Dark Blue:
  Same-sex marriage legal
Medium Blue:
  Same-sex marriage performed elsewhere recognized
Light Blue:
  Same-sex marriage legalization pending3
Gray:
  No prohibition or recognition of same-sex marriage
Beige/Gold/Khaki/Yellow:
  Judicial ruling(s) overturning a same-sex marriage ban stayed indefinitely pending appeal
Cream/Light Yellow:
  Judicial ruling against a ban on recognizing out-of-state same-sex marriages, stayed indefinitely pending appeal
Light Red/Medium Red:
  Same-sex marriage banned contrary to federal circuit precedent
Dark Red:
  Same-sex marriage banned

1 Native American tribal jurisdictions have laws pertaining to same-sex marriage independent of state law.
2 Same-sex marriage is legal in St. Louis, Missouri. In Kansas, nineteen counties are complying with a preliminary federal court order barring the defendants from enforcing Kansas's same-sex marriage ban.
3 A ruling striking down Florida's same-sex marriage ban has been stayed until January 5, 2015.

Prcc27 (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:2014 Jerusalem synagogue massacre

Should this article be titled "2014 Jerusalem synagogue attack" or "2014 Jerusalem synagogue massacre"? See discussion above for arguments. ThaddeusB (talk) 22:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Although government of Turkey proclaims that it opposes ISIS on an official level, the academic world appears to dismiss such a notion altogether. In light of the recent report by the Huffington Post, it's becoming increasingly accepted by the academic community that Turkey may not only be actively neutral towards ISIS, but be supporting it outright. Turkey is currently listed as part of the opposition, albeit a "(limited/pending)" kind of opposition. I have currently found no evidence pointing to any incident wherein which Turkey has military engaged against ISIS. Turkey has gone so far as to disallow America's use of their own airbase in Incirlik. With that said, since Wikipedia abides by the standards and opinions the academic world sets, rather than such official policy that may not be in line with the facts on the ground or by the academic community, I propose removing Turkey from the list found under Multinational coalition opposition. Étienne Dolet (talk) 05:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:List of individuals sanctioned during the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine

Does this article violate WP:What Wikipedia is not? If so, which part? If not, does it violate any other rule? --George Ho (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:2012 Benghazi attack

Does the current title describe what the article is accuracy about? Does it adhere to WP:NCE, WP:AT, and other policies and guidelines? If neither, what name do you suggest? --George Ho (talk) 19:48, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Inter-civil war violence in Libya

Does the current title of the article adhere to related guidelines and policies, like WP:NCE and WP:AT? If not, what name do you suggest? --George Ho (talk) 19:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17

Should political commentary from parties not directly involved in the crash be removed from the article? USchick (talk) 21:50, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Inter-civil war violence in Libya

The 2012 attack on US embassy in Libya, which led to deaths, is in the lede. Is it worth mentioning in both lede and body article or in just body? Remove it from the lede and then rewrite lede? --George Ho (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Six-Day War

There are other Six-Day Wars: Ugandan-Rwandan conflict and British-Chinese conflict. Although there is no definite criterion for a primary topic, is this topic the most popular and/or historically significant of all Six-Day Wars? --George Ho (talk) 07:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Cambodian genocide denial

*This RfC asks the question whether the section on Chomsky's "denial" of the Cambodian Genocide is neutral and complies with BLP, POV and WEIGHT policies. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 22:14, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:United States

Should the primary figures for the area and population of the United States be defined as: those of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and five major territories (Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Marianas); or as those of the 50 states and the District of Columbia? These figures will be listed in the infobox, and will be those used in lists of countries (e.g., by population, by area). The alternate figure will be footnoted in the infobox.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:57, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:House of Assembly of Jamaica

Should the {{Politics of Jamaica}} be added this article? Number 57 20:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Ukraine

Editor @NeilN has indicated that death-toll statistics for the current civil war in the Ukraine should be excluded and deleted in the section for the civil war in the Ukraine article (section titled "Pro-Russian unrest"). The current death-toll statistics in the civil war in Ukraine now exceeds the casualty statistics for 9-11 in New York. Ukraine is currently going through its largest crisis since Chernobyl and @NeilN appears to believe that deleting information on casualty statistics in Ukraine ought to be done as WP:Notnews. @NeilN has deleted the following one sentence edit. "On 25 October 2014, the news weekly magazine Economist updated the status of Ukraine's casualty statistics in an article titled, The Battle for Ukraine's Future, stating: 'The energy and hope of a new beginning that sustained the (Maidan) revolution have been drained by a war that has claimed 3,600 lives.'" Those who think it is responsible to Support the inclusion of the casualty statistics in the article should indicate their position as a "Support" comment, and those who wish to block the inclusion of the death-toll statistics should indicate this as an Oppose comment. FelixRosch (talk) 20:16, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Mark Begich

Trying to determine whether or not this is 1) a reliable source, and 2) not a violation of WP:UNDUE -- Here is the material as it currently appears in the article.

In all of his 6 years in the US Senate Beigich has received a 100% rating from abortion-proponents NARAL and a 0% rating from abortion-opponents NRLC. ---- here is the source


Comments

Looking at it closer, the source appears reliable, but having the above material in the article is a clear violation of WP:UNDUE as it is not attributed to any other source than this website. -- Somedifferentstuff (talk) 09:28, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Template:Rfc/testcases

Template:Rfc/testcases

Category talk:Executioners


For more information, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment. Report problems to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment. This list is updated every hour by Legobot.

Deletion discussions


Conservatism

New articles

This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2014-11-27 20:18 (UTC)
















Other listings

Cleanup listing
Popular pages
Top edits watchlist
Hot Articles list (Top 20)

Related projects

WikiProject Conservatism is one of the Politics WikiProjects.

General Politics | Biography: Politics and government | Elections and Referendums | Law | Money and politics | Political parties | Voting Systems
Political culture Anarchism | Corporatism | Fascism | Oligarchy | Liberalism | Socialism
Social and political Conservatism | Capitalism | Libertarianism
Regional and national Australia | China | India | Japan | South Korea | New Zealand | Pakistan | United Kingdom | UK Parliament constituencies | US Congress | U.S. Supreme Court Cases

External links

  • This project on Commons Commons-logo.svg COM

Directory Directory of WikiProjects

 

Council WikiProject Council

 

Guide Guide to WikiProjects