Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Archive

Centralized discussion
Proposals	Discussions	Recurring proposals
RFC on appropriate handling/removal of non-free images that breach WP:NFCC policy #9. RfC on the proposed cessation of selective delete (other than history merge fixes) and resulting changes to deletion policies, including the removal of a Revision Deletion criterion. Invitation to comment on candidates standing for 2012 Audit Subcommittee appointment RfC about whether "new messages" banner hoaxes should be prohibited RfC on how files from non-copyright states should be treated and used on WP Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.
archive · talk · edit · history · watch

This page contains archived centralized discussion listings. The listings are grouped by the date in which they were archived, not when they were first posted, so this page is a record of the archiving rather than the posting. The links in the listings go to discussions which may have their own dedicated page or to talkpages which are subject to their own archiving, as such the links may not always lead directly to the actual discussions. Updates are ongoing.

While it may be useful to examine previous discussions on a topic, especially if planing to re-open a discussion on that topic, consensus does change. The relevance of past discussions depends on how long ago the discussion took place, how many people were involved, and the manner in which the information was presented. Decisions on whether to link to previous discussions will depend on the circumstances.

Category:Wikipedia proposals has more discussions (approved, rejected, and proposed) some of which may not have been listed for centralized discussion.

February

• Discussion about improving WP:PORNBIO
  • Listed 30 December 2011, archived 8 February 2012
• Discussion about whether Template:Persondata should be deleted, moved to the article talkpage, or kept as it is.
  • Listed 30 January 2012, archived 8 February 2012
• Discussion on deleting Template:Lead too short.
  • Listed 1 Febuary 2012, archived 9 February 2012